Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kenneth Leslie Caldwell, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court briefMay 20, 2026

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

No.

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FILED

MAY 2 0 2026

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

cjjPPEME COURT. U.S.

Kenneth Leslie Caldwell - PETITIONER,

v.

United States of America - RESPONDENT.

On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari

to the United States Court of Appeals

— r

for the Federal Circuit

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Kenneth Leslie Caldwell

The Joshua House, 1435 N 15th St, Council Bluffs, IA 51501

(7161-534-9868

2017emailforward@gmail.com

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

A. If a president/chief signs orders to change things, can this petition be used as a vessel

to fix concerns, problems, and situations (identified)?

B. As the 25th Amendment (of the United States Constitution) is supposed to be a

guideline for lawmakers/Congress/senate/house of representatives/etc., what must be done if

people (acting under color of law) are identified in continued appearances as complicit with

allowing of (highly) illegal and gravely unconstitutional activities, and identified as grossly unfit

to hold title (of office)?

C. In what outreach of legislation can personnel in a government capacity pick and

choose which (highly) illegal activities to allow, without due process?

LIST OF PARTIES

[ X ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page.

A list of all parties to the proceeding in the court whose judgment may (possibly) be affected by

the outcome of this petition is as follows:

Kenneth Leslie Caldwell,

and,

United States (also professedly identified as ‘United States of America’).

There is an unknown number of entities/associations/person(s) and such that ostensibly may be

affected but are not listed to avoid confusion/delay/complication.

RELATED PROCEEDINGS

All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. Though there are

possibilities someone could think of other cases as potentially “related”, to avoid confusion I list

just these cases as the (directly) related cases relevant.

Caldwell v. United States, United States Court of Federal Claims docket # 24-2074 (April

30, 2025) / (July 30, 2025)

Caldwell v. United States ofAmerica, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal

Circuit docket # 25-2014 (March 2, 2026)

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

i

LIST OF PARTIES........................................................

ii

RELATED PROCEEDINGS

..................................................................................................ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

iii

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

v

PETITION

............................................................................................... 1

OPINIONS BELOW

......................................................................1

JURISDICTION

1

CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS PROVIDED

1

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

5

I. Detestable brazen malicious activities of news companies

depicted, involving defamation, go unhinged without punishment,

fine, or consequence

.................................................................................... 5

II. There is a fundamental problem of no “jurisdiction” for any court,

calling for application of power from the Supreme Court of the

United States or any other Court.

........................................................................................ 6

III. (Complicity with) Allowing perceived aggravated sexual abuse identified,

such as the extraordinary/astonishing allowing of things perceived in my case,

is an illustrated illegality that perceptive courts of a civil society cannot enforce

without obloquy

10

iii

IV. With situations affecting my psychology, I in theory lose massive amounts

of income with the wanton/willing “lewd sexual encroachments”

“United States allows/allowed”, as news companies appear to continue

to defame me, unimpeded...................................................................................................... 11

V. This being the Supreme Court of the United States, new

procedures or legislation are viable to fix things.................................................................. 12

REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION............................................................................. 17

CONCLUSION.................................................................................................................................. 23

APPENDIX

APPENDIX A, order, Docket # 25-2014 (Fed. Cir. March 2, 2026)............................................... la

APPENDIX B, mandate, Docket # 25-2014 (Fed. Cir. March 9, 2026)......................................... 3a

APPENDIX C, order, Docket # 25-2014 (Fed. Cir. March 5, 2026).............................................. 4a

APPENDIX D, order, Docket # 25-2014(Fed. Cir. January 27, 2026)........................................... 6a

APPENDIX E, order, Docket # 25-2014 (Fed. Cir. December 31, 2025).................................... 26a

APPENDIX F, order, Docket # 24-2074 (Court of Fed. Claims April 30, 2025)........................ 27a

APPENDIX G, judgment, Docket # 24-2074 (Court of Fed. Claims 4/30/25)............................ 30a

APPENDIX H, order, Docket # 24-2074 (Court of Fed. Claims 12/19/24................................... 31a

APPENDIX I, order, Docket # 24-2074 (Court of Fed. Claims July 30, 2025............................. 32a

APPENDIX J, order, Docket # 25-2014 (Fed. Cir. December, 10, 2025).................................... 33a

APPENDIX K, order, Docket # 25-2014 (Fed. Cir. February 12, 2026)...................................... 38a

APPENDIX L, order, Docket # 24-2074 (Court of Fed. Claims 12/10/25).................................. 40a

APPENDIX M, order, Docket # 24-2074 (Court of Fed. Claims March 2, 2026)...................... 42a

iv

APPENDIX N, order, Docket # 25-2014 (Fed. Cir. October 21, 2025)... .................................... 44a

APPENDIX O, mandate, Docket # 24-2074 (Court of Fed. Claims 3/9/26)................................ 46a

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

UNITED STATES CODES

5 United States Code § 2302...................................................

4

10 United States Code §§ 251-154............................................................................................... 2, 15

18 United States Code § 1512.......

3

18 United States Code § 1513...................................................

3

18 United States Code § 3663A.......................................................................................................... 4

28 United States Code § 1254(1)........................................................................................................ 1

CONSTITUTION LAW

25th Amendment of the United States Constitution...................................................................... 1,15

Article 2 of the United States Constitution.............. . .......................................................................... 1

ACTS

Mandatory Victims Restitution Act................................................................................................ 4, 5

Victim and Witness Protection Act.......................

2, 3

Whistleblower Protection Act.............................................................................................................. 4

v

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Petitioner Kenneth Leslie Caldwell petitions for a writ of certiorari to review the

judgment(s) of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

OPINIONS BELOW

It is unknown if the opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

is published or unpublished. I did not find documentation (there) that was issued as an “opinion”

in name. I challenge/object to judgments and orders, including (but presumably not limited to)

one(s) of interest, such as Appendix A, page 1 a.

It is unknown if the opinion of the United States Court of Federal Claims is published or

unpublished. I did not find documentation (there) that was issued as an “opinion” in name. The

Appendix contains orders/judgments.

JURISDICTION

The court of appeals for the federal circuit issued judgment on March 2, 2026, denying

rehearing and dismissing the REHEARING EN BANC.1 This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to

28 United States Code § 1254(1). The appeals court issued judgment denying rehearing on

12/31/2025,2 and issued a mandate 3/9/2026.3

CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS PROVIDED

Underlined are laws from my Rehearing En Banc in the United States Court of Appeal s

for the Federal Circuit.

