Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
3,958 results
0.27s
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1980
Bradford, 423 U.S. 147, 96 S.Ct. 347, 46 L.Ed.2d 350 (1975); Illinois State Board of Elections v. … Brotherhood of Rail- way & Steamship Clerks, 281 U.S. 548, 565, 50 S.Ct. 427, 482, 74 L.Ed. 1034 (1930).
Appendix — Asherman v. Connecticut
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1985
California, 386 U.S. 18, 24. … State, 482 S.W. 2d 155 (Tex) (electrical cord used); State v. Houston, 209 N.W. 2d 42 (lowa) (turning of lights to test visibility at night, through glass windows); State v.
470 U.S. 1050Appendix — ADAMS v. WAINWRIGHT (No. 83-5701)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1983
State, 380 So.2d 423 (Fla. 1980) ............. 21 Aldridge v. State, 351 So.2d 942 (Fla. 1977) .......... 17 Arango v. State, 411 So.2d 172 (Pla. 1982) ............ 12,13 Armstrong v. … State, 380 So.2d 423, 424 (Fla. 1980), in no way binds this Court. The determination of the legal sufficiency of this evidence is a matter of federal law. Stephens v. Zant, supra.
Appendix — E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1988
Co., 160 U.S. 110, 116 (1895) (cited in Adams, 383 U.S. at 48-49, 148 USPQ at 482). Du Pont contends that Decca Limited v. United States, 420 F.2d 1010, 164 USPQ 348 (Ct. Cl. 1970), cert. … (.942-.945 ) PX 333, PX 334 67%** Tr. 482 0.25* PX 336 0.42-0.58 PX 334 Pipe High PX 336 2,5, 14 Tr. 482-83A Tr. 482-83A A164 District Court Opinion PHILLIPS MARLEX PRODUCT COMONOMER
488 U.S. 986Appendix — Orsini v. Connecticut
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1982
Menillo, 168 Conn. 266, 362 A.2d 962, vacated, 423 U.S. 9, 96 S.Ct. 170, 46 L.Ed.2d 152 (1975), on remand, 171 Conn. 141, 368 A.2d 136 (1976); and (6) that his trial attorney was so inept that the … Menillo, 168 Conn. 266, 269, 362 A.2d 962, vacated, 423 U.S. 9, 96 S.Ct. 170, 48 L. Ed.2d 152 (1975), on remand, 171 Conn. 141, 368 A.2d 136 (1976); State v.
459 U.S. 861Appendix — Knowles Electronics, Inc. v. Tibbetts Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1968
Tibbetts (Mailed May 3—1966-U.S. … Sec. 482.
390 U.S. 953Appendix — Lufthansa German Airlines v. Krys
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1998
Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974)). … United States, 318 U.S. 423, 431-32, 63 S.Ct. 672, 87 L.Ed. 877 (1943)).
522 U.S. 1111Appendix — Brown v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1974
United States, 397 U.S.'742, 750 (1970), McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 770 (1970), and Parker v. … United States, 394 U.S. 165 (1969).
419 U.S. 1047Appendix — Clay E. McElroy Warden v. M. W. Holloway
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1981
Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684, 95 S.Ct. 1881, 44 L.Ed.2d 508 (1975); Pat- terson v. New York, 482 U.S. 197, 97 S.Ct. 2319, 53 L.Ed.2d 281 (1977); and Sandstrom, supra. … United States, 156 U.S. 482, 458, 15 S.Ct. 394, 402, 39 L.Ed. 481 (1895)).
451 U.S. 1028Appendix — City of Jackson v. Mississippi Power & Light Co.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1941
Co., 62 Miss. 607, 116 U.S. 307, Pe RG EE Sins Bel aa Nan ake sta ne eA 26 Stone v. Illinois Central R. Co., 116 U.S. 347... .... 26 Texarkana v. Arkansas-Louisiana Gas Co., 306 U.S. … United States, 249 U.S. 564, 63 L. ed. 772, 777; Inter- slate Commerce Commission v. Alabama, etc. Co., 168 U.S. 168, 42 L. ed. 414, 423; Cincinnati etc. v.
312 U.S. 698Appendix — M. C. Manufacturing Co. v. Texas Foundries, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1976
Co., 371 U.S. 505, 527, 83 S.Ct. 358, 9 L.Ed.2d 466 (1963). However, in the case at bar the relevant facts are without dispute. … Hahn, Inc., 350 F.Supp. 1044, 1051 (D.Minn.1972), modified on other grounds, 480 F.2d 482 (8th Cir. 1973). Adm. Office, U.S. Courts—West Publishing Company, Saint Paul, Minn.
424 U.S. 968Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1969
Missouri, 342 U.S. 421, 423 (1952); Seagram & Sons v. Hostetter, 384 U. S. 35, 47-48 (1966). … Republic Stecl Corp., 362 U.S. 482, 490 n. 5 (1960); F. 7. C. v. Mandel Brothers, 359 UL S. a 391 (1959); F. HH. A. v. The Darlington, Inc., 358 U.S. 84, 89-90 (1958); McLaren v.
393 U.S. 323Appendix — Top Vision Cable Co. v. City of Owensboro
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1973
City of Fremont, 423 F. 2d 548 (6th Cir. 1970). … Redding, 304 U.S. 252 (1938).
411 U.S. 948Appendix — Jadair, Inc. v. Walt Keeler Co.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1982
Denckla, 357 U.S. 235, 253, 78 S.Ct. 1228, 1240, 2 L.Ed.2d 1283 (1958). This standard must be applied on a case-by-case basis. Id. … United Aircraft Corporation, 482 F.2d 1079, 1085 (lst Cir. 1973) that the "interest of the forum [state] in not discouraging foreign purchasers from dealing with resident sellers for fear ef having
459 U.S. 944Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1990
Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 96 S.Ct. 598, 46 L.Ed.2d 561 (1976). The official having the responsibility to act must also have displayed “deliberate indifference" or "gross negligence." Turpin v. … Goode,423 U.S. 362, 371, 96 S.Ct. 598, 604, 46 L.Ed.2d 561, 569 (1976).
493 U.S. 1044Appendix — Moretti v. New Jersey
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1968
J. 418, 423 (1964). … E. 2d 677, 680, cert. denied, 325 U.S. 872, 89, L.
393 U.S. 952Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1990
Eikenberry, 725 F.2d 482 (%h Cir. 1984), rev d on other grounds sub nom. Brockett v. … Brown. 555 F.2d 407, 416-17 (Sth Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 904 (1978); United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352, 364-65 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 (1976).
498 U.S. 924Appendix — Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Hercules Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1985
Litton Industries, 423 F.2d at 652. … Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938).
474 U.S. 980Appendix — O'Bannon v. Indiana Civil Liberties Union
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2002
Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578, 586-87 (1987). … See Edwards, 482 U.S. at 586-87.
534 U.S. 1162Appendix — Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Telecor Communications, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2003
Louisiana Power & Light Co., 435 U.S. at 414, 98 S.Ct. at 1137. … The U.S.
538 U.S. 1031
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.