Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
3.17s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Byron Christopher Chinchilla, Petitioner v. Greg Lewis, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 26, 2018
De La Torre said he and his friends prevented Chinchilla from going through their pockets. 2 RT 399. Huitron said he did. 2 RT 184186. … Adraktas, #215323 Attorney For Byron Chinchilla 24
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 18, 2022
JA423–24, 261. … Oliver, 399 F. Supp. 348, 355–57 (M.D. Ala. 1975) (noting and summarizing dozens of cases).
Petitioners Reply Brief — United States v. Ross
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1982
carefully analyzed the benefits gener- ally derived from warrants, and shown that they are greatly attenuated in the context of a search of a seized container such as respondent’s paper bag (Br. 21-24 … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970), and limit the automobile search exception to exigent cir- cumstances created by the mobility of an unsecured auto- mobile on the highway.
456 U.S. 798Reply Brief — Pennsylvania v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1972
This Honorable Court has set forth the underlying prin- ciples governing railroad reorganizations in New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 US 392, 26 LEd 2d 691, 90 SCt. 2054 (1970), in which Mr. … Co., 26 F Supp 18, 24, aff’d sub nom Palmer v. 10 Warren, supra.
409 U.S. 894Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 9, 2019
Id. at 399 (quoting Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298, 327 (1995)). … See 569 U.S. at 386-87, 399, 401. The Berry decision clearly does not constitute evidence under the traditional sense of the word.
Reply Brief — Hilao v. Revelstoke Investment Investment Investment Corp., Inc. (No. 08-1019)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2008
International Yachting Group, Inc., 252 F.3d 399 (5th Cir. 2001) and Jalapeno Prop. Mgmt., LLC v. … For that reason, Revelstoke had no Rule 24 property interest whatsoever in the Hawai’i judgment and its intervention was improper.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 27, 2026
No. 24-889 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ____________________________ HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC., et al., Petitioners, v. … Microsoft Corp., 399 F.3d 1325, 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2005).
Opposition Brief — Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Maine People's Alliance (No. 06-1540)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2007
Honeywell, 399 F.3d at 259-61. … Pet. 24.
Petitioners Brief — United States v. Henry
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1980
24 Webster’s New International Dictionary CR A ID ecieereteacennnanatcaceane 21, 24 Iu the Supreme Court of the United States OCTOBER TERM, 1979 No. 79-121 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONER … accused against an erroneous or improper prosecution.” 399 U.S. at 9 (plurality opinion).
447 U.S. 264Petitioners Brief — New York v. Burger
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1987
Laws 1336 19 Act of July 24, 1986, ch. SIS, § 6, 1986 N.Y. … Rptr. at 399: Moore v. State, 442 So.2d at 216 (Fla.); State v. Tindell, 272 Ind. at 482-83, 399 N.E.2d at 747-48; People v. Barnes, 146 Mich. App. at 42, 379 N.W.2d at 466; Shirley v.
482 U.S. 691Respondents Brief — United States v. Gouveia
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1984
Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970) 22, 24, 26, 47 Commonwealth v. Chacko, 500 Pa. 571, 459 A.2d 311 (1983) waka de ch abca wand wees Bada s\n 21 Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (1980) 47 Davis v. … Brief 24).
467 U.S. 180Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
Rev. 399, 399-400 and notes 1, 3 (1974). We will continue to adhere to our previous characterization to avoid confusion. … Florida, 399 U.S. at 95.
449 U.S. 1083Opinion — Jones v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1927
[January 24, 1927.] Mr. Justice Hotmes delivered the opinion of the Court. … County Commis- sioners, 248 U. 8. 399, 404.
273 U.S. 195Brief for the United States in Opposition — Durham v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States in Opposition · 1969
Griffith agreed to pay Hayes $10 per day for expenses, and a bonus at the end of his employment if his efforts were successful overall (R. 24, 63). … United States, 399 F. 2d 318 _(C.A. 5), certioggri-denied, 393°U.S. 1098; Bullock — v. United States, 383 F. 2d 545 (C.A. 5); United States v.
396 U.S. 839Memorandum in Opposition — Burr Oaks Corp. v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Memorandum in Opposition · 1967
Commissioner, 248 F. 2d 399:(C.A..2); _ '_. P.M. Finance Corp. v. Commissioner, 302 F. 24 786 — . CRB Aronov* yy Construction Co. v. United States, - 223 -F. Supp.. 175 (M.D.
385 U.S. 1007Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 13, 2025
Or to know that it is impossible for an incoming energy of 340 W/m’ could be absorbed as 399 W/m’ [40 96]. … All you need to know is that 398 is more than 160, and 399 is more than 340. 18- You don’t need to be a scientist or a legal expert to know that: 1) For IPCC to adjust (fabricate) the measurements to prove
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 17, 2021
Id. at 23-24 (F rankfurter, J., concurring). … DATED: this 18th day of July, 2021. 24
Reply Brief — Weaver v. Steger
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1993
See Street, 367 U.S. at 775 (a refund of nonchargeable expenditures); Allen 373 U.S. at 122-24. … See R. 1, 11 39, 41, 42; R. 32 at 18-24; R. 40 at 12-16, 23-25.
507 U.S. 917Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 18, 2021
Following a jury trial on August 24 and 25, 2016, petitioner was found guilty of the felony offenses of grand larceny and conspiracy to commit grand larceny. … Housden, 3 App. 39 184 W.Va. 171, 175, 399 S.E.2d 882, 886 (1990).
Reply Brief — Cusano v. Klein (No. 05-1492)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2006
BIO 9, 11-12, 24. That argument is wrong on multiple levels. First, Respon- dents concede that the issue was presented to, and rejected by, the Ninth Circuit. Pet. 12-13; BIO 24-25." … BIO 22-24. Accusations 1 & 3 involve legal positions as to which Respon- dents are spectacularly wrong.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.