Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Tarek Farag, Petitioner v. Joseph R. Biden, former President of the United States, et al.

TABLE OF CONTENTS OF APPENDIX

Notice of Issuance of Mandate [7th Circuit

Appellate Court (24-2998)]

la

Order Denying Petition for Rehearing [7th Circuit

Appellate Court (24-2998)]

2a

Order Denying Oral Argument, and to Bring

Attention to Overlooked Evidence, and to Stop

Petitioner from Filing Any Further Filings [7th

Circuit Appellate Court (24-2998)]

3a

Plaintiff-Appellant Motion to Bring the Attention to

an Overlooked Evidence and to File Electronically

[7th Circuit Appellate Court (24-2998)]|

4a

Motion for an Urgent Oral Argument to Settle the

Hoax [7th Circuit Appellate Court (24-2998)]

7a

Motion to Reconsider (Rehearing) the Order

Denying Farag’s Request to File Electronically

and Summarily Affirming District Court’s Denial

of Farag’s Motion for a Declaratory and Injunctive

Relief [7th Circuit Appellate Court (24-2998)]

lla

Order Summarily Affirming the District Court’s

Denial of Farag’s Motion for a Preliminary

Injunction and His Motion to File Electronically

[7th Circuit Appellate Court (24-2998)]

25a

Order Denying Farag’s Motion for Extension of

Time [District Court (1:24-cv-2728)]

27a

Plaintiff's Motion to Allow More Time to Respond

(Because of the Appeal) [District Court (1:24-cv-

2728)|

28a

Order Denying Farag’s Motion to Stay the

Proceedings, and Certifying the Appeal as

Frivolous

3la

a os oe ee

Plaintiff's Motion to Stay the Proceedings (Because

of the Appeal) [District Court (1:24-cv-2728)

33a

Transcript of Proceedings 10/22/24 at 9:57 AM

{District Court (1:24-cv-2728)

35a

Docketing Statement in the Hoax [7th Circuit

Appellate Court (24-2998)

44a

Notice of Appeal [District Court (1:24

46a

Order Denying the “Motion to Declare that the

Claims That ‘Burning Fossil Fuel is Causing Global

Warming” is a Hoax and to Enjoin the Defendants

from Enforcing It, Declaring that the Hoax is real,

and Warning the Plaintiff from Filing Frivolous

Filings [District Court (1:24

47a

Order Setting the Video Conferencing Hearing

[District Court (1:24

48a

Motion to Declare that the Claims That ‘Burning

Fossil Fuel is Causing Global Warming” is a Hoax,

and to Enjoin the Defendants from Enforcing It

District Court (1:24

49a

Verified Amended Complaint For Declaratory,

Injunctive, and Other Relief (Corrected) [District

Court (1:24

56a

Order Denying Plaintiff's Motions Asking the

Court to Recuse Itself, and Seeking Reassignment

[District Court (1:24

103a

Plaintiff's Motion to Transfer the Case to H.J.

Valderrama [District Court (1:24-cv-2728)]

104a

ii

Case: 1:24-cv-02728 Document #: 102 Filed: 12/31/24 Page 1 of | PageID #:370

Case: 24-2998 Document: 00714494666 Filed: 12/31/2024 Pages: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Everett McKinley Dirksen Office of the Clerk

United States Courthouse Phone: (312) 435-5850

Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn www.ca7.uscourts. gov

Street Chicago, Illinois 60604

NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF MANDATE

December 31, 2024

To: Thomas G. Bruton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of Illinois

Chicago, IL 60604

TAREK FARAG,

Plaintiff - Appellant

No. 24-2998 V.

JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., et al.,

Defendants - Appellees

Originating Case Information:

District Court No: 1:24-cv-02728

Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division

District Judge Jeremy C. Daniel

Herewith is the mandate of this court in this appeal, along with

the Bill of Costs, if any. A certified copy of the opinion/order

of the court and judgment, if any, and any direction as to costs

shall constitute the mandate.

RECORD ON APPEAL STATUS: No record to be returned

Case: 1:24-cv-02728 Document #: 103 Filed: 12/31/24 Page | of | PageID #:371

Case: 24-2998 Document: 00714494665 Filed: 12/31/2024 Pages: 1

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

CERTIFIED COPY

December 23, 2024

Before

DIANE S. SYKES, Chief Judge

JOHN Z. LEE, Circuit Judge

DORIS L. PRYOR, Circuit Judge

No. 24-2998

TAREK FARAG, Appeal from the United

Plaintiff-Appellant, States District Court for the

7 Northern District of Ilinois,

JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., et al., | @stern Division.

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 1:24-cv-02728

Jeremy C. Daniel,

Judge.

