Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersbriefs

10,000+ results

0.46s

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Craig v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1970

    During this period there was no difficulty with the tanks or gauges (T. 120). Shortly after dinner they ran out of oxygen (T. 121). … for cleaning.

    400 U.S. 964
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Intercity Maintenance Co. v. Local 254

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001

    Air Line Pilots Association, 193 F.3d 1185, 1197-1200 (11th Cir. 1999). … See Abreen Corp., 709 F.2d at 756 (holding that a union official’s comments may be used to infer the object of union activity).

    534 U.S. 818
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Hughes v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 940 (2018) (No. 17-155)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

    Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711 (1987)....................666 24 Planned Parenthood of Se. Pa. v. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air®® to determine the controlling opinion.

  • Memorandum — Massachusetts v. American Trucking Assns.

    Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 2001

    2 of a judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that remands the En- vironmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) final rules revising the National Ambient Air … See Clean Air Act § 109, 42 U.S.C. 7409.

    532 U.S. 901
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — City of New Orleans v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2000

    Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, Pub. … The EE/CA was made available for comment on April 17, 1996. One February 28, 1997, a Proposed Plan. of Action was released for public comment.

    531 U.S. 813
  • Opposition Brief — Pozsgai v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1994

    of a pollutant “into water” within the meaning of Section 502(6) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1362(6). … The court reasoned that the term “water” in the Clean Water Act includes “wetlands.” Jd. at 3la. 5. The court of appeals affirmed. Pet. App. la-27a. a.

    510 U.S. 1110
  • Reply Brief — BP America Production Co. v. Burton

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2006

    Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Johnson, No. 93- 1377, 1994 WL 484506 (5th Cir. Sept. 7, a a 19, 20 Pioneer Inv. Servs. v. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546 (1986), and West v. Gibson, 527 U.S. 212 (1999), did indeed “construe[] the term ‘action’ to encompass administrative actions.”

    549 U.S. 84
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mitchell R. Swartz, Petitioner v. United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 15, 2018

    It notes that scientists from various nations "are devoting significant resources to this work in the hope of finding a new clean energy source. … The real purpose here is for the USPTO to review carefully the conditions that are needed for proposed reactors and the written reviews and comments of the using organizations, such as DTRA, DARPA, DIA

  • Opposition Brief — Bylinski v. City of Allen Park

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1999

    " 33 U.S.C. § 1319(f), as must citizen suits under the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1365(a). … 320, Act 245 and the Federal Clean Water Act. 10.

    527 U.S. 1037
  • Reply Brief — Michael Sackett, et ux., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Nov 30, 2021

    The Court recently rejected a similar contra-review argument in granting certiorari in a case challenging EPA’s authority under the Clean Air Act. See West Virginia v. … But the fact that the Sacketts do not seek review of every aspect of Clean Water Act jurisdiction, such as the extent to which the Clean Water Act regulates tributaries of traditional navigable waters,

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Erika Jacobs, Petitioner v. 35 West Apartments

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 23, 2021

    | Rule 1.4, or (3) delivered oveMhe-counter to the Supreme Court clerk withinj the same 30-day time period required by § 990A. … Defendant responded to the request for repairs and some work was done, specifically, Defendant stated that the air vents were cleaned. See Exhibit “B”.

  • Petitioners Brief — United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1985

    The 1977 Amend- ments to the FWPCA changed the popular name of the statute to the Clean Water Act. 33 U.S.C. 1251 note. … Riverside defended its actions by asserting that none of its property was subject to Clean Water Act jurisdiction.

    474 U.S. 121
  • Record and brief — Pacific Legal Foundation v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development Commission

    Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1982

    of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977— relied on by the Ninth Circuit (App. at 33 n.28, 44), but nowhere mentioned by any petitioner—Congress permitted the States to regulate radioactive air emissions … National policy expressed in such legislation as the Clean Air Act and the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1977 is the reason.

    457 U.S. 1133
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Alicia Lowe, et al., Petitioners v. Sara Gagne-Holmes, Acting Commissioner, Maine Department of Health and Human Services, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 17, 2025

    (cleaned up)).) … Id. at 724 (cleaned up).

  • Transcript of Record — United States v. Binghamton Construction Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1954

    Mechanics, heavy equipment_____-_ ee Oilers, heavy equipment Selb eamiaistacaediip aes ae: | Operators, air compressors, 160 cubic feet and under SE aren . 85 Operators, air compressors, over 160 cubic … Other areas showed numerous honeycombs, air bubbles, and pockmarks.

    347 U.S. 171
  • Appendix — Gondeck v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1965

    , (1) at anv military, air or naval base accuired after January 1, 1940, by the United States from any foreign government. 33 U.S.C. 920. … On April 24, 1958, Gondeck completed his sched- uled eight-hour shift, came off duty, returned to his quarters, cleaned up, availed himself to some extent of the employer furnished recreation facilities

    382 U.S. 25
  • Appendix — Lanfranconi v. Tidewater Oil Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1967

    Plaintiff’s average annual earnings for _ that period work out to be slightly under $6,400.. … interior and exterior of the premises in a good and clean condition.

    389 U.S. 951
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Odegard v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1988

    Using a clean, dampened kimwipe, SA Doerr wiped the exterior of the checkbook and reported he found no blue stains. … Otherwise the Judge Advocate General shall act upon the petition.

    484 U.S. 1061
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dawn Desrosiers, et al., Petitioners v. Charlie Baker, Governor of Massachusetts

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 10, 2021

    transportation employees, including air traffic controllers, ramp personnel, aviation security, and aviation management and other workers – including contracted vendors – providing services for air passengers … Air transportation employees, including air traffic controllers and maintenance personnel, ramp workers, aviation and aerospace safety, security, and operations personnel and accident investigations.

  • Petitioners Reply Brief — Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum Institute

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1980

    bin'hida44') ale oe alone s 3a Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, as amended, P.L. 91-604, 84 Stat. 1676, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seg. ....... 3a I di kv ou ob wl ves seebc kev 3a TE REDO os sas cjcdive … Another statute which requires cost-benefit evaluations for some regulations but not others is the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq., which were passed the same

    448 U.S. 607

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.