Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.21s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Republican Party of Minn. v. White
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927) ..........---s+-se00e-0es 12 CONST'TUTIONAL PROVISIONS U.S. … Stafford, 490 N.W.2d 418, 423 (Minn. 1992) (citing Judicial Branch Committee Report, Minnesota Constitutional ission (1972)).
536 U.S. 765Amicus Curiae Brief — Proctor v. California
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
Phillips, 41 Cal.3d 29, 711 P.2d 423 (1985) .... 17 People v. Pinholster, No. S004616 ............050 ee eeee 20 People v. Proctor, 4 Cal.4th 499, 842 P.2d i100 (1992), cert. granted, 114 S. … Phillips, 41 Cal.3d 29, 63, 711 P.2d 423, 444 (1985) (26-year-old victim was “in the prime of his life"); People v. Samayoa, No. S006284, XL RT 49 (victim was an adult “in her prime”); People v.
510 U.S. 1010Amicus Curiae Brief — Arlington Central School Dist. Bd. of Ed. v. Murphy
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
J.T: Gibbons, Inc., 482 U.S. Gy SG eictncccshilsinansiacstcnsmbindins iclassinslbideincibisambiddininin 15, 17 Das v. McHenry Sch. Dist. #15, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 315 (N.D. Ill. … Casey, 499 U.S. 83, 86 (1991); Crawford Fitting Co. v. J.T. Gibbons, Inc., 482 U.S. 437, 439 (1987).
548 U.S. 291Amicus Curiae Brief — Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western NY
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Grace, 461 U.S. 171 (1983) ........... 2,4 United States v. Irving, 509 F.2d 1325 (Sth Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 931 (1975) ................. 15 United States v. … Irving, 509 F.2d 1325 (Sth Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 931 (1975); United States v. Omirly, 488 F.2d 353 (4th Cir. 1973); United States v. Rutherford, 332 F.2d 444 (2d.
519 U.S. 357Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Taxation and Finance of NY v. Milhelm Attea & Bros.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
United States, 318 U.S. 423 ee Ce ccc cee ccceccccese 6 Commissioner v. Duberstein, 363 U.S. 278 (1960)... 4 County Yakima v. Yakima Nation, _. US. MME, «cc cccccccccscssecs 17 Fellows v. … Georgia, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515, 582 (1832); [3] Language must be liberally construed in favor of the Indians. Choctaw Nation v. United States, 318 U.S. 423, 431-32 (1943); Tulee v.
512 U.S. 61Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Salerno
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
Edwards, 430 A. 2d 1321 (D.C. 1981) (en banc), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 TTT passim United States v. King, 482 F.2d 768 (D.C. Cir. t 21 United States v. … King, 482 F.2d 768, 775 (D.C. Cir. 1973). Congress rejected a proposal to confer immunity on the de- fendant’s testimony at the preventive detention hearing. H.R. 5865, 98th Cong., 2d Sess.
481 U.S. 739Amicus Curiae Brief — Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara Cty.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
See 443 U.S. at 200. … in No. 78-482 at 5 & n.4. 28 is the intent to stop taking sex into account once the long-range percentage goals are attained.” 748 F.2d at 1318.
480 U.S. 616Amicus Curiae Brief — Al Odah v. United States (Nos. 06-1196, 06-1195)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
/d. at 482 (quoting King v. Cowle, 97 Eng. Rep. 587, 598-99 (K.B. 1759)). … Dotson, 544 U.S. 74, 79 (2005) (quoting Preiser, 411 U.S. at 482, 487). 1. A CSRT has no power to order a detainee released, even if it determines that the detainee is not an enemy combatant.
Amicus Curiae Brief — California v. Deep Sea Research, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Steinmetz, 973 F.2d 212 (3d Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 984 |. ne rs i. Se. i ee 2 Utah Div. of State Lands v. United States, 482 U.S. 193 (1987)... 2 2. ees 11 Wilburn Boat Co. v. … United States, 482 U.S. 193, 195-98 (1987)).