ORDER

Plaintiff-Appellant filed a petition for rehearing on December

2, 2024. All the judges on the panel have voted to deny

rehearing. The petition for rehearing is therefore DENIED.

Case: 24-2998 Document: 14 Filed: 12/10/2024 Pages: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Everett McKinley Dirksen Office of the Clerk

United States Courthouse Phone: (312) 435-5850

Room 2722 - 219 8. Dearborn www.ca7.uscourts.gov

Street Chicago, Illinois 60604

ORDER

December 10, 2024

By the Court

TAREK FARAG,

Plaintiff - Appellant

Vv.

No. 24-2998 JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., et al.,

Defendants - Appellees

Originating Case Information:

District Court No: 1:24-cv-02728

Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division

District Judge Jeremy C. Daniel

The following are before the court:

1. MOTION FOR ORAL ARGUMENT TO SETTLE THE

HOAX, filed on December 5, 2024, by the pro se appellant.

2. MOTION TO BRING ATTENTION TO OVERLOOKED

EVIDENCE AND TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY, filed on

December 9, 2024, by the pro se appellant.

IT IS ORDERED that the motions are DENIED as

unnecessary. Appellant’s petition for rehearing is under

consideration. Any further filings by appellant will be returned

unfiled.

Case: 24-2998 Document: 13 Filed: 12/09/2024 Pages: 3

Appellate Case No.: 24-2998

IN THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT APPELLATE COURT

APPEAL FROM NORTHERN DISTRICT COURT OF

ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

TAREK FARAG, pro se

Plaintiff-Appellant District Civil Case No

V. 1:24-cv-02728

JOSEPH BIDEN, ET AL juded: Honorable

Defendants-Appellees. JEREMY C. DANIEL

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT MOTIONS TO BRING THE

ATTENTION TO AN OVERLOOKED EVIDENCE AND

TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY

Plaintiff-Appellant Tarek Farag (hereinafter Farag), pro se,

states the following under oath:

I- MOTION TO BRING THE ATTENTION TO AN

OVERLOOKED EVIDENCE

1- Farag’s motion for declaratory and injunctive relief

(hereinafter Motion)[40] was focusing on the scientific

analysis to sufficiently and easily prove that the Hoax is a

hoax relying on verifying numbers. However, he clearly

proved in 63 of his amended complaint [21] that the EPA

(Environmental Protection Agency) (government’s entity

that is supposed to be responsible about the Hoax), HAS

NO SCIENTIFIC PROOF WHATSOEVER to support

the Hoax, as he already stated in 963 of the Amended

Complaint:

“63- Farag submitted a Freedom Of Information

Act (FOIA) request to the EPA [Tracking # EPA-

4

2022-001766, Date 01/05/2022], asking for all the

scientific information that supports the man made

global warming. Farag received a response from

Ephraim Atkinson, on 1/31/2022, email:

hopkins.daniel@epa.gov, stating that they have

nothing scientific to support the Hoax! “[21).

Notice that Farag already forwarded these

communications to all Counsels on record on 12/6/2024,

and for the practical reasons he will not be able to attach

them.

Farag stated in his FOIA request:

“Please provide all the SCIENTIFIC: data, reports,

analysis, experiments, studies, etc. that show the

GOOD and BAD effects of the MAN-MADE

CLIMATE CHANGES, and support its existence or

its future existence, according to which the agency

and the US government concluded and/or

recommended and/or ACTED and/or joined

national or international organizations to COMBAT

this man-made climate changes.

Note: Most of the requested materials could be in

electronic format, I accept its delivery by email to

save time and money.”

2- This Appellate Court stated “This court has carefully

reviewed the record in the district court, the record on

appeal, and Farag’s motion” [9]. However, they

overlooked 463 of his Amended Complaint [21] (as

stated above). Which proves beyond any doubt that the

EPA and the government, has no evidence whatsoever to

support the Hoax, which proves Farag’s claims that the

5

Hoax has no scientific basis. This evidence alone

invalidates the erroneous findings and certification of H.J.

Daniel that the Motion is frivolous.

3- WHEREFORE, this Court should reverse its decision

affirming the District Court’s decision, and grant Farag’s

Motion for the Declaratory and Injunctive relief.

II- MOTION TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY

4- Farag filed a motion to allow him to file the documents

in this Court electronically using the CM/ECF system on

11/13/2024. However, his motion was denied on

11/21/2024, without stating any reason [9].

S- WHEREFORE, this Court should allow Farag to fully

use the CM/ECF system.

6- WHEREFORE, Plaintiff-Appellant Tarek Farag

respectfully asks this Honorable Court to expeditely

reverse the District Court’s decision declaring that his

motion for declaratory and injunctive relief is frivolous,

declare that the claims that “burning fossil fuel could

cause harmful global warming” has no scientific basis and

is a Hoax, grant the injunctive relief as request in the

Motion, allow Farag to use the CM/ECF system, and grant

other relief as proper and just.

