Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
3,958 results
0.19s
Appendix — Serzysko v. Chase Manhattan Bank
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1969
There are a number of other sections as to which the Act has‘ not provided any private remedies ies as to which a steno (1964), 377 U.S. 426, 84 S.Ct. 15585, ‘12 L.Ed.2d 423—(im- rae " plied as to … ’ *2.#99 e Si)” + The Court further stated (pp. 138-139 of 392, U.S. p. 1984 _ of 88 S.Ct.) : rc a ad be There i is nothing i in the language of the anti- o e, } - \. trust acts which indicates
396 U.S. 904Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1990
Goode, 423 U.S. at 371, between her injury and the policies and practices that Smith and Miller employed and affirmative acts they took in furtherance of them to make this a jury issue. … Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371, 96 S.Ct. 598, 604, 46 L.Ed.2d 561, 569 (1976).
493 U.S. 1044Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1976
Conn.), affirmed, 409 U.S. 1069 (1972); Jiminez v. Richardson, 353 F.Supp. 1356 (N.D. Ill. 1973); Watts v. Veneman, 334 F.Supp. 482 (D. … Venemam, 334 F.Supp. .482 (D.D.C. 1971), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 476 F.2d 529 (D.C.Cir. 1973).
427 U.S. 524Appendix — Ginzburg v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1966
United States, 354 U.S. 484 (1957) : ‘*All ideas having even the slightest redeeming social importance—unorthodox ideas, controversial ideas, even ideas hateful to the prevailing climate of opinion—have … Day, 370 U.S. 478, 482 (1962) as ‘‘ ‘patent offensiveness’ or ‘inde- cency’’’.
383 U.S. 463Appendix — Associated Film Distribution Corp. v. Casey
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1987
Eikenberry, 725 F.2d 482, 495 (9th Cir. 1984), rev’d. on otner grounds sub nom. Brackett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc., 105 S. Ct. 2794 (1985). … Stuart, 423 U.S. 1327, 1329, 96 S.Ct. 251, 253, 46 L.Ed.2d 237 (1975), in which Justice Blackmun wrote in another context: “Each passing day may constitute a separate arid cogniza- ble infringement
480 U.S. 933Appendix — Harris County Comm'rs Court v. Moore
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1975
Carter, 405 U.S. 134, 31 L.Ed.2d 92 (1972); White v. Regester, U.S. 37 L.Ed.2d 314 (1973); Harper v. Virginia Bd. of Elec- tic..s, 383 U.S. 663, 16 L.Ed.2d 169 (1966); cf. Oregon v. … A4itcheil, 400 U.S. 112, 27 L.Ed.2d ” (1970).
420 U.S. 77Appendix — Princo Corp. v. International Trade Commission
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2011
/d. at 88 (citing [ID at 423-436 (IF 4 156, 482-85. 493-94, 498-502, 520. 526-3 LOS finally, respondents assert that the tying of non-essential patents ultimately harms competitio1 in the CD-R/RW) … ID at 203-04; FF 482-485.
563 U.S. 987Appendix — Vinston v. Arkansas
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1982
United States, 267 U.S. 132, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543 (1925); Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 90 S.Ct. 1975, 26 L.Ed. 2d 419 (1970). … State, 273 Ark. 482, 621 S.W.2d 216 (1981). Both Henshaws testified that they got a goud look at the robbers.
459 U.S. 833Appendix — J. Truett Payne Co. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1981
Clayton Act, § 4, 15 U.S. C.A. § 15. 4. … National Ass’n of Securities Dealers, Inc., 509 F.2d 147, 158 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 868, 96 S.Ct. 131, 46 L.Ed.2d 97 (1975).
451 U.S. 557Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1991
Hampton, 600 F.2d 600, as well advertised and publicized, followed Butz, 438 U.S. at 482 in determining that no unqualified immunity existed for publicity campaigns. … Imbler, 424 U.S. at 423.
501 U.S. 1201Appendix — Gray v. Entergy Operations, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2001
Patel, 46 F.3d 482, 484 95th Cir. 1995); Federal Sav. & Loan Ins. Corp. v. Griffin, 935 F.2d 691, 702, (5th Cir. 1991). … Hicks, 509 U.S. 502, 515 (1993) discussing Burdine).
534 U.S. 818Appendix — Kyer v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1967
Guerre, 342 U.S. 512 (1952). … Merrill, 332 U.S. 380, 384 (1947). oS Re .
387 U.S. 929Appendix — American Trucking Assns. v. Conway
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1987
Brady, 480 U.S. 274 (1977). … Silas Mason Co., 300 U.S. 577 (1987) ; Alaska v. Arctic Maid, 366 U.S. 199 (1961).
483 U.S. 1019Appendix — Wirtz v. Hotel, Motel & Club Employees Union, Local 6
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1968
Republic ' Steel Corp., 362 U.S. 482, 492 (1960); Mitchell v. De-. Mario Jewelry, Inc., 361. USS. 288, 290- 92 (1960) ; Porter -' v. Warner Co., 328 US. 395, 397-98 (1946). … tS | U.S.
391 U.S. 492Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1986
Curran, 482 F. Supp. 31, 40 (S.D.N.Y. 1979) ; Yablonski v. UMW, 80 L.R.R.M. … Co., 518 F.2d 1258 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1091, 96 S.Ct. 887, 47 L.Ed.2d 103 (1976); Niesz v.
479 U.S. 960Appendix — Von Zuckerstein v. Argonne National Laboratory
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1993
Lukens Steel Co., 482 U.S. 656, 107 S.Ct. 2617, 96 L.Ed.2d 572 (1987). … Lukens Steel Co., 482 U.S. 656, 107 S.Ct. 2617, 96 L.Ed.2d 572 (1987), observed that labor unions have been held liable under section 1981 for that sort of discrimination, but only when the grievance
510 U.S. 959Appendix — Hughes-Bechtol, Inc. v. West Virginia Board of Regents
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1984
Postal Telegraph, 155 U.S. 482, 487 (1894). … Alabama, 155 U.S. 482, 15 Ss.
469 U.S. 1018Appendix — Hynes v. Sonido, Inc. (No. 08-1331)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2008
Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986) (a 1986 determination of the U.S. … Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986) (a 1986 determination of the U.S.
Appendix — Fortenberry v. New York Life Insurance
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1972
Kirtley, 307 F.2d 418, 423 (8 Cir. 1962); Altrichter v. Shell Oil Co., 263 F.2d 377, 380 (8 Cir. 1959). … (Footnotes omitted) 287 U.S. at 481, 53S.Ct. at 254.
409 U.S. 981Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1991
State, 494 So.2d 834, 836 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986); Mitchell State, 423 So.2d 904 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982). Compare Harrell] v. State, 475 So.2d 650 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985), involving this same defendant. … Alabama, 479 U.S. 922, 107 S.Ct. 328, 93 L.Ed.2d 300 (1986).
499 U.S. 984
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.