Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kenneth Leslie Caldwell, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court briefMay 20, 2026
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
No.
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FILED
MAY 2 0 2026
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
cjjPPEME COURT. U.S.
Kenneth Leslie Caldwell - PETITIONER,
v.
United States of America - RESPONDENT.
On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari
to the United States Court of Appeals
— r
for the Federal Circuit
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Kenneth Leslie Caldwell
The Joshua House, 1435 N 15th St, Council Bluffs, IA 51501
(7161-534-9868
2017emailforward@gmail.com
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
A. If a president/chief signs orders to change things, can this petition be used as a vessel
to fix concerns, problems, and situations (identified)?
B. As the 25th Amendment (of the United States Constitution) is supposed to be a
guideline for lawmakers/Congress/senate/house of representatives/etc., what must be done if
people (acting under color of law) are identified in continued appearances as complicit with
allowing of (highly) illegal and gravely unconstitutional activities, and identified as grossly unfit
to hold title (of office)?
C. In what outreach of legislation can personnel in a government capacity pick and
choose which (highly) illegal activities to allow, without due process?
LIST OF PARTIES
[ X ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page.
A list of all parties to the proceeding in the court whose judgment may (possibly) be affected by
the outcome of this petition is as follows:
Kenneth Leslie Caldwell,
and,
United States (also professedly identified as ‘United States of America’).
There is an unknown number of entities/associations/person(s) and such that ostensibly may be
affected but are not listed to avoid confusion/delay/complication.
RELATED PROCEEDINGS
All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. Though there are
possibilities someone could think of other cases as potentially “related”, to avoid confusion I list
just these cases as the (directly) related cases relevant.
Caldwell v. United States, United States Court of Federal Claims docket # 24-2074 (April
30, 2025) / (July 30, 2025)
Caldwell v. United States ofAmerica, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit docket # 25-2014 (March 2, 2026)
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
i
LIST OF PARTIES........................................................
ii
RELATED PROCEEDINGS
..................................................................................................ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
iii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
v
PETITION
............................................................................................... 1
OPINIONS BELOW
......................................................................1
JURISDICTION
1
CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS PROVIDED
1
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
5
I. Detestable brazen malicious activities of news companies
depicted, involving defamation, go unhinged without punishment,
fine, or consequence
.................................................................................... 5
II. There is a fundamental problem of no “jurisdiction” for any court,
calling for application of power from the Supreme Court of the
United States or any other Court.
........................................................................................ 6
III. (Complicity with) Allowing perceived aggravated sexual abuse identified,
such as the extraordinary/astonishing allowing of things perceived in my case,
is an illustrated illegality that perceptive courts of a civil society cannot enforce
without obloquy
10
iii
IV. With situations affecting my psychology, I in theory lose massive amounts
of income with the wanton/willing “lewd sexual encroachments”
“United States allows/allowed”, as news companies appear to continue
to defame me, unimpeded...................................................................................................... 11
V. This being the Supreme Court of the United States, new
procedures or legislation are viable to fix things.................................................................. 12
REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION............................................................................. 17
CONCLUSION.................................................................................................................................. 23
APPENDIX
APPENDIX A, order, Docket # 25-2014 (Fed. Cir. March 2, 2026)............................................... la
APPENDIX B, mandate, Docket # 25-2014 (Fed. Cir. March 9, 2026)......................................... 3a
APPENDIX C, order, Docket # 25-2014 (Fed. Cir. March 5, 2026).............................................. 4a
APPENDIX D, order, Docket # 25-2014(Fed. Cir. January 27, 2026)........................................... 6a
APPENDIX E, order, Docket # 25-2014 (Fed. Cir. December 31, 2025).................................... 26a
APPENDIX F, order, Docket # 24-2074 (Court of Fed. Claims April 30, 2025)........................ 27a
APPENDIX G, judgment, Docket # 24-2074 (Court of Fed. Claims 4/30/25)............................ 30a
APPENDIX H, order, Docket # 24-2074 (Court of Fed. Claims 12/19/24................................... 31a
APPENDIX I, order, Docket # 24-2074 (Court of Fed. Claims July 30, 2025............................. 32a
APPENDIX J, order, Docket # 25-2014 (Fed. Cir. December, 10, 2025).................................... 33a
APPENDIX K, order, Docket # 25-2014 (Fed. Cir. February 12, 2026)...................................... 38a
APPENDIX L, order, Docket # 24-2074 (Court of Fed. Claims 12/10/25).................................. 40a
APPENDIX M, order, Docket # 24-2074 (Court of Fed. Claims March 2, 2026)...................... 42a
iv
APPENDIX N, order, Docket # 25-2014 (Fed. Cir. October 21, 2025)... .................................... 44a
APPENDIX O, mandate, Docket # 24-2074 (Court of Fed. Claims 3/9/26)................................ 46a
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
UNITED STATES CODES
5 United States Code § 2302...................................................
4
10 United States Code §§ 251-154............................................................................................... 2, 15
18 United States Code § 1512.......
3
18 United States Code § 1513...................................................
3
18 United States Code § 3663A.......................................................................................................... 4
28 United States Code § 1254(1)........................................................................................................ 1
CONSTITUTION LAW
25th Amendment of the United States Constitution...................................................................... 1,15
Article 2 of the United States Constitution.............. . .......................................................................... 1
ACTS
Mandatory Victims Restitution Act................................................................................................ 4, 5
Victim and Witness Protection Act.......................
2, 3
Whistleblower Protection Act.............................................................................................................. 4
v
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Petitioner Kenneth Leslie Caldwell petitions for a writ of certiorari to review the
judgment(s) of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
OPINIONS BELOW
It is unknown if the opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
is published or unpublished. I did not find documentation (there) that was issued as an “opinion”
in name. I challenge/object to judgments and orders, including (but presumably not limited to)
one(s) of interest, such as Appendix A, page 1 a.
It is unknown if the opinion of the United States Court of Federal Claims is published or
unpublished. I did not find documentation (there) that was issued as an “opinion” in name. The
Appendix contains orders/judgments.
JURISDICTION
The court of appeals for the federal circuit issued judgment on March 2, 2026, denying
rehearing and dismissing the REHEARING EN BANC.1 This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to
28 United States Code § 1254(1). The appeals court issued judgment denying rehearing on
12/31/2025,2 and issued a mandate 3/9/2026.3
CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS PROVIDED
Underlined are laws from my Rehearing En Banc in the United States Court of Appeal s
for the Federal Circuit.
