Documents

Respondents Brief — James Erin McKinney, Petitioner v. Arizona

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Oct 25, 2019

Fleming 61 So.3d 399 (Fla. 2011) ..................................19, 24 State v. Harper 823 P.2d 1137 (Wash. App. 1992) .........................40 State v. … Ryan 811 F.3d 292 (9th Cir. 2015) ................. 2, 22, 24, 26 Styers v. Ryan No. 2:98-cv-02244, 2012 WL 3062799 (D. Ariz. July 26, 2012) ............................. 22, 24, 38 Teague v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — L. N. Jackson & Co. v. Royal Norwegian Government

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1950

Rozford Knitting Co., supra at pages 24-26. … Roxford Knitting Co., supra at pages 24-26, 265 F. 177, ¢.d. 253 U. S. 498.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Gilligan v. Morgan

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973

Law Review 399, 408-16 LE | OI aE ABE'S ACE NE te Si 78 i aR BO a 11, 20 Maitland, Constitutional History of England 266-28 RAMs fs ee dacs i PE ERE N EOE el ab eg 4 Note, The Federal Injunction as … Law Review 399, 408-16 (1972).

Petition — Rodriguez v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977

gg CY RR eee yy Hie 24 nene bieus saekin See 24 United States v. Cox, 536 F.2d 65 (5th Cir. 1976) .... 24 United States v. Davis, 357 F.2d 438 (5th Cir, 1966) 20 United States v. … denied, 399 U.S. 933 (1970) .................. 13, 15 United States v. Kenner, 354 F.2d 780 (2d Cir. 1965) 14 United States v. Knight, 535 F.2d 1059 (8th Cir. 1976) 24 United States v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Handy v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1972

Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)...... 7, 13, 24, 37, 40 —_ es eeE——eeEeEeEeEeEeeeeeeeeeeeee vi Cont. Cases Page People v. … Driscoll, 399 F 2d 135 (1968) "B10. 11, 24 U.S. v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967) ..... 1, 12, 13, a, 18, 19, 3. 21 24, 27, 31, 32, 33,34 U.S. v.

Petitioners Brief — Clemente Avelino Pereida, Petitioner v. Robert M. Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Jan 28, 2020

Uhl, 107 F.2d 399, 400 (2d Cir. 1939) (L. Hand, J.) … See supra at 22-24. 2. The modified categorical inquiry is not a “factual” one.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Brandon Alexander, Petitioner v. Ohio

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 29, 2024

Morris, 141 Ohio St.3d 399, 2014-Ohio-5052, 24 N.E.3d 1153. … Morris, 141 Ohio St.3d 399, 2014-Ohio-5052, 24 N.E.3d 1153 at 411 26.

Respondents Brief — Boykin v. Alabama

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1969

Pennsylvania, 882 U.S. 399, 15 L. Ed. 2d 447, 86 S. Ct..518 = 6 Howard v. State, 194 So. 2d 834 11 Hulsey v. United States, 369 F. 2d 284(1966) 9 Miranda v. Arizona, 884 U.S. 436 - 12 People v. … Tanner, 8 Cal. 24 279, 298 6 People v. Keller, 245 Cal. App. 24 711, 714.715 - 6 In Re Frederick Saterfield, Sup. Ct. of Calit., Crim. 11573 . 6 Trop v. Dulles, 256.U.S. 96, 89 6 Yates v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Timothy Peoples, Jr., Petitioner v. Raul Machuca, Jr., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 30, 2025

Lewis, 174 F.3d 987, 991 (9th Cir. 1999). 23 In California, the statute of limitations for § 1983 actions is the two-year period set forth in 24 California Civil Procedure Code § 335.1. … Co., 25 Cal. 2d 399 (1944) and Addison, 21 Cal. 3d at 318- 24 19 ).

Opposition — Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981

No. 96-265, § 94 Stat. 399 .............. 28 Revised Interstate Commerce Act, Pub. L. … April 24, 1981

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lingle v. Mitchell (No. 08-438)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2008

Moore, 131 F.3d 399, 415 n. 18 (4m Cir. 1997); see also Estelle v. … Moore, 131 F.3d 399, 415 n. 18 (4 Cir. 1997). Judge Doughton expressly stated that he would “look at’ the letter for impeachment purposes only.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Williams v. Jaglowski

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002

(Id. par. 24.) … Raby, 40 Ill.2d 392, 399, 240 N.E.2d 595, 599 (1968). Plaintiff argues that neither prong of the test is met here. | A.

Petitioners Brief — Teague v. Lane

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1989

Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 100 (1970); Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co., 328 U.S. 217, 220 (1946). … Williams, 399 U.S. at 99, 100.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

Daniels & Martin 1990 at 24. … Pennsylvania, $3 382 U.S. 399 (1966).

Reply Brief Petitioner — Chase Nat. Bank v. Norwalk

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief Petitioner · 1934

SAP Saale 24° Columbus Ry. Light’ & Power Co. v. Columbus, 249 ee S. 399 27 ( -Columbus v. Public Utilities Cuiendediin, 103 O. S. : 79 . = ee 24, 28. Coombes v. … City of Akron, 24 U.8 243, respondent’s brief page 105, was ‘concerned solely with the effect: of legislation upon inchoate rights.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Laguna v. California Board of Education

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2000

Kolodziejski, supra 399 U.S. at 212. … Kolodziejski, supra, 399 U.S. at 210.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF

Agency decision · Agency decision

Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012) ............................................................................... 2 Cesar Castillo, Inc. v. … Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399, 400, 408 (2012) (citing Commission study findings as “evidence … that some brands were exploiting [the Hatch Waxman] statutory scheme to prevent or delay the marketing

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Steven Anthony Alvarez, Petitioner v. M. Eliot Spearman, Warden

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 28, 2018

See 24 Early v. … I at 10, 12.) 22 23 1. 24 In Strickland v.

Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Options Exchange LLC; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Adopt BOX Rule 7300 To Allow the Exchange To Trade Preferenced Orders

Federal Register · Notice · Feb 11, 2015

Therefore, the Commission does not believe that the proposal will negatively impact quote competition or order flow on BOX. 24   Id. … SEC , 444 F.2d 399 (2d Cir. 1971); Arleen Hughes, 27 SEC 629, 636 (1948), aff'd sub nom. Hughes v. SEC, 174 F.2d 969 (D.C. Cir. 1949)).

Respondents Brief — Madison v. Alabama, 138 S. Ct. 943 (2018) (No. 17-7505)

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2018

Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986), and Panetti v. … Br. at 24.