Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Christina Alessio, Petitioner v. United Airlines, Inc.

Supreme Court briefSep 19, 2019

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

Suprg

No. 19-

$EP /

3°[5

0£T>ye

3ht tlje

Supreme Court of tfje ?Hntteb States

CHRISTINA ALESSIO,

Petitioner,

UNITED AIRLINES, INC.,

Respondent.

On a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Christina Alessio

Petitioner Pro Se

1970 N. Cleveland-Massillon Road

Unit 589

Bath, OH 44210

(330) 338-7052

September 19,2019

SUPREME COURT PRESS

(888) 958-5705

♦

Boston, Massachusetts

■2^/c

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

Introduction: With great respect this case is

about Life, Liberty and the pursuit for Righteousness

at 30,000 feet.

Federal Law Fact: Federal Rule of Law 49

U.S.C. § 5124, forbids harmful materials onboard the

Aircraft.

National/Global Significant Fact: The Respondent

approves the use of “Chemical Substance Products”

inside the Aircraft Cabin for cleaning and airfreshening, with no oversight providing verification

and certification with an Official Government Document

“Certificate of Compliance” that the Respondent, in

fact, is following the Rule of Law.

The Petitioner Respectfully Presents

the Following Questions:

1. Does the Rule of Law apply to the Respondent?

2. Is the Respondent in compliance with the

statutes?

3. With respect, can the Petitioners Brief have

merit to be granted when, the Federal Question above,

to this case was never answered by the Lower Courts?

4. With respect, can the Petitioners Brief have

merit to be granted when, the Wrong Law was

applied by the Lower Courts?

Wrong Law: Americans with Disabilities Act

(ADA)

Order 6/24/2019

Judgment Entry 11/20/2018

Memorandum Opinion and Order 11/20/2018

Memorandum Opinion and Order 2/15/2018

Note: The Correct Law for respectful judicial

review is Federal Law 49 U.S.C. § 5124.

5. With respect, can “STRICKEN” Evidence at

App.ll9a-196a, based on the Wrong Law applied by

the Lower Courts, have merit to grant the Petitioners

Brief, to review the EVIDENCE, applying the Correct

Law: Federal Law 49 U.S.C. § 5124?

6. With respect, can missing COMPLAINT Docket

information, communicated and reproduced at App.

94a-100a, from a Government Agency regarding an

unanswered Federal Question, have merit for granting

a Petition?

7. With respect, do you believe products used to

clean and air-freshen the Aircraft Cabin should be

transparent, no secrets, with complete list of ingredients

made available, for a better Air-Quality Environment?

8. With respect, can exposure to Chemical Clean

ing and Chemical Air-Freshening Products used inside

the Aircraft Cabin approved by the Respondent, with

no Federal Government Oversight to Indoor AirQuality Standards, (other than “No Smoking”), have

merit for granting a Petition?

9. With respect, can our United States of America

116th Congress, provide the Respondent with an

Official Government Oversight Document: “Certificate

of Compliance”, for the Global Air-Traveling Public,

including a complete “Product List with 100% of the

Ingredients”, made available for “Safety and Health

in the Aircraft Cabin”? A respectful basic Civil and

Ill

Human “Right to Know”, as well as “Need to Know”

in this particular and unique environment.

10. With respect, can NATIONAL/GLOBAL

SIGNIFICANCE have merit for granting a Petition?

LIST OF PROCEEDINGS

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Case No. 18-4251

Christina Alessio, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

United Airlines, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

Date of Order: June 24, 2019

U.S. Federal District Corut of Northern District of Ohio

Case No. 5:17-CV-01426-SL

Christina Alessio, Plaintiff v.

United Airlines, Inc., Defendant.

Date of Order Striking Plaintiff Filings: November

15, 2017

Memorandum Opinion and Order Granting Motion to

Dismiss: February 15, 2018

Date of Memorandum Opinion Granting Motion to

Dismiss Amended Complaint and Entry of Judgment:

November 20, 2018.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

QUESTIONS PRESENTED............................

LIST OF PROCEEDINGS...............................

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES............................

Xll

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI..

OPINIONS BELOW.................................. .

JURISDICTION................................................

CONSTITUTIONAL AND

STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED

STATEMENT OF THE CASE.........................

A. Underlying Issue: Chemical Substance

Cleaning and Chemical Substance AirFreshening Products Used Inside the

Aircraft Cabin................................................

B. Proceedings in the U.S. Federal District

Court, Case No. 5:17-CV-01426-SL..............