Article 2 of the United States Constitution / 25th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution in
appearance for most relevant parts states there is “authority to impeach and remove" government
‘Appendix A, page 1 a.
2 Appendix E, page 26a.
3 Appendix O, page 46a.
1
personnel from office for "treason,4 bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors" or when
such person(s) are "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office".5 6
10 United States Codes
251-254 in appearance for most relevant parts states “§ 251.
Federal aid for State governments” - “Whenever there is an insurrection”7 or “unlawful
obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion” that make it “impracticable to enforce
the laws”,8 “The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other
means, shall” take action “if it—(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the
United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege,
immunity, or protection” ... “or impedes the course of justice under those laws”. Insurgents(or
‘insurrectionists’) may "disperse and retire peaceably to their abodes within a limited time."9
The Victim and Witness Protection Act in appearance for most relevant parts states: "(2)
All too often the victim of a serious crime is forced to suffer physical,10 psychological,11 or
financial hardship first"12... "3) Although the majority of serious crimes falls under the
jurisdiction of State and local law enforcement agencies, the Federal Government, and in
particular the Attorney General, has an important leadership role to assume in ensuring that
victims of crime, whether at the Federal, State, or local level, are given proper treatment" ... "(4)
Under current law, law enforcement agencies must have cooperation from a victim of crime and
4 https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S4-l/ALDE 0000Q282/
5 https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxxv
6 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CONAN-l 992/pdf/GPO-CONAN-l 992-10-26.pdf
7 https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:10%20section:2510/o20edition:prelim)%200R%20(granuleid:USCprelim-titlel0-section251')&f=treesort&num=0&edition=prelim
8https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-titlel0-section252&num=0&edition=prelim
9 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2016-titlelO/pdf/USCODE-2Q16-titlelO-subtitleA-partI-chapl3sec253.pdf; Also https://www.law.comell.edu/uscode/text/10/251 https://www.law.comell.edu/uscode/text/10/252
https://www.law.Cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/253 https://www.law.comell.edu/uscode/text/10/254
10 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 1779134309426750 r.png
11 (Note mental health support received.)
12 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 1779134117454795 r.png
2
yet neither the agencies nor the legal system can offer adequate protection or assistance when the
victim, as a result of such cooperation, is threatened or intimidated".
18 United States Code § 1512, a part of the Victim and Witness Protection Act, in
appearance for most relevant parts states “§1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an
informant” ... "(a)(1) Whoever kills or attempts to kill", "(b) Whoever knowingly uses
intimidation or physical force, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do
so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person", or "(c) Whoever intentionally
harasses another person and thereby hinders, delays, prevents, or dissuades any person from- (1)
attending or testifying in an official proceeding; (2) reporting to a law enforcement officer" shall
be "fined under this title or imprisoned".
. From a college website with discrepancies of what is written in mind (same code, 18
U.S.C. § 1512):13 “(d) Whoever intentionally harasses another person and thereby hinders,
delays, prevents, or dissuades any person” ... “or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this
title or imprisoned" ... “an official proceeding need not be pending or about to be instituted at
the time of the offense; and (2) the testimony, or the record, document, or other object need not
be admissible in evidence or free of a claim ofprivilege.” ... "(k) Whoever conspires to commit
any offense under this section shall be subject to the same penalties".14
From 18 United States Code § 1513, a part of the Victim and Witness Protection Act in
appearance for most relevant parts states:15 “(e) Whoever knowingly, with the intent to retaliate,
13 https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-1994-titlel8-sectionl512&num=0&edition=1994
14 https://www.law.comelI.edU/uscode/text/l 8/1512
15 httDs://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?hl=false&edition=1994&req=granuleid%3AUSC-1994-titlel8sectionl 513&num=0&saved=%7CZ3 JhbnVsZWlk01VTOvOxOTkQLXRpdGxlMTgtc2VidGlvbiEl MTI%3D%7C%
7C%7C0%7Cfalse%7C1994
3
takes any action harmful to any person, including interference with the lawful employment or
livelihood of any person” “shall be fined under this title or imprisoned”.16
Whistleblower Protection Act (as I was told to file a Whistleblower Form), in appearance
for most relevant parts states, from 5 United States Code § 2302, a part of the Whistleblower
Protection Act: "(b) Any employee who has authority to take, direct others to take, recommend,
or approve any personnel action, shall not, with respect to such authority—"... "(8) take or fail
to take, or threaten to take or fail to take, a personnel action with respect to any employee or
applicant for employment because of’... “violation of any law, rule, or regulation, or (ii) gross
mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific
danger to public health or safety".17
Mandatory Victims Restitution Act in appearance for most relevant parts states “CRIME
VICTIM FUND” - “In addition, the victim may at any time assign the victim’s interest in
restitution payments to the Crime Victim Fund in the Treasury without in any way impairing the
obligation of the defendant to make such payments”.18 "18 U.S. Code § 3663A - Mandatory
restitution to victims of certain crimes" ... "(a)" ‘ (2)For the purposes of this section, the term
“victim” ‘ “means a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of an
offense for which restitution may be ordered including, in the case of an offense that involves as
an element a scheme, conspiracy, or pattern of criminal activity, any person directly harmed by
the defendant’s criminal conduct in the course of the scheme, conspiracy, or pattern"19 ...
