Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.12s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Competitive Enterprise Institute, et al., Petitioners v. Michael E. Mann
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 12, 2019
Mann to Phil Jones (Dec. 30, 2004, 09:22:02) .........................................13 Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: EPA … Montford, 31 Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: EPA’s Response to Public Comments, Vol. 2, Response (2-65) at 46. 32 See Patrick
Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 25, 2022
Air Act. 2. … Circuit’s interpretation of the Clean Air Act.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Environment
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Yet even the Respondent concedes that, except for EPCRA and the Clean Air Act (which will be discussed infra), all the other major environmental statutes require that a plaintiff “must allege an ongoing … §1365(a); Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. §7604(a); Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA), 30 U.S.C.
523 U.S. 83Amicus Curiae Brief — Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
The citizen suits provision of the Clean Air Act of 1970, which provided for citizen suits for the first time, and which formed the model for the Water Act version, was the subject of extensive 20 … ‘T]he legislative history of the (Clean Air] Act contains’ explicit indications that private enforcement suits were intended to be limited to the injunctive relief expressly provided for.
484 U.S. 49Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit because it is consistent with a plain reading of the 1980 regulations and the language and structure of the Clean Air Act (“CAA” or the “Act”). … Air Act.”
549 U.S. 561Amicus Curiae Brief — American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Browner
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
THE STATUTORY SCHEME CLEARLY REQUIRES THE EPA TO CONSIDER CONSEQUENTIAL COSTS OF THE PROMULGATION OF AIR QUALITY CRITERIA. 3 The EPA paraphrases its obligation under the Clean Air Act to use “the … Sunstein, /s the Clean Air Act Unconstitutional?, 98 MICH. Law REV. 303, 328 (1999). 4 quantification of the risks associated with competing standards.
530 U.S. 1202Amicus Curiae Brief — BP p.l.c., et al., Petitioners v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 23, 2020
by the Clean Air Act because the Act provides “the exclusive cause of action for the claim asserted” and “provides the exclusive remedy.” … Suppositions about the federal interest in air pollution would also need to address the Clean Air Act, Congress’s word on the subject.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
foreign policy considerations to the EPA under the Clean Air Act, § 202(a)(1). … Air Act
549 U.S. 497Amicus Curiae Brief — Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
REQUIRING EPA TO IDENTIFY “INTELLI- GIBLE PRINCIPLES” DERIVED FROM THE CLEAN AIR ACT IS CONSISTENT WITH ESTABLISHED PRECEDENTS ........................ A. … Rusk, 381 U.S. 1 (1965) .2.0..... eee eee 11 I eee 16 26 U.S.C. § 501(c) (3) .... . 1 iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued Clean Air Act § 109(b) (1), 42 U.S.C. § 7409(b) (1) Clean Air Act § 307(d
531 U.S. 457Amicus Curiae Brief — Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
The first citizen suits provision was in the Clean Air Act of 1970. It was the model for the Water Act version. … As the First Circuit itself said in Pawtuxet Cove: The Clean Air Act, from which the Clean Water Act took the phrase "is . - ein violation,” see 42 U.S.C.
484 U.S. 49Amicus Curiae Brief — Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Environment
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Rather, the court infers Congress intended to allow such suits when it amended the Clean Air Act. 42 U.S.C. § 7401, et seq. … Air Act.
523 U.S. 83Amicus Curiae Brief — American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Browner
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
This Court should interpret the Clean Air Act to avoid this potential constitutional difficulty. … Circuit has applied this presumption to a different provision of the Clean Air Act.
530 U.S. 1202Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 5, 2024
EPA Misinterpreted its Authority Under Clean Air Act Section 111. … The most common definitions at the time of the Clean Air Act’s enactment required far more than what EPA suggests.
Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Applicants v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 5, 2024
EPA Misinterpreted its Authority Under Clean Air Act Section 111. … The most common definitions at the time of the Clean Air Act’s enactment required far more than what EPA suggests.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 5, 2024
EPA Misinterpreted its Authority Under Clean Air Act Section 111. … The most common definitions at the time of the Clean Air Act’s enactment required far more than what EPA suggests.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 5, 2024
EPA Misinterpreted its Authority Under Clean Air Act Section 111. … The most common definitions at the time of the Clean Air Act’s enactment required far more than what EPA suggests.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District v. Friends of Milwaukee's Rivers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
); 42 U.S.C. §7604 (Clean Air Act); 15 U.S.C. §2619 (Toxic Substance Control Act); 42 U.S.C. §11046 (Emer- gency Planning & Community Right to Know Act). 16 by state courts - will be open to independent … 309(g) of the Act, including notice and comment procedures and penalty assessment factors.
544 U.S. 913Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 24, 2022
Jorling is a leading expert on the drafting, implementation, and evolution of the Clean Air Act. Mr. … Congress contemplated that the Clean Air Act’s social and economic impact could—and likely would— be significant.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Michigan v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-46)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
Air Act’s requirements. … of power plants under other Clean Air Act provisions.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
In Congress’ words, the fundamental object of a citi- zen suit under either the Clean Water Act or the Clean Air Act is to bring about “a result”—abatement of on- going violations—and the court of appeals … Congress, however, expressly modeled section 505, including the quoted phrase, after section 304 of the Clean Air Act.
484 U.S. 49
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.