C. Proceedings in the United States Court of

Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Case No. 184251 ................................................................ 11

REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION..... . 13

CONCLUSION

TABLE OF CONTENTS — Continued

Page

APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS

Opinions and Orders

Order of the Sixth Circuit

(June 24, 2019)................................................... la

Judgment Entry of the District Court of

Northern District of Ohio

(November 20, 2018)......................................... 7a

Memorandum Opinion and Order of the District

Court of Northern District of Ohio

(November 20, 2018)........... .............................. 8a

Memorandum Opinion and Order of the District

Court of Northern District of Ohio

(February 15, 2018).......................................... 15a

Docket Details

United States Court of Appeals for the

6th Circuit........................................

32a

United States District Court of

Northern District of Ohio...............

35a

Notice of Appeal

Plaintiff Filing, Notice of Appeal

(December 18, 2018).............

51a

Vll

TABLE OF CONTENTS - Continued

Page

Complaints

Plaintiff Filing, Amended Complaint

(March 9, 2018).............................

53a

Respectful Amended Complaint

(March 9, 2018).....................

55a

Plaintiff Filing, Complaint

(July 7, 2017)................................

66a

Charges of Discrimination

Respectfully Submitted with Complaint

Charge of Discrimination

(July 20, 2015)..........

76a

Charge of Discrimination

(April 18, 2017).........

88a

Exhibits to Complaint

Exhibit D — EEOC Letters Missing....................... 94a

“Dismissal and Notice of Rights” Respectfully

Submitted with Complaint (Docket #1, Attach

ment #5) (Letter Dated: April 18, 2017)........... 94a

“EEOC: FOIA Letter” Respectfully Submitted

with Complaint (Docket #1, Attachment #5)

(Letter Dated: June 2, 2017)

... 97a

Exhibit E — Emails Respectfully Submitted with

Complaint (Docket #1, Attachment #6)

101a

TABLE OF CONTENTS - Continued

Page

U.S. Senator’s Response

(July 22, 2015)......................................

101a

U.S. Congresswoman’s Response

(July 31, 2015)......................................

103a

AFA-CWA Senior Staff Attorney’s Response

(February 28, 2017)..............................

105a

Inflight Manager’s Response

(June 7, 2017)........................................

106a

Follow-Up with Cleveland President of

Association of Flight Attendants

(June 29, 2017).....................................

108a

Exhibit F — Letters Respectfully Submitted with

Complaint (Docket #1, Attachment #7)....... 110a

U.S. Senator’s Office

(May 25, 2017).... ..............................

110a

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

(June 2, 2016)...................................

112a

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

(OSHA) (September 19, 2016)

114a

Health and Wages Overview

Respectfully Submitted with Complaint

Health and Wages Overview

(Docket #1, Attachment #10)

117a

TABLE OF CONTENTS - Continued

Page

Stricken Evidence from the Court Record

Plaintiff Filing

(Docket ll) (August 21, 2017)

119a

Appeal Letter Request to the EEOC

for Redacted FOIA Information

(August 21, 2017)................ .......

121a

Plaintiff Filing

(Docket 14) (August 29, 2017).........

127a

Short List of 79 Irregular Operation Reports

with Responses........................................ 129a

Images of Table Pertaining to Irregular

Operations Report.................................... 135a

Plaintiff Filing

(Docket 16) (September 14, 2017)

139a

EEOC: FOIA Response Letter

(August 29, 2017).............

141a

Plaintiff Filing

(Docket 17) (September 18, 2017)

143a

Email Correspondence Letter of Concern,

With Former President’s Letter of

Response (July 12, 2016).

146a

OSHA Communication Letter

(August 17, 2017)............

150a

TABLE OF CONTENTS - Continued

Page

Department of Labor Email Correspondence

(September 12, 2017)

152a

Plaintiff Filing

(Docket 19) (September 26, 2017).......

154a

EEOC: FOIA Appeal Response Letter

(September 20, 2017).....................

157a

Letter to the President

(April 20, 2017)................................

159a

Irregular Operations Report

(September 26, 2017).....................

161a

Emails Requesting hard copy of Personnel/

Medical Files (September 25, 2017)

163a

Plaintiff Filing

(Docket 20) (October 17, 2017)............

166a

EEOC: FOIA Appeal Response Letter

(October 6, 2017).............................

169a

Plaintiff Filing

(Docket 21) (October 25, 2017)

177a

Letter from Defendants Legal Representative

(October 20, 2017)............................

180a

Letter Response to Defendants Legal

Representative (October 25, 2017)

182a

Image of Medical CD..............................

184a

FedEx Record of Delivery of CDs

(October 25, 2017)............................

