Documents

Respondents Brief — Key Tronic Corp. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1994

The private respondents allowed haz- ardous chemicals from the dry cleaning plant to contam- inate Stanton Road’s land. Pet. App. C2, D2-D6. a. … See Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, Pub. L.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Andrew Hanson, et al., Petitioners v. District of Columbia, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 26, 2025

National Firearms Act: Hearing(s) on H.R. 9066 Before the Comm. on Ways and Means, 73rd Cong. 45 (1934) (cleaned up); accord Andrews v. … Tr. at 8 (comment of Kennedy, J.), District of Columbia v.

Appellants Reply Brief — Potomac Edison Co. v. Pennsylvania

Supreme Court brief · Appellants Reply Brief · 1981

In so acting, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, itself, created, for the first time in this case, the federal question before this Court. … The Court held that the manufacure of potato chips, con- sisting of storing raw potatoes at a given temperature for a specified period, testing, storing at increased temperature, cleaning, slicing,

Opposition — Williams v. Pacific Maritime Ass'n

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981

I acknowledge that I and all other B Men had to keep an absolutely clean record .. . … Qantas Empire Air- ways, Lid., 573 E2d 1082, 1091 (9th Cir. 1978), the Ninth Circuit held a union could breach its duty of fair representation if it acted “arbitrarily” even in the absence of bad faith

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Shawn K. Bever, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 3, 2025

(cleaned up). … Id. at 703 (cleaned up).

Appendixmm — Bieneman v. Chicago

Supreme Court brief · Appendixmm · 1989

§2401(a) for suits against the United States, a period that is employed to mark the outer limits for purposes of in- verse condemnation actions under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. §1491(aX1). … Garcia and Good- man concluded that only one period should be borrowed from state law, the one generally applicable to personal injuries.¢ 3 The 12-year period in the Quiet Title Act, 28 U.S.C. §2409a

Appendix — Mt. Hope Asphalt Corp. v. Zagata

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1998

The sample bottle was then sealed and the exterior was cleaned, if necessary. … Hope is liable for Accardi’s acts.

Opposition Brief — Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Basic American Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2002

App.”) at 23. 3 Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), as amended by the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (the “MPPAA”), 29 U.S.C. … Linde Air Prods. Co., 336 U.S. 271, 275 (1949).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Shelby County Sheriff v. Leach

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990

See, Restatement, Agency 2d, Sec. 94, comment a., when inaction acts a ratification, (here must be some knowledge on the part of the principal of the wrong, and a manifestation of approval through a … failure to act.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Benito Moreno-Rodriguez, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 23, 2020

Sosa, 387 F.3d 131 (2d Cir. 2004) ............................................................ 15 viii Utility Air Regulatory Group v. … Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) of 1996, § 309(c)(2), Pub. L.

Reply Brief — Alcan Aluminum Corp. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2004

American Trucking Assn’s, Inc., 531 U.S. 457 (2001) (interpreting foundational “national ambient air quality standards” provisions of the Clean Air Act); Solid Waste Agency of N. Cook Cty. v. … Army Corps of Engrs, 531 U.S. 159 (2001) (interpreting foundational “navigable waters” provision of Clean Water Act); Babbitt v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Brock

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1987

The Department published a revised proposal on Sep- tember 17, 1982, 47 FR 41304, with a 30-day review and comment period. … One commentator suggested that carriers should be required to retain applications for a 12-month period.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

parties liable for the costs of these clean-ups.” … Indeed, many com- prehensive federal statutes lack an express limitations period. See, e.g., id. at 266 (42 U.S.C. § 1983); Agency Holding Corp. v.

Opposition Brief — Arkansas v. Oklahoma

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991

The Court of Appeals simply gave the unambiguous language of the Clean Water Act its plain meaning. … And the petition’s prediction that this interpretation will “disrupt administration of the Clean Water Act” (Ark.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bugenig v. Hoopa Valley Tribe

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002

§ 7410(0) (defining scope of jurisdiction over tribal air quality plans pursuant to “tribal ‘implementation plans” in Clean Air Act). … § 7601(d)(2)(B), a provision of the Clean Air Act, delegates to Indian tribes the authority to enforce the Clean Air Act on nonmember fee-owned land within a reservation.

Opposition Brief — Leavitt v. Tennessee Valley Authority

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2004

EPA asserts that the decision below “is based on a mis- taken construction of the Clean Air Act[].” Pet. at 12. … The court held that “[t]he Clean Air Act is ““ Nor is the significance of ACOs generally a matter of record in this case.

Transcript of Record — Southern R. Co. v. North Carolina

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1964

During the same period, that is, the last year, how mamy trips by air have you made? A. … Acting under U.S.C.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Weyerhaeuser Co. v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., 139 S. Ct. 45 (2018) (No. 17-71)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

As one commentator has noted, “(t]he most likely source of a federal nexus for a private development project is Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, which requires private parties to obtain permits … Federal regulatory programs, like the Clean Water Act, are expanding.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Longman v. Food Lion, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2000

During the 2-1/2-year "Class Period" between May 7, 1990, when Food Lion issued its 1989 Annual report, and November 5, 1992, when the PrimeTime Live broadcast aired, plaintiffs purchased stock in Food … ling person acted in good faith and did not directly or indirectly 24a induce the act or acts constituting the violation or cause of action. 15 U.S.C. § 78t(a).

Reply Brief — Corner Post, Inc., Petitioner v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jan 12, 2024

U.S.Br.24 (cleaned up). … Rotkiske, 140 S.Ct. at 360-61 (cleaned up).