Respectfully submitted this December 6, 2024.

Plaintiff: TAREK FARAG, pro se.

411 N WARWICK AVE, WESTMONT, IL 60559

Phone: 630 709 3965

Email: tarekfaragusa@hotmail.com, tarekfarag@comcast.net

PROOF OF SERVICE

On 12/6/2024, I, Tarek Farag on oath state that I served this

notice attached to it the stated document above, by Email, and

they will be served by CM/ECF system.

Plaintiff: TAREK FARAG, pro se.

411 N Warwick Ave, Westmont, IL 60559

VERIFICATION BY CERTIFICATION

Under penalties as provided by law, the undersigned certifies

that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and

correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information

and belief and as to such matters the undersigned certifies as

aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

Signed:

Executed on December 6, 2024.

Al

Plaintiff: TAREK FARAG, pro se.

411 N Warwick Ave, Westmont, IL 60559

Case: 24-2998 Document: 12 Filed: 12/05/2024 Pages: 2

Appellate Case No.: 24-2998

IN THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT APPELLATE COURT

APPEAL FROM NORTHERN DISTRICT COURT OF

ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

TAREK FARAG, pro se

Plaintiff-Appellant District Civil Case No

Wa 1:24-cv-02728

JOSEPH BIDEN, ET AL Judge: Honorable

Defendants-Appellees. JEREMY C. DANIEL

MOTION FOR AN URGENT ORAL ARGUMENT TO

SETTLE THE HOAX

Plaintiff-Appellant Tarek Farag (hereinafter Farag), pro se,

states the following:

1- Farag just filed his motion to reconsider (rehearing) on

11/29/2024, proving that the “claims that burning fossil fuel

generating CO2 could cause a harmful manmade global

warming”, has no scientific basis (hereinafter Hoax).

2- This Court is not sure that the Hoax is a hoax, due to the

large misinformation and deception.

3- Due to the huge importance and urgency to resolve the

Hoax’s reality, and to save time and resources, Farag asks this

Court to have an urgent hearing (oral argument) as soon as

possible, to examine the scientific facts, related only to

“increasing CO2 could cause harmful manmade-globalwarming”, not if there is a global warming or not.

4- Although the defendants had more than 7 months to present

their disputes to Farag’s proofs without filing any opposition,

and the appeals rules don’t allow introducing new materials,

Farag asks this Court to give them and any supporters of the

Hoax, an exceptional opportunity to bring their “scientists” that

support the Hoax to prove (argue) that the Hoax is not a hoax.

However, Farag believes that no one will dare to come to prove

that the Hoax is not a hoax.

5- Farag believes that once the proponents of the Hoax define

some terms and answer few questions, he will be able to prove

that the Hoax is a hoax, within few minutes, which will save a

lot of time and resources.

6- WHEREFORE, Plaintiff-Appellant Tarek Farag

respectfully asks this Honorable Court to have an urgent

hearing to know the reality of the Hoax, and for other relief as

this Court feels proper and just.

Respectfully submitted this December 2, 2024.

Plaintiff: TAREK FARAG, pro se.

411 N WARWICK AVE, WESTMONT, IL 60559

Phone: 630 709 3965

Email: tarekfaragusa@hotmail.com, tarekfarag@comcast.net

PROOF OF SERVICE

On 12/1/2024, I, Tarek Farag on oath states that I served the

above Motion by Email to all the Counsels on record, and they

will be served by the Clerk using the CM/ECF system.

Executed on December 2, 2024.

a ae

Plaintiff: TAREK FARAG, pro se.

411 N Warwick Ave, WestmonT,

IL 60559

Phone: 630 709 3965

Email: tarekfaragusa(@hotmail.com

VERIFICATION BY CERTIFICATION

Under penalties as provided by law, the undersigned certifies

that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and

correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information

and belief and as to such matters the undersigned certifies as

aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

Executed on December 2, 2024.

Plaintiff: TAREK FARAG, pro se.