"(4)Clarification.—In ordering restitution under this section, a court shall order the defendant to
make restitution to a person who has assumed the victim’s rights under paragraph (2) to
16 https://www.law.comell.edu/uscode/text/18/1513
17 https://www.law.comell.edU/uscode/text/5/2302 ;
httDs://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=29&f=treesort&num=125
18 https://www.iustice.gov/sites/default/files/usao-az/legacy/2006/09/26/restitut.pdf
19 https://www.law.comell.edu/uscode/text/18/3663A
4
reimburse that person’s necessary and reasonable” “(B) lost income, transportation, and other
expenses incurred” “physical, psychiatric, and psychological care, including nonmedical care”
and other things including “therapy and rehabilitation", applicable when there was “(i)a crime of
violence".20
Another notable read (regarding Mandatory Victims Restitution Act) states
' President Reagan said in 1982 that, "The plight of innocent citizens victimized by lawlessness
deserves immediate national attention." ... The two primary goals of restitution are to prevent
unjust enrichment and to promote rehabilitation '.21
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
I. Detestable brazen malicious activities of news companies depicted, involving defamation,
go unhinged without punishment, fine, or consequence.22
It’s been observed nefarious people employed by news companies attacked me
unprovoked, starting in 2011 in New York State, then 2012 in Idaho state,23 and in 2016 in Idaho
state,24 with continuance of lying stories circulating being distributed across the internet after
multiple front page appearances and news interviews.25 I was advised by a law firm to press
charges in 2016 about the 2016 lies and executive branches would not do anything.26 I continued
to try to press charges and eventually sued in 2018 unsuccessfully, 2019 unsuccessfully, 2021
unsuccessfully, 2022 unsuccessfully (after going through state district and supreme courts), 2023
20 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 1779134309426750 r.png
21 https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2852&context=flr
22 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 1779134117454795 r.png
23 https://www.idahostateiournal.com/news/local/i-f-man-arrested-after-threatening-bar-employee-withknife/article a45a4ec0-237c-lle2-84dl-0019bb2963f4.html
24 https://www.kpvi.com/news/man-arrested-after-bomb-scare-released-speaks-out/article bf61d376-lbbeHe6-9166-0f3140711876.html
25 https://www.eastidahonews.com/2016/05/man-possessed-explosives-released/;
https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/l 03844643 1779210811161461 r.png
26 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 1779136835438119 r.png
5
J
unsuccessfully (after having Government waive right to respond),27 and in 2024 not successfully
yet.28
A lot happened, but that’s the summary (about news), with other notable activities being
that I passed out information about scot-free news the same year a newspaper there dissolved
reportedly with everyone gone but one person at a new news entity,29 I was told to talk to the
police chief but I had not and did not know about bad news until later and was never told/offered
anything about receiving/restitution money, and, a “caricature” of me was distributed with edited
hue/color/contrast/etc.30
II. There is a fundamental problem of no “jurisdiction” for any court,31 calling for
application of power from the Supreme Court of the United States or any other Court.32
a. In the (afore mentioned) case of 2021 I demanded "perpetrators representing media
companies get busted or be prosecuted",33 yet it was dismissed with the State arguing for
dismissal by “Rule 12(b)(1)” for lack of “jurisdiction”.34 The case was dismissed WITH
PREJUDICE implying I can’t bring suit about it ever again.35 Seeing problems already with
judiciary situations, I (in advance) left certain Defendants out for the second round in 2022. The
2022 case in Idaho was dismissed with prejudice,36 for “reasons as stated on the record”,37
27 https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-7380/309518/2024051011291Q795 Waiver%20Letter%20-237380.pdf
28 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cofc-l 24-cv-02074/context; see also
https://fedcircuitblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/24-1122.QRDER.2-5-2024 2265021.pdf
29 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 1779137088631353 r.png ;
https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 1779211842129178 r.png
30 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 177913737283605 r.png
31 https://app.midpage.ai/document/caldwell-v-united-states-1000370300635 ; see also
https://app.midpage.ai/case/caldwell-v-united-states-1000370300635
32 Possibly relevant https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All Writs Act
33 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 1779202787345284 r.png
34 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777917801323967 r.png
35 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777918163206083 r.png
36 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777923514667346 r.png
37 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777923720486513 r.png
6
including “Rule 12(b)(1)” “lack of jurisdiction”.38 I took that to the Supreme Court of Idaho,39
docket # 49782-2022,40 Caldwell v Judicial Administration of Idaho, East Idaho News, and Local
News 8 with activity possibly also seen as being within “Idaho Court of Appeals” amid
switching activity ordered from supreme court to appeals court. Anyway, that case I lost.41 It
was “affirmed”,42 for that same thing “jurisdiction”. Soon before that opinion came out for the
Supreme Court of Idaho (or appeals court, same docket #), I filed Complaint in the United States
Court of Federal Claims anticipating that I’d be treated without dignity.43 That case was
dismissed for (lack of) “jurisdiction”.44 It went to the United States Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit and it was affirmed to be dismissed for lack of “jurisdiction”.45 I filed a Petition
for Writ of Certiorari,46 to the Supreme Court of the United States,47 Caldwell v USA,48 and that
case was dismissed,49 even though Government waived “right to respond”.50 One may also note
the word “repugnant”.51
b. Going now to the more directly related/relevant case of the United States Court of
Federal Claims, I filed that Complaint within 5 months of the 2024 Supreme Court (of the United
38 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777924489568507 r.png
39 https://www.casemine.com/iudgement/us/64114bd2b0elce2c4ea4df99
40 https://www.studicata.com/summaries/court-of-appeals-of-idaho/caldwell-v-the-iudicial-admin-of-idaho-2023o5dlyj/
41 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777926457605486 r.png
42 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777926894228756 r.png
43 https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gci-1949/article-3 ; “cruel treatment and torture”, “outrages upon
personal dignity”, “humiliating and degrading treatment”, and “judicial guarantees” “recognized as indispensable by
civilized peoples”.
44 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777929045108182 r.png . See also
https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777929389343098 r.png
45 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777929721688992 r.png and
https://www.casemine.com/iudgement/us/65c45902abf0ab06640e7137
46 https://www.sunremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-7380/309021/202405061Q4336585 20240506-10384300003325-00004453.pdf
47 https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/23-7380.html
48 https://scotusgate.com/case.php7numbeF23-7380
49 https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-7380/314925/20240613143858Q13 CaldwellReh.pdf
50 https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-7380/309518/20240510112910795 Waiver%20Letter%20-237380.pdf
51 https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-1994-title28-sectionl257&num=0&edition=1994
7
States) dismissal,52 trying to maintain promptness amid tremendous amounts of stress and duress.
