Documents

Reply Brief — Moody v. Texas

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1978

(See Pet. pp. 24-27) It is the general principle of statutory law that a statute must be definite and certain to be valid. … State of Pennsylvania, 387 U.S. 399, 86 S.Ct. 518. It is also clear that an unconstitutional statute is void and unenforceable and has no legal effect. Miller v.

Opposition — Freedman v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1976

C) is reported at 399 F. Supp. 668. JURISDICTION The judgment of the court of appeals was entered on January 8, 1976. … On the basis of the evidence offered at the hearing held on July 24, 1975, the district court had substantially accepted petitioner’s claim of exclusive access to and control over the firm’s records

Opinion — James v. Strange

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1972

State recoupment laws, notwithstanding the state In- terests they may serve, need: not blight in such. dis- criminatory fashion the hopes of indigents — self- 24 Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. … Alabama, 399 U. S. 1 (1970); Mempa v. Rhay, 389 U. S. 128 (1967); United States v. Wade, 388 U. S. 218 ee Miranda v. Anzona, 384 U. - 436 (1966).

Supplemental Memorandum for Respondent — Young v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Memorandum for Respondent · 1942

| «- 2119 F. 24 399. , eter Young, alias Young Lup, )On Writ of Certiorari, to © —_ a —~ eds Young vs. United States. The Government confessed error and we brought the case here.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Karl Cotton, aka Karl Cornelius-Cotton, Petitioner v. Supreme Court of the United States, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 18, 2017

Am., Inc., 399 F.3d 745, 749 (6th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, we DENY the motion for costs and AFFIRM the district court's judgment. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Deborah S. … That occurred, it appears from Plaintiffs timeline and other materials (ECF No. 1, PagelD.24; ECF No. 1-1, PagelD.52-65) about a year ago, on September 28, 2015.

Application — In Re Daniel Clate Acker, Applicant

Supreme Court brief · Application · Sep 24, 2018

Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986). PRAYER FOR RELIEF For the reasons above and for those stated in his accompanying Original Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Mr. … Dated: September 24, 2018. Respectfully submitted, s/s A. Richard Ellis ________________ A.

Application — Robert Fratta, Applicant v. Texas

Supreme Court brief · Application · Jan 6, 2023

Fratta , 2007 WL 2872698, at *24. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986) (plurality op.); see also Wainwright v.

Emergency Application — Richard Gerald Jordan, Applicant v. Mississippi

Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Jun 20, 2025

a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court has been denied or the time for filing such petition has expired, the court shall set an 4 execution date…”); See also Pet. for Cert. in No. 24 … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986). Additionally, a stay of execution is necessary to facilitate a thorough and meaningful review, protecting that same due process right.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Yale Broadcasting Company v. Federal Communications Commission

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973

Leeann 24 The high degree of exigency required has most recently been pointed out by this Court in Vale v Louisiana, 399 US 30 (1970), where the dissent proposed the general rule that warrantless … Chambers v Maroney, 399 US 42 (1970).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Rudy Mario Flores, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 29, 2025

Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970) .................................................................... 34 Zherka v. … Flores, No. 24-50459 (5th Cir. June 30, 2025) (per curiam), is reproduced at Pet.

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Cambridge Loan & Building Co.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1928

Oh 24. R «. $921 “ve Tete V Let NN Cem Se fol) Nes. Act of Mar 24, 3955 x hl at Je he ’ | ad . \S ¢ th GF Ave 18 Se Jono ‘ ole Comp 1. pops eo Tele 1% I Pew \ ‘> ! … Sec 24 \ Comp Stop 333 N M., See. $27, Se 1915. N. ¥., See, 388 Cons ha? NOD. Sec S120. Comp LL. 1973.

Jurisdictional Statement — Dowdle v. New York

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1966

Estimated time to reach the Court of Appeals: Eighteen (18) to Twenty-four (24) months. Outlook:-Fair to good, for a New Trial. … J. 399, 217 A. 2d 441 (1966).

Reply Brief — Hotel & Motel Ass'n v. City of Oakland

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2004

Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923)). … Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 736-8000 Counsel for Petitioners May 24, 2004 * Counsel of Record

Jurisdictional Statement — Ginocchi v. Burrell School District

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1986

.: Is 24 Purdon's Statutes Sect. 11-1151 governing demotions of a school's tenured professional employees in Pennsylvania so vague as to be unconstitutional? … Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399, i> L.EG.2d 447. 15 Vague laws offend several important values ....

Petition for Rehearing — Carrie Rae Eldridge, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · Nov 9, 2021

Neff, 95 US 733, 24 L.Ed. 565........................... 9 Stanton u. Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103 (1916).................................. 11 State v. … Howbert; 231 U.S. 399, at 416417 (1913), and later, Bowers v. Kerbaugh-Empire H Co., 271 U.S. 170 (1926).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Villages, Inc. v. Metropolitan Development Commission

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1985

I a a alate aes cent lainmacctanisnsnal 24 Drummond v. … Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923), is at stake in this case.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Timothy Fitzgerald Tolliver, Petitioner v. Cameron Harvanek, Warden

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 12, 2025

Case 5:24-cv-00104-PRW Document 6 Filed 03/19/24 Page 4 of 9 recommendation). … Delo, 513 U.S. 298, 327 (1995)); accord McQuiggin k Perkins, 569 U.S. at 399 (applying the same standard to petitions asserting actual innocence as a gateway to raise habeas claims that are time-barred

Opinion — Union Pacific R. Co. v. Laramie Stock Yards Co.

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1913

Heth. 3 Cranch, 399, 413; Reynolds v. McArthur, 2 Pet. 417: United States v. American Sugar Refining Co., 202 U. S. 963, 577; Winfree, Admr., v. Northern Pac. Railway Co., 227 U.S. 296. … on considering the act of June 24, 1912. as one of limitation.

Petitioners Brief — Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2007

BAP 2003).... 10, 13, 24 In re Noll, 172 B.R. 122 (Bkrtcy.M.D.Fla. 1994) ......... 16, 17 In re Ponzini, 277 B.R. 399 (Bkrtcy.D.Ar. 2002)................ 18 In re Snyder, 279 B.R. 1 (1" Cir. … No. 95-989, at 94 (1978) .......ccccccccccccccceeeeeeeees 12, 20 Rules a 26 TE NE 24 ee 24 Fed.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Munro v. Socialist Workers Party

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986

Supp. 399 (M.D.Ala. 1984) Libertarian Party of Florida 5 v. State of Florida, 710 F.2d 790 (llth Cir. 1983) Libertarian Party of Nebraska 5 v. Beerman. 598 F. Supp. 57 (D. … Feb. 24, 1986) (No. 85-964).