Article 2 of the United States Constitution / 25th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution in

appearance for most relevant parts states there is “authority to impeach and remove" government

‘Appendix A, page 1 a.

2 Appendix E, page 26a.

3 Appendix O, page 46a.

1

personnel from office for "treason,4 bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors" or when

such person(s) are "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office".5 6

10 United States Codes

251-254 in appearance for most relevant parts states “§ 251.

Federal aid for State governments” - “Whenever there is an insurrection”7 or “unlawful

obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion” that make it “impracticable to enforce

the laws”,8 “The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other

means, shall” take action “if it—(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the

United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege,

immunity, or protection” ... “or impedes the course of justice under those laws”. Insurgents(or

‘insurrectionists’) may "disperse and retire peaceably to their abodes within a limited time."9

The Victim and Witness Protection Act in appearance for most relevant parts states: "(2)

All too often the victim of a serious crime is forced to suffer physical,10 psychological,11 or

financial hardship first"12... "3) Although the majority of serious crimes falls under the

jurisdiction of State and local law enforcement agencies, the Federal Government, and in

particular the Attorney General, has an important leadership role to assume in ensuring that

victims of crime, whether at the Federal, State, or local level, are given proper treatment" ... "(4)

Under current law, law enforcement agencies must have cooperation from a victim of crime and

4 https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S4-l/ALDE 0000Q282/

5 https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxxv

6 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CONAN-l 992/pdf/GPO-CONAN-l 992-10-26.pdf

7 https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:10%20section:2510/o20edition:prelim)%200R%20(granuleid:USCprelim-titlel0-section251')&f=treesort&num=0&edition=prelim

8https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-titlel0-section252&num=0&edition=prelim

9 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2016-titlelO/pdf/USCODE-2Q16-titlelO-subtitleA-partI-chapl3sec253.pdf; Also https://www.law.comell.edu/uscode/text/10/251 https://www.law.comell.edu/uscode/text/10/252

https://www.law.Cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/253 https://www.law.comell.edu/uscode/text/10/254

10 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 1779134309426750 r.png

11 (Note mental health support received.)

12 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 1779134117454795 r.png

2

yet neither the agencies nor the legal system can offer adequate protection or assistance when the

victim, as a result of such cooperation, is threatened or intimidated".

18 United States Code § 1512, a part of the Victim and Witness Protection Act, in

appearance for most relevant parts states “§1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an

informant” ... "(a)(1) Whoever kills or attempts to kill", "(b) Whoever knowingly uses

intimidation or physical force, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do

so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person", or "(c) Whoever intentionally

harasses another person and thereby hinders, delays, prevents, or dissuades any person from- (1)

attending or testifying in an official proceeding; (2) reporting to a law enforcement officer" shall

be "fined under this title or imprisoned".

. From a college website with discrepancies of what is written in mind (same code, 18

U.S.C. § 1512):13 “(d) Whoever intentionally harasses another person and thereby hinders,

delays, prevents, or dissuades any person” ... “or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this

title or imprisoned" ... “an official proceeding need not be pending or about to be instituted at

the time of the offense; and (2) the testimony, or the record, document, or other object need not

be admissible in evidence or free of a claim ofprivilege.” ... "(k) Whoever conspires to commit

any offense under this section shall be subject to the same penalties".14

From 18 United States Code § 1513, a part of the Victim and Witness Protection Act in

appearance for most relevant parts states:15 “(e) Whoever knowingly, with the intent to retaliate,

13 https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-1994-titlel8-sectionl512&num=0&edition=1994

14 https://www.law.comelI.edU/uscode/text/l 8/1512

15 httDs://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?hl=false&edition=1994&req=granuleid%3AUSC-1994-titlel8sectionl 513&num=0&saved=%7CZ3 JhbnVsZWlk01VTOvOxOTkQLXRpdGxlMTgtc2VidGlvbiEl MTI%3D%7C%

7C%7C0%7Cfalse%7C1994

3

takes any action harmful to any person, including interference with the lawful employment or

livelihood of any person” “shall be fined under this title or imprisoned”.16

Whistleblower Protection Act (as I was told to file a Whistleblower Form), in appearance

for most relevant parts states, from 5 United States Code § 2302, a part of the Whistleblower

Protection Act: "(b) Any employee who has authority to take, direct others to take, recommend,

or approve any personnel action, shall not, with respect to such authority—"... "(8) take or fail

to take, or threaten to take or fail to take, a personnel action with respect to any employee or

applicant for employment because of’... “violation of any law, rule, or regulation, or (ii) gross

mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific

danger to public health or safety".17

Mandatory Victims Restitution Act in appearance for most relevant parts states “CRIME

VICTIM FUND” - “In addition, the victim may at any time assign the victim’s interest in

restitution payments to the Crime Victim Fund in the Treasury without in any way impairing the

obligation of the defendant to make such payments”.18 "18 U.S. Code § 3663A - Mandatory

restitution to victims of certain crimes" ... "(a)" ‘ (2)For the purposes of this section, the term

“victim” ‘ “means a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of an

offense for which restitution may be ordered including, in the case of an offense that involves as

an element a scheme, conspiracy, or pattern of criminal activity, any person directly harmed by

the defendant’s criminal conduct in the course of the scheme, conspiracy, or pattern"19 ...

"(4)Clarification.—In ordering restitution under this section, a court shall order the defendant to

make restitution to a person who has assumed the victim’s rights under paragraph (2) to

16 https://www.law.comell.edu/uscode/text/18/1513

17 https://www.law.comell.edU/uscode/text/5/2302 ;

httDs://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=29&f=treesort&num=125

18 https://www.iustice.gov/sites/default/files/usao-az/legacy/2006/09/26/restitut.pdf