That Complaint of case 24-2074 in the United States Court of Federal Claims was never
defended against by Defendant United States;53 RCFC 12(h).54 With that, it seems my complaint
is not without merit as Marzulla Law (a prestigious law firm) implied.55 I noticed judge
Schwartz went back to a routine that may seem to occur often to pro se litigants, which is to refer
back to a previous case and dwell on those past decisions.56 Though I stated in my undefended
Complaint that there was “no lack of’ “jurisdiction” (including “subject-matter jurisdiction”),57
my case was dismissed,58 again for lack of “jurisdiction”.59
c. I took it to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, case 25-2014,
Caldwell v USA. There, the Defendant replied this time. “The appeal is dismissed”,
“frivolous”,6® I shall bear “costs” as stated in the ‘Order’.61 Yet how is my case frivolous if two
or more barred/knowledgeable people of law both state they cannot help but the decision doesn’t
“reflect” “on the merits” along with the fact Defendant United States didn’t defend against my
complaint?62 My appeal was “dismissed” 12/10/2025.63 I filed documentation initiating
rehearing for that case 25-2014 that same day on 12/10/2025 and on 12/31/2025 the petition for
52 Docket fee of $405 was paid, https://dockets.iustia.eom/docket/federal-claims/cofee/l :2024cv02074/51257 ;
Later, in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, case 25-2014, in forma pauperis status was granted on
10/21/2025. https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/cafc/25-2014
53 https://dockets.iustia.eom/docket/federal-claims/cofce/l:2024cv02074/51257 ; See note at filing # 1 showing
answer due date of 2/11/2025.
54 https://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/sites/cfc/files/Rules%202.12.26.pdf
55 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097_1777931752775290_r.png
56 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097_1777932453960100 r.png
57 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777932887317645_r.png
58 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097_1777933358290184 r.png
59 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777933733932823 r.png ; See also Appendix G, page 30a.
60 Page 24a of the Appendix.
61 Page 25a of the Appendix ; https://cases.iustia.eom/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/25-2014/25-2014-2025-1210.pdf?ts=1765378904
62 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 177854892358116 r.png and
https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097_1777931752775290 r.png
63 Starting at pages 24a, 36a, and 40a of the Appendix; see also
https://www.casemine.com/iudgement/us/693a525bec9d648fe4336aed
8
rehearing was denied.64 On 1/27/2026 I filed for a Petition for Rehearing En Bane,65 but that
was dismissed 3/2/2026 without a show of major opinion or discussion in just 2 very brief
pages,66 before my 2/15/2026 motion to submit brief on the merits was decided upon.67 That fact
about deciding on my Rehearing En Banc without my brief on the merits and the fact that the
Order disposing of my appeal on 12/31/2025 referred to a non-existent case "Caldwell v. United
States, No. 2024-1102" (seemingly in error) are two technicalities that might signify a second
chance possibly should exist for me and my case, considering my substantial rights at risk. I
motioned to Recall the Mandate on 3/2/2026,68 and on 3/3/2026 that motion was denied.69 On
3/9/2026 a formal “mandate” was issued.70
d. As disclosed and proclaimed time and time again, there is no court allowing
“jurisdiction”. Denying me relief in saying no “jurisdiction”, the court in a sense confirms my
status as some kind of representative/ambassador/minister/etc. of state I exist in; also if/since
there is no jurisdiction, demands of my Complaint are not farfetched,71 as portrayal of me as a
humiliated person/entity with no dignity nor equality when it comes to law continues,72 amid
details of allowed complicity with crimes horrific in nature.73 At minimum I’d be allowed my
‘base’ rights over land I own or acquire.74
64 Appendix E, page 26a. https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778549348367328 r.png
65 Pages 6a-23a of the Appendix.
66 Appendix A, page la.
67 Appendix C, page 4a; https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778549645393011 r.png
68 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778550018316219 r.png
69 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097_177855017956316 r.png
70 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097_1778550313259667 r.png
71 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643_l779139190834096 r.png
72 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 1779139378989117 r.png
73 https://legalclaritv.org/when-does-the-supreme-court-have-original-iurisdiction/
74 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 17792007797704 r.png
9
III. (Complicity with) Allowing perceived aggravated sexual abuse identified, such as the
extraordinary/astonishing allowing of things perceived in my case, is an illustrated illegality
that perceptive courts of a civil society cannot enforce without obloquy.
Regarding my complaint of case 24-2074 in the United States Court of Federal Claims
that went undefended, I like to bring forth the certitude that I stated "because of the importance
of stopping the lewd sexual encroachments people of the United States allows/allowed" in it,75
which in observance signifies admittance that “United States allows/allowed” “lewd sexual
encroachments”. Sexual abuse is a bad thing, and a judicial branch applying law should not
allow complicit actions/inactions by executive branch allowing it,76 especially when there is
power vested to the court to do something about it.77 The Supreme Court of the United States
had power to change things,78 yet,79 while it still appears maybe people “are complicit with
highly illegal activities”,80 no comt wants jurisdiction;81 the supreme court should in theory be
unable to enforce an illegality though,82 especially perceived illegalities of allowing rude,83
vile,84 and downright evil things undoubtedly seamed to ideologies of sexual abuse.85 Cruel
oppressions I suffer are oppressions that cause me to be without “dignity” as public ridicule and
75 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778614770316644 r.png
76 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 1779201104974676 r.png ; Incident Number 20-30241161,
Boise, ID. Check first minute of audio file and around 1:15,4:00, and 6:25, of Folder 4 of Exhibit AA of Docket #
49782, Supreme Court of Idaho, Caldwell v Judicial Administration of Idaho et. al. “Check cameras”. I Went to the
hospital that same day.