411 N Warwick Ave, WestmonT,

IL 60559

Phone: 630 709 3965

Email: tarekfaragusa@hotmail.com

10

Case: 24-2998 Document: 10 Filed: 12/02/2024 Pages: 11

Appellate Case No.: 24-2998

IN THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT APPELLATE COURT

APPEAL FROM NORTHERN DISTRICT COURT OF

ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

TAREK FARAG, pro se

Plaintiff-Appellant District Civil Case No

‘e 1:24-cv-02728

JOSEPH BIDEN, ET AL

Judge: Honorable

Defendants-Appellees. JEREMY C. DANIEL

MOTION TO RECONSIDER (REHEARING) THE

ORDER OF 11/21/2024 [duc. 9], DENYING FARAG’S

REQUEST TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY

AND SUMMARILY AFFIRMING DISTRICT COURT’S

DENIAL OF FARAG’S MOTION FOR A

DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Plaintiff-Appellant Tarek Farag (hereinafter Farag), pro se,

states the following under oath:

Note: Farag is not disputing global warming, he is disputing

that CO2 increase could cause it.

1- The Seventh Circuit Appellate Court (hereinafter 7ACrt)

erred in denying Farag’s request to file electronically, knowing

that he is already using the CM/ECF system and receiving all

the documents electronically. This denial violated the mandates

to file all court documents electronically whenever possible,

and his right to be heard. It obstructs his right to access

justice, increases his costs dramatically, and will certainly

delay his filing with the potential to be permanently lost due to

the terrible service of the USPS (he already complained about).

Even, if there is any objection to grant his request, he has the

right to know and defend himself.

1

2- The 7ACrt didn’t rule on the declaratory relief, Judge’s

disqualification, or other issues.

3- The 7ACrt order didn’t state in specificity the reasons for

its decision, which is against Farag’s right to know and defend

himself.

4- The 7ACrt erred in affirming the District Court’s decision

summarily without considering all the evidence, and not

considering them in the light most favorable to Farag.

5- The 7ACrt stated “Summary disposition is appropriate . .

‘when the position of one party is so clearly correct as a matter

of law - -”’, which applies in this case to Farag’s benefits.

Farag stated clearly in his complaint since April 2024, that he

is seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, served all the

defendants with his motion [40], allowing sufficient time to

respond. Up until now, NONE of the defendants filed any

opposition, even, during the hearing of 10/22/24, making it

very clear that they offer no opposition. The only opposition

was from H.J. Daniel, who used his own knowledge, which

disqualifies him, because he violated U.S.Code § 455:

(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United

States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in

which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

(b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following

circumstances:

(1) Where he has a personal bias or prejudice

concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed

evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding;

H.J. Daniel was required to rule on what is already in the

record, didn’t present any evidence whatsoever to support his

position, was unable to dispute any of the facts Farag

demonstrated, didn’t recognize the evidence in the motion [40],

wrongfully concluded that the motion [40] “to be frivolous and

misleading”, and testified on behalf of the defendants that “I

think it is fairly well-settled that climate change is a thing, and

it is happening”, without providing any evidence

12

“I am denying your motion, docket entry 40. You asked

the Court to declare that manmade global warning due

to burning fossil fuel has no scientific basis and is a

hoax. And I find that contention that there is no

scientific basis to be frivolous and misleading. While

parties may agree or scientists may disagree as to the

extent, I think it is fairly well-settled that climate change

is a thing, and it is happening, and you haven't

presented any evidence whatsoever to support your

statement that there is no scientific basis, or that issues

of manmade global warming, as you frame it, are a

hoax’’.[80 p 9]

Additionally, there is nothing in science “well-settled” by a

large number of people, there is always doubts and scientific

research to verify the theories. Honest scientists focus more on

the things that oppose their theories. Michelson and Morley

(1887) came to the brilliant idea of measuring the absolute

speed and direction of the earth in apace. They were surprised

not to get any results within the accuracy of their equipment. It

was easy for them to make up findings that the earth is moving

in some dangerous direction at tremendous speed to a

catastrophic end, within hundreds or thousands of years (so

that no one can verify it), causing chaos, just to become

famous. Instead, they presented their failures to the world and

to other scientists to repeat their measurements and explain the

failures, which lead to the discovery of Einstein's theory of

relativity. Ironically, during the hearing of 10/22/24, there were

few cases asking for injunctions, H.J. Daniel verified only that

all the parties were served and granted them all.

6- H.J. Daniel stated “J find that contention that there is no

scientific basis to be frivolous and misleading” [80]. This is

exactly the opposite of the declaration Farag asked him to do

(he declared the Hoax is real). He claimed that he lacks the

authority to make this declaration against the powerful

people, but can do it - with certification - against the tiny

Farag[88]. This certification didn’t add anything new, it was a

13

quick preemptive strike to block Farag’s appeal, in response

to his motion stating “3- Farag is expeditiously and diligently

appealing that denial entered on 10/22/2024, and working very

hard, under tremendous pressure, to file his appellant’s brief,

hopefully before 11/22/2024 (he received the transcript of

proceedings just yesterday 1 1/18/2024).”[87|. H.J. Daniel

became a defendant, defending his order by accusing

Farag of “a frivolous effort to block the normal progress of

litigation” [88], which is clearly the opposite of Farag’s

intentions and actions. Farag was taking the issues with

the utmost urgency and quickly ordered the transcript

before (quickly) filing his notice of appeal [79].

