Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.25s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Lopez: Can the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act Survive Commerce Clause Attack?, 15 Va. Envtl. … See Clean Water Authority Restoration Act of 2005 $.912, 109th Cong.
546 U.S. 932Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mills v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001
scaneiaediinieaitehinaina et — The District Court stated in its opinion that, at the time in question, the subject land was probably not a “wetland” for purposes of the Clean Water Act. … The defendants were originally convicted by jury trial in 1989 of five counts of discharging pollutants into the waters of the United States without a permit, in violation of the Clean Water Act 33
531 U.S. 1144Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 13, 2026
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 250 F.3d 23, 36 (1st Cir. 2001); see also Serrano-Colon v. … Brown and Pringle also failed to identify the period between Cahoon’s comment and their layoffs, thus failing to demonstrate a temporal proximity sufficient to show discrimination.
Opposition Brief — California Trout, et al., Petitioners v. Hoopa Valley Tribe, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Oct 28, 2019
Circuit correctly concluded that a state’s express agreement to not act on an applicant’s request for certification pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1341(a)(1), for a period … federal licenses pursuant to Clean Water Act Section 401.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Individuals for Responsible Government, Inc. v. Washoe County
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1997
The Supreme Court has applied the zone of interests test most frequently in suits brought under the Administrative Procedure Act. 19 rae ae ee cP ae aaa | : | See, e.g., Air Courier Conference of … ® Information on Wester Nevada Clean Communities. Inc.
522 U.S. 966Petitioners Reply Brief — Smith v. Hall
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1937
Also, the photograph, Ex- hibit 26-C, opposite page 37 of the James brief, showing Hastitigs in the act of inserting a tray in one of the com. … Hogan took a few chicks in payment for cleaning some clothes but knew nothing about the results se- cured at the hatchery (James R. p. 787).
301 U.S. 216Reply — Green v. Donahoe, 135 S. Ct. 1892 (2015) (No. 14-613)
Supreme Court brief · Reply · 2015
With regard to discrete claims, such as termination, the filing periods run from when each wrongful act occurred. Id. at 113-14. … , the resignation would be the employer’s “last act” triggering the filing period.
Appendix — EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Train
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1977
(the "Act"). … Solids can be cleaned up or washed down.
430 U.S. 112Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Duluth Steamship Co. v. Allied Chemical & Dye Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1956
air Neth as eats BA RE ete ceed Se IC PRE he NRG a = certs nr san ss... BO) eed 8 The written contract called for a ‘‘continuous”’ un- loading operation. … Y. 618, 628; Restatement of Torts §441, Comment (1) se. In U. S. v.
351 U.S. 908Opposition Brief — Berman Enterprises, Inc. v. Jorling
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1994
The summary abatement provision of the ECL is mandated by the provisions of the Clean Air Act which require states to include as part of any approvable state implementation plan, authority comparable … Since the adoption of this provision in the Clean Air Act, other federal environmental statutes that have been adopted contain similar emergency provisions and extend the availability of such relief
510 U.S. 1073Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jacqueline A. Watkins, Petitioner v. City of Chicago, Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 3, 2023
(cleaned up). … (cleaned up).
Amicus Brief — Mobil Oil Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1984
IV .... eat ee oO Statutes: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7414 (Supp. V 1981) ..... RR Sd vba a = 88 “ Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §1251 ef seq. (1976 & BU.. … V. 1981); Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7414 (Supp. V 1981); Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. § 9604(e(1)(B) (Supp.
466 U.S. 980Opposition Brief — Texas Water Conservation Ass'n v. Department of the Interior
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1992
", . . irreparable damage to air, land, and water... " How is the air -- or the land -- or water -- damaged by the acceptance of the easement? … There the question was whether a land withdrawal review program was “agency action" within the meaning of the Act.
506 U.S. 823Opposition Brief — Texas Water Conservation Ass'n v. Department of the Interior
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1992
People Against Nuclear Energy, 460 U.S. 766 (1983) National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. … ". . . irreparable damage to air, land, and water..." How is the air -- or the land -- or water -- damaged by the acceptance of the easement?
506 U.S. 823Jurisdictional Statement — Spalding Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co. v. Department of Revenue
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1969
A copy of this Order is, set forth in Appendix B. } , Appellant's Notice of Appeal to this court was filed in the Court of Appeals of Kentucky on March 26, 1969, within the statutorily prescribed period … The act grants a broad exemption én sales made of “thachinery for new and expanded industry, ** Ken- tucky Revised Statutes 139. 480(8), but in a separate section thé act undertakes to classify industries
396 U.S. 2Petitioners Brief — NATIONAL COTTON COUNCIL OF AMERICA v. RAYMOND J. DONOVAN (Nos. 79-1583, 79-1429)
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1980
The Occupational Safety and Health Act .... 3 B. … App. 65) '* The Standard prohibits compressed air blow-down cleaning ex- cept where alternative means are not feasible. 43 Fed.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 22, 2025
Arizona applies a three-year limitations period to fraud claims. Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-543(3). … However, on December 20, 2018, Moreland published a “Notice of 30-day Public Comment Period Administrative Settlement Agreement” (“Notice of Settlement”) in the Arizona Business Gazette.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1980
We bought some of the finest equipment that can be bought to clean catch basins and to clean storm drains. … on a periodic basis.
446 U.S. 55Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990
To comply with the federal Clean Water Act,! … The Clean Water Act itself is silent as to this issue.
493 U.S. 1077Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Robert S. Carlborg, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 22, 2025
—For purposes of this section, the active force drawdown period is the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on October 1,1995. 79a Public Law 112-81, 125 Stat. 1390 (2011 … the period at the end the following: and (2) the period beginning on the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 and ending on December 31, 2018”. (2) INAPPLICABILITY
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.