Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersbriefs

10,000+ results

1.90s

  • Emergency Application — TikTok Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General

    Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Dec 16, 2024

    (cleaned up). … users outside the United States, where the Act’s prohibitions do not apply, we would need a period of lead time to work closely with our service providers.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Columbia Falls Aluminum Company, LLC, Petitioner v. Atlantic Richfield Company

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 12, 2023

    As a result, on December 4, 1996, EPA issued a Notice of Violation to CFAC for violation of Section 301(a) of the federal Clean Water Act for the unauthorized discharge of cyanide-contaminated seepage … and steam cleaning, non-process wastewater from the fabrication shop steam cleaning, and stormwater beginning in the early 1960s.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Board of Airport Commissioners v. Jews for Jesus, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986

    The Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 aplies only to cases of actual controversy.’’ … No such franchise, permit, or license shall be made for a term or period greater than fifty (50) years, nor shall any such lease be made for a term or period greater than the term permitted by state

    479 U.S. 812
  • Emergency Application — TikTok, Inc. and ByteDance Ltd., Applicant v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General.

    Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Dec 16, 2024

    (cleaned up). … users outside the United States, where the Act’s prohibitions do not apply, we would need a period of lead time to work closely with our service providers.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mexicana Airlines v. Wolgel

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1987

    This case also involves §404(b) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 which provides: No air carrier or foreign air carrier shall make, give, or cause any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage … Magnolia Petroleum Co., 357 U.S. 221 (1958) (iimitations period of Jones Act applied to a seaworthiness action under general admiralty law); Occidental Life Insurance Co. v.

    484 U.S. 927
  • Opposition Brief — Randall Wayne Mays, Petitioner v. Texas

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Oct 9, 2019

    A trial court abuses its discretion by acting “without reference to any guiding rules and principles” or where “the act was arbitrary or unreasonable.” Downer v. … Price’s own notes capture the following comments Mays made to Dr.

  • Reply Brief for the Petitioner — Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief for the Petitioner · 1949

    Nor did the Commission ev idence any embarrassment in fixing ‘‘rates’’ for past periods, as well as prospectively, under the Air Mail Acts (Pet. Br., pp.. 96-59). … Air Maid Acts airline- were not required by Taw to carry the mail. (Res.

    336 U.S. 601
  • Appendix — Cooper v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1984

    It is appro- 39/ In United Air Lines, Inc. v. … Her ability to work on the machine was confined to cleaning.

    467 U.S. 867
  • Appendix — Milwaukee v. Illinois

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1981

    ” $ 505(h). 20 Clean Water Act of 1977, P.L. 95-217, 91 Stat. 1566 (to be codified 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 et seq.). … The 1972 Amendments An analysis of the 1972 amendments of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act clearly shows that Congress in no way in- I Similarly, the Supreme Court, in construing the Clean Air

    451 U.S. 304
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. Sun Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998

    Transport Workers Union, 451 U.S. 77 (1981) (Title VII/Equal Pay Act). With the enactment of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (“SARA”), Pub. L. … A judgment has its own procedural safeguards, and CERCLA settle- ments are subject to publication in the Federal Register and a 30-day notice and comment period. 42 U.S.C. § 9622(i).

    522 U.S. 1113
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — George Sheetz, Petitioner v. County of El Dorado, California

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 17, 2023

    City & Cnty. of San Francisco, 41 P.3d 87, 105 (Cal. 2002) 16 (cleaned up, emphasis added). … , or an act “generally applicable” to a broad group.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Donnie Lowe, Petitioner v. Rick Raemisch, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 9, 2018

    This case is an ideal vehicle for considering the question presented because the record is clean and the decisions below reasoned. … Because the record is clean and the decisions below reasoned, this case is an ideal vehicle for considering the question presented. I.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Citizens for the Appropriate Placement of Telecommunications Facilities v. Federal Communications Commission

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001

    It ordered local governments to act on any request for authorization to place transmitting facilities within a “reasonable period of time,” 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(ii), App. … Circuit has recently ruled that Sections 108 and 109 of the Clean Air Act, as construed by the EPA, effect “an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power” because the agency had “articulated no

    531 U.S. 1070
  • Opposition Brief — Volkema v. Michigan

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1998

    . - -vii- Statutes Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et SG.......cccccessesseseeeeenes 7 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1344... cccccccccscsceeseeeneeees 13 Executive Reorganization Order 1995-18, … In addition to these cases, and of particular relevance to the underlying case, are a series of takings cases based on actions taken by the federal government under the Clean Water Act ("CWA"), 33 U.S.C

    525 U.S. 1040
  • Opposition Brief — Ballard v. Albright

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1996

    The Age Discrimi- nation in Employment Act provides that an employer does not violate the Act by terminating an employee “based on reasonable factors other than age,” or “for good cause.” 29 U.S.C. … The airport terminal building was infested with mice and needed general cleaning. TR 142-43, S.A. 37-38.

    519 U.S. 809
  • Reply Brief — Limtiaco v. Camacho

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2007

    Delta Air Lines, Inc., 367 U.S. 316, 326- 327 (1961), and has further endorsed the D.C. Circuit's judicial-economy rationale, see, ¢.g., Stone v. … controls over financial operations” and has been unable to achieve clean audit reports, GAO, U.S. Insular Areas: Economic, Fiscal, and Financial Accountability Challenges 30 (Dec. 2006).

    549 U.S. 483
  • Respondents Brief — APC Investment Co., et al., Petitioners v. Howmet Aerospace Inc., fka Arconic, Inc., et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · May 13, 2021

    Nor does it remotely capture what the court of appeals decided here. 13 The dispute in Guam concerns whether, in a settlement between the United States and Guam under the Clean Water Act, Guam accrued … Water Act).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Laura Smith, as Duly Appointed Representative and Independent Administrator of the Estate of Andrea Manfredi, Deceased, et al., Petitioners v. The Boeing Company, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 5, 2025

    For example, the 737 MAX air crash at issue produced 87 wrongful death actions. … Servs., LLC, 565 U.S. 368, 380 (2012) (cleaned up).

  • Opposition Brief — Brink's Co. v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2005

    9701 et seq.): RMA OEY 8605 bude dbcdus sd secdineens 17 ea ED dwn 3 4045540500 54 nk en eeeees 3 BPA PUREE aed ap enededsnaewaainesans 17 26 U.S.C. 9701 note (§ 19142, 106 Stat. 3037) ..... 2 AiR … See 29 U.S.C. 1381-1461; Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v.

    544 U.S. 904
  • Joint Appendix — Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Ed. Fund, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1985

    When they are published, there will follow a thirty-day period for public comment. The comments may well result in changes to the proposed regulations. … Our Clean Air and Clean Water Proj- 402 ects are national programs which draw their support from members in every state.

    473 U.S. 788

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.