19 https://www.law.comell.edu/uscode/text/18/3663A

4

reimburse that person’s necessary and reasonable” “(B) lost income, transportation, and other

expenses incurred” “physical, psychiatric, and psychological care, including nonmedical care”

and other things including “therapy and rehabilitation", applicable when there was “(i)a crime of

violence".20

Another notable read (regarding Mandatory Victims Restitution Act) states

' President Reagan said in 1982 that, "The plight of innocent citizens victimized by lawlessness

deserves immediate national attention." ... The two primary goals of restitution are to prevent

unjust enrichment and to promote rehabilitation '.21

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

I. Detestable brazen malicious activities of news companies depicted, involving defamation,

go unhinged without punishment, fine, or consequence.22

It’s been observed nefarious people employed by news companies attacked me

unprovoked, starting in 2011 in New York State, then 2012 in Idaho state,23 and in 2016 in Idaho

state,24 with continuance of lying stories circulating being distributed across the internet after

multiple front page appearances and news interviews.25 I was advised by a law firm to press

charges in 2016 about the 2016 lies and executive branches would not do anything.26 I continued

to try to press charges and eventually sued in 2018 unsuccessfully, 2019 unsuccessfully, 2021

unsuccessfully, 2022 unsuccessfully (after going through state district and supreme courts), 2023

20 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 1779134309426750 r.png

21 https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2852&context=flr

22 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 1779134117454795 r.png

23 https://www.idahostateiournal.com/news/local/i-f-man-arrested-after-threatening-bar-employee-withknife/article a45a4ec0-237c-lle2-84dl-0019bb2963f4.html

24 https://www.kpvi.com/news/man-arrested-after-bomb-scare-released-speaks-out/article bf61d376-lbbeHe6-9166-0f3140711876.html

25 https://www.eastidahonews.com/2016/05/man-possessed-explosives-released/;

https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/l 03844643 1779210811161461 r.png

26 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 1779136835438119 r.png

5

J

unsuccessfully (after having Government waive right to respond),27 and in 2024 not successfully

yet.28

A lot happened, but that’s the summary (about news), with other notable activities being

that I passed out information about scot-free news the same year a newspaper there dissolved

reportedly with everyone gone but one person at a new news entity,29 I was told to talk to the

police chief but I had not and did not know about bad news until later and was never told/offered

anything about receiving/restitution money, and, a “caricature” of me was distributed with edited

hue/color/contrast/etc.30

II. There is a fundamental problem of no “jurisdiction” for any court,31 calling for

application of power from the Supreme Court of the United States or any other Court.32

a. In the (afore mentioned) case of 2021 I demanded "perpetrators representing media

companies get busted or be prosecuted",33 yet it was dismissed with the State arguing for

dismissal by “Rule 12(b)(1)” for lack of “jurisdiction”.34 The case was dismissed WITH

PREJUDICE implying I can’t bring suit about it ever again.35 Seeing problems already with

judiciary situations, I (in advance) left certain Defendants out for the second round in 2022. The

2022 case in Idaho was dismissed with prejudice,36 for “reasons as stated on the record”,37

27 https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-7380/309518/2024051011291Q795 Waiver%20Letter%20-237380.pdf

28 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cofc-l 24-cv-02074/context; see also

https://fedcircuitblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/24-1122.QRDER.2-5-2024 2265021.pdf

29 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 1779137088631353 r.png ;

https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 1779211842129178 r.png

30 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 177913737283605 r.png

31 https://app.midpage.ai/document/caldwell-v-united-states-1000370300635 ; see also

https://app.midpage.ai/case/caldwell-v-united-states-1000370300635

32 Possibly relevant https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All Writs Act

33 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 1779202787345284 r.png

34 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777917801323967 r.png

35 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777918163206083 r.png

36 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777923514667346 r.png

37 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777923720486513 r.png

6

including “Rule 12(b)(1)” “lack of jurisdiction”.38 I took that to the Supreme Court of Idaho,39

docket # 49782-2022,40 Caldwell v Judicial Administration of Idaho, East Idaho News, and Local

News 8 with activity possibly also seen as being within “Idaho Court of Appeals” amid

switching activity ordered from supreme court to appeals court. Anyway, that case I lost.41 It

was “affirmed”,42 for that same thing “jurisdiction”. Soon before that opinion came out for the

Supreme Court of Idaho (or appeals court, same docket #), I filed Complaint in the United States

Court of Federal Claims anticipating that I’d be treated without dignity.43 That case was

dismissed for (lack of) “jurisdiction”.44 It went to the United States Court of Appeals for the

Federal Circuit and it was affirmed to be dismissed for lack of “jurisdiction”.45 I filed a Petition

for Writ of Certiorari,46 to the Supreme Court of the United States,47 Caldwell v USA,48 and that

case was dismissed,49 even though Government waived “right to respond”.50 One may also note

the word “repugnant”.51

b. Going now to the more directly related/relevant case of the United States Court of

Federal Claims, I filed that Complaint within 5 months of the 2024 Supreme Court (of the United

38 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777924489568507 r.png

39 https://www.casemine.com/iudgement/us/64114bd2b0elce2c4ea4df99

40 https://www.studicata.com/summaries/court-of-appeals-of-idaho/caldwell-v-the-iudicial-admin-of-idaho-2023o5dlyj/

41 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777926457605486 r.png

42 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777926894228756 r.png

43 https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gci-1949/article-3 ; “cruel treatment and torture”, “outrages upon

personal dignity”, “humiliating and degrading treatment”, and “judicial guarantees” “recognized as indispensable by

civilized peoples”.

44 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777929045108182 r.png . See also

https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777929389343098 r.png

45 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777929721688992 r.png and

https://www.casemine.com/iudgement/us/65c45902abf0ab06640e7137

46 https://www.sunremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-7380/309021/202405061Q4336585 20240506-10384300003325-00004453.pdf

47 https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/23-7380.html

48 https://scotusgate.com/case.php7numbeF23-7380

49 https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-7380/314925/20240613143858Q13 CaldwellReh.pdf

50 https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-7380/309518/20240510112910795 Waiver%20Letter%20-237380.pdf

51 https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-1994-title28-sectionl257&num=0&edition=1994

7

States) dismissal,52 trying to maintain promptness amid tremendous amounts of stress and duress.