77 https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-3/
78 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778616127794695 r.png
79 https://scotusgate.com/search.php?partv=Kenneth+Leslie+Caldwell
80 Page 8a of the Appendix.
81 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cofc-l 24-cv-02074/pdf/USCQURTS-cofc-l 24-cv-02074O.pdf
82 https://cases.iustia.com/federal/district-courts/federalclaims/cofce/l:2024cv02074/51257/18/0.pdf?ts=1746114569
83 https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6819b0291d8db5ace5072b49
84 https://law.iustia.eom/cases/federal/district-courts/federal-claims/cofce/l:2024cv02074/51257/18/
85 https://www.law.comell.edu/uscode/text/18/2241 ; possibly relevant https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/epstein-files-usambassador-allegations-1780761
10
humiliation goes (against me) without consequence.86 To enforce complicity of allowing illegal
defamation and complicity of allowing illegal ‘sexual abuse’ is to enforce something delusive in
nature and is damaging to the semblance of judiciary.87
IV. With situations affecting my psychology,88 I in theory lose massive amounts of income
with the wanton/willing “lewd sexual encroachments” “United States allows/allowed”,89 as
news companies appear to continue to defame me, unimpeded.90
If I am not worth it to be offered payment, logic suggests news companies should not take
advantage of my name and character with “preposterous moronic stories going far beyond the
established norms” “that falsely claim” I “committed infamous/felonious crimes” as my
(undefended) Complaint so worded.91 I was selected Honored Listee for a Biography book and
was in theory denied hundreds of thousands of dollars a year if not millions because of activities
of ‘news’ that stripped that status away.92 Is not that a claim for relief in and of itself when
people are noticeably not holding true to their oaths of office in display of complicit allowing of
calculated illegal activities when the allowing of such hypothesized/illustrated illegal activities
not only harms me physically and mentally but in theory harms my earning potential?93 I called
for (other) ways to earn large sums of money regarding my one-of-a-kind world class skills
including athletic showmanship skills such as pushing a firetruck,94 crushing walnuts with one
86 See Chapter 1 Article 3(1 )(c) of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 for example;
https://www.icrc.org/sites/default/files/extemal/doc/en/assets/files/nublications/icrc-002-0173.pdf
87 https://ecf.cofc.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show public doc72024cv2Q74-18-0
88 William Aardsma, M.A. LPC; (719)-384-5446
89 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778614770316644 r.png
90 https://law.iustia.eom/cases/federal/district-courts/federal-claims/cofce/l:2023cv00320/47216/21/
91 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778618105308789 r.png
92 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778618681514056 r.png
93 Regulatory Takings: General Doctrine:
https://www.law.comell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/regulatory-takings-general-doctrine Kicked off of
Honored Listee status: https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778618948911396 r.png The news link
that did it: https://www.kpvi.com/news/man-arrested-after-bomb-scare-released-speaks-out/article bf61d376-lbbe11 e6-9166-0f3140711876.html
94 https://www.voutube.com/shorts/zhR9UFOdABO
11
hand,95 and puncturing pop cans with my finger,96 but I (for some reason) encounter (many)
difficulties finding them and still complain about stories that are evidently defamatory in nature
playing a contributing factor in difficulties finding large sums of money.
V. This being the Supreme Court of the United States, new procedures or legislation are
viable to fix things.
a. As far as I know, many people of the public still might remember me as the man at the
center of the “bomb scare” with NBC logo used; audio only may be there now, appearing to
intend to show it how I originally might have wanted, with no video.97
The court accepted Government’s stance before regarding waiving right to respond in the
Supreme Court,98 and it seems there should be no difference now when approaching same
circumstances yet now I even have more circumstances to have courts favor me; I’d argue
someone is wrong if they said I am “frivolous” in my work.99 There is a law in fact that states
when “court finds that there is a want of jurisdiction, the court shall” ... “transfer such action or
appeal to any other” “court”.100 I want a jurisdiction so I can have my matters settled,101 and
there’s an observed need for jurisdiction regarding perceived sexual “encroachments”,102 exhibits
95 https://www.youtube.com/shorts/WvbPYlbVXrE
96 https://www.youtube.com/shorts/H-Gmx7byAU8
97 https://www.kpvi.com/news/man-arrested-after-bomb-scare-released-speaks-out/article bf61d376-lbbe-lle69166-0f3140711876.html
98 https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-7380/309021/202405Q6104336585 20240506-10384300003325-00004453.pdf
99 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778620735854214 r.png ; Pages 24a, 36a, and 40a of the
Appendix.
100 “§ 1631. Transfer to cure want of jurisdiction” ; https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE96/pdf/STATUTE-96-Pg25.pdf#page=31
https://www.govinfo.gOv/content/pkg/USCODE-2023-title28/pdf7USCODE-2023-title28-partIV-chap87secl406.pdf: https://www.law.comell.edu/uscode/text/28/1631
101 https://law.iustia.com/constitution/us/article-3/
102 Page 19a of the Appendix, https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778623455395309 r.png
12
of defamatory news,103 perceived multi-billion dollar Gay-Mob Monopoly activity,104 and
perceived environmental stuff.105
b. Wrongful oppression still aggravates me without compensation, though it seems like I
did many heroic types of things, like the hypothetical flipping of enough lawmakers during/after
my trip to DC in October 2025 to (in November 2025) apply enough persuasion to have the
Epstein Transparency Act signed.106 On 1/27/2026 I filed my Rehearing En Banc in case 252014 explaining something about “unlawful activity output on a daily basis”,107 and on
1/30/2026 the second wave of Epstein files was released giving rise to theories that my
Rehearing En Banc somehow helped.108 My Rehearing En Banc gave sagacious “presidential
level solutions” yet I am patently treated like I should be overwrought with joy just to still be
alive for a possible application to HUD,109 food stamps, or an Obama phone or something,
simply to allow news companies to in appearances without penalty say I pulled a knife,110 had
“narcotics”,111 “explosives”,112 and was involved with a “bomb scare”,113 when no court of law
has record of such.114 I don’t get restitution or compensation for the news stories. It’s observed
that ACLU won’t help,115 Southern Poverty Law Center won’t,116 Anti-Defamation League
103 Page 21a and page 22a of the Appendix.
104 Page 20a of the Appendix.
105 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778623851619864 r.png
106 https://www.aol.com/news/trump-signs-bill-release-epstein-014742974.html
107 Page 1 Oa of the Appendix.
108 https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/epstein-files-release-doi-01-30-26
109 Page 21a of the Appendix.
110 https://www.idahostateioumal.com/news/local/i-f-man-arrested-after-threatening-bar-employee-withknife/article a45a4ec0-237c-11 e2-84dl -0019bb2963f4.html; beliefs exist the pic is edited.
111 https://www.eastidahonews.com/2016/05/police-situation-underwav-at-blackfoot-walmart/
112 https://www.eastidahonews.com/2016/05/man-possessed-explosives-released/
113 https://www.kpvi.com/news/man-arrested-after-bomb-scare-released-speaks-out/article bf61d376-lbbeHe6-9166-0f3140711876.html
114 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778626691107771 rung and
https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 177862691725654 r.png for example.
'15 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777583797851241 r.png
116 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudffont.net/98221097 1777583901816291 r.png
13
won’t,117 and Black Lives Matter hasn’t, so even though some places tout (on their site) about
helping victims (including homosexuals) it seems they don’t care about what’s going on about
my situation as a heterosexual (even though my situation is seemingly what they are supposedly
supposed to advocate for). People have me giving out thousands of dollars in docket fees and
other costs over the years, while I am victim, discoverer of monopoly, whistleblower, and helper
(who did other things considered heroic like comment about pumps to save a soccer team during
flood, email a fire chief about commercial ionizers before 90MPH winds, and comment about
“ice” to cool waters about hurricane). I still claim that I am an unpaid member of the Pacer Class
Action Lawsuit (after asking),1181 still wonder about the “million” dollars the fed ex employee
had me conjecture about,119 and I still would like to receive money for work I did as an African
American.120 The point is, after heroic things and court work, I still have to “bear” costs,121 and
in worse situations attorney fees also, as ordered,122 though Court has power to change that.
