Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.09s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Ferguson v. Charleston
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
During the same time period, women were excluded from higher education out of concern that "the physiological effects of hard study and academic competition with boys would inter- fere with the development … to have microwave ovens checked for radiation leakage because of "talk that [the microwave] may be a modern menace," id. at 65; and to wear rubber gloves and avoid in- haling when using household cleaning
532 U.S. 67Amicus Curiae Brief — Backiel v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Model Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.6 comment (1983)(emphasis added). … As one commentator has observed: Federal grand juries have less than a clean slate with respect to the First Amendment.
498 U.S. 980Amicus Curiae Brief — Penson v. Ohio
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988
the Court expressly stated that the doctrine then being elaborated was itself constitutional law: The constitutional of substantial equality and fair process can only be attained where counsel acts … A bright-line rule--crisp, clean, and easy to administer--would be of great value both to lawyers and to courts.
488 U.S. 75Amicus Curiae Brief — Bush v. Vera
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995
Rights Act of 1965. … There are no residual losses from “bad” elections and redistricting schemes of the past: Each time a governmental entity redistricts its jurisdiction, the slate is cleaned.
515 U.S. 1172Amicus Curiae Brief — Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Inst., 138 S. Ct. 43 (2017) (No. 16-980)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
During their tenures, amici were charged with enforcing the nation’s election laws, including the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA) and the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA). … And a voter can stay registered by engaging in any kind of voter activity during this four-year period. See Pet. 10.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 8, 2021
I can’t clean my house. I can’t cook. And now my well is probably not going to work.” … As one commentator aptly described it, the Klamath Basin is an area “where water is the limiting factor for so many species as well as for most human development,” and “water conflicts are nothing new.
Amicus Curiae Brief — California, et al., Petitioners v. Texas, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 30, 2020
City of Nelson, supra………….14 Luke 6:31………………………………………………...32 Matthew 7:12……………………………………………32 Ed Morrissey, Video: Lack of severability in ObamaCare a “colossal mistake”, Hot Air, Feb. 2, 2011, 2:15 p.m … For example, the Act permits insurers to establish limited enrollment periods each year to discourage the uninsured from waiting until they are sick before purchasing insurance. . . .
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 13, 2026
For example, take the so-called “Negro Seaman Acts.” … See Michael Schoeppner, Peculiar Quarantines: The Seamen Acts and Regulatory Authority in the Antebellum South, 31 L. & Hist.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Imperial Irrigation District v. State Water Resources Control Board
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Water users and other in- __terested parties will have a 60-day period to review and comment on the regulations after they are published as proposed regulations in the Federal Register. … At the close of the public comment period, comments will be eval- uated and Reclamation will publish in the Federal Register a synopsis of the issues that were raised and Reclamation’s responses.
502 U.S. 857Amicus Curiae Brief — Trump v. Int'l Refugee Assistance Project, 138 S. Ct. 50 (2017) (No. 16-1436)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Because courts “presume that [the govern- ment] act[s] in a constitutional manner,” Illinois v. … Statements to the media are not “official acts.” And they are unreliable indicia of purpose.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers, 138 S. Ct. 43 (2017) (No. 16-1276)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
The Simitations period is short—the Sarbanes-Oxley Act prescribed a 90-day limitations period, which the Dodd-Frank Act extended to 180 days. 18 U.S.C. § 1514A(b)(2)(D); see Pub. L. … The Chamber’s comments urged the SEC to adopt such a rule.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Cedar Point Nursery, et al., Petitioners v. Victoria Hassid, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 7, 2021
The Court rejected analogies to Logan Valley, however, and commented that dicta in Logan Valley suggesting that “whenever a privately owned business district serves the public generally its sidewalks and … This is not an open-air shopping district, a public shopping mall, or even a public retail parking lot.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Trump v. Int'l Refugee Assistance Project, 138 S. Ct. 50 (2017) (No. 16-1436)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
§ 1182(f), which the President invoked as authority for issuing EO-2, requires him to act “by proclama- tion.” … When a party decides to invade the legal rights of another party for only a short period of time—a period that ordinarily does not allow for the full scope of appel- late litigation, up to and including
Amicus Curiae Brief — LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 EE LS Lae REE ene Oe near ee Ieee SERS ROE 13 Tegtmeier v. … Delta Air 14 Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 91 (1983).
552 U.S. 248Amicus Curiae Brief — Lynch v. Morales-Santana, 136 S. Ct. 2545 (2016) (No. 15-1191)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001) 7, 16 CONSTITUTION & STATUTES Oe I air cccscsccceccscccccscocccecccesss passim Child Citizenship Act of 2000, Pub. L. … and Nationality Act Amendments of 1986, Pub.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 15, 2025
There, this Court ruled 5 Judge Beryl Howell’s comments about January 6 protestors have been widely reported. See, e.g., K. … O’Hearn (Biden) of the New Jersey district court enjoined the Air Force from removing two App.3 “transgender” service members pursuant to Trump’s order banning “transgender” service members. 17.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974
This Court has declared: “{A] statute which either forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of. … If it acts 28 at all, it must choose less drastic means.” (Cita- tions omitted.) Id, at 348.
418 U.S. 241Amicus Curiae Brief — Auer v. Robbins
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
wages guaranteed under the Act. … That regulation was adopted after being proposed for comment, see 19 Fed.
519 U.S. 452Amicus Curiae Brief — California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
INTRODUCTION This Court is not writing on a clean slate. … Mondell’s comments were discussed, quoted and referenced in excruciating detail in the briefs presented to this Court in First lowa.
493 U.S. 1068Amicus Curiae Brief — Santa Fe Independent School Dist. v. Doe
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
[and] an act of legal or moral implementation: ENFORCEMENT.” WEBSTER’S NINTH NEW COLLEGIATE DICTIONARY 637 (1983). … Will school officials have to preview the contents of a speech any time a speaker could potentially inject a sectarian or proselytizing comment into it?
530 U.S. 290
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.