Documents

Petitioners Brief — Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2003

General Motors Corp., 876 F.2d 1060 (1st Cir. 1989) (Clean Air Act); United States v. Boccanfuso, 882 F.2d 666, 671 (2d Cir. 1989) (Clean Air Act); Southwestern Pa. Growth Alliance v. … Browner, 121 F.3d 106, 114 (3d Cir. 1997) (Clean Air Act); Pardee, 269 F.3d at 431 (Coal Act); Fort Worth Nat'l Corp. v.

Opposition Brief — In re Alker

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1962

Denton told Phillips to be ready to clean the mud off the automobile when the boy returned with the whiskey (R. 266). … Webb ad- mitted that he drove the car which carried the whiskey and both Webb and Phillips helped in putting air in the tires and air lifts.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Sierra Club v. Morton

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1973

SIERRA CLUB AND CITIZENS FOR CLEAN AIR AND WATER Petitioners Vv. RoGErS C. B. … Higgins, Clerk] SreRRA CLUB and CITIZENS FOR CLEAN AIR AND WATER, Plaintiffs-A ppellants, Vv. WALTER J.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

Lopez: Can the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act Survive Commerce Clause Attack?, 15 Va. Envtl. … See Clean Water Authority Restoration Act of 2005 $.912, 109th Cong.

Respondents Brief — Johnny Kirkland, Petitioner v. Huntington Ingalls, Incorporated

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Jul 30, 2019

Kirkland Case 1:17-cv-00135-HSO-JCG Document 75 Filed 09/11/18 Page 3 of 15 worked as a third class laborer, which included cleaning up, painting, cleaning insulation, grinding rust off tanks, cleaning … Liquid Air Corp., 387 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th Cir. Case 1:17-cv-00135-HSO-JCG Document 75 Filed 09/11/18 Page 9 of 15 1994) (en banc); see also Lujan v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002

statutes enacted in the 1960s and 1970s imposed obligations on the federal government to develop and maintain certain minimum standards for clean air, see “Clean Air Act” of 1963, Pub.L. … The Act establishes an account to be known as the Uranium Enrichment Decon- tamination and Decommissioning Fund (Fund), which, over a 15-year period, would accumulate the monies required to clean up

Appendix — J & E Salvage Co. v. United States, 41 Fed. Cl. 76 (1998) (No. 97-2080)

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1998

Army; 57F3875, Air Force). … Air Force.) c.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Protection Agency v. Defenders of Wildlife

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

EPA, 399 F.3d 486 CDi, TIN voscccticccccesnseerncicstmnstnicrisamizmataa a 22 STATUTES: Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. … This process involves dozens of overlapping state and federal laws, including ESA implementation, NEPA, state NEPA equivalents, wetland permits, clean air conformity, etc.

Opposition Brief — Atlantic States Legal Foundation, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1994

EPA’s Clean Water Act Implementing Regulations ........ 15 3. NYSDEC’s Interpretation of the Clean Water Act is Similar to that Adopted by EPA ................ 20 4. … ASLF’s Interpretation of the Clean Water Act Would Cripple the NPDES PURINE WOME 0 ov vs ccccccisecees 23 POINT II A CITIZEN SUIT UNDER SECTION 1365 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT MAY NOT BE PREMISED SOLELY

Amicus Curiae Brief — National Ass'n v. Defenders of Wildlife

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

EPA, 399 F.3d 486 GG Fi cts sonnccounssssrnsniecianiensennimmntesnnmennneenai 22 STATUTES: Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. … This process involves dozens of overlapping state and federal laws, including ESA implementation, NEPA, state NEPA equivalents, wetland permits, clean air conformity, etc.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

Subject: Establishment and Use of Wetland Mitigation Banks in 6 the Clean Water Act Section 404 Regulatory Program,” 60 Fed. … Water Act ("CWA")?

Opposition Brief — Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Sep 9, 2024

Whether the 2022 reinstatement of the 2013 waiver contravened the Clean Air Act (a question the court of appeals did not reach). 3. … Legal Background As originally enacted in 1963, the Clean Air Act did not regulate motor vehicle emissions. See Pub. L. No. 88-206, 77 Stat. 392 (1963).

Application — Lucas Wall, et al., Applicants v. Transportation Security Administration

Supreme Court brief · Application · Nov 29, 2021

Procedure Act. 54 TSA’s Health Directives were issued without following APA procedures including notice and comment. … To satisfy its notice-and-comment obligations under the APA, ‘an agency must consider and respond to significant comments received during the period for public comment.’ Perez v. Mortg.

Opposition Brief — Nevada Irrigation District, et al., Petitioners v. California State Water Resources Control Board, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Apr 10, 2023

The Clean Water Act provides, however, that “[i]f the State * * * fails or refuses to act on a request for certification, within a reasonable period of time (which shall not exceed one year) after receipt … See In re Clean Water Act Rulemaking, 60 F.4th 583, 593-596 (2023). The 2020 rule thus remains in force, although it does not apply here for the reasons explained above. 4

Transcript of Record — Coryell v. Phipps

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1943

I do think, along that line, that it would be. best to let the questions be devoid of comments on what the answer has been; just let it be a question, and without ‘comments; I think that would be a … . ’ A. .Did you say for a period of years? Q For'the period. from 1935. at A. I think it would be perfectly safe.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Leslie Salt Co. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

Act § 101, ENT CEPT ECO TCE CT ECT COLT EET y § 1319(c)(1)(A), Clean Water Act § 309(c)(1)(A)....... 6 § 1341(a)(1), Clean Water Act § 401(a)(1)............ 10 § 1344(a), Clean Water Act § 404(a). … ................. 3 § 1362(6), Clean Water Act § 502(6)................. 15 § 1362(7), Clean Water Act § 502(7).................. 3 Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments ee Gwin ccun'st sé

Transcript of Record — United States v. Lexington Mill & Elevator Co.

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1914

Now assuming that to be true, would that in your opinion [by] any reason why country air is more wholesome than the foul air of manufacturing cities where mar- kets are not kept clean and the like? … Formerly, we had to wait a certain period, before we could get to the new flour, using it, until it was through a period of sweat, as we called it. Q.

Amicus Curiae Brief — City and County of San Francisco, California, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 26, 2024

During this comment period, any interested member of the public can comment and may ask for a public hearing. Id. § 124.11. … After the comment period closes, the agency must consider and respond to all significant comments that were received, 40 C.F.R. § 124.17, and must also include or respond to comments provided by other

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ron Rutledge, Petitioner v. Board of County Commissioners of Johnson County, Kansas

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 17, 2023

See Foster, 830 F.3d at 1191 (noting that “a one and one-half month period between protected activity and adverse action may, by itself, establish causation” (quotation cleaned up)). … (quotation cleaned up); see also Mueggenborg v. Nortek Air Sols., LLC, No. 20-6147, 2021 WL 4807176, at *8 (10th Cir.

Prologue — Mississippi River Fuel Corp. v. Federal Power Commission (No. 586)

Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 1960

Under the Natural Gas -Act, may the Federal — Power Commission without notice or hearing order i natural gas company to file new rate schedules retre- actively reducing its rates for a past period ? … : aod _ STATUTE INVOLVED The pertinent provisions of the Natural Gis Act. 92 Stat. 821 (1938), as amendéd, 15 U.S.€. 717 ef seq. air set forth in Appendix B, infra, pp. 16a-18a. } .* s Ho ‘ |