Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.87s
District Court, D. Utah · Feb 8, 2024
Penn Gaming, LLC v. Collins, 656 F.3d 1210, 1214 (10th Cir. 2011). 8 1mage Software, Inc. v. … Dahoui’s 39 Metzler v. Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · Sep 15, 2023
LEON LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. Case No. … SA-23-CV-00893-JKP WENDELL BROWN, GRETCHEN BROWN, NEFTALI M.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBullard Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
253 F. Supp. 391 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 5, 1966
In Norris v. National Labor Relations Board, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 106 , 177 F.2d 26 (1949), the employer based its suit on grounds similar to that in Atlas Life Insurance Company v. … The Court need not depend upon its own interpretation of Leedom v. Kyne to justify this result, for the Board itself has at least on one occasion stated that Leedom v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedBoard of Trustees v. Sullivant Avenue Properties, LLC
508 F. Supp. 2d 473 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · May 17, 2007
Board of Trustees of the Sheet *475 Metal Workers’ National Pension Fund (“Plaintiff’) has brought this action against Sullivant Avenue Properties (“Sullivant”) and Trio Leasing Partnership (“Trio”) (collectively “Defendants … See 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (e)(2); see also Sprinzen v.
Cited 46 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · Mar 17, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:19CV685 SEAN BROWN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Ryan Gregory, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil action. … Hutchinson v. Staton, 994 F.2d 1076, 1081 (4th Cir. 1993) (citing Weyerhaeuser Corp. v. Koppers Co., 771 F. Supp. 1406, 1419 (D. Md. 1991); Atkins v. Marathon LeTourneau Co., 130 F.R.D. 625, 626 (S.D. Miss. 1990)).
Cited 0 timesUnknown718 F. Supp. 1434 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 18, 1989
See, Liddell VII v. State, 731 F.2d 1294, 1317 (8th Cir.1984); Morgan v. McDonough, 689 F.2d 265, 276 (1st Cir.1982); Davis v. … Brown’s assistance, the Court expects a single plan developed by efforts of both the City Board and the State which departs from the status quo, but does not involve massive disruption throughout the school system.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · May 15, 2020
BROWN, #1083630, Petitioner, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19cv370 HAROLD W. … Cts. 11(a); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335–38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483–85 (2000).
Cited 0 timesUnknownHoblock v. Albany County Board of Elections
341 F. Supp. 2d 169 · District Court, N.D. New York · Oct 25, 2004
. § 1983 , alleging a violation of their Fourteenth Amendment rights by Defendant Albany County Board of Elections’ (“Board”) refusal to tally their absentee ballots. … Although the Board is correct in its assertion that a § 1983 action cannot be sustained where mere “unintended irregularities” in the conduct of elections occur, Gold, 101 F.3d at 801 ; see also Powell v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedNorwalk Core v. Norwalk Board of Education
298 F. Supp. 210 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Oct 28, 1968
students in the City who do not attend a neighborhood school and for whom the privilege and right of a neighborhood school would exist but for the action of defendant in denying them that privilege and right; and Defendant Board
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 2024
See Weitzner v. … Specifically, Brown alleges 19 EBC, Inc. v. Clark Bldg. Sys., Inc., 618 F.3d 253, 262 (3d Cir. 2010) (quoting Clark v. Modern Grp.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCivil, Aeronautics Board v. Aeromatic Travel Corp.
349 F. Supp. 1151 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 25, 1972
CAB v. Modern Air Transport, Inc., id. at 624. . CAB v. Modern Air Transport, Inc., id. at 624. . Id. at 625. . Pan American World Airways v. … In addition to the fact that several similar cases are pending before the Board certain other developments, initiated by the Board, may bear on the issues at bar.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 2024
BROWN, : Petitioner, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:24-CV-799 v. … Slutzker v. Johnson, 393 F.3d 373, 381 (3d Cir. 2004) (quoting Lines v. Larkins, 208 F.3d 153, 166 (3d Cir. 2000)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States v. Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 1, 2012
U.S. v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Servs., Inc., __ F.R.D. __, 2012 WL 3776708 (D.D.C. 2012) (ECF Nos. 116, 117). … That Opinion indicated that defendant Kellogg, Brown & Root (“KBR”) is entitled to limited discovery on force protection matters relating to the parties’ LOGCAP III agreement. U.S. v. KBR, 2012 WL 3776708 at *10–*12.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · Nov 15, 2024
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Courtney B., Case No. 24-CV-4172 (TNL) Plaintiff, v. … Ayers v. Texas Dep’t of Criminal Justice, 70 F.3d 1268, 1268 (5th Cir. 1995) (per curiam).
Cited 0 timesUnknownWeber v. Port Arthur School Board
759 F. Supp. 341 · District Court, E.D. Texas · Jan 31, 1991
BACKGROUND Katie Weber (Weber) and Marian Bazile (Bazile), both black women, brought separate suits against the Port Arthur School Board (School Board), the Port Arthur Independent School District (School District), Joe Pitts … See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802 , 93 S.Ct. 1817, 1824 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973). 5.
Cited 0 timesPublished53 F.R.D. 85 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 14, 1971
Kelly, Inc., 283 F.2d 96, 99 (3d Cir. 1960); Television Reception Corporation v. … However, neither the distribution and sale of products by the defendant, Rachelson v. E.
Cited 1 timesPublishedHeadlee v. Franklin County Board of Elections
368 F. Supp. 999 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 20, 1973
See, e. g., McDonald v. Board of Election Commissions, 394 U.S. 802, 809 , 89 S.Ct. 1404 , 22 L.Ed.2d 739 (1969). … McDonald v. Board of Election, 394 U.S. 802 , 89 S.Ct. 1404 , 22 L.Ed.2d 739 (1969). Texas does not place a condition on the exercise of the right to vote, nor does it quantitatively dilute votes that have been cast.
Cited 10 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 4, 2024
Fowler v. UMPC Shadyside, 578 F.3d 203, 211 (3d Cir. 2009) (quotations omitted). As Brown is proceeding pro se, the Court construes her allegations liberally. Vogt v. … Liberally construed, the Court concludes that Brown has alleged a sufficient basis for proceeding at this early stage of the litigation. See Huston v. Procter & Gamble Paper Prods.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 4, 2024
BAYLSON, J. 1 See, e.g., Meade v. Reynolds, 810 F. … (citing Lee v. Armontrout, 991 F.2d 487, 489 (8th Cir. 1993)); Harris v. McMullen, 609 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMajeske v. Bay City Board of Education
177 F. Supp. 2d 666 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Dec 27, 2001
Brown v. Francis, 75 F.3d 860, 864-65 (3d Cir.1996). See also Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario v. City of Detroit, 874 F.2d 332, 339 (6th Cir.1989). … of California v.
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna