Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

1.95s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Pierce County v. Guillen

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

    Weber Aircraft Corporation, 465 U.S. 792 (1984), this Court held that an investigative report conducted pursuant to Air Force regulations provid- ing that such safety investigations were not to be used … (e.g. 23 USC 152 and Sec. 203 of the Highway Safety Act of 1973).

    537 U.S. 129
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Los Angeles Police Dept. v. United Reporting Publishing Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

    See, e.g., Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552 (1994 & Supp. III 1997); Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a (1994 & Supp. … Reporters Comm. for Free- dom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989) (same with respect to FBI “rap sheets”); Department of the Air Force v.

    528 U.S. 32
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Tanco v. Haslam, 135 S. Ct. 1040 (2015) (No. 14-562)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

    Dep’t of Air Force, 527 F.3d 806 (9th Cir. alae a carte ein nneremenneel 4 Woodward v. … Someone who fantasizes about such acts? Someone who will identify himself or herself as gay or lesbian?” M.V.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Obergefell v. Hodges

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

    Someone who fantasizes about such acts? Someone who will identify himself or herself as gay or lesbian?” M.V. … Diamond, Sexual Identity, Attractions, and Behavior Among Young Sexual-Minority Women Over a 2-Year Period, 36 Dev.

    576 U.S. 644
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

    Lessee of C her, 15 Rac EEE Wii cnssinssciensbinighasiebetommeuttetieceuaneient 7,8 Cleans © Se, DE GLE. … The only other treaty case during this period was Owings v. Norwood’s Lessee, 9 U.S. 344 (1809), which involved a dispute related to land in Maryland.

    548 U.S. 331
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Hammon v. Indiana

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

    Maryland, ERR ar air eran yaar 18 Bourjaily v. United States, oo eS re een 7,12 California v. Green, RT i a a a i ial 6, 7 Coy v. Iowa, Ee es i deka van eens 6 Crawford v. … In the words of commentator Akhil Reed Amar, “much is lost by the clause-bound approach that now dominates constitutional discourse.”

    546 U.S. 976
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Daniel Z. Crowe, et al., Petitioners v. State Bar of Oregon, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 24, 2025

    Bar, Proposed Comments of the Labor and Employment Law Section of the District of Columbia Bar on Support for “D.C. … The Labor and Employment Section of the District of Columbia Bar filed a comment in support of the District of Columbia Civil Rights Tax Fairness Act of 2001, which would have eliminated income taxation

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Dutra Grp. v. Batterton, 139 S. Ct. 627 (2018) (No. 18-266)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

    As correctly noted by one respected commentator, “what the Court did in Miles is to decree that the meas- ure of damages available to a Jones Act seaman for negligence and unseaworthiness under the … Korean Air- lines Co, Lid., 516 U.S. 217, 224 (1996) (confirming Miles’ holding that the Jones Act “permits compensa- tion only for pecuniary loss”).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 923 (2018) (No. 17-965)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

    Because courts “presume that [the government] act[s} in a constitutional manner,” Illinois v. … Statements to the media are not “official acts.” And they are unreliable indicia of purpose.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Kelo v. New London

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

    constitutional); Hayes, * See also 2A NICHOLS ON EMINENT DOMAIN § 7.06[27] n. 25 and 26 (2004) (listing the following states as finding that non-blighted proper- ties may be taken to prevent slums and clean … The court explained, “[the statute of limitations] cannot be used to immunize an agency which adopts a redevelop- ment plan legal on its face, then after the 60-day period has elapsed deviates from

    545 U.S. 469
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1978

    or a billion dollars, or even more. . .” in order to clean up the on- site high-level waste. Severo, Too Hot to Handle, New York Times Magazine, April 10, 1977. See, App. 1198-51. = Dr. … the impact of our decisions and to balance short term needs against long-term comments: Als our every act has the potential to pro- foundly alter future lives, our minimum ethical ob- ligation is

    435 U.S. 519
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Healy

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

    Const., art. 1, §8 ............0.0 000005. 19 Agricultural Adjustment Act of May 12, 1933, c. 25, § 9(a), 48 Stat. 31 2.2.2... 2. ee ee ee 19 Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972, Pub. L. … See, e.g., the Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972, Pub. L.

    512 U.S. 186
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Mineta

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

    Steele, A Threat in the Air: How Stereotypes Shape Intellectual Identity and Performance, 52 American Psychologist 613 (1997) .....ccccececcccccececes 7 ne ER RR ee vii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES-Continued … Steele, A Threat in the Air: How Stereotypes Shape Intellectual Identity and Performance, 52 American Psychologist 613 (1997). See also Claude M.

    534 U.S. 103
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Nuclear Regulatory Commission, et al., Petitioners v. Texas, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 9, 2024

    Shortly after, the Commission started the public engagement process needed to develop an environmental impact statement, soliciting comments and holding public meetings. See, e.g., 83 Fed. … Santander Consumer USA Inc., 582 U.S. 79 (2017) (cleaned up)). The textual difference between these two provisions is easily explained.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Railroad Commission v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

    Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983) Southern Pacific Transportation v. Public Utilities Comm'n: 647 F. Supp. 1220 (N.D. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983). Section 484 of FRSA, 45 U.S.C. 434, is such an express preemption provision.

    503 U.S. 1003
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. Hawaii, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 30, 2018

    See, e.g., Lauren Carroll, In Context: Donald Trump’s comments on a database of American Muslims, Politifact (Nov. 24, 2015), http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2015/ nov/24/donald-trumps-‌comments-database-american-muslims … comments have continued as recently as August, 2017.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

    Castro for back pay for any period of time, despite its concession that it acted illegally in Mr. Castro’s layoff. … In suburban New York, where large numbers of workers toil in landscape and small construction, restaurants, domestic service and building cleaning ~ Aarne srr u}ndocumented workers are the employees

    535 U.S. 137
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Gonzales v. Raich

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

    Rojas, Comment, California's Compassionate Use Act and the Federal Government's Medical Marijuana Policy: Can California Physicians Recommend Marijuana to Their Patients Without Subjecting Themselves … Air and water resources rarely inhabit one state.

    545 U.S. 1
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Easterwood v. CSX Transportation (No. 91-1206)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

    Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983). … We have been unable to complete our review of the merits during the intervening period.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Egelhoff v. Egelhoff

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

    Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983) venesonensnncees tedusdedidetverebsuabank 5 Statutes Pie OF OG oh cc ccccccece Siugusehussetay 18 29 U.S.C. § 1001(a)........... … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 90 (1983)).

    532 U.S. 141

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.