Amid public reports of (government) (personnel’s) worsening physical health, mental
health, and cognitive decline,123 usage of nuclear bomb(s) without Congressional approval was
reportedly blocked,124 by high-ranking U.S. military official(s),125 so in essence/theory I helped
save the planet from nuclear warfare also, since my Rehearing En Banc I shared called for a stop
to “illegal operations by” ... “ in essence ‘taking the key with’ “ which is conceivably what
117 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 _1777583871288892_r.png
118 https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ347/PLAW-lQ7publ347.pdf; “E-Govemment Act of 2002”.
119 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778628970578714 r.png
120 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643_1779203022584402_r.png
121 Page 25a of the Appendix.
122 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 177863110971268 r.png
123 https://www.nvtimes.com/2026/04/13/us/politics/trump-mental-fitness-25th-amendment.html
124 https://www.usatodav.eom/storv/news/politics/2026/03/02/is-us-at-war-with-iran-trump-congress/88940873007
125 https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/trump-tried-to-use-nuclear-codes-but-was-stopped-bv-military-chief/arAA21nbUt
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/intemational/us/shock-claim-rocks-washington-trump-was-on-theverge-of-nuclear-decision-stopped-bv-military-chief/articleshow/130417784.cms
14
happened with nuke(s).126 It seems calls for impeachment (of personnel) grow,127 and if my
petition for writ of certiorari can be used as a vessel to do it by the “25th Amendment to the
United States Constitution”,128 okay. Also okay, perhaps it would be, if members of congress
create a mentioned body that hasn’t been assigned reportedly available via the 25th
Amendment.129 If not, another avenue perceivably may be the “10 U.S.C. §§ 251-254” laws I
brought up to solve problems, to allow for a saunter into retirement via agreed signoff/retirement/quitting for reasons to include health/abilities/requests/etc.
Anyway, at this point it seems practical that a country should be able to accept a request
for me to grant me dual citizenship rights to include a passport for me that does not have my
holographic picture for religious purposes,130 so I can in the abstract flee from oppressive
situations of stalking and preserve my liberties as a refugee or hopefully/possibly as a title better
than that, like an Olympian/talented-performer, some kind of freelance terror-monopoly-
hunter/monopoly-hunter, or a diplomat/minister/ambassador/chief in hopes to win something
someday and claim what is mine in America land (including rights). If courts/govemment
personnel/politicians want to help me and have that arranged, okay.
c. Many settings seem to complement or accomplish right-affecting confusions. My
Brief in Response to the order to show cause that was submitted on 1/13/2025 was not filed until
3/21/2025,131 for reasonings I cannot recall, and a document of 1/15/2025 was not filed until
126 Page 16a of the Appendix.
127 https://www.indeDendent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-Dolitics/trump-impeachment-articles-25-amendmentb2953836.html
128 Page 9a of the Appendix.
129 “such other body as Congress may by law provide” ; https://thehill.com/homenews/house/583Q863-raskin-bill25th-amendment/ ; possibly relevant https://democrats-judiciary.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rankingmember-raskin-introduces-legislation-establishing-independent-commission-on-presidential-capacity ; possibly
relevant https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778631991732768 r.png
130 (as it is argued that storing of biometrics of the brain is as if it is an infringement of
intellectual/Copyright/Trademark rights) https://futurism.com/science-energy/research-flv-brain-matrix
131 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778632913116282 r.png
15
3/21/2025 as well.132 My MOTION FOR ESTOPPEL BY SILENCE AND FOR EX PARTE
JUDGMENT WITH RCFC 52.1(c)(2) AND RCFC 52.1(c)(3) APPLIED submitted 1/15/2025
was put in between those filings.133 A Brief in Response, by the way, possibly could be a pretty
significant document, too.
My Motion to include newly substantiated information which seemingly could have been
significant was denied. I thought I clearly identified in my Original Complaint that I had
“subject matter jurisdiction”,134 yet the mere asking for clarification on that (again) seems to
validly be an inconsiderate cause for confusion. Perhaps I forgot to mention something in my
response to that order to show cause because of established confusion, and perhaps I overlooked
the 2/11/2025 due date on the docket possibly mistakenly referring to the 1/3/2025 date as the
due date not realizing it was a 2/11/2025 due date thereby causing more confusion amongst
situations within judiciary. Also, the afore mentioned 24 - “1102” thing might have affected my
case unrighteously; at least it is possible anyway.135 In summary it seems confusing things
affected my rights to the point I should be given another chance to win (about it). It seems to be
an unnecessary burden to me to make me go back and find things when I, in (apparent) respects
to court idiom, already presented the work. Also, I was disappointed to not see any opinion or
any kind of major time or effort used to write the Order denying my Rehearing En Banc, which
is a supposedly a very rare process especially for a Pro Se Litigant like me. Another note is that
if Al was used, my Informal Brief of case 25-2014 doesn’t allow a copy paste of a large portion
of what is written, so that in all likeliness wouldn’t even visualize to an Al program. I also note
132 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778633112983905 r.png
133 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778633239405421 r.png
134 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778634184280455_r.png
135 (For example if judiciary is thinking of a different case.)
16
that an order denying relief vanished as if advanced hackers were involved; after some effort I
finally re-obtained a copy.136
REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION
If my petition is granted:
I'd have money/power for groundbreaking good ideas to help oppressed humans via
advocating/authoring for: government funded sanitation teams for disease/virus prevention
(when needed),137 Al takeover prevention laws like no graven images/no moving parts/manual
key operated Al only/low HZ audio/low graphics/ business license for high quality/etc., reverse
auction bidding so large companies could (in maximum efficiency) pay to complete government
tasks in exchange for advertising logos on equipment, impeding gay rights movements in the
food industry and other industries unlawfully/unfairly disrupted by them, free medical care,138
free/no-need auto insurance,139 allocating resources to support advanced research of space/travel,
allocating resources to research for clean energy, and allocating resources to counter
evil/wrongful uses of sleep/alien technologies.140 With that and dedicated focus on ideas from
my books, national debt, in (this realistic) theory, would actually start decreasing with legitimate
pre-calculated numbers generating profit; I’d suggest a hurry as someone may(or might) have
given others my book ahead of consumers in apparent attempted scam proceedings,141 trying to
have others get ahead, generating profit with (tangible) currency.142
136 Appendix I, page 32a.
137 (Ken’s Philosophies): https://www.bamesandnoble.eom/w/kens-philosoDhies-l-through-l 0-kennethcaldwell/1146049427
138 (with a flat rate medical tax on income possibly .5%, insurance available for all, and poor using the medical tax
system to pay for medical care in exchange for higher medical tax percentage on income the following year up to
20% or other maximum amount determined).