7- The reason Farag sued this large number of defendants

knowing that he doesn’t have the financial resources or the

legal skills that would allow him to defeat the well trained

and highly skilled lawyers, in a Court that usually

considers the pro se plaintiffs as angry persons that have

no idea about the law. It was to give the opportunity to the

largest number of people to dispute his findings and to

prove that the Hoax is not a hoax. This is why Farag was

avoiding the high expenses of serving the defendants using

expensive methods. He could have sued few officials with

certified mail, and after winning the case it will be easy for

him to sue all the possible defendants, which could include

more than one third of all the elected officials.

8- H.J. Daniel was concerned about the political effects of

the issues. He thought that Farag was “trying to use the

Court to make political statements” [80 p 7}. And was not

willing to grant the declaratory and injunctive relief “You

ask me to enjoin the government from enforcing all the

actions to combat global warming, that seems to be a

policy choice, that is beyond the scope of this Court's

jurisdiction.” [80 p 9]. In reality, Farag exhausted all the

administrative, political, and scientific venues to fight the

14

Hoax, and dedicated almost all his time and resources for

this fight, even on the expense of his personal finances. It

started before Obama’s declaration (that there is a global

warming causing see level to rise (around 2016)), which

was the turning point (since higher temperature will cause

more evaporation that would cause see level to go down).

The record is clear that Farag contacted the UN Secretary

General and the defendants trying to resolve the issue (few

are presented in [1 914 to 416]). However, he discovered

that he was facing a very powerful International Criminal

Enterprise and very corrupt officials that can squash him

into nothing. The only venue for him was to use whatever

integrity left in the judicial system before collapsing, to

stop the Hoax. Even, if there were political relief available,

H.J. Daniel should have granted it, as 28U.S.Code §

2201(a) states: “- -any court - - may declare the rights and

other legal relations of any interested party seeking such

declaration, whether or not further relief is or could be

sought’. Yes, such relief has huge legal, political,

economical, scientific, and social impacts. The lies of the

Hoax goes beyond criminal.

9- Farag and other interested non-party people were instructed

to use Webex to watch the hearing on 10/22/24, using the link

https://us—courts.webex.com/meet/Judge_ Daniel [42]. Farag

tested it before the hearing to find out that it didn’t work,

but he was assured that it will be active on the hearing

time, which didn’t happen, and no one was able to watch

the hearing, or figure out why. Farag participated in the

hearing using the phone that had a bad connection, which

resulted in many errors as evident frum the transcript [80].

Farag tried to check the errors with the court reporter, but

H.J. Daniel assumed that Farag is trying to change the

transcript [89].

10- H.J. Daniel is not the only judge that thinks that the

15

Hoax is real. The three Justices: Breyer, Sotomayor, and

Kagan (hereinafter Dissenters), of SCOTUS believed and

acted without any scientific evidence in the record that

connects the global warming to CO2 absorption. In their

dissenting opinion (West Virginia, et al., v. EPA, et al. 597

U.S. - - (2022) ) stated:

Today, the Court strips the Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) of the power Congress gave it to respond

to “the most pressing environmental challenge of our time.

Climate change ’s causes and dangers are no longer

subject to serious doubt. Modern science is

“ynequivocal that human influence ”— in particular, the

emission of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide— “has

warmed the atmosphere, ocean cnd land.”

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Sixth

Assessment Report. The Earth is now warmer than at

any time “in the history of modern civilization, ” with

the six warmest years on record all occurring in the last

decade. The rise in temperatures brings with it

“increases in heat-related deaths,” “coastal inundation

and erosion,” “more frequent and intense hurricanes,

floods, and other extreme weather events,” “drought,”

“destruction of ecosystems”, and “potentially

significant disruptions of food production.” If the

current rate of emissions continues, children born this

year could live to see parts of the Eastern seaboard

swallowed by the ocean. Rising waters, scorching heat,

and other severe weather conditions could force “mass

migration events[,] political crises, civil unrest,” and

“even state failure.” Dept. of Defense, Climate Risk

Analysis 8 (2021)(not the job of the army). And by the

end of this century, climate change could be the cause of

“4.6 million excess yearly deaths.

- - The majority complains that a similar definition—

cited to the Solicitor General’s brief but originally from

16

another dictionary—is just too darn broad.

-- If the majority is not distinguishing between

technological controls and all others, what is it doing -

and how far does its opinion constrain EPA? - - The

majority makes no effort to say. And because that is so,

the majority cannot even attempt to ground its limit in

the statutory language.