That Complaint of case 24-2074 in the United States Court of Federal Claims was never

defended against by Defendant United States;53 RCFC 12(h).54 With that, it seems my complaint

is not without merit as Marzulla Law (a prestigious law firm) implied.55 I noticed judge

Schwartz went back to a routine that may seem to occur often to pro se litigants, which is to refer

back to a previous case and dwell on those past decisions.56 Though I stated in my undefended

Complaint that there was “no lack of’ “jurisdiction” (including “subject-matter jurisdiction”),57

my case was dismissed,58 again for lack of “jurisdiction”.59

c. I took it to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, case 25-2014,

Caldwell v USA. There, the Defendant replied this time. “The appeal is dismissed”,

“frivolous”,6® I shall bear “costs” as stated in the ‘Order’.61 Yet how is my case frivolous if two

or more barred/knowledgeable people of law both state they cannot help but the decision doesn’t

“reflect” “on the merits” along with the fact Defendant United States didn’t defend against my

complaint?62 My appeal was “dismissed” 12/10/2025.63 I filed documentation initiating

rehearing for that case 25-2014 that same day on 12/10/2025 and on 12/31/2025 the petition for

52 Docket fee of $405 was paid, https://dockets.iustia.eom/docket/federal-claims/cofee/l :2024cv02074/51257 ;

Later, in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, case 25-2014, in forma pauperis status was granted on

10/21/2025. https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/cafc/25-2014

53 https://dockets.iustia.eom/docket/federal-claims/cofce/l:2024cv02074/51257 ; See note at filing # 1 showing

answer due date of 2/11/2025.

54 https://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/sites/cfc/files/Rules%202.12.26.pdf

55 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097_1777931752775290_r.png

56 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097_1777932453960100 r.png

57 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777932887317645_r.png

58 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097_1777933358290184 r.png

59 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777933733932823 r.png ; See also Appendix G, page 30a.

60 Page 24a of the Appendix.

61 Page 25a of the Appendix ; https://cases.iustia.eom/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/25-2014/25-2014-2025-1210.pdf?ts=1765378904

62 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 177854892358116 r.png and

https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097_1777931752775290 r.png

63 Starting at pages 24a, 36a, and 40a of the Appendix; see also

https://www.casemine.com/iudgement/us/693a525bec9d648fe4336aed

8

rehearing was denied.64 On 1/27/2026 I filed for a Petition for Rehearing En Bane,65 but that

was dismissed 3/2/2026 without a show of major opinion or discussion in just 2 very brief

pages,66 before my 2/15/2026 motion to submit brief on the merits was decided upon.67 That fact

about deciding on my Rehearing En Banc without my brief on the merits and the fact that the

Order disposing of my appeal on 12/31/2025 referred to a non-existent case "Caldwell v. United

States, No. 2024-1102" (seemingly in error) are two technicalities that might signify a second

chance possibly should exist for me and my case, considering my substantial rights at risk. I

motioned to Recall the Mandate on 3/2/2026,68 and on 3/3/2026 that motion was denied.69 On

3/9/2026 a formal “mandate” was issued.70

d. As disclosed and proclaimed time and time again, there is no court allowing

“jurisdiction”. Denying me relief in saying no “jurisdiction”, the court in a sense confirms my

status as some kind of representative/ambassador/minister/etc. of state I exist in; also if/since

there is no jurisdiction, demands of my Complaint are not farfetched,71 as portrayal of me as a

humiliated person/entity with no dignity nor equality when it comes to law continues,72 amid

details of allowed complicity with crimes horrific in nature.73 At minimum I’d be allowed my

‘base’ rights over land I own or acquire.74

64 Appendix E, page 26a. https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778549348367328 r.png

65 Pages 6a-23a of the Appendix.

66 Appendix A, page la.

67 Appendix C, page 4a; https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778549645393011 r.png

68 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778550018316219 r.png

69 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097_177855017956316 r.png

70 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097_1778550313259667 r.png

71 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643_l779139190834096 r.png

72 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 1779139378989117 r.png

73 https://legalclaritv.org/when-does-the-supreme-court-have-original-iurisdiction/

74 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 17792007797704 r.png

9

III. (Complicity with) Allowing perceived aggravated sexual abuse identified, such as the

extraordinary/astonishing allowing of things perceived in my case, is an illustrated illegality

that perceptive courts of a civil society cannot enforce without obloquy.

Regarding my complaint of case 24-2074 in the United States Court of Federal Claims

that went undefended, I like to bring forth the certitude that I stated "because of the importance

of stopping the lewd sexual encroachments people of the United States allows/allowed" in it,75

which in observance signifies admittance that “United States allows/allowed” “lewd sexual

encroachments”. Sexual abuse is a bad thing, and a judicial branch applying law should not

allow complicit actions/inactions by executive branch allowing it,76 especially when there is

power vested to the court to do something about it.77 The Supreme Court of the United States

had power to change things,78 yet,79 while it still appears maybe people “are complicit with

highly illegal activities”,80 no comt wants jurisdiction;81 the supreme court should in theory be

unable to enforce an illegality though,82 especially perceived illegalities of allowing rude,83

vile,84 and downright evil things undoubtedly seamed to ideologies of sexual abuse.85 Cruel

oppressions I suffer are oppressions that cause me to be without “dignity” as public ridicule and

75 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778614770316644 r.png

76 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 1779201104974676 r.png ; Incident Number 20-30241161,

Boise, ID. Check first minute of audio file and around 1:15,4:00, and 6:25, of Folder 4 of Exhibit AA of Docket #

49782, Supreme Court of Idaho, Caldwell v Judicial Administration of Idaho et. al. “Check cameras”. I Went to the

hospital that same day.

77 https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-3/

78 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778616127794695 r.png

79 https://scotusgate.com/search.php?partv=Kenneth+Leslie+Caldwell

80 Page 8a of the Appendix.

81 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-cofc-l 24-cv-02074/pdf/USCQURTS-cofc-l 24-cv-02074O.pdf

82 https://cases.iustia.com/federal/district-courts/federalclaims/cofce/l:2024cv02074/51257/18/0.pdf?ts=1746114569

83 https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6819b0291d8db5ace5072b49

84 https://law.iustia.eom/cases/federal/district-courts/federal-claims/cofce/l:2024cv02074/51257/18/

85 https://www.law.comell.edu/uscode/text/18/2241 ; possibly relevant https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/epstein-files-usambassador-allegations-1780761

10

humiliation goes (against me) without consequence.86 To enforce complicity of allowing illegal

defamation and complicity of allowing illegal ‘sexual abuse’ is to enforce something delusive in

nature and is damaging to the semblance of judiciary.87

IV. With situations affecting my psychology,88 I in theory lose massive amounts of income

with the wanton/willing “lewd sexual encroachments” “United States allows/allowed”,89 as

news companies appear to continue to defame me, unimpeded.90

If I am not worth it to be offered payment, logic suggests news companies should not take

advantage of my name and character with “preposterous moronic stories going far beyond the

established norms” “that falsely claim” I “committed infamous/felonious crimes” as my

