Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.63s
Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2021
Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302, 324 (2014) (“We expect Congress to speak clearly if it wishes to assign to an agency decisions of vast economic and political significance.” (cleaned up)). … According to some, Congress is incapable of acting quickly in response to emergencies.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Friends of Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2000
No. 228, 101st Cong., Ist Sess. 373 (1989) "[t]he assessment of civil penalties for violations of the [Clean Air] Act [is] necessary for 16 deterrence, restitution and retribution").2 Thus, where … long period of time avoids any penalty for its violations.
528 U.S. 167Petitioners Brief — PDR Network, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Jan 8, 2019
As interpreted by the Fourth Circuit, the Hobbs Act would also raise a serious question about whether 6 This Court has not considered the constitutionality of provisions in the Clean Air Act and other … Air Act].”).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Air Act legislation and increasing competition from Western coal sources. … Pre-Coal Act History of Coal Industry Provided Rationale for Adoption of Coal Act A review of the history of the coal industry over the period of time from the 1940’s to the passage of the Coal Act
524 U.S. 498Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · Jan 4, 2023
Cir. 2005) (If the agency “effects a substantive change in the regulation, notice and comment are required.” (cleaned up)). 71. … First, they argue that Plaintiffs could not have suffered a procedural deprivation based on the lack of a notice-and-comment period because the HEROES Act expressly exempts the APA’s notice-and-comment
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Circuit decision to some stakeholders for comments. This policy acknowledges the impact of the D.C. … EPA regulations since 1985 have been based upon the interpretation that TMDLs may be expressed in periods longer than a twenty-four hour period. 50 Fed. Reg. 1779, 1776 (Jan. 11, 1985); 64 Fed.
Appendix — Water Works & Sewer Board of Birmingham v. Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1999
See Clean Water Act § 101(g), 33 U.S.C. § 1251(g). … Section 101(g) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C.
528 U.S. 951Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 15, 2026
Air Regul. Grp. v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302, 324 (2014). … But Applicants’ choice to put the substantive cart (modifying SAVE) before the procedural horse (a comment period and publication of a new SORN) means no valid SORN has yet been published.
Record and brief — Gilliland v. City of Palmdale
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1982
City of Palmdale (1981) 127 Cal.App.3d 386, 392-393, 179 Cal.Rptr. 627, 631. 7/ E.g., Hagman, Comment (May 1981) 33 Land Use Law & Zoning Digest 5; Kanner, Comment (May 1981) 32 Land Use Law & Zoning … The County’s act of burdening the Gillilands for the ~ a Air Force is in furtherance of the County’s determination of its own best interest in keeping Air Force Plant 42 operating in Los Angeles County
456 U.S. 967Reply Brief — National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet Services
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2005
Air Act—an issue on which the EPA itself had adopted varying positions over time. … Thus, in Chev- ron itself, the EPA was entitled to deference when it deter- mined that a group of multiple pollution-emitting devices constitutes a single “stationary source” under the Clean Air Act
545 U.S. 967Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Public Citizen v. Carlin
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2000
So here comes a whistle clean. … And during that entire thirty second period, twenty or thirty second period, whatever you said, his head did not move in any direction? A. No. Q. Did the ... well, let me back up a little bit.
529 U.S. 1003Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 1, 2026
(quoting Contract Cleaning Maint., Inc. v. United States, 811 F.2d 586, 592 (Fed. Cir. 1987)). … and regulations under that Act), $150,000 or less.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Perkins v. United States (No. 07-999)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007
Progress On Performance Plan Elements Element 1-Element 7 (Needs significant Improvement) Comments *see specific comments on rear of form. … No complaints received during this rating period. 2. No complaints received during this rating period.
Appendix — Toussaint v. McCarthy
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1987
a clean, untorn mattress, a clean, untorn blanket, a clean, untorn pillow, a properly functioning toilet and a properly functioning sink. 2. … At that time, I had A-561 had over a year clean time, that is, I had no prison disciplinary reports for that period of time.
481 U.S. 1069Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Grefer (No. 07-1055)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007
Ed. 2d 674 (2001); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908, Comment e (1979). … Booher’s notes taken from comments made by Mr.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007
Clean Water Act The Clean Water Act provides that “any discharge of dredged or fill materials into ‘navigable waters’—defined as the ‘waters of the United States’—is forbidden unless author- ized by … a permit issued by the Corps of Engineers pursuant to § 404 [of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1344].”
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cox v. City of Dallas, Texas (No. 05-1226)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005
While the issuance of citations for illegal dumping throughout the city was virtually nonexistent during the period of 195 through 1993, during this same period the City sued the operator of the Deepwood … An organization may aggregate its experience in each activity over the 2-year period preceding its application to meet this 1 year 115a qualification period requirement.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989
Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 471 Se I ON virssticia cnn ceaedatcentionacceuctemetsiaiduces United States v. 1966 Beechcraft Aircraft Model King Air, 777 F.2d 947 (4th Cir. 1985) —............. … Kind of exchange In order to achieve the purpose of the Agreement a periodic exchange of experience shall take place.
489 U.S. 1016Opposition Brief — Producer Coalition v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2003
quality Standards pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.§ 7401 et seq.), to the extent that activities authorized under this Act significantly affect the air quality of any State. … , subject to the right of judicial review as provided in this Act, if such default continues for the period of thirty days after mailing of notice by registered letter to the lease owner at his record
540 U.S. 937Amicus Curiae Brief — Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983) . 6 STATUTES AND REGULATIONS: Federal: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7543 ..... 8 Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1146 _. ee x … Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7543(a) (“relating to the control of [motor vehicle} emissions”).
505 U.S. 88
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.