Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.06s
Supreme Court brief · Application · May 4, 2020
Test name and code: COVID-19 (Test code: 8000101424) Note: Order as “Miscellaneous” and add comment: “COVID-19 ARUP” Collect: Nasopharyngeal swab. … (“ADA”) and the Rehabilitation Act (“RA”).
Reply Brief — Growth Energy, et al., Petitioners v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C., et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Sep 10, 2024
As the petition explained (at 16-21), the circuit courts—across various Clean Air Act contexts—are broadly divided over whether an integrated decision resolving multiple individual parties’ interests is … The 2022 exemption actions differ from many Clean Air Act actions and did not merely “appl[y a] new interpretation of the hardship standard and [a] new economic” finding. Opp.24.
Reply Brief — Excel Corp. v. Estate of Kriefall
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2004
There, the Court adopted EPA’s con- struction of the Clean Air Act even though not embodied in a formal rule, stating that “[c]ogent ‘administrative interpre- tations . . . not the products of formal … Significantly, the Clean Air Act’s numerous > USDA first announced the goal of reducing the presence of E. coli in meat to “an undetectable level” in 2002, more than two years after the plaintiffs in
541 U.S. 956Map Too Large For Filming — New York v. New Jersey
Supreme Court brief · Map Too Large For Filming · 1921
Borough: Actes. … —Of course, it is only the mal-odorous element in sewage that makes this phenomenon noticeable: evaporation from clean water would act precisely in a similar manner, but it would manifest itself in
256 U.S. 296Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Postal Service v. Gregory
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001
Department of Air Force, 24 M.S.P.R. 429, 431 (1984). 3. … Department of the Air Force, 9 M.S.P.R. 335, 339-40 (1981).
534 U.S. 1Amicus Curiae Brief — E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1976
The Clean Air Act authorizes the Administrator to prohibit, control, or regulate a fuel or fuel additive if “the emission products will endanger the public health or welfare... .” 42 U.S.C. § 1857F- … Agey., 515 F.2d 206, 214 (8th Cir. 1975), appeal pending, states that the one principle upon which Clean Air Act cases are in agreement is that the standard for review of agency decisions is the arbitrary
426 U.S. 941Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 17, 2023
See Foster, 830 F.3d at 1191 (noting that “a one and one-half month period between protected activity and adverse action may, by itself, establish causation” (quotation cleaned up)). … (quotation cleaned up); see also Mueggenborg v. Nortek Air Sols., LLC, No. 20-6147, 2021 WL 4807176, at *8 (10th Cir.
Reply Brief — Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2004
period. 4 the remedy adequately protects the interests it would vindi- cate. … EPA also ignores the history that makes clear that Congress not only intended to allow continued economic growth in clean air areas, but specifically intended the States—‘not Federal agencies” —to determine
540 U.S. 461Amicus Curiae Brief — Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. Army Corps of Engineers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
In fact, the inclusion of “isolated water bodies” does not dramatically alter the reach of the Clean Water Act beyond areas Petitioner finds acceptable. … Petitioner also downplays the biological role of isolated water bodies as a secondary concern of the Clean Water Act.
531 U.S. 159Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Robert V. Smith, Petitioner v. Jay A. Odom, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 17, 2026
Id. at 757, 761–63 (cleaned up). … This Case Presents a Clean and Focused Vehicle for Resolving the Meaning of “Materially Adds” in the Post-2010 Original-Source Provision.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Williams v. Gonzales (No. 05-1627)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006
This immunity extended to suits brought under the Civil Rights act of 1964 (the “Act”). … Sanitizing and air drying of equipment were not being accomplished due to the use of paper towels to clean and dry equipment.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2003
See Clean Air Implementation Project v. EPA, 150 F.3d 1200, 1204 (D.C.Cir.1998). … See, e.g., Clean Air Implementation Project, 150 F.3d at 1206.
538 U.S. 803Amicus Curiae Brief — Burlington v. Dague
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 560 (1986) (fee-shifting provision of Clean Air Act should be interpreted like 42 U.S.C. … *Delaware Valley II interpreted the fee-shifting provision of the Clean Air Act, suse § 7604(d).
505 U.S. 557Petitioners Brief — Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2002
General Motors Corp., 876 F.2d 1060 (1st Cir. 1989) (Clean Air Act); United States v. Boccanfuso, 882 F.2d 666, 671 (2d Cir. 1989) (Clean Air Act); Southwestern Pa. Growth Alliance v. … Browner, 121 F.3d 106, 114 (3d Cir. 1997) (Clean Air Act); Pardee, 269 F.3d at 431 (Coal Act); Fort Worth Nat'l Corp. v.
536 U.S. 955Petition — Schlanger v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979
Schlanger had his military career destroyed and his reenlistment contract breached by acts of 8 U.S. Air Force authorities. … STATEMENT OF FACTS In December 1962, Herbert Schlanger enlisted in the United States Air Force (USAF) for a period of 4 years and began his service.
441 U.S. 943Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 4, 2024
Commentators have alarmed at this shift. … This case is a clean vehicle to address what both CRST and Delta Air Lines did not while potentially complimenting a decision in Lackey v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — VNG Corporation, Petitioner v. Lang Van, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 23, 2023
Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 (1945) (cleaned up). … Triple Up, 2018 WL 4440459, at *3-4 (cleaned up).
Appendices — Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Luther
Supreme Court brief · Appendices · 1996
Air Illinois, Inc. (1988), 165 Il. App. 3d 923, 930, 520 N.E.2d 852, 856.) The figures presented in Dr. … Shakespeare: Romeo and Juliet, act Ul, sc. ii, 43.
516 U.S. 1159Amicus Curiae Brief — Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995
Feb. 29, 1984) (comments of Sen. Durenberger). … is clean."
515 U.S. 1192Appendix — Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1982
employees represented by the Brotherhood of Railway, Air- line and Steamship Clerks, a constituent member of RLEA.* * By letter of David F. … These functions were: station clean- ing, car cleaning, ticket selling, security, and operation of the Newtown-Fox Chase line. A Conrail witness at the hearing, Donald A.
459 U.S. 1087
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.