139 (based on very low flat fee rate for all, insurance available to all, extra insurance required for high risk drivers)
140 (“Hypocretin” is a recent study topic I read about).
1411 received my $500 back (via dispute); BoFABank, Claim ID # 260116531950 and# 260116532195.
142 (for example if Lego Al videos were inspired by the ‘low graphics for Al’ idea);
https://www.bamesandnoble.com/w/kens-philosophies-11 -to-20-kenneth-caldwell/l 1493 63506
17
Countries of significance such as China, Russia, Israel, Ukraine, France, America, Iran,
the Korea(s), and others in Europe, Africa, Asia and Americas would be one step closer to
making world peace (more of) a reality with the International Safe Civilian Treaty/laws I thought
up/etc.,143 because even if countries still decided they are at war, civilians would (still) be safe
(or at least much safer) from negative effects of war, and with countries agreeing to a
“Fundamental Religion Proposition” mentioned or something similar,144 citizens in countries
with adversities about religion might/may be excused for a 1st time offense involving religion in
exchange for high fine instead of jail time. Me/scientists/etc., for research purposes, with land,
would be able to do decisive research experimenting with or without the ‘all seed bearing plants
allowed’ depending on jurisdiction request/application, even researching the research of
scientists who use or don’t use seed-bearing plants,145 as long as lawfully allowed.146 Either way,
with or without allowance of all-seed-bearing plants (for research/entertainment in controlled
manners such as fizz drink/edible/etc.), facilitation of monopoly giving advantage to
homosexuality would be fixed with ‘Adult Zones’ to excite the research industry sector with
incentivizing perks for intelligence and new discoveries would likely be found.147 China in
bilateral/multilateral/omnilateral agreements could in theory grant land ‘base rights’ for
‘research’ regarding discussions about Tawain, ostensibly $1 billion to be paid (possibly in
143 Page 18a of the Appendix for example.
144 Page 20a of the'Appendix.
145 https://biblehub.com/genesis/I-12.htm ; https://biblehub.com/genesis/l-29.htm ;
146 https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/statement-signmg-the-religious-land-use-and-institutionalizedpersons-act-2000 “zoning or landmark law”;
https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1779119088846548 r.png ;
https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1779119209949163 r.png ; Also please note that an order
denying me relief once stated “Mr. Caldwell mentions jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1505, but he has not pleaded
that he is an Indian or represents an Indian group”, and now I am stating that I in fact do have trace amounts of
Native American within my ancestry, directly related to American Indians who traversed the Trail of Tears.
https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 1779208612239268 r.png
147 It was seen that “heterosexual for children” typed on a Google Images search on 4/28/2026 brought up a number
of LGBTQ and gay topics, and a blurred “heterosexual pom” Google Images search for this example showed text
indicating 2 of the top 5 results would have shown a user wanting to avoid homosexual topics images of
homosexualism and lesbianism.
18
energy and possibly more) to China for allowing base rights for research at any one research base
location; a peace treaty idea with Tawain (in theory) could be negotiated, with the war
reparations idea(regarding Iran), paid in energy.148
I’d be able to maintain “unalienable Rights” which include “Life, Liberty and the pursuit
of Happiness”,149 to expand with research ‘bases’ for good diplomacy representing for the
person(s) of different straights,150 and I’d be able to help educate people with advocation for
television programming bringing monetary incentives to teach viewers during the program and
allow them to obtain questions to answer during commercials for better advertising efficiency.151
My petition if/when successfully used as a vessel to accomplish a Peace Plan about the
Iran War/conflict will in theory have parties agree to mediated terms that: suggest non
aggression toward terrorist groups seems realistic if it is an omnilateral/multilateral agreement
since allies of Israel in character won’t/can’t allow terrorists to attack Israel, agree continuation
of Iran’s control over the Straight of Hormuz supposedly may work as a negotiated term but
supposedly only in the form of war reparations (for example a monthly flat rate, in lifted
sanctions/energy/etc.), suggest scientific research to acquire renewable-resource energy from
different sources might allow war reparations be issued in the form of energy sold/energy given
back from research bases,152 and agree the need for finding safer sources of energy and for
148 (Perhaps page 19a and page 20a of the Appendix for example.)
149 https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/dec1aration-transcript
150 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfi~ont.net/98221097 1779119209949163 r.png
151 (with Possible Patent rights as well please?)
J52 (For an example: I conjured up a theory about reverse engineering characteristics possible when dealing with
mushrooms/mushroom spores (which may seem alien like), and light. I theorize if one were to successfully reverse
engineer a light particle (or something related) regarding space/travel alongside something to do with
mushrooms/spores, we’d become a dominant species within our solar system for the galaxy and beyond with
something I was thinking about involving instantaneous travel to where a light particle was calculated to be way
back in the past. Also in a theory, is why an alien might probe, if they do, closer to the stomach for ‘cleaner’ fuel
production regarding mushroom spores. I have other workings in the making such as automatic/synthetic
photosynthesis and with that, in theory, astronauts could live longer in space with this theorized system of mine I’ve
tested in minimal amounts; it seemed to work for breathing indoors.) See also: ‘scalar waves’. I have ideas for
clean (and safer) renewable energy (rather than energy from nuclear activity or fossil fuels).
19
finding a comprehensive Peace Plan outweigh needs of enriching uranium so a revert back to
certain terms from the Obama era might be feasible (with bases in the region, for research
purposes (only)).153 That legit plan would work for environmentalists of America wanting to
help prevent bad things for mankind anyway; with successful applications of such
treaties/plans/theories the uranium situation would be mediated with no need for uranium, and
the Straight of Hormuz would resume activity with a slight monthly toll for ‘reparations’ that
would incentivize speeded research/production of energy from base(s) (for research/rights/etc.)
in the region, to give the payout in energy produced instead money currency.
