Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.43s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Skrupa, 372 U.S. 726 (1963) ............ 20 First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987) ............... 12 Florida Rock Industries, Inc. v. … County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304, 314 (1987), the taking clause “does not prohibit the taking of private property, but instead places a condition on the exercise of that power.”
524 U.S. 498Amicus Curiae Brief — Nansay Hawaii, Inc. v. Public Access Shoreline Hawaii
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
Standard Oil Co., 449 U.S. 232 (1980)......... 13 First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987) ...... 10 Hodel v. … City of San Jose, 485 U.S. 1, 9-14 (1988); First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304, 311-12 (1987); FCC v.
517 U.S. 1163Amicus Curiae Brief — Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Marques
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Supreme Court, U.S. … Gibbons, Inc., 482 U.S. 437, 445 (1987); Busic v. United States, 446 U.S. 398, 406 (1980), Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp., 353 U.S. 222, 228-229 (1957), Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v.
525 U.S. 822Amicus Curiae Brief — Nieves v. Bartlett (No. 17-1174)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019
Hill, 482 U.S. 451 (1987)........... 9,10 Crawford-El v. Britton, 523 U.S. 574 Fit ntsitinesnninnesntinndninctundninininidhinmigeiennennen 14, 21, 22, 24 Ctr. for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. … Hill, 482 U.S. 451, 455, 471-72 (1987). As this Court stated: [I]n the face of verbal challenges to police action, officers and municipalities must respond with restraint.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 29, 2026
STAT. § 22a-423 .............................................. 12 CONN. GEN. STAT. § 22a-430 .............................................. 12 DEL. … STAT. §§ 22a-423, 22a-430(a); DEL. CODE tit. 7, 2 13 then brings us to RCRA, which “obligate[s] a federal polluter, like any other, to obtain permits from … the state permitting agency.” U.S.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
MeClure, 456 U.S. 188 (1982). 9 United States v. Gaincy, 380 U.S. 63 (1965) 13 United States v. Will, 449 U.S, 200 (1980) wy. 10 Usery v. … II at 423. 9 F.2d 128 (3rd Cir. 1986), aff'd without opinion by a divided Court, 481 U.S. 735 (1987), is misplaced.
508 U.S. 602Amicus Curiae Brief — Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis v. Trinko, LLP
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
McCready, 457 U.S. at 482-83 (citing Reiter v. Sonotone Corp., 442 U.S. 330 (1979)). … McCready, 457 U.S. at 482; Brunswick, 429 U.S. at 488. Respondent’s injuries were also the foreseeable and proximate result of Petitioner’s illegal conduct.
540 U.S. 398Amicus Curiae Brief — 303 Creative LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Aubrey Elenis, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 26, 2021
FCC, 512 U.S. 622 (1994). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 United States v. … Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 96 (1987) (“[M]any religions recognize marriage as having spiritual significance ….”).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 6, 2020
U.S. Dist. Court for S. Dist. of Iowa, 482 U.S. 522 (1987) .............................................. 27 Walden v. … Dist. of Iowa, 482 U.S. 522, 542 (1987) (“It is well known that the scope of American discovery is often significantly broader than is permitted in other jurisdictions . . . .”).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Va. 427, 211 S.E.2d 674, cert. denied, 423 U.S. 991 FE ae ee ae ee 7 Srivastava v. Harte Hanks Communications, Inc., Communications Daily, May 7, 1990 (Tex. Ct. Com. … Va. 427, 211 S.BE.2d 674, cert. denied, 423 U.S. 991 (1975); see also Wheeler, supra note 2; Note, Punitive Damages and Libel Law, 98 Harv. L.
499 U.S. 1Amicus Curiae Brief — National Ass'n v. Defenders of Wildlife
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Gibbons, Inc., 482 U.S. 437, 445 (1987) (“As always, where there is no clear intention otherwise, a specific statute will not be controlled or nullified by a general one, regardless of the priority … Hill, 437 U.S. 153, 174, 194 (1978).