520 U.S. 1263Amicus Curiae Brief — Boumediene v. Bush
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
/d. at 482 (quoting King v. Cowle, 97 Eng. Rep. 587, 598- 99 (K.B. 1759)). … Dotson, 544 U.S. 74, 79 (2005) (quoting Preiser, 411 U.S. at 482, 487). 1. A CSRT has no power to order a dctaince released, even if it determines that the detainee is not an enemy combatant.
553 U.S. 723Amicus Curiae Brief — Obergefell v. Hodges
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 95-96 (1987) (recognizing “a constitutionally protected marital relationship in the prison context”). … Turner, 482 U.S. at 95-96. Gay people are parents, too, and the challenged marriage bans’ overbreadth is made yet more appar- ent by their cruel impact on the children of same-sex couples.
576 U.S. 644Amicus Curiae Brief — Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. Scott
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Shabazz, 482 U.S. 342, 349 (prison regulations allegedly infringing constitutional rights are themselves constitutional so long as they are “reasonably related to legitimate penological interests”) … The exclusionary rule, instead, “was a judicially created means of effectuating the rights secured by the Fourth Amendment” in discrete settings, Powell, 428 U.S. at 482, a rule that did not apply to
524 U.S. 357Amicus Curiae Brief — Hillside Dairy Inc. v. Lyons
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
See House Hearings 480-482. … He urged “[flederal legislation * * to preserve California’s standards” for the composition of fluid milk products, id. at 482, but did not urge legislation to protect the pricing and pooling laws against
539 U.S. 59Amicus Curiae Brief — National Ass'n v. Defenders of Wildlife
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997)........... 8 United States v. West of Eng. Ship Owner's Mut. Prot. & Indem. … Wells, 519 U.S. 482, 491 (1997). Nothing remotely suggests that Congress abrogated common-law principles when it enacted the ESA.
551 U.S. 644Amicus Curiae Brief — Hill v. Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
Schultz, 487 U.S. 474, 482 (1988). Its only impact is to regulate the place where such expression occurs. Petitioners and their amici nevertheless assert that the statute is content-based. … Madsen, 512 U.S. at 763. ® See Frisby v. Schultz, 487 U.S. 474, 482-83 (1988), United States v.
526 U.S. 1062Amicus Curiae Brief — Tamer Mahmoud, et al., Petitioners v. Thomas W. Taylor, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 10, 2025
Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520 (1993) ................................................ 13 Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987) ................................................ 20 Eknes-Tucker v. … Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987) and Mozert v. Hawkins Cnty.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Fusari v. Steinberg
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
Ricuarp Larson National Employment Law Project, Ine. 423 West 115th Street New York, New York 10027 MarttiE Lovis THOMPSON STEPHEN E. GO? … Ricuarp Larson National Employment Law Project, Ine. 423 West 118th Street New York, New York 10027 Martrig Lovis Tuompson STEPHEN E.
419 U.S. 379Amicus Curiae Brief — Brown v. Pro Football, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
NLRB, 452 U.S. RSE STA IS Ne aoe 14, 25 Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. Coyne, 482 U.S. 1 a ccluenlislleenabnianne 20 Golden State Transit Corp. v. … Coyne, 482 U.S. 1, 22 n.15 (1987) (referring to “the basic fact that a nonunion employer .is freer to set employment terms than is a unionized employer”).
518 U.S. 231Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 30, 2018
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, 482 U.S. 270 (1987) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Lamie v. U.S. … Brotherhood of Locomotive Eng’rs, 482 U.S. 270, 282 (1987) (agency’s refusal to grant reconsideration of an action because of material error); Webster v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Cmty., 136 S. Ct. 567 (2015) (No. 15-138)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Shearson, 482 U.S. 220, 241 (1987). That is, in enacting Section 1964(c), Congress was focused on the ability of those injured by criminal conduct to obtain a civil remedy. … foreclosed by Shearson, in which the Court expressly found that this policing function “was a secondary concern” and that Congress’ primary focus was on providing victims a remedy for their injuries. 482
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.