Documents

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — National Coalition for Men, et al., Petitioners v. Selective Service System, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 3, 2026

(cleaned up); Ramming v. … (cleaned up).

Application — Department of Education, et al., Applicants v. Myra Brown, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Application · Dec 2, 2022

First, they argue that Plaintiffs could not have suffered a procedural deprivation based on the lack of a notice-and-comment period because the HEROES Act expressly exempts the APA’s notice-and-comment … (quoting Utility Air, 573 U. S., at 324).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — California Trout, et al., Petitioners v. Hoopa Valley Tribe, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 26, 2019

Warren Co. v. 1 U.S. territories are considered “states” under the Clean Water Act. 33 U.S.C. § 1362(3). … The States’ Role Under the Clean Water Act As described above, section 401 of the Clean Water Act applies broadly to any federally permitted or licensed “activity” that “may result in any discharge into

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Brown v. Maintenance & Industrial Services, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995

immediately as an employee and the petitioner was not afforded a hearing or rebuttal to respondent (Coleman's) charge allegeding being asleep, in an area of work space that was in violation of OSHA Clean-Air … /Safe Air work space.

Appendix — United States v. City of Chicago

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1970

_Some evidence was presented to show the carrier’s car- cleaning program and the problems. involved. … Sometimes delay in arrival at Chicago requires quick turnaré md, arid cleaning of the ears leaves much to be desired.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Wilson v. Johnson

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2003

Air, Inc.,2 and claims that the Navy did not act in good faith. 3. … (12) plaintiff has alleged various comments made by Wedel which suggested shedid not act in good faith. See Wilson dec! at 1.

Supplemental Appendix — McConnell v. Federal Election Commission

Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Appendix · 2003

The ads stated that they were paid for by a group calling itself “Republicans for Clean Air.” … “Republicans for Clean Air” was actually a front for two brothers who had ties to the Bush campaign.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lenair Moses, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 19, 2022

(cleaned up). … Id. at 47 (cleaned up).

Transcript of Record — United States v. Lexington Mill & Elevator Co.

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1914

Which is as follows: “I have found that flour after be- ing acted upon by the modified air, that is air which has been acted upon by the spark, your matter is very notably bleached, presenting a dead … Do you clean that pipe yourself personally, or just tell the boys take it out in the air and clean it? A. Well, I have cleaned it personally myself. How many times?

Appendix — City of New York v. United States Department of Transportation

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1984

; Sections 309 and 176 of the Clean Air Act, as amended (42 USC 7401 et seq.) ; Section 106 of the National His- toric Preservation Act of 1966 (16 USC 470, herein- after “the Historic Preservation … ); Section 16 and 18(a) of the Airport and Air- way Develpoment Act of 1970 (49 USC 1716, 1718, here- inafter “the Airport Act”) ; and Section 14 of the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964 (49 USC

Appendix — Middlesex County Utilities Authority v. City of New Brunswick

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1983

The EPA points to statements in the legislative history of the Clean Water Act, such as the comment in the Senate Report that “jajs a general rule, the volume and character of each dis- charge into … EPA, 631 F.2d at 885 (refusing to set aside plausible and reasonable interpretation of Clean Air Act by EPA simply because party offers an _ alternative plausible interpretation).

Appendix to Appellants Brief — Kress v. Aghnides (No. 508)

Supreme Court brief · Appendix to Appellants Brief · 1957

Mf the final fee be not paid within that period, the patent will be — - withheld: SEE REVISED STATUTES, SECTION 4885 - - AS AMENDED BY ACT OF CONGRESS APPROVED | §' AUGUa? … If the final fee be not paid within that period, the patent will be withheid; SEE REVISED STATUTES, SECTION 4885 AS AMENDED BY ACT OF CONGRESS APPROVED AUGUST 9, 1939.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Hughes v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 940 (2018) (No. 17-155)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

Army Corps of Engineers over the “waters of the United States,” a term of art used in the Clean Water Act. … Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc., 474 U.S. 121 (1985), in the case of Clean Water Act juris- diction.

Joint Appendix Vol I — Kelo v. New London

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix Vol I · 2005

Following the 45 day review and comment period of the Draft Environmental Impact Evaluation for the Fort Trumbull MDP area, review of public and state agency comments, and consideration of the adminis … Rationale for Selection of the Preferred Alternative Following the 45 day review and comment period of the Draft Environmental Impact Evaluation for the Fort Trumbull MDP area, review of public and

Respondents Brief — Panama Mail SS Co. v. Vargas

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1930

Miss Vargas had a right to sit on deck, a great many seasick people prefer the deck where there is plenty of air to a stuffy stateroom. … Benson is also commented upon by the District Court of Appeal in People v. Norrington, 55 Cal.

Appendix — SeaRiver Maritime, Inc. v. Exxon Seamen's Union

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1996

See, e.g., Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. … We em- phasized the potentially disastrous environmental conse- quences of an oil spill, and noted that statutes such as the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 ef seq., and the Oil Pollution Act of

Respondents Brief — Winston Tyler Hencely, Petitioner v. Fluor Corporation, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Apr 28, 2025

Midwest Air Traffic Control Serv., Inc., 8 F.4th 105 (2d Cir. 2021) ........................... 14, 27 Banco Nacional v. … (cleaned up). The decision below also comports with this Court’s precedent regarding “obstacle” preemption.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Wetlands Action Network v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001

In August 1990, MTP-PV applied to the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) for a permit under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1344. … The action alleged violations of the National Environmental Policy Act and the Clean Water Act. Jurisdiction was invoked under 28 U.S.C. 1331.

Petitioners Brief — St. Joe Paper v. The Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1954

of the Bankruptey Act, Congress did not write on a clean slate, but as a postscript to a long series of enactments dealing with railroad con- solidations and mergers, throughout the whole history of … McDonoveu, Jr., Attorneys for Petitioner, Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company. POOR COPY

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Grefer (No. 07-1055)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007

Ed. 2d 674 (2001); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908, Comment e (1979). … Booher’s notes taken from comments made by Mr.