Documents

Amicus Brief — Penn Central Transp. Co. v. New York City

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1978

National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, 16 U.S.C. § 470(b).” … air... .” 416 U.S. at 9-10.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Whitewater Draw Natural Resource Conservation District, et al., Petitioners v. Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 18, 2021

decision to act. … After a notice and comment period, DHS adopted its final NEPA procedures, “contained in” the Directive and Manual, and duly published its “Notice 19 of Final National Environmental Policy Act Implementing

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Local 300, United Industrial Workers v. Marriott In-Flite Services Division of Marriott Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1970

INFORMATION CONCERNING ELECTION The Act provides that only one valid representation election may be held in a 12-month._ period. … At 392, flight service equipment is received and cleaned, and raw food items are received, cleaned, cut, cooked, portioned, and packed ready to be served for de- livery to aircraft.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Cass v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1974

acted upon for a number of years, will not be disturbed except for cogent rea- sons. … This would have been a matter of importance to the GAO, which commented on the 1956 legislation, as well as to executive agencies, and to veteran’s organizations.

Reply Brief — Abbey Nursing Home, Inc. v. Estate of Richardson

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1985

That's what they used to be able to move her because she was heavy, and pottychairs, tables, medical tables, and I had an electric pump that ran 24 hours a day for her air mattress, and electric air … Trava did — she helped clean her. She helped Change her. She helped bathe her. She combed her hair. She helped clean up her room. She helped wash.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ross v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994

He went to the bathroom to clean himself off and came back and threw a towel at Ms. Cedillo. The petitioner then took her back to her car. R. 230-31. … Fhe cautionary instruction was simply not enough, and it again empha- sized the doctor’s comments about the petitioner’s poten- tial for future violence.

Opposition Brief — Ellett Bros. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2002

(“CERCLA”), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (“SARA”), P.L. 99-499. … Often, these cases involve a wrongful act that produces no harm for a period of time and then suddenly manifests itself in a burst of damage... .

Reply Brief — California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1987

California EPA), 426 U.S. 200 (1976), where this Court held that the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act do not require federal agencies to obtain state permits. … Air Act and Clean Water Act.

Appendix — Cudahy Co. v. Miller

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1989

If the statute begins to run when an act of pollution is com- mitted, the two-year limitations period would expire, in many instances, before the resulting polluted ground- water ever left American … This recital covers the entire period of the facility’s existence and is exceptionally detailed for the period since 1938.

Amicus Brief — Milwaukee v. Illinois

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1981

Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. § 1857, 42 U.S.C. § 1857h-2(e); recodified to 42 U.S.C. … Air Act. 475 F.

Record and brief — Fortney v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1988

The safety organization shall review all regular operations and al) seasonal or special operations such as tank cleaning, boiler cleaning, window cleaning, and infrequent matenals handling jobs Hazards … Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 730 F.2d 842, 855-56 (2d Cir. 1984).

Opposition Brief — Perini Corp. v. City of New York

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1999

Under the Clean Water Act, the E.P.A. funded 55% of the contract, the price of which was some $40,000,000. The City provided the remaining funding. … Water Act.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bugenig v. Hoopa Valley Tribe

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002

§ 7410(0) (defining scope of jurisdiction over tribal air quality plans pursuant to “tribal ‘implementation plans” in Clean Air Act). … § 7601(d)(2)(B), a provision of the Clean Air Act, delegates to Indian tribes the authority to enforce the Clean Air Act on nonmember fee-owned land within a reservation.

Respondents Brief — Growth Energy, Petitioner v. American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Dec 8, 2021

ROSEN Attorney Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 SupremeCtBriefs@usdoj.gov (202) 514-2217 QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a provision of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., that eases … Cir. 2014) ................... 10 Statutes and regulation: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. ..................................... 2 42 U.S.C. 7545 .................................................

Petitioners Brief — Den Norske Amerikalinje, A/S v. Blumental Import Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1940

Hubert, supra, Stanley & Co. of Calcutta, acting as agents of Cooper, Smith & Co. of Philadelphia, lien. … Y.), 70 Fed. 32, cited by the Cireuit Court of Appeals, R. p. 312, the -harterers, acting in the immediate presence of the masterand ag his amanuenses, signed, as his agents, clean bills of lading

Respondents Brief — Chicago v. Environmental Defense Fund

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1994

The resource recovery facility incinerates the municipal solid waste that it receives and its air emissions are subject to the Clean Air Act. See 42 U.S.C. 7429. … Where, therefore, as in this case, there has been no notice and comment period, it is especially important that judicial review not be limited.

Joint Appendix — Richard Eugene Glossip, Petitioner v. Oklahoma

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · Apr 23, 2024

He probably had no— very few comments even made together and I wouldn’t seen, in my opinion, why he would have a reason to do such a violent act to someone that he hardly knew. 110 Q. … Turned the air conditioner up full blast and then we left.

Amicus Brief — Escondido Mut. Water Co. v. La Jolla Band of Mission Indians

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1984

The Institute engages in research, public education, lobbying, and litigation activities in support of energy and water conservation, the protection of air, water and land resources, the safe and clean … Its 37,000 members are dedicated to the protection of clean water and the enhancement of trout and salmon resources.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Scott v. City of Hammond

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1985

Section 1370................. 17 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 7401 ef seg. .......... 25 Section 116, 42 U.S.C. Section 7476 ................. 25 Section 304(e), 42 U.S.C. … Thus, 12 years after the passage of the Clean Water Act the discharge of raw sewage is permitted under the Act. 8 After Scott filed his complaint with his state law claims based on diversity of citizenship

Transcript of Record — Railway Clerks v. Association for Benefit of Noncontract Employees

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1965

Thompson, and his comments on it yoquested. … —views of United Air Lines, Inc. on the various aspects of _ the handling of this case. We will, however, comment briefly . On two points made in your letter.