185a

TABLE OF CONTENTS - Continued

Page

Plaintiff Filing

(Docket 22) (November 3, 2017)

187a

Emails Including: Inflight Management and

Cleveland AFA Union President

(November 3, 2017)

190a

America, the Jury

First Sequel....

197a

Second Sequel

301a

Xll

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Page

CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

United States Constitution...............

United States Constitution, Article V

STATUTES

28 U.S.C. § 1254(1)

49 U.S.C. § 5124....

passim

Other Authorities

1. Federal Law 49 U.S.C. § 5124:

Federal Rule of Law 49 U.S.C. § 5124, Forbids

Harmful Materials Onboard the Aircraft.

2. Two EEOC Letters Respectfully Submitted

with Complaint Are “Missing” from Docket Text #1*

Attachment #5:

U.S. Federal District Court of Northern District

of Ohio, Civil Docket for Case #: 5:17-cv-01426SL, Filed 7/7/2017.

“DISMISSAL AND NOTICE OF RIGHTS” Letter

Dated: April 18, 2017, (Original Letter 1 Page).

EEOC was unable to certify Respondent is in

compliance with the statutes. (App.94a-96a).

Xlll

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued

“EEOC: FOIA” Letter Dated: June 2, 2017, (Orig

inal Letter 3 Pages). EEOC redacted information,

fearful of public scrutiny. (App.97a-100a).

Both EEOC Letters were also respectfully sub

mitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the

Sixth Circuit held with Appellants Brief for judicial

review and request for verification/certification of

compliance with the Rule of Law. Still unanswered

and unresolved, both EEOC Letters are respectfully

being submitted with Petitioner’s Brief, for thoughtful

judicial review.

3. Docket #1 is understood as construed: With

respect, Clerical Error: “Charges of Discrimination”

documents (App.76a-93a), were submitted under and

into “Docket #1, Attachment #5, Exhibit D—EEOC

Letters,” (PagelD #: 13-22).

Correction: “Docket #1, Attachment #5, Exhibit

D—EEOC Letters”, should be the Petitioner’s two

EEOC Letters, respectfully submitted, though both are

missing from COMPLAINT, Filed 7/7/2017.

4. Docket #11 states:

Filed 8/21/2017

STRICKEN 11/15/2017: Supplement to 1

Complaint, Attachment #5, Exhibit D—EEOC

Letters, filed by Christina Alessio. (Attachments:

#l) Letter to Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission). (DJJ) (Entered: 08/21/2017)

5. Docket #11 Clarification:

PagelD #: 130-134 is a letter the Petitioner wrote

to the EEOC and not Exhibit D, EEOC Letters

XIV

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued

Written to the Petitioner and Missing on the

Docket Text #1, Attachment #5.

6. U.S. Federal District Court of Northern District

of Ohio Docket Text: #1, Attachment #5, Exhibit D—

EEOC Letters: (Original Letters 4 Pages, missing alto

gether)

7. U.S. Federal District Court of Northern District

of Ohio Docket Text: #36. (4 Pages, missing altogether),

PagelD #:273-276.

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

May the United States Supreme Court Be Pleased

with the Petitioner’s Brief.

YOUR HONOR and with great respect, this case

is about Life. Liberty and the pursuit for Righteousness

at 30.000 feet.

Let the Rule of Law and Facts of this Case, be

respectfully submitted in order for a clear judicial

review of the Lower Courts Judgment. The Correct

Rule of Law applied should be Federal Law 49 U.S.C.

§ 5124, which forbids hazardous materials aboard the

Aircraft. With respect, all must follow the law.

OPINIONS BELOW

Petitioner is respectfully seeking review of the

following opinions and order:

The Opinion of the United States Court of Appeals

for the Sixth Circuit, dated June 24, 2019 is included

below at App.la. The Entry of Judgment and Memo

randum Opinion and Order of the District Court of

Northern District of Ohio Dismissing the AMENDED

COMPLAINT, dated November 20, 2018, are included

below at App.7a, 8a. The Memorandum Opinion and

Order of the District Court of Northern District of Ohio

Dismissing the original COMPLAINT, dated February

15, 2018, is included below at App.l5a. These opinions

and orders have not been designated for publication.

Note: There is important Docket information

“STRICKEN” Evidence from originating Case No.:

5:17-CV-01426-SL. The Stricken Evidence has been

reproduced in the appendix at App. 119a-196a.

With respect, the Lower Courts applied the

Wrong Law — the Americans with Disabilities Act

(ADA). With respect, this case is not about the

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and providing

an accommodation for one.

