Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersbriefs

10,000+ results

1.11s

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Duane L. O'Malley, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 26, 2019

    The State in an Earlier "Statutory" Civil enforcement of the Clean Air Act ("CAA") offense under an approved State Implementation Plan '("SIP") and "Permit Program" would: (1) allow Pinski to stipulate … lqnguageofthe Clean Air Act requires only general intent, especially in the context of asbestos", 739 F.3d kt 1007.

  • Defendants Brief — Rasmussen v. Idaho

    Supreme Court brief · Defendants Brief · 1901

    , disinfected and aired, and should be left unused for af least four weeks (better two months) before clean sheep are placed in them; fields in which scabby sheep have been kept should stand vacant … Spring is there- for a period of great danger.

    181 U.S. 198
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — BP p.l.c., et al., Petitioners v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 23, 2020

    Air Act." … Cheswick Generating Station, 734 F.3d 188, 197 (3d Cir. 2013) (holding that "the Clean Air Act does not preempt state common law claims").

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Shell PLC, fka Royal Dutch Shell PLC, et al., Petitioners v. City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2024

    Besides interstate water compacts, Congress also enacted the Clean Water Act. … City of New York, 993 F.3d at 95 (“[T]he Clean Air Act does not regulate foreign emissions. So the City’s claims concerning those emissions still require us to apply federal common law.”).

  • Supplemental Appendix — Rockefeller v. Tacha

    Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Appendix · 2004

    Defen- dant has used this knowingly false representation to eliminate jurisdiction of Plaintiff's claims related to the Clean Air Act (“CAA”) employee protection provision coverage. … Defendant admits that Plaintiff made written comments and NOT a mere oral comment to EPA. See Exhibit DOL-3 at 3. This admitted violation is described within Exhibit DOL-2 at 1 thru 3.

    541 U.S. 1031
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Responsible Offshore Development Alliance, a D.C. Nonprofit Corporation, Petitioner v. Department of the Interior, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 5, 2025

    The Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act Congress enacted the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) “to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters.” 33 U.S.C … Claims under the APA for Violations of the Clean Water Act Next, Plaintiffs allege that the Corps violated the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. § 1251, et seq., and attendant regulations in issuing

  • Petition — NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RECYCLING INDUSTRIES, INC. v. SECRETARY OF LABOR (Nos. 80-1170, 80-1134, 1155)

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981

    Similarly, in /nternational Harvester, supra, EPA’s automobile emission standards under the Clean Air Act were remanded to EPA because, as written, they might unfairly interfere with the competitive … OSHA’s actions thus effectively deprived the secon- dary smelters of their statutory rights under both the OSH Act and the Administrative Procedure Act, ‘‘to submit [meaningful] written data or comments

  • Appendix B — Kelly v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix B · 1994

    He stated that this phenomena could be avoided, however, by periodic -B 12- cleaning or replacement of the trapped sediments following inspections conducted at least semi-annually. … Cahill is correct that air masses arrive at Lake Tahoe from the relatively clean airsheds of the Pacific Northwest and that a lot of the airborne pollution which is carried to the Lake by winds has

    510 U.S. 1041
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — California Trout, et al., Petitioners v. Hoopa Valley Tribe, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 26, 2019

    We would at a minimum seriously consider staff ’s recommendation in acting in this case. 28a by the deadline established by the Clean Water Act — a reasonable period of time, not to exceed one year from … The Tribe notes that section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act provides that if a state “fails or refuses to act on a request for certification, within a reasonable time (which shall not exceed one year

  • Transcript of Record — United States v. United Engineering & Contracting Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1914

    —All gravel must be clean, sea-washed, silica gravel of best quality. … Air pump.—A suitable air pump must be installed direct con- nected to a proper motor, for priming all pumps. The same must be approved by the civil engineer in charge. 6d. Ventilating fan.

    234 U.S. 236
  • Record P — Nye & Nissen v. United States (No. 228)

    Supreme Court brief · Record P · 1948

    Bt " is-the contents that ene and the air cell hecoine S. … Did I wipe them clean with a towel ? Q. Yes. A. If that is. there. Q. I will read-it to you again: ©.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Piper Aircraft Corp. v. Cleveland, by and Through the Conservator of His Estate, Cleveland

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993

    In light of these comments, a cost analysis was conducted by the FAA which indicated that a substantial financial burden would be imposed upon many consumers over a short period of time if the proposals … Here, the court ignored the holding in Ouellette: In determining whether Vermont nuisance law "stands as an obstacle" to the full implementation of the [Clean Water Act], it is not enough to say that

    510 U.S. 908
  • Appendix — Environmental Protection Agency v. Defenders of Wildlife

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2007

    Such oversight relates to different substantive standards—those of the Clean Water Act, rather than the Endangered Species Act. The Clean Water Act stan- dards governing permitting decisions wil! … Petitioners sued, claiming that the rules were promulgated in viola- tion of NEPA and the Clean Air Act. /d. The Supreme Court rejected petitioners’ arguments.

    549 U.S. 1105
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kenneth Leslie Caldwell, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 20, 2026

    srsltid=AfmBOorxOoJpOSZRskQimizJE-Wc2FJteiAVP4PixSb83Ii5SnKvIel 161 (For example, a base to the West of the highly polluted countries of India and China could let air quality improvement work clean the … air, while generating income somehow). 23

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — D. A., a Minor, By and Through his Mother, B. A., et al., Petitioners v. Tri County Area Schools, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 1, 2026

    AFSCME, 585 U.S. 878, 914 (2018) (cleaned up); accord, e.g., Snyder v. … Id. at 584-85 (cleaned up).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Douglas M. Folts, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 17, 2025

    OM told Appellant, “[I]t’s not that,” and that she was still cleaning her room. Appellant responded: “‘Cleaning.’ I understand. Wash your hands when you’re done.” … The military judge also made findings relating to Appellant’s comments about neighborhood children planning to play on a water slide at Appellant’s home.

  • Motion for divided argument — Oklahoma, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Motion for divided argument · Jan 24, 2025

    Air Act requires. … As the parties regulated by SIPs, they ultimately bear much of the economic cost imposed by Clean Air Act regulations. 3.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — National Ass'n v. Defenders of Wildlife

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

    Subcomm. on Air and Water Pollution of the Comm. on Public Works, 92nd Cong. 4356 (1971) ..... 11, 12 Robert V. … Another example of a statute that could be affected by the Ninth Circuit's ruling is the federal Clean Air Act (“CAA”) (42 U.S.C. §§ 7401, et seq.).

    551 U.S. 644
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Protection Agency v. Defenders of Wildlife

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

    Subcomm. on Air and Water Pollution of the Comm. on Public Works, 92nd Cong. 4356 (1971) ..... 11, 12 Robert V. … Another example of a statute that could be affected by the Ninth Circuit's ruling is the federal Clean Air Act (“CAA”) (42 U.S.C. $$ 7401, et seg.).

    549 U.S. 1105
  • Appendix — Fields v. Wilbur

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2010

    Defendant Kuiz contends that he Cleaned the arca outside of plaintiffs cell and lnstructed him how to clean the inside of his cell. Uk 12. … Amendment, prison officials act with the requisite culpable antent when they act with deliberate indifference to an inmates’ suffering.

    562 U.S. 834

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.