The majority today goes beyond those sensible

principles - - -

And last Term, the Court concluded that the Centers for

Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) lacked the

power to impose a nationwide eviction moratorium. -(?).

We said then: “[T]here is nothing counterintuitive to

the notion that EPA can curtail the emission of

substances that are putting the global climate out of

kilter."’ It is EPA (that's the Environmental Protection

Agency, in case the majority forgot) acting to address

the greatest environmental challenge of our time.

And if the majority thinks those constraints do not

really constrain, then it has a much bigger problem - -.

Or take an even more technological-sounding

approach: the use of carbon-capture equipment. Order

the installation of that equipment, the Trump

administration concluded, and the “exorbitant” costs

“would almost certainly force the closure” of all

affected “coal-fired power plants”

-- Whatever else this Court may know about, it does

not have a CLUE about how to address climate change.

And let’s say the obvious: The stakes here are high. Yet

the Court today prevents congressionally authorized

agency action to curb powerplants’ carbon dioxide

emissions. The Court appoints itself—instead of

Congress or the expert agency—the decision-maker on

climate policy. I cannot think of many things more

frightening.

17

The Dissenters raised the issue of “ carbon-capture

equipment”, which is one of the most egregiously illogical

thing the proponents of the Hoax are promoting that if

they were successful they will kill life on earth. Capturing

CQ2 is exactly what the plants do. They capture CO2 into

carbohydrates (food), store the sun’s energy (better than a

battery), and cool the environment (opposite of the Hoax’s

claims). Farag is not a legal expert, but at least he can see

that the Dissenters are using strange language, which is

more political than legal. Using the Dissenters’ language,

Farag cannot think of many things more frightening than

having just one Justice of SCOTUS not ruling according to

the law. However, the more frightening thing happened,

when a Justice was appointed because she is a woman

while she/he/ they don’t know why she/he/they is/are a

woman. Farag would never accept a job based solely on

his gender, origin, or other discriminatory criteria.

11- Farag appreciates the quick ruting of this Appellate

Court, as the certificate of H.J. Daniel was filed on

11/20/24 and its ruling was issued and filed quickly on

11/21/24, which reflects the urgency and the importance

this Court gives to the issues. However, Farag believes

that its Judges have the same opinion as H.J. Daniel and

the Dissenters that the Hoax is real and settled. When

they “carefully reviewed the record in the district court,

the record on appeal, and Farag’s motion’ [9], they were

required to act according to a presumption that H.J.

Daniel was correct. However, they ignored the evidence

presented in {3 to 49 of the Motion [40], which are the

undisputed numbers and the equation of CO2 absorption.

This Court made errors: 1) Ignored the evidence in the

Motion and the record. 2) Made a summary ruling not in

the light most favorable to Farag. 3) Ignored the fact that

no defendant cared or dared to oppose the Motion. 4)

18

Made a ruling based on their opinions and personal

knowledge, without evidence, or support from the existing

record, violating U.S. Code § 455.5) Showed an

appearance of impartiality.

12- On 5/28/24, Farag filed a motion [7] expressing his

concerns that H.J. Daniel could appear impartial, as he was

appointed and recommended to the bench by three of the most

powerful POLITICAL defendants: President Biden, and the

Senators Durbin and Duckworth.

13- HJ. Daniel should have disqualified himself, as the

Supreme Court held that disqualification of a judge is

appropriate when he or she reasonably should have known

that the situation created an appearance of impropriety,

even if the judge was not actually aware of the details of

the situation. Liljeberg v. Health Svcs. Acq. Corp., 486

U.S. 847 (1988).

14- The appealed issues have great importance and

urgency because: 1) they cover the past and future ruling

of SCOTUS related to global warming; 2) it is very urgent

to stop the egregious and illogical actions like capturing

CO2, or spreading reflectors in the atmosphere to prevent

sun’s energy from reaching the earth, which could kill life;

3) to stop destroying our economy; and 4) to stop the huge

waste of about $2 millions/hour of our money (not

government’s money). In case that this Court decide to

affirm the lower Court’s order, then it should certify the

appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States pursuant

to Ill. Sup. Ct. R. 316.

15- AsH.J. Daniel raised questions about Farag’s

standing without ruling that he has no standing, it is

important to clarify this here. To establish his standing and

that he suffered an injury in fact, Farag showed that he

actually (not theoretically) is paying extra money and

reducing his standard of living due to enforcing the Hoax.

19

For many years, Farag was paying about 17% extra money

on all his electric bills (injury in fact not theoretical). For

zero carbon emission, zero emission standard, carbon free

energy resource, etc. (directly related to enforcing the

Hoax) [21 Exh C5], [40 2], [80 p 6]. These injuries would

be eliminated by declaring that the Hoax has no

scientific basis and will be stopped by the requested

injunction. Which satisfied all the elements of standing.

