Documents

Appendix — Outboard Marine Corp. v. Illinois

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1981

Rev. 597; Comment, 49 Denver L.J. 609 (1973); Comment, 77 Dick. L. Rev. 451 (1972); Comment, The Expansion of Federal Common Law and Federal. … Section 301(a) of the [Clean Water] Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311(a).”

Respondents Brief — Devines v. Maier

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1984

(a) Clean and Sanitary. … (a) To be Clean.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bragdon v. Abbott

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998

Finally. as previously indicated, reproduction extends beyond the act of conception and the period of gestation, to the process of caring for and raising a child. … evacuators, and air/water syringes.

Opposition — Hedley v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983

Act provides for an even shorter period, namely, two years and three years in the case of willful violations, with regard to the statute of limitations for accrual of dam- ages. … Act provides for an even shorter period, namely, two years and three years in the case of willful violations, with regard to the statute of limitations for accrual of dam- ages.

Joint Appendix Vol II — Burlington v. Dague

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix Vol II · 1992

Delaware Valley Citizens Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 92 L.Ed.2d 439, 106 S. Ct. … Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7604(d) or civil rights claims) or a substantial amount of the relief sought (in the case of Clean Water Act or RCRA claims).

Appendix — Bausch & Lomb Optical Co. v. Lyon

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1955

He follows this treatment in vacuum by post- baking in air to harden the coating. Sabine (Patent No. 2301456) refers by inference to the post-baking in air used by Cartwright. … In this experiment he also used pre-heating and _post- baking in air.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Palmieri v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (No. 06-1135)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006

of 1976", or Title V of Public Law 101-549, the "Clean Air Act", and where the issuance of a permit in such a manner is contrary to such authorization. 4. … (3) Clean Air Act (CAA) amendments, 42 USC 7401 et seq., 1990 for any air pollution control source under ECL article 19 subject to the following Federal requirements: (i) prevention of significant

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Shell Oil Co. v. Pedraza

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992

Exhaust air shall not be discharged in the work areas and clean makeup air shall be introduced in sufficient volume to maintain the correct operation of the local exhaust system. … Suffi- cient ventilation with clean air should be maintained in the area to permit the correct operation of the local exhaust system.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987

See e.g., Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7604 (a). … II, § 2, ci. 2. 26 during the period since the Act’s enactment.

Amicus Curiae Brief — HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Renewable Fuels Association, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 31, 2021

Congress stated its purposes plainly in the text of the law enacting the program—to “increase the production of clean, renewable fuels.” Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (“EISA”), Pub. L. … Air Act defines “small refinery” as “a refinery for which the average aggregate daily crude oil throughput for a calendar year … does not exceed 75,000 barrels.” 42 U.S.C. §7545(o)(1)(K). 8 20 granted

Amicus Curiae Brief — Shell PLC, fka Royal Dutch Shell PLC, et al., Petitioners v. City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2024

The Clean Air Act recognizes “the primary responsibility” of States to prevent and control “air pollution … at its source.” 42 U.S.C. §7401(a)(3). … Air Act and Clean Water Act.

Appendix — United States v. General Dynamics Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1974

pollution abatement procedings under the Clean Air Act of 1963, as emended. … INTRODUCTION ae The Air Quality Act of 1967, as did the earlier Clean Air é amended, emphasizes the need for Federal ip and assistance to State and local ies in the control of air poll The act also

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Christina Alessio, Petitioner v. United Airlines, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 19, 2019

the Aircraft Cabin for Cleaning and Air-Freshening. … Air-Quality 100% matters. B. Underlying Issue: Chemical Substance Cleaning and Chemical Substance Air-Freshening Products Used Inside the Aircraft Cabin. 1.

Opposition Brief — Smith v. Brookshire Brothers, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2006

Air-cleaning devices should be utilized on all exhaust ventilation systems. Waste materials, including empty containers, must be permanently dis- posed of in an environmentally secure manner. … INHALATION: Remove to fresh air.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, 479 (1999). … United Air Lines, Inc., supra, 527 U.S. at 483.

Amicus Curiae Brief — English v. General Elec. Co.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990

who disclose information, under, for exampie, the Clean Air Act. … See, Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7416, Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. 1370 and Mine Health and Safety Act, 30 U.S.C. 955.

Opposition Brief — Garcia v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988

The initial decision of the Air Force Court of Military Review (Pet. App. 2a-13a) is reported at 18 M.J. 716. A subsequent opinion of the Air Force Court of Military Review on remand (Pet. … That incident also occurred while petitioner was acting as a dental technician (PX 2). 3 towards her mouth (Tr. 43, 45, 50).

Respondents Brief — Texas, et al., Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Nov 8, 2021

Ass’n’s Clean Air Project v. EPA, 752 F.3d 999 (D.C. Cir. 2014) ........................... 26 Sierra Club v. … Ass’n’s Clean Air Project v. EPA, 752 F.3d 999, 1003 (D.C. Cir. 2014); and United States v. Picciotto, 875 F.2d 345, 347-348 (D.C. Cir. 1989)). That assertion of a lowercourt conflict lacks merit.

Petition for Rehearing — Irving F. Rounds, Jr., Petitioner v. Maura T. Healey, Governor of Massachusetts, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · Jul 20, 2023

The Petitioner’s legal efforts to report (“Blow the Whistle”) on his former employer for violations of the Clean Air Act to the U.S. … The Petitioner’s legal efforts to report (“Blow the Whistle”) on his former employer for violations of the Clean Air Act to the U.S.

Brief for Respondent — Paragon Jewel Coal Co. v. Commissioner

Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1965

At the-plant Paragon cleaned, sized and sold the coal. … John McCall Company for coal sold during this period.