With respect, the Lower Courts should be directed

to apply the Correct Law — Federal Law 49 U.S.C.

S 5124.

Respectfully, to the best of the Petitioners under

standing and knowledge, the United States Constitu

tion, Article V, in simple terms heard with respect:

“An attack against one is an attack against all.”

Respectfully, this case is not about one but about

all in this unique and particular environment, the

Aircraft Cabin. With respect, this case is about a

conflict of law regarding compliance with the statutes:

Federal Law 49 U.S.C. § 5124. and the Respondent’s

use of “Chemical Substance Products” for Cleaning

and Air-Freshening inside the Aircraft Cabin. Respect

fully. Respondent has approved the use of “Chemical

Substance Products” with no Government Oversight.

providing verification and certification with a “Certif

icate of Compliance” Document.

With respect, all onboard are disabled with no

accommodation from exposure to “Chemical Substance

Products”, used inside the Aircraft Cabin and approved

by the Respondent. With great respect, Rule of Law

forbids hazard materials onboard the Aircraft.

AMENDED COMPLAINT was filed 3/9/2018 (Docket

#27, PagelD #:234-24l) (App.53a-65a), applying the

Correct Law. Respectfully, in search for answers.

JURISDICTION

The Opinion of the United States Court of Appeals

for the Sixth Circuit was entered on June 24, 2019.

This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1254(l).

CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY

PROVISIONS INVOLVED

49 U.S. Code § 5124

A person knowingly violating section 5104(b) or

willfully or recklessly violating this chapter or a

regulation, order, special permit, or approval

issued under this chapter shall be fined under title

18, imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both;

except that the maximum amount of imprison

ment shall be 10 years in any case in which the

violation involves the release of a hazardous

material that results in death or bodily injury to

any person.

(b) Knowing Violations.—For purposes of

this section—

(l) a person acts knowingly when—

(A) the person has actual knowledge of the

facts giving rise to the violation; or

(B) a reasonable person acting in the circum

stances and exercising reasonable care

would have that knowledge; and

(2) knowledge of the existence of a statutory

provision, or a regulation or a requirement

required by the Secretary, is not an element

of an offense under this section.

(c)

Willful Violations.—For purposes of this

section, a person acts willfully when—

(1) the person has knowledge of the facts giving

rise to the violation; and

(2) the person has knowledge that the conduct

was unlawful.

(d) Reckless Violations.—

For purposes of this section, a person acts

recklessly when the person displays a delib

erate indifference or conscious disregard to

the consequences of that person’s conduct.

As respectfully understood, a person knowingly

violating, and/or willfully, recklessly violating this

chapter, regulation or order shall be fined $250,000

and/or prison 5 years; in any case which involves a

violation or the release of hazardous materials that

results in death or bodily injury to any person. The

person has knowledge of the facts to the violation.

• The person acts willfully to the violation with

the knowledge of the facts.

• The person has knowledge that the conduct is

unlawful.

• The person acts recklessly and displays delib

erate disregard to the consequences of that

person’s conduct.

YOUR HONOR and with great respect, Please

note for the record:

Federal Law 49 U.S.C. § 5124 is placarded in

the terminal at every podium/gate before you board

Respondents Aircraft. For example, at the Cleveland

Hopkins International Airport the placard states in

part:

“Advice to passengers

Federal law forbids the carriage of hazardous

materials aboard aircraft in your luggage or

on your person.”

“It’s the law: you must declare your hazard

ous materials to the airline or air package

carrier. A violation of the Federal Hazardous

Materials Regulations (49 CFR Parts 171180) can result in 5 years imprisonment and

penalties of $250,000 or more (49 U.S.C. §

5124).”

UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION:

To Protect the People.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

A. Introduction

As respectfully understood, the Writ of Certiorari

granted may be upon the Petition after Order and

Judgment, applying the Wrong Law. With respect,

the Wrong Law applied by the Lower Courts — the

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

With respect, the Correct Law is 49 U.S.C. § 5124,

whereby the Federal Question was never answered

as to whether or not the Respondent is in compliance

with the statutes.

With great respect, the Global Air-Traveling Public

has a Civil and Human Right for safe and transparent

Air-Quality with respect to the Respondents approval

use of “Chemical Substance Products” inside the

Aircraft Cabin for Cleaning and Air-Freshening.

Respectfully, the Global Air-Traveling Public has

a “Right to Know” and “Need to Know”, with full

disclosure and transparency of all Aircraft Cabin

Products, because Human Health is just as important

as our Safety. With respect. Air-Quality 100% matters.

Underlying Issue: Chemical Substance Cleaning