(undefended) Complaint so worded.91 I was selected Honored Listee for a Biography book and

was in theory denied hundreds of thousands of dollars a year if not millions because of activities

of ‘news’ that stripped that status away.92 Is not that a claim for relief in and of itself when

people are noticeably not holding true to their oaths of office in display of complicit allowing of

calculated illegal activities when the allowing of such hypothesized/illustrated illegal activities

not only harms me physically and mentally but in theory harms my earning potential?93 I called

for (other) ways to earn large sums of money regarding my one-of-a-kind world class skills

including athletic showmanship skills such as pushing a firetruck,94 crushing walnuts with one

86 See Chapter 1 Article 3(1 )(c) of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 for example;

https://www.icrc.org/sites/default/files/extemal/doc/en/assets/files/nublications/icrc-002-0173.pdf

87 https://ecf.cofc.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show public doc72024cv2Q74-18-0

88 William Aardsma, M.A. LPC; (719)-384-5446

89 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778614770316644 r.png

90 https://law.iustia.eom/cases/federal/district-courts/federal-claims/cofce/l:2023cv00320/47216/21/

91 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778618105308789 r.png

92 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778618681514056 r.png

93 Regulatory Takings: General Doctrine:

https://www.law.comell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/regulatory-takings-general-doctrine Kicked off of

Honored Listee status: https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778618948911396 r.png The news link

that did it: https://www.kpvi.com/news/man-arrested-after-bomb-scare-released-speaks-out/article bf61d376-lbbe11 e6-9166-0f3140711876.html

94 https://www.voutube.com/shorts/zhR9UFOdABO

11

hand,95 and puncturing pop cans with my finger,96 but I (for some reason) encounter (many)

difficulties finding them and still complain about stories that are evidently defamatory in nature

playing a contributing factor in difficulties finding large sums of money.

V. This being the Supreme Court of the United States, new procedures or legislation are

viable to fix things.

a. As far as I know, many people of the public still might remember me as the man at the

center of the “bomb scare” with NBC logo used; audio only may be there now, appearing to

intend to show it how I originally might have wanted, with no video.97

The court accepted Government’s stance before regarding waiving right to respond in the

Supreme Court,98 and it seems there should be no difference now when approaching same

circumstances yet now I even have more circumstances to have courts favor me; I’d argue

someone is wrong if they said I am “frivolous” in my work.99 There is a law in fact that states

when “court finds that there is a want of jurisdiction, the court shall” ... “transfer such action or

appeal to any other” “court”.100 I want a jurisdiction so I can have my matters settled,101 and

there’s an observed need for jurisdiction regarding perceived sexual “encroachments”,102 exhibits

95 https://www.youtube.com/shorts/WvbPYlbVXrE

96 https://www.youtube.com/shorts/H-Gmx7byAU8

97 https://www.kpvi.com/news/man-arrested-after-bomb-scare-released-speaks-out/article bf61d376-lbbe-lle69166-0f3140711876.html

98 https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-7380/309021/202405Q6104336585 20240506-10384300003325-00004453.pdf

99 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778620735854214 r.png ; Pages 24a, 36a, and 40a of the

Appendix.

100 “§ 1631. Transfer to cure want of jurisdiction” ; https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE96/pdf/STATUTE-96-Pg25.pdf#page=31

https://www.govinfo.gOv/content/pkg/USCODE-2023-title28/pdf7USCODE-2023-title28-partIV-chap87secl406.pdf: https://www.law.comell.edu/uscode/text/28/1631

101 https://law.iustia.com/constitution/us/article-3/

102 Page 19a of the Appendix, https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778623455395309 r.png

12

of defamatory news,103 perceived multi-billion dollar Gay-Mob Monopoly activity,104 and

perceived environmental stuff.105

b. Wrongful oppression still aggravates me without compensation, though it seems like I

did many heroic types of things, like the hypothetical flipping of enough lawmakers during/after

my trip to DC in October 2025 to (in November 2025) apply enough persuasion to have the

Epstein Transparency Act signed.106 On 1/27/2026 I filed my Rehearing En Banc in case 252014 explaining something about “unlawful activity output on a daily basis”,107 and on

1/30/2026 the second wave of Epstein files was released giving rise to theories that my

Rehearing En Banc somehow helped.108 My Rehearing En Banc gave sagacious “presidential

level solutions” yet I am patently treated like I should be overwrought with joy just to still be

alive for a possible application to HUD,109 food stamps, or an Obama phone or something,

simply to allow news companies to in appearances without penalty say I pulled a knife,110 had

“narcotics”,111 “explosives”,112 and was involved with a “bomb scare”,113 when no court of law

has record of such.114 I don’t get restitution or compensation for the news stories. It’s observed

that ACLU won’t help,115 Southern Poverty Law Center won’t,116 Anti-Defamation League

103 Page 21a and page 22a of the Appendix.

104 Page 20a of the Appendix.

105 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778623851619864 r.png

106 https://www.aol.com/news/trump-signs-bill-release-epstein-014742974.html

107 Page 1 Oa of the Appendix.

108 https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/epstein-files-release-doi-01-30-26

109 Page 21a of the Appendix.

110 https://www.idahostateioumal.com/news/local/i-f-man-arrested-after-threatening-bar-employee-withknife/article a45a4ec0-237c-11 e2-84dl -0019bb2963f4.html; beliefs exist the pic is edited.

111 https://www.eastidahonews.com/2016/05/police-situation-underwav-at-blackfoot-walmart/

112 https://www.eastidahonews.com/2016/05/man-possessed-explosives-released/

113 https://www.kpvi.com/news/man-arrested-after-bomb-scare-released-speaks-out/article bf61d376-lbbeHe6-9166-0f3140711876.html

114 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778626691107771 rung and

https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 177862691725654 r.png for example.

'15 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1777583797851241 r.png

116 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudffont.net/98221097 1777583901816291 r.png

13

won’t,117 and Black Lives Matter hasn’t, so even though some places tout (on their site) about

helping victims (including homosexuals) it seems they don’t care about what’s going on about

my situation as a heterosexual (even though my situation is seemingly what they are supposedly

supposed to advocate for). People have me giving out thousands of dollars in docket fees and

other costs over the years, while I am victim, discoverer of monopoly, whistleblower, and helper

(who did other things considered heroic like comment about pumps to save a soccer team during

flood, email a fire chief about commercial ionizers before 90MPH winds, and comment about

“ice” to cool waters about hurricane). I still claim that I am an unpaid member of the Pacer Class

Action Lawsuit (after asking),1181 still wonder about the “million” dollars the fed ex employee

had me conjecture about,119 and I still would like to receive money for work I did as an African

American.120 The point is, after heroic things and court work, I still have to “bear” costs,121 and

in worse situations attorney fees also, as ordered,122 though Court has power to change that.