Hence, H.J. Daniel should have issued the requested

declaration pursuant to 28 U.S. Code § 2201(a) “declare

the rights and other legal relations of any interested party

seeking such declaration”. Additionally, Farag stated in his

Motion many additional actual damages from the

enforcement of the Hoax. Due to imposing restrictions and

regulations to reduce the available carbon- based fuel

resulting in an increase in electricity rates, while wasting

our money to subsidize the implementation of other forms

of energy like electric cars, solar and wind energy, etc.

The price of natural gas increased from $0.0485/Therm to

$0.2134, the price of gasoline was doubled [40 p 2].

Because the cost of transportation is a large factor in the

cost of almost everything, an increase in fuel prices

increased the costs of: insurance, car prices, car

maintenance, food, medicine, rent, etc. Moreover, our

Federal Government is wasting $45,200,000 per day

that should have been used to improve our lives [40 p 2].

All the above stated injuries and their relationship to the

Hoax and the ability to remedy them by a declaratory and

injunctive relief, didn’t convince H.J. Daniel as he stated

“T don't see the connection between the declaration you are

asking me to make and your injuries” [80 p 6].

16- Farag tried to explain the fraud behind the Hoax in a

very simple way to allow people with a calculator and low

level of education to understand it. In his motion [40 43]

20

he put the scientific equation of radiation absorption in a

simple form instead of its scientific standard form:

I=I,e © ; where I the intensity of radiation at

distance L W/m’; Ip the intensity of radiation at the origin

W/m”; C is the absorption coefficient m’': and L is the

distance in meters. Taking the example of the strong

absorption of CO2 with the current concentration of 400

ppm at its band of 15 um, CO2 fully absorbs the IR in

about 10 m (assume full absorption is Ip/1 100 for CL=7).

Then doubling CO2 would double the absorption

coefficient (C). Using a calculator, this IR will be fully

absorbed in about 5 m, or at 10 m its intensity would be

Ip/1202604. Hence, doubling CO2 reduces the absorption

distance to its half, reduce the intensity of radiation at the

same distance by a factor of 1,202,604! but will never

increase the amount of radiation I as the proponents of

the Hoax claim. To explain more the falsity of the Hoax,

we look at a similar situation for driving at night using

car’s headlights (represent Earth’s emitted IR). When there

is a small amount of fog (small CO2 concentration) the

visible distance is limited by the fog concentration, when

the fog’s concentration increases (CO2 increases) the

visible distance decreases (CO2 full absorption distance

decreases) NOT to increase the intensity of the headlights

(not to increase the IR emitted from the Earth), When

someone claims that adding 2 gm of flour to 2500 gm of

sugar, would double the energy content compared to

adding 1 gm of flour, the easiest way to verify this, is to

measure the energy content of each individually. Anyone

can understand these explanation and their numbers,

however, the Hoax’s promoters are using scary tactics to

manipulate the facts pretending that scientists only can

understand it.

17- Farag stated more evidence in his Motion [40] that

21

you don’t need to be a scientist to know that it is

impossible for the Earth receiving 160 W/m’ to emit more

than 398 W/m? [40 96]. Or to know that it is impossible

for an incoming energy of 340 W/m’ could be absorbed as

399 W/m’ [40 96]. All you need to know is that 398 is

more than 160, and 399 is more than 340.

18- You don’t need to be a scientist or a legal expert to

know that: 1) For IPCC to adjust (fabricate) the

measurements to prove their faulty theory, and to validate

their faulty models, is a FRAUD [40 7], 2) For NASA to

knowingly repeat, or be the source of IPCC’s fraud, is also

a fraud [40 8], and, 3) For anyone to knowingly hide the

truth, and the facts presented by the real experts, and

publishes lies instead, is committing a crime [40 48].

19- The record makes the position of all the parties very

clear including H.J. Daniel’s. In reality, H.J. Daniel is the best

witness to testify to prove how the defendants manipulated

his thinking to believe that the true scientific facts and

numbers Farag presented are lies and “ to be frivolous and

misleading”, but the Hoax is real and “is happening”.

20- WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Tarek Farag, pro se,

respectfully requests that this Honorable Court Order the

following:

1) Declare that the Man-Made-Global-Warming due to

burning fossil fuel has no scientific basis and is a

destructive Hoax;

2) Invalidate all the laws, administrative orders,

regulations, subsidiaries, etc. to enforce the Hoax;

3) Enjoin the government from enforcing the Hoax; Or in

the alternative:

4) Certify the appeal to the Supreme Court Of The United

States pursuant to Rule 319; and

5) Take any additional actions this Honorable Court sees

22

as proper and just.