551 U.S. 644Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Lubbock, Texas v. Oscar Rendón Renda Contracting, Inc. (No. 06-965)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Unit, 507 U.S. 163, 168 (1993). See Pickering v. Bd. of Educ. of Twp. High School Dist. 205, Will Cty., 391 U.S. 563 (1968); Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138 (1983). … App. 480, 482, 556 P.2d 328, 330 (1976). * 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 10 claims.”
Amicus Curiae Brief — Golden Gates Heights Investments v. City and County of San Francisco
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
Irving, 481 U.S. 704 (1987); and First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987). … Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419 (1982) ........... 5 Nollan v. California Coastal é& Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987)........ 3-4,6-11 Yee v. City of Escondido, 503 U.S.
510 U.S. 928Amicus Curiae Brief — California Department of Human Resources Development v. Java
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1971
Smith, 392 U.S. 309 (1988)))))⸗ 5 Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 397 (1970) 45 Steward Mach. Co. v. … Williams, 397 U.S. 471, 481-482 (1970), another of the A.F.D.C. regulated state welfare benefit controversies, placed direct reliance on the position of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare
402 U.S. 121Amicus Curiae Brief — Bryan Christopher Bell, Petitioner v. North Carolina
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 19, 2025
Maryland, 482 U.S. 496 (1987) .............................................. 24 Bosse v. Oklahoma, 580 U.S. 1 (2016) .................................................. 24 Broady v. … Oklahoma, 580 U.S. 1 (2016) (per curiam) (Oklahoma’s application of Booth v. Maryland, 482 U.S. 496 (1987)); Wearry v. Cain, 577 U.S. 385 (2016) (per curiam) (Louisiana’s application of Brady v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Boerne v. Flores
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
U.S. EPA, 725 F.2d 761, 770 (D.C. Cir. 1984). … United States, 143 U.S. 457, 461 (1892) (quoting United States v. Kirby, 74 U.S. 482, 486- 487 (1868)); see also e.g., Iowa State Univ. Research Foundation, Inc. v.
521 U.S. 507Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 14, 2025
FTC, 482 F.2d 672 (D.C. Cir. 1973) ............................ 24 NLRB v. Noel Canning, 573 U.S. 513 (2014) ............................................ 28 Seila Law LLC v. … FTC, 482 F.2d 672, 678 (D.C. Cir. 1973); see also Daniel A. Crane, Debunking Humprey’s Executor, 83 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1835, 1860–62 (2015).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Nebraska Cattlemen, Inc. v. Livestock Marketing Assn.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Landreneau, 365 F.3d 423 (Sth Cir. 2004) petition for cert. filed (U.S. June-30, 2004) (No. 04-23)... cccccccesseeessreeeeeeees 27 Riley v. … Landreneau, 365 F.3d 423, 434 n.21 (Sth Cir. 2004) petition for cert. filed (U.S. June 30, 2004) (No. 04-23).
543 U.S. 977Amicus Curiae Brief — Karadzic v. Kadic
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
United States District Ct., 482 U.S. 522 1s ra os 19 The Steamship Appam, 243 U.S. 124 (1917) .......... 19 Tannenbaum v. Rabin, No. CV-95-4537, 1996 WL 75283 enn PO ee y Tel-Oren v. … Ct., 482 U.S. 522 (1987); and enforcing foreign judgments, see Hilton v. Guyot, 159 U.S. 113 (1895).
518 U.S. 1005Amicus Curiae Brief — Maxwell v. Bishop
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1970
Denno, 388 U.S. 293 (1967) ....2............... i) Tehan v. Shott, 382 U.S. 406 (1966) ..,............... ae 4 Winston v. United States, 172 U.S. 303, 312-313 (1899) .... 11 Witherspoon, vy. … Denno, 388 U.S. 293 (1967); Johnson v. New Jersey, 384 U.S.” 719 (1966); Tehan v. Shott, 382 U.S! 406 (1966) ; Linkletter v. Walker, 381 US. 618 (1965).
398 U.S. 262
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.