“We”/USA/America in such scenario would pay a little extra and must/might/may ‘research’ to
stay in the region (with bases), and Iran in theory might have the apology/recognition they
reportedly asked for. Even if a research base area was granted further away than speculated,
transported energy first going to Allied regions in theory would still have obligation to be
directed to/through/toward the region.
A quoted phrase from my petition that Government waived “right to respond” to,154 is
that there seems to be a sense of “terrorism” in "allowing sexual enticements of little children"
by the apparent "monopoly" existing I want "credit for discovering".155 ‘Adult Zones’ I (in
theory) would advocate for (as long as lawful, of course) would fix things with proposed ideas of
keeping homosexual pornographic images out of the minds of children and ideas of incentivizing
intelligence with Adult Zones allowing rules of legal seed bearing plants for
entertainment/research and new ‘massage’ laws if jurisdiction(s) allow, with granted entries only
153 (the word ‘research’ proposed to possibly include preventative measures for opposing straggler/skirmish terrorist
groups).
154 https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-7380/309518/2024051011291Q795_Waiver%20Letter%20-237380.pdf
155 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudffont.net/103844643 1779124541634843 r.png
20
to elite smart people/joumeymen of the community.156 In principle, marriages would last longer,
covert police operations I am sure exist would be able to use funds much more efficiently to
protect women (and women issuing tickets who don’t pay room tax) to still serve and protect
without violating rights, people would be content with more freedom in their rights, government
would earn (more) money while (still) employing safety mechanisms (for the people) in a more
efficient desired manner, and less men (in theory with statistics) would be driven to murder.157
Children would have incentives to want to be smart with religious fundamentals as they imagine
what it would be like to be in an Adult Zone with a Bachelor Degree or higher or pro-test pass
without (seeing) grotesque sexual images that people who lack fundamental religious beliefs
allow children to see, thereby making the human race smarter/better/civil (again), at the same
time (in such imagined scenario) creating an intrinsic strong defense against oppressive
techniques Gay-Mob-Monopoly/Terror-Monopoly/Monopoly activities utilize if/when
youngsters (young adults or minors) stick together longer after leaving school generally when
they are 18 to ‘protect’ their women,158 for example a defense against ‘mumbler attacks’ where
the stalking victim hears different parties mumble the same phrases. Fundamental social life and
sexual life activities to humans that these days humans lack thereby may/would be increased to
increase livability and quality of life, for example if a widowed mother of 5 in her younger days
lacks resources, a room tax system with timed key card could allow meet up (and exchange of
contact information) after a number unique visits. Everybody could guard against being
156 (Bachelor Degree and above for example); imagined to be with perks like gym, post services, free meal and
concert tickets, etc. at a low monthly rate.
157 "patterns suggest that men who report more problems" ... "tend to exhibit more anger-related emotions and
behaviors like feeling angry and losing one's temper." ; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11380368/
158 2 examples for showing the opposite (in picture) of what theorized Adult Zones would do:
httDs://thela.org/segments/who-is-hamas-leader-vahya-sinwar/;
httDs://www.telegraDh.co.uk/news/2023/12/20/hamas-leader-evades-capture-israeli-forces-gaza-tunnels/
21
physically/mentally/sexually oppressed(much easier). People would read, write, and work
smarter, and clean themselves/others/environments more often.
I'd have money/power for advocating for a defense against a recognized subliminal attack
upon democracy that seems to show faulty in the democracy law that allows just anybody who
was voted in to be a policy leader, by advocating for a new requisite ability to pass a GED test,
an I.Q. test for 85 LQ. or higher(a low standard), and an SAT test with at least an 80 percentile
score, before being deemed equipped with enough intelligence to be a policy leader/politician.
I'd have money/power to advocate for an International Secure Network Treaty (or other
name) that imaginably would have participating countries to have disclaimers used that have
entities associated with wireless networking state that transactions are not 100 percent
trustworthy, that (at full efficiency of law) wireless communications are best for entertainment
purposes only, that companies/countries may pledge to try to upload to an offline database (with
no wireless hardware attached) at the end of the day (if unable to change methods for daily
transactions), thereby in theory helping nations protect valuable information against thievery and
against terrorists trying to fool systems that use biometric security features.159
People in theory would have access to new and efficient marriage counseling, mental
health counseling, and physical health counseling.
I’d have enough resources to retire and start a family with authoring ability available
if/when beckoned, the things about news companies would have adequate disposition, and
people acting under color of law in representation of government could (hypothetically) go home
peaceably without fear being charged (in the ‘hand over’ or ‘Operation Quit’).
159 https://www.nvtimes.com/2025/10/13/travel/eu-biometric-border-checks.html;
https://www.biometricupdate.com/202605/us-demand-for-biometric-access-complicates-eu-visa-waiver-talks ;
https://www.newcastleherald.com.au/story/9246767/australian-travellers-european-borders-face-new-ees-chaos/
22
Other countries of the international community would be pleased to help grant me the
‘base’ rights I deserve as a human being in representation of myself as my own entity that the
law system so far seemingly in all appearances forced me to become. I’d be able to have rights
and resources for doing research of space/travel and for cleaning the air with commercial
ionizers,160 with America poised (in theory) to benefit from profitable situations.161 My rights (I
want) to have dual citizenship (hopefully with a passport that does not have a hologram for
religious purposes) and to have rental car money with plenty of gas money so I can avoid
stalking would be (more of) a reality.
CONCLUSION
Wrong or right, this documentation really seems to fully define remediation of substantial
situations. This Petition for a Writ of Certiorari should be granted.
Signed,
//
LL-
s\ /i .
All
Name: Kenneth Leslie Caldwell
Mailing Address: The Joshua House, 1435 N 15th St, Council Bluffs, IA 51501
Phone: (716)534-9868
Emai 1: 2017emailforward@gmai 1 .com
160 "Ozone, composed of three oxygen atoms (03), reacts with various compounds and photons to form oxygen
(02). In hydroponics, this process occurs naturally through the action of ozone generators or carbon filters that
convert ozone into oxygen."; https://canadagrowsuDDlies.com/blogs/main/how-long-does-it-take-to-tum-ozoneinto-oxvgen?srsltid=AfmBOorxOoJpOSZRskQimizJE-Wc2FJteiAVP4PixSb83Ii5SnKvIel
161 (For example, a base to the West of the highly polluted countries of India and China could let air quality
improvement work clean the air, while generating income somehow).
23
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.