Amid public reports of (government) (personnel’s) worsening physical health, mental

health, and cognitive decline,123 usage of nuclear bomb(s) without Congressional approval was

reportedly blocked,124 by high-ranking U.S. military official(s),125 so in essence/theory I helped

save the planet from nuclear warfare also, since my Rehearing En Banc I shared called for a stop

to “illegal operations by” ... “ in essence ‘taking the key with’ “ which is conceivably what

117 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 _1777583871288892_r.png

118 https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ347/PLAW-lQ7publ347.pdf; “E-Govemment Act of 2002”.

119 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778628970578714 r.png

120 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643_1779203022584402_r.png

121 Page 25a of the Appendix.

122 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 177863110971268 r.png

123 https://www.nvtimes.com/2026/04/13/us/politics/trump-mental-fitness-25th-amendment.html

124 https://www.usatodav.eom/storv/news/politics/2026/03/02/is-us-at-war-with-iran-trump-congress/88940873007

125 https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/trump-tried-to-use-nuclear-codes-but-was-stopped-bv-military-chief/arAA21nbUt

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/intemational/us/shock-claim-rocks-washington-trump-was-on-theverge-of-nuclear-decision-stopped-bv-military-chief/articleshow/130417784.cms

14

happened with nuke(s).126 It seems calls for impeachment (of personnel) grow,127 and if my

petition for writ of certiorari can be used as a vessel to do it by the “25th Amendment to the

United States Constitution”,128 okay. Also okay, perhaps it would be, if members of congress

create a mentioned body that hasn’t been assigned reportedly available via the 25th

Amendment.129 If not, another avenue perceivably may be the “10 U.S.C. §§ 251-254” laws I

brought up to solve problems, to allow for a saunter into retirement via agreed signoff/retirement/quitting for reasons to include health/abilities/requests/etc.

Anyway, at this point it seems practical that a country should be able to accept a request

for me to grant me dual citizenship rights to include a passport for me that does not have my

holographic picture for religious purposes,130 so I can in the abstract flee from oppressive

situations of stalking and preserve my liberties as a refugee or hopefully/possibly as a title better

than that, like an Olympian/talented-performer, some kind of freelance terror-monopoly-

hunter/monopoly-hunter, or a diplomat/minister/ambassador/chief in hopes to win something

someday and claim what is mine in America land (including rights). If courts/govemment

personnel/politicians want to help me and have that arranged, okay.

c. Many settings seem to complement or accomplish right-affecting confusions. My

Brief in Response to the order to show cause that was submitted on 1/13/2025 was not filed until

3/21/2025,131 for reasonings I cannot recall, and a document of 1/15/2025 was not filed until

126 Page 16a of the Appendix.

127 https://www.indeDendent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-Dolitics/trump-impeachment-articles-25-amendmentb2953836.html

128 Page 9a of the Appendix.

129 “such other body as Congress may by law provide” ; https://thehill.com/homenews/house/583Q863-raskin-bill25th-amendment/ ; possibly relevant https://democrats-judiciary.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rankingmember-raskin-introduces-legislation-establishing-independent-commission-on-presidential-capacity ; possibly

relevant https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778631991732768 r.png

130 (as it is argued that storing of biometrics of the brain is as if it is an infringement of

intellectual/Copyright/Trademark rights) https://futurism.com/science-energy/research-flv-brain-matrix

131 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778632913116282 r.png

15

3/21/2025 as well.132 My MOTION FOR ESTOPPEL BY SILENCE AND FOR EX PARTE

JUDGMENT WITH RCFC 52.1(c)(2) AND RCFC 52.1(c)(3) APPLIED submitted 1/15/2025

was put in between those filings.133 A Brief in Response, by the way, possibly could be a pretty

significant document, too.

My Motion to include newly substantiated information which seemingly could have been

significant was denied. I thought I clearly identified in my Original Complaint that I had

“subject matter jurisdiction”,134 yet the mere asking for clarification on that (again) seems to

validly be an inconsiderate cause for confusion. Perhaps I forgot to mention something in my

response to that order to show cause because of established confusion, and perhaps I overlooked

the 2/11/2025 due date on the docket possibly mistakenly referring to the 1/3/2025 date as the

due date not realizing it was a 2/11/2025 due date thereby causing more confusion amongst

situations within judiciary. Also, the afore mentioned 24 - “1102” thing might have affected my

case unrighteously; at least it is possible anyway.135 In summary it seems confusing things

affected my rights to the point I should be given another chance to win (about it). It seems to be

an unnecessary burden to me to make me go back and find things when I, in (apparent) respects

to court idiom, already presented the work. Also, I was disappointed to not see any opinion or

any kind of major time or effort used to write the Order denying my Rehearing En Banc, which

is a supposedly a very rare process especially for a Pro Se Litigant like me. Another note is that

if Al was used, my Informal Brief of case 25-2014 doesn’t allow a copy paste of a large portion

of what is written, so that in all likeliness wouldn’t even visualize to an Al program. I also note

132 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778633112983905 r.png

133 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778633239405421 r.png

134 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1778634184280455_r.png

135 (For example if judiciary is thinking of a different case.)

16

that an order denying relief vanished as if advanced hackers were involved; after some effort I

finally re-obtained a copy.136

REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION

If my petition is granted:

I'd have money/power for groundbreaking good ideas to help oppressed humans via

advocating/authoring for: government funded sanitation teams for disease/virus prevention

(when needed),137 Al takeover prevention laws like no graven images/no moving parts/manual

key operated Al only/low HZ audio/low graphics/ business license for high quality/etc., reverse

auction bidding so large companies could (in maximum efficiency) pay to complete government

tasks in exchange for advertising logos on equipment, impeding gay rights movements in the

food industry and other industries unlawfully/unfairly disrupted by them, free medical care,138

free/no-need auto insurance,139 allocating resources to support advanced research of space/travel,

allocating resources to research for clean energy, and allocating resources to counter

evil/wrongful uses of sleep/alien technologies.140 With that and dedicated focus on ideas from

my books, national debt, in (this realistic) theory, would actually start decreasing with legitimate

pre-calculated numbers generating profit; I’d suggest a hurry as someone may(or might) have

given others my book ahead of consumers in apparent attempted scam proceedings,141 trying to

have others get ahead, generating profit with (tangible) currency.142

136 Appendix I, page 32a.

137 (Ken’s Philosophies): https://www.bamesandnoble.eom/w/kens-philosoDhies-l-through-l 0-kennethcaldwell/1146049427

138 (with a flat rate medical tax on income possibly .5%, insurance available for all, and poor using the medical tax

system to pay for medical care in exchange for higher medical tax percentage on income the following year up to

20% or other maximum amount determined).

