Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
4,691 results
0.26s
Petition — International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979
REA Express, Inc., 523 F.2d 164, 171 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1017, 96 S.Ct. 451, 46 L.Ed.2d 388 (1975). In NLRB v. … denied, 423 U.S. 927, 96 S.Ct. 274, 46 L.Ed.2d 255 (1975), the court approved the Board’s determination of unlawful unilateral action when an employer manifested a purpose to hire his predecessor’s
439 U.S. 1070Petition — Marshall v. Daniel Construction Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
Wedding, 418 U.S. 461 (1974). … (Proposed Findings of Fact, Nos. 478 through 482).
439 U.S. 880Petition — Illinois v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977
Chicago, 400 U.S. 8 (1970). … Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1052 (1976), quoting City of San Antonio vy. Civil Aero- nautics Board, 374 F.2d 326, 329 (D.C. Cir. 1967). See also | K.
434 U.S. 828Petition — National Labor Relations Board v. Decaturville Sportswear Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1975
Inter- tiorari denied, 397 U.S. 935 —.. 15 national Van Lines, 409 U.S. 48 ____. 16 Maggio v. Zeitz, 333 U.S. 56 seoseoseceocsoceosons 20 National Labor Relations Board v. … Mexia Textile Mills, 339 U.S. 563, 569).
423 U.S. 913Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 423-25 (1976), with which the State 18 Attorney's Office should conduct § its functions. … Administrator of General Service, 433 U.S. 425 (1977); Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589 (1977).
454 U.S. 975Petition — Pegues v. Mississippi State Employment Service
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983
The U.S. … Partida, 430 U.S. 482, 97 S.Ct. 1272, 51 L.Bd.2d 498 (1977).
464 U.S. 991Petition — JAMES C. C. EDWARDS v. S-1, A MINOR (Nos. 80-1770, 80-1791)
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
Davis, 442 U.S. 397, 99 S.Ct. 2361, 60 L.Ed.2d 980 (1979). … L. 94-482. Under that Act, “vocational education” includes industrial arts and consumer and homemaking education programs.
Petition — Brewer v. Memphis Publishing Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
U.S. Const. Amend. I. … truth of his allegations and admitted making up certain conversa- tions quoted in the article, explaining that the conversa- tions ‘Seemed to be a logical extension of what must have gone on... .” 482
452 U.S. 962Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1982
Pullman, 312 U.S. at 500. … Powell, 423 U.S. 87, 93, 96 S.Ct. 316, 320, 46 L.Ed.2d 228 (1975). 62a CONCLUSION Perhaps the clearest fact that emerges from this litigation is that the issue of gun control, in whatever form, is
Petition — Consumer Product Safety Comm'n v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
U.S. at ’ 47 U.S.L.W. at 4444. … Collins, 482 U.S. 46, 54, 97 S.Ct. 2229, 2234, 53 L.Ed.2d 100 (1977), is also distinguishable.
447 U.S. 102Petition — Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Malandris
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983
McClure, 486 U.S. 188,198 (1982); Irvin \ Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 722 (1961); In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133, 136 (1955). … Harris, 482 F.Supp. 323 (D.Colo.,Kane,J.); Griswold v. Lange Co., C 4681 (D.Colo., April 18, 1977, Arraj, J.); Alexander v.
464 U.S. 824Petition — Arado v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977
422 U.S. at 435. See also Rogers v. I. Paper Co., 510 F.2d 1340, 1350 (8th Cir.), vacated on other nds, 423 U.S. 809 (1975); Georgia Power Co., 474 F. 2d at 913-14. … Davis, 44 U.S. L. W. 4789 (U.S.
434 U.S. 875Petition — Howe v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
Croninger, 226 U.S. 491, 507 9. … Illinois, 118 U.S. 557 (1886).
449 U.S. 992Petition — Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Wetzel
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976
We are asked to determine whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S. … Duke Power Co., 401 U.S, 424, 433-434, 91 S. Ct. 849, 28 L. Ed. 2d 158 [1971]; Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 85 S. Ct. 792, 13 L. Ed. 2d 616 [1965].
429 U.S. 1000Petition — National Commission on Egg Nutrition v. Federal Trade Commission
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
Button, 371 U.S. 415, 432 (1963). … See also Pitofsky, supra, n. 6, at 692-693 and nn. 129-130, and Note, ‘‘Corrective Advertising’’ Orders of the Federal Trade Commission, 85 Harv.L.Rev. 477, 482-483 (1973).
439 U.S. 821Petition — Standard Alliance Industries, Inc. v. Black Clawson Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979
General Motors Corp., 482 F.2d 1047 (5th Cir. 1973), appeal following remand, 537 F.2d 105 (Sth Cir. 1976), and Metro Invest. Corp. Vv. Portland Rd. … denied, 402 U.S. 983, 91 S. Ct. 1662, 29 L. Ed. 149 (1971). eon Ln ee SO A29 Vv. United States, 422 U.S. 35, 95 S. Ct. 2091, 45 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1975); Fillippon v.
441 U.S. 923Petition — Stouffer Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
N.L.R.B., 308 U.S. 401 (1940); Boire v. Greyhound Corp., 376 U.S. 423, 476-477 (1964); Eastern Greyhound Lines v. Fusco, 323 F. 2d 477, 479 (C.A. 6, 1963); Local 542 Operating Engineers v. … U.S., 327 U.S. 114; Carlson v. Landon, 342 U.S. 524; Fong Yue Ting v. U.S., 149 U.S. 698; nor are appeals allowed as a maiter of right. Pote (Station WLOE) v.
434 U.S. 1065Petition — CADE v. ALABAMA (No. 79-5525)
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979
Medrano, 416 U.S. 802 (1974); Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 394 U.S. 147 (1969); Wright v. Georgia, 373 U.S. 284 (1963); Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886). … North Carolina, 423 U.S. 280 (19's). 6-8 - i, J. OG.
Petition — Exxon Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
FTC, 482 F.2d 672, 696 (D.C. Cir. 1973). The oil companies’ expressio unius argument remains highly speculative. … Texaco, Inc., 180 U.S. App.
445 U.S. 925Petition — Artic International, Inc. v. Midway Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983
Co., 374 U.S. 174 (1963). … Jerry Elsner Co., 482 F.Supp. 980, 988 (S.D.N.Y. 1980). See Vogue Ring Creations, Inc. v. Hard- man, 410 F.Supp. 609 (D.R.I. 1976).
464 U.S. 823
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.