Documents

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Carl A. Robertson, Petitioner v. Interactive College of Technology, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 9, 2018

Once Robertson said he "believed that he was decisively underpaid," Petitioner's comments made a valid claim under the "Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act ("LLFPA"), which expands the statutory limitations periods … - (14) with Plaintiff's *annual reviews as written over a three-year period from 2009-2011 Plaintiff sincerely believed that due to the December 2011 comments to his annual review. and what he considered

Amicus Curiae Brief — Pozsgai v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

In a rever- sal of terms that is worthy of Alice In Wonder- land, the regulatory hydra which emerged from the Clean Water Act mandates in this case that a landowner who places clean fill dirt on a … air and water pollution, or other environmental hazards that may have effects in more than one state.”

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Douglas County v. Babbitt

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996

See, e.g., Pacific Legal Foundation, 657 F.2d at 834 n. 4 (actions under the Clean Air Act are categorically exempt from NEPA); Jones v. … Ruckelshaus, 467 F.2d 349, 359 (3rd Cir. 1972) (Clean | Air Act procedure should be used instead of NEPA), cert. denied, 409 l! U.S. 1125, 93 S.Ct. 937, 35 L.Ed.2d 256 (1973).

Supplemental Appendix — White Industries, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Co.

Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Appendix · 1988

A38 During the period at issue in this suit, Carthage Air- ways purchased 23 Cessna aircraft. … During the period at issue in this suit, Carthage Air- ways purchased 23 Cessna aircraft.

Petition — King v. Public Service Employees Local Union 572

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978

Gemini provides cleaning services for the kitchen at Fort Monroe, Virginia, a federal enclave. … Air Terminal Services, 85 F.Supp. 545, 548 (E.D. Va. 1949); Air Terminal Services, Inc. v. Rentzet et. al., 81 F.Supp. 611 (E.D. Va. 1949); Note, Federal Assimilative Crimes Act, 70 Harv. L.

Opposition Brief — West Virginia Univ. Hospitals, Inc. v. Casey

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991

This is true even if “the use of the experts was ‘indispen- sable to the determination of tthe case’ lFor example, the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7604(d), expressly provides for attorneys fees and … No one challenged this rule in the appeal before the Seventh Circuit, ibid., and that court's comments on the issue are therefore no more than dicta.° The Eighth Circuit in SapaNAJIN v.

Opposition Brief — Whitcomb v. Sanitary Commission of Anne Arundel County

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1970

allegation in petitioners’ first “question”, that the Court of Appeals “abused its discretion in refusing to grant a meaningful hearing”, appears on the record to be so pre- sumptuous as not to warrant comment … air” and to enjoy an unpolluted environment

Appendix — McCarthy v. Toussaint (Nos. 86-1587, 86-1588)

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1987

of time. 125. \_- Three months of this four-month reduction, Or a reduction based on this ration for any lesser period, shall be based upon forebearance from any act for which the prisoner could … cell, furnished with at least a bed, cot or bunk and a clean, untorn mattress, a clean, untorn blanket, a clean, untorn pillow, a 279.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Citizens for the Appropriate Placement of Telecommunications Facilities v. Federal Communications Commission

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

See for example, Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1316(c)(allowing states to enforce standards under the 11 Act if they are at least as stringent as the federal standards); Clean Air … (ii) A State or local government or instrumentality thereof shall act on any request for authorization to place, construct, or modify personal wireless service facilities within a reasonable period

Amicus Curiae Brief — Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

Cessna Air- craft Co., 665 S.W.2d 439 (Tex. 1984). … Co., 892 F.2d 378 (Sth Cir. 1990) (a lint-cleaning machine should have interlock device to shut off its rollers when guard is removed) (applying Louisiana law); Grover v.

Record and brief — Jeffrey Allen Muehleman v. Florida

Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1987

The propriety of prosecutorial comments must be examined in context. … Had hed over « twenty-day period numerous conversations, perhaps every day, with Mr.

Appellants Brief — Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana

Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1981

Air Act of 1970, Pub. … News 8232. 38 testimony and documentary evidence—was notably cur- sory. * Plaintiffs asserted that the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1970, Pub. L.

Amicus Brief — Kings County v. Santa Rosa Band of Indians

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1977

In addition, both federal law, Clean Air Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. $§ 1857 et seq., and state law, Cal. … Health and Safety Code $$ 24198 et seq., require the development of air pollu- tion control plans applicable only to specific geographical areas because of air pollution problems specifically related

Amicus Curiae Brief — National Republican Senatorial Committee, et al., Petitioners v. Federal Election Commission, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 28, 2025

Bellotti, 435 U.S. at 802 (Burger, C.J., concurring) (cleaned up). … Sorrell, 548 U.S. 230, 264 (2006) (Kennedy, J., concurring) (cleaned up).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — American Airlines, Inc. v. Criales

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1997

Trans World Air- lines, Inc., 455 U.S. 385, 397, 102 S. … acts and fraud/corruption.

Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Craven v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1951

There a brakeman had been employed only one day by the Seaboard Air Line Railway, but he had had some experience on railroads. … Negligence was charged for failure to furnish a pump to clean the basin; for failure to furnish protective clothing; and for failure to supply facilities for cleaning up and dis- posing of waste.

Appendix — Exportadora de Sal, S. A. de C. V. v. Sugimoto

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1994

Code § 646, Law Revision Comments (1970). … Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws § 175 comment d: “This list 1s not exclusive. Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws §6 comment c.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Boeing Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1988

A proposed regulation imposing such a limitation was published with an invitation for public comment, and the period for comment was extended beyond the usual 30 days. 24 Fed. … By request of the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association, the comment period was reopened for an additional 30 days on September 29, 1986 (51 FR 34520).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Weliver v. Board of Appeals, Maryland Department of Labor (No. 07-292)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007

Terrell Air Conditioning, 48 Md. App. 439, SE EF RE eiiisadeinctincneidulialnesnnlisueitasinedesaiaias 25 Weliver v. … Terrell Air Conditioning, 48 Md. App. 439, 442, 759 A.2d 1071, 1072-1073 (1981). To similar effect, in Beech Aircraft Corporation v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Ashley Moody, Attorney General of Florida, et al., Petitioners v. NetChoice, LLC, dba NetChoice, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 6, 2023

Reno, 521 U.S. at 850–51 (cleaned up). … For example, “YouTube removed over a billion comments in a three-month period in 2020.” Paxton, 49 F.4th at 487. That translates to YouTube removing over ten million comments a day.