139 (based on very low flat fee rate for all, insurance available to all, extra insurance required for high risk drivers)

140 (“Hypocretin” is a recent study topic I read about).

1411 received my $500 back (via dispute); BoFABank, Claim ID # 260116531950 and# 260116532195.

142 (for example if Lego Al videos were inspired by the ‘low graphics for Al’ idea);

https://www.bamesandnoble.com/w/kens-philosophies-11 -to-20-kenneth-caldwell/l 1493 63506

17

Countries of significance such as China, Russia, Israel, Ukraine, France, America, Iran,

the Korea(s), and others in Europe, Africa, Asia and Americas would be one step closer to

making world peace (more of) a reality with the International Safe Civilian Treaty/laws I thought

up/etc.,143 because even if countries still decided they are at war, civilians would (still) be safe

(or at least much safer) from negative effects of war, and with countries agreeing to a

“Fundamental Religion Proposition” mentioned or something similar,144 citizens in countries

with adversities about religion might/may be excused for a 1st time offense involving religion in

exchange for high fine instead of jail time. Me/scientists/etc., for research purposes, with land,

would be able to do decisive research experimenting with or without the ‘all seed bearing plants

allowed’ depending on jurisdiction request/application, even researching the research of

scientists who use or don’t use seed-bearing plants,145 as long as lawfully allowed.146 Either way,

with or without allowance of all-seed-bearing plants (for research/entertainment in controlled

manners such as fizz drink/edible/etc.), facilitation of monopoly giving advantage to

homosexuality would be fixed with ‘Adult Zones’ to excite the research industry sector with

incentivizing perks for intelligence and new discoveries would likely be found.147 China in

bilateral/multilateral/omnilateral agreements could in theory grant land ‘base rights’ for

‘research’ regarding discussions about Tawain, ostensibly $1 billion to be paid (possibly in

143 Page 18a of the Appendix for example.

144 Page 20a of the'Appendix.

145 https://biblehub.com/genesis/I-12.htm ; https://biblehub.com/genesis/l-29.htm ;

146 https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/statement-signmg-the-religious-land-use-and-institutionalizedpersons-act-2000 “zoning or landmark law”;

https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1779119088846548 r.png ;

https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/98221097 1779119209949163 r.png ; Also please note that an order

denying me relief once stated “Mr. Caldwell mentions jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1505, but he has not pleaded

that he is an Indian or represents an Indian group”, and now I am stating that I in fact do have trace amounts of

Native American within my ancestry, directly related to American Indians who traversed the Trail of Tears.

https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/103844643 1779208612239268 r.png

147 It was seen that “heterosexual for children” typed on a Google Images search on 4/28/2026 brought up a number

of LGBTQ and gay topics, and a blurred “heterosexual pom” Google Images search for this example showed text

indicating 2 of the top 5 results would have shown a user wanting to avoid homosexual topics images of

homosexualism and lesbianism.

18

energy and possibly more) to China for allowing base rights for research at any one research base

location; a peace treaty idea with Tawain (in theory) could be negotiated, with the war

reparations idea(regarding Iran), paid in energy.148

I’d be able to maintain “unalienable Rights” which include “Life, Liberty and the pursuit

of Happiness”,149 to expand with research ‘bases’ for good diplomacy representing for the

person(s) of different straights,150 and I’d be able to help educate people with advocation for

television programming bringing monetary incentives to teach viewers during the program and

allow them to obtain questions to answer during commercials for better advertising efficiency.151

My petition if/when successfully used as a vessel to accomplish a Peace Plan about the

Iran War/conflict will in theory have parties agree to mediated terms that: suggest non­

aggression toward terrorist groups seems realistic if it is an omnilateral/multilateral agreement

since allies of Israel in character won’t/can’t allow terrorists to attack Israel, agree continuation

of Iran’s control over the Straight of Hormuz supposedly may work as a negotiated term but

supposedly only in the form of war reparations (for example a monthly flat rate, in lifted

sanctions/energy/etc.), suggest scientific research to acquire renewable-resource energy from

different sources might allow war reparations be issued in the form of energy sold/energy given

back from research bases,152 and agree the need for finding safer sources of energy and for

148 (Perhaps page 19a and page 20a of the Appendix for example.)

149 https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/dec1aration-transcript

150 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfi~ont.net/98221097 1779119209949163 r.png

151 (with Possible Patent rights as well please?)

J52 (For an example: I conjured up a theory about reverse engineering characteristics possible when dealing with

mushrooms/mushroom spores (which may seem alien like), and light. I theorize if one were to successfully reverse

engineer a light particle (or something related) regarding space/travel alongside something to do with

mushrooms/spores, we’d become a dominant species within our solar system for the galaxy and beyond with

something I was thinking about involving instantaneous travel to where a light particle was calculated to be way

back in the past. Also in a theory, is why an alien might probe, if they do, closer to the stomach for ‘cleaner’ fuel

production regarding mushroom spores. I have other workings in the making such as automatic/synthetic

photosynthesis and with that, in theory, astronauts could live longer in space with this theorized system of mine I’ve

tested in minimal amounts; it seemed to work for breathing indoors.) See also: ‘scalar waves’. I have ideas for

clean (and safer) renewable energy (rather than energy from nuclear activity or fossil fuels).

19

finding a comprehensive Peace Plan outweigh needs of enriching uranium so a revert back to

certain terms from the Obama era might be feasible (with bases in the region, for research

purposes (only)).153 That legit plan would work for environmentalists of America wanting to

help prevent bad things for mankind anyway; with successful applications of such

treaties/plans/theories the uranium situation would be mediated with no need for uranium, and

the Straight of Hormuz would resume activity with a slight monthly toll for ‘reparations’ that

would incentivize speeded research/production of energy from base(s) (for research/rights/etc.)

in the region, to give the payout in energy produced instead money currency.

