Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.17s
Petitioners Brief — Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1996
Curtiss, 7 U.S. (3 Cranch) eT 3 Thermtron Products, Inc. v. Hermansdorfer, 423 U.S. 336 Tr Nt 2 2 Sa ec AT 15 Union Planters Nat’l Bank of Memphis v. … No. 423, 99th Cong., 2d Sess.
519 U.S. 61Motion of the ICC to Affirm — Dixie Carriers, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Motion of the ICC to Affirm · 1956
Mechling, 330 U.S. 567...) 4;6,7 Schilling v. Schwitzer-Clmmins Co., 142 F. 2d 82... -. a... °° 8 . Texas & Pacific Ry. v. 1.C.C., 162 US -197— Bia toe ; 5 Thompson v. … Capital Transit Co., 338 U.S. 286 pe se United States v. Great Northern Ry. Co., 343 U. 5. 562. a 10.
351 U.S. 56Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lopinson v. Pennsylvania
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1968
Dessus, 423 Pa. 177 (1966). … Schmidt, 423 Pa. 432 (1966).
392 U.S. 647Opposition Brief — Dent v. City of Dallas
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988
Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 370 (1976) ............... 5 il STATEMENT OF THE CASE Petitioner’s statement of the case is essentially correct, but incomplete. … Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 370 (1976); Hays v. Jefferson County, 668 F.2d 869, 872 (6th Circuit, 1982), cert. denied 459 U.S. 833; Merchant v.
485 U.S. 977Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 13, 2025
See Kyles, 514 U.S. at 436; Barker, 423 F.3d at 1094. … Barker, 423 F.3d at 1093 (citing Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 395, 397–99, 405 (2000)).
Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Catanzaro v. Hart Electronics Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1984
United States, (1973) 413 U.S. 266 12 Boyd v. United States (1886) 116 U.S. 616 6 Carroll v. United States (1925) 267 U.S. 132 ao Cox v. Texas (1906) 202 U.S. 446 16 Fasnacht v. … § 482 § 1582 Title 28 U.S.C. § 1257(1) iv.
465 U.S. 1070Opposition — Costle v. Pacific Legal Foundation
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980
National Coal Operators, 423 U.S. at 394. EPA regulations contain no similar provision. 3. … National Coal Operators, 423 U.S. at 396.
445 U.S. 198Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jones v. Caterpillar Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993
Williams (1987), 482 U.S. 386, 96 L. Ed. 2d 318, 107 S. Ct. 2425. … Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 107 S.Ct. 2425, 96 L.Ed.2d 318.
510 U.S. 946Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1953
York, 326 U.S. 99; Holmberg v. Armbrecht, 327 U.S. 392; Russell v. Todd, 309 U.S. 280; Stanley v. … Div. 480, 482, 84 N.Y.S. 2d 605, 607; Arthur Philip Export Corp. v. Leathertone, 275 App. Div. 102, 104, 87 N.YS. 2d 665, 667; Airedale Worsted Mills, Inc. v.
346 U.S. 854Opinion — Hendrick v. Maryland
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1915
Louis, 100 U. 8. 423, 429; Foote v. Mary- land, 232 U.S. 494, 504. … S. 415, 423: Collins v.
235 U.S. 610Amicus Curiae Brief — Thornburg v. Gingles
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Supp. 1021, 1026 n.10 (D.D.C. 1972), aff'd, 410 U.S. 962 (1973); Bolden v. City of Mobile, 423 F. Supp. 384, 388-89 (S.D. … Partida, 430 U.S. 482, 496 n.17 (1977); Alexander v. Louisiana, supra, 405 U.S. at 630 n.9, 632.
478 U.S. 30Slip Opinion — Lingle v. Chevron USA Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Slip Opinion · 2005
County of Los Angeles, 482 U. S. 304, 314 (1987). … United States, 495 U.S. 423, 432 (1990); id., at 447 (SCALIA, J., concurring in judgment).
544 U.S. 528Petition — Pennsylvania v. Williams
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
Pertier, 422 U.S, 531, 95 S.Ct. 2313 (1975) 9,10 UNITED STATES v, Watson, 423 U.S, 411. 96 S.CT. 820 (1976), REHEARING DENIED, 424 U.S, 979, 96 S.Ct. 1488 (1976) 18,19 WALDER v. … PoweLL, suPRA AT 482-486, 96 S. Cr. at 3046- 3049.
446 U.S. 912Opposition Brief — Wilson ex rel. Wilson v. Brother Records, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1997
Code 1981 § 13-423(a). 74 F.3d at 1300-1301. … He claimed personal jurisdiction attached under §§ 13-423(a)(3) and 13-423(a)(4), two sections of the long- arm statute which did not extend to the full limits of the Constitution. 74 F.3d at 1300.
520 U.S. 1103Respondents Brief — Federal Communications Commission v. Iowa Utilities Board
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2002
Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997) .........cc-cceeeeees 15 Wisconsin v. FPC, 303 F.2d 380 (D.C. … Wells, 519 U.S. 482, 490 (1997) (natu- ral reading of the full text is the “first criterion in the interpretive hierarchy” for statutes); Connecticut Nat’l Bank v.
537 U.S. 807Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 19, 2022
Wages, 423 U.S. 276, 285 (1976). … County of Los Angeles, 441 U.S. 434, 449 (1979) (negative Foreign Commerce Clause); Michelin Tire, 423 U.S. at 285 (Import-Export Clause).
Reply Brief — Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Battaglia
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2011
Co., 335 U.S. 520, 423 (1949)).? … Ohio, 360 U.S. 423, 436-37 (1959); accord Stern & Gressman et al., Supreme Court Practice § 3.19, at 185 (8th ed. ' Conrail referenced Aparicio v. Norfolk & W.
564 U.S. 1052Amicus Curiae Brief — Nebraska Cattlemen, Inc. v. Livestock Marketing Assn.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Landreneau, 365 F.3d 423, 429 (5th Cir. 2004). … Landreneau, 365 F.3d 423, 430 (5th Cir. 2004).
543 U.S. 977Respondents Brief — At&t Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Board
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2002
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 468 U.S. 137 EES eee 18 United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997) .............ccce0000 15 Wisconsin v. FPC, 303 F.2d 380 (D.C. … Wells, 519 U.S. 482, 490 (1997) (natu- ral reading of the full text is the “first criterion in the interpretive hierarchy” for statutes); Connecticut Nat'l Bank v.
537 U.S. 807Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Tommy Lee Hubbard, Jr., Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 22, 2023
Code Ann. § 39-17-423(a)(3)…………………………….……………….………10, 12 Tenn. … § 39-17-423(a)(3); Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-415(a)(1).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.