Respectfully submitted this November 29, 2024.

Plaintiff: TAREK FARAG, pro se.

411 N WARWICK AVE, WESTMONT, IL 60559

Phone: 630 709 3965

Email: tarekfaragusa@hotmail.com, tarekfarag@comcast.net

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIENCE

The undersigned, Plaintiff-Appellant, Tarek Farag, furnishes

the following in compliance with F.R.A.P Rule 32(a)(7):

I hereby certify that this brief conforms to the rules contained

in F.R.A.P Rule 32(a)(7) for a brief produced with a

proportionally spaced font. The length of this brief is (3668 )

words.

Dated 11/29/2024. -

Plaintiff: TAREK FARAG, pro se.

411 N WARWICK AVE, WESTMONT, IL 60559

Phone: 630 709 3965

PROOF OF SERVICE

On 11/29/2024, I, Tarek Farag on oath states that I served the

stated “Motion to Reconsider” by Email to all the Counsels on

record, and they will served by the Clerk using the CM/ECF

system.

Executed on November 29, 2024.

ed fae

Plaintiff: TAREK FARAG, pro se.

411 N Warwick Ave, WestmonT, IL 60559

Phone: 630 709 3965

Email: tarekfaragusa@hotmail.com

VERIFICATION BY CERTIFICATION

Under penalties as provided by law, the undersigned certifies

that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and

correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information

and belief and as to such matters the undersigned certifies as

aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

Executed on November 29, 2024.

Plaintiff: TAREK FARAG, pro se.

411 N Warwick Ave, WestmonT, IL

60559

Phone: 630 709 3965

Email: tarek faragusa@hotmail.com

24

Case: 1:24-cv-02728 Document #: 104 Filed: 12/31/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:372

Case: 24-2998 Document: 00714494664 Filed: 12/31/2024 Pages: 2

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Everett McKinley Dirksen Office of the Clerk

United States Courthouse Phone: (312) 435-5850

Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn www.ca7.uscourts. gov

Street Chicago, Illinois 60604

CERTIFIED COPY

ORDER

November 21, 2024

Before

DIANE S. SYKES, Chief Judge

JOHN Z. LEE, Circuit Judge

DORIS L. PRYOR, Circuit Judge

TAREK FARAG,

Plaintiff - Appellant

Vv.

No. 24-2998 JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., et al.,

Defendants - Appellees

Originating Case Information:

District Court No: 1:24-cv-02728

Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division

District Judge Jeremy C. Daniel

The following is before the court: MOTION TO ALLOW

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY

USING THE CM/ECF SYSTEM, filed on November 19, 2024,

by the pro se appellant.

This matter comes before the court for its consideration

upon the request of appellant Tarek Farag for leave to

become an electronic filer, received by this court on

November 19, 2024.

This court has carefully reviewed the record in the district

court, the record on appeal, and Farag’s motion. Based on

this review, the court has determined that any issues that

could be raised are insubstantial and that further briefing

would not be helpful to the court’s consideration of the

issues. See Mather v. Village of Mundelein, 869 F.2d 356,

357-58 (7th Cir. 1989) (court may summarily decide case

where no member believes briefing would be useful).

“Summary disposition is appropriate . . . “when the

position of one party is so clearly correct as a matter of

law that no substantial question regarding the outcome of

the appeal exists.’” Williams v. Chrans, 42 F.3d 1137,

1139 (7th Cir. 1994) (quoting Joshua v. United States, 17

F.3d 378, 380 (Fed. Cir. 1994)). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED and that the

district court’s denial of Farag’s motion for a preliminary

injunction is summarily AFFIRMED.

26

Case: 1:24-cv-02728 Document #: 97 Filed: 12/09/24 Page | of | PagelD #:361

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois - CM/ECF NextGen

1.8 (rev. 1.8.1)

Eastern Division

Tarek Farag

Plaintiff, Case No.: 1:24-cv—02728

Vv. Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel

Joseph Biden, et al.

Defendant

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday,

December 9, 2024:

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel:

The plaintiff's motion for an extension of time [95] is

denied. The plaintiff previously claimed that his pending

appeal required more time to respond to the motions filed

by various defendants in his case. The Seventh Circuit

ruled on that appeal on November 21, 2024, leaving the

plaintiff free to focus on the motions filed in the district

court. All deadlines stand. The motion hearing is stricken.

Mailed notice. (vcf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was generated by CM/ECF, the

automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and criminal

dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is

enclosed, please refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and

other information, visit our web sile al www.ilnd.uscourts. gov.

[OCR skipped on page(s) 31-110]

[Read from a scan; the first 30 pages.]