“We”/USA/America in such scenario would pay a little extra and must/might/may ‘research’ to

stay in the region (with bases), and Iran in theory might have the apology/recognition they

reportedly asked for. Even if a research base area was granted further away than speculated,

transported energy first going to Allied regions in theory would still have obligation to be

directed to/through/toward the region.

A quoted phrase from my petition that Government waived “right to respond” to,154 is

that there seems to be a sense of “terrorism” in "allowing sexual enticements of little children"

by the apparent "monopoly" existing I want "credit for discovering".155 ‘Adult Zones’ I (in

theory) would advocate for (as long as lawful, of course) would fix things with proposed ideas of

keeping homosexual pornographic images out of the minds of children and ideas of incentivizing

intelligence with Adult Zones allowing rules of legal seed bearing plants for

entertainment/research and new ‘massage’ laws if jurisdiction(s) allow, with granted entries only

153 (the word ‘research’ proposed to possibly include preventative measures for opposing straggler/skirmish terrorist

groups).

154 https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-7380/309518/2024051011291Q795_Waiver%20Letter%20-237380.pdf

155 https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudffont.net/103844643 1779124541634843 r.png

20

to elite smart people/joumeymen of the community.156 In principle, marriages would last longer,

covert police operations I am sure exist would be able to use funds much more efficiently to

protect women (and women issuing tickets who don’t pay room tax) to still serve and protect

without violating rights, people would be content with more freedom in their rights, government

would earn (more) money while (still) employing safety mechanisms (for the people) in a more

efficient desired manner, and less men (in theory with statistics) would be driven to murder.157

Children would have incentives to want to be smart with religious fundamentals as they imagine

what it would be like to be in an Adult Zone with a Bachelor Degree or higher or pro-test pass

without (seeing) grotesque sexual images that people who lack fundamental religious beliefs

allow children to see, thereby making the human race smarter/better/civil (again), at the same

time (in such imagined scenario) creating an intrinsic strong defense against oppressive

techniques Gay-Mob-Monopoly/Terror-Monopoly/Monopoly activities utilize if/when

youngsters (young adults or minors) stick together longer after leaving school generally when

they are 18 to ‘protect’ their women,158 for example a defense against ‘mumbler attacks’ where

the stalking victim hears different parties mumble the same phrases. Fundamental social life and

sexual life activities to humans that these days humans lack thereby may/would be increased to

increase livability and quality of life, for example if a widowed mother of 5 in her younger days

lacks resources, a room tax system with timed key card could allow meet up (and exchange of

contact information) after a number unique visits. Everybody could guard against being

156 (Bachelor Degree and above for example); imagined to be with perks like gym, post services, free meal and

concert tickets, etc. at a low monthly rate.

157 "patterns suggest that men who report more problems" ... "tend to exhibit more anger-related emotions and

behaviors like feeling angry and losing one's temper." ; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11380368/

158 2 examples for showing the opposite (in picture) of what theorized Adult Zones would do:

httDs://thela.org/segments/who-is-hamas-leader-vahya-sinwar/;

httDs://www.telegraDh.co.uk/news/2023/12/20/hamas-leader-evades-capture-israeli-forces-gaza-tunnels/

21

physically/mentally/sexually oppressed(much easier). People would read, write, and work

smarter, and clean themselves/others/environments more often.

I'd have money/power for advocating for a defense against a recognized subliminal attack

upon democracy that seems to show faulty in the democracy law that allows just anybody who

was voted in to be a policy leader, by advocating for a new requisite ability to pass a GED test,

an I.Q. test for 85 LQ. or higher(a low standard), and an SAT test with at least an 80 percentile

score, before being deemed equipped with enough intelligence to be a policy leader/politician.

I'd have money/power to advocate for an International Secure Network Treaty (or other

name) that imaginably would have participating countries to have disclaimers used that have

entities associated with wireless networking state that transactions are not 100 percent

trustworthy, that (at full efficiency of law) wireless communications are best for entertainment

purposes only, that companies/countries may pledge to try to upload to an offline database (with

no wireless hardware attached) at the end of the day (if unable to change methods for daily

transactions), thereby in theory helping nations protect valuable information against thievery and

against terrorists trying to fool systems that use biometric security features.159

People in theory would have access to new and efficient marriage counseling, mental

health counseling, and physical health counseling.

I’d have enough resources to retire and start a family with authoring ability available

if/when beckoned, the things about news companies would have adequate disposition, and

people acting under color of law in representation of government could (hypothetically) go home

peaceably without fear being charged (in the ‘hand over’ or ‘Operation Quit’).

159 https://www.nvtimes.com/2025/10/13/travel/eu-biometric-border-checks.html;

https://www.biometricupdate.com/202605/us-demand-for-biometric-access-complicates-eu-visa-waiver-talks ;

https://www.newcastleherald.com.au/story/9246767/australian-travellers-european-borders-face-new-ees-chaos/

22

Other countries of the international community would be pleased to help grant me the

‘base’ rights I deserve as a human being in representation of myself as my own entity that the

law system so far seemingly in all appearances forced me to become. I’d be able to have rights

and resources for doing research of space/travel and for cleaning the air with commercial

ionizers,160 with America poised (in theory) to benefit from profitable situations.161 My rights (I

want) to have dual citizenship (hopefully with a passport that does not have a hologram for

religious purposes) and to have rental car money with plenty of gas money so I can avoid

stalking would be (more of) a reality.

CONCLUSION

Wrong or right, this documentation really seems to fully define remediation of substantial

situations. This Petition for a Writ of Certiorari should be granted.

Signed,

//

LL-

s\ /i .

All

Name: Kenneth Leslie Caldwell

Mailing Address: The Joshua House, 1435 N 15th St, Council Bluffs, IA 51501

Phone: (716)534-9868

Emai 1: 2017emailforward@gmai 1 .com

160 "Ozone, composed of three oxygen atoms (03), reacts with various compounds and photons to form oxygen

(02). In hydroponics, this process occurs naturally through the action of ozone generators or carbon filters that

convert ozone into oxygen."; https://canadagrowsuDDlies.com/blogs/main/how-long-does-it-take-to-tum-ozoneinto-oxvgen?srsltid=AfmBOorxOoJpOSZRskQimizJE-Wc2FJteiAVP4PixSb83Ii5SnKvIel

161 (For example, a base to the West of the highly polluted countries of India and China could let air quality

improvement work clean the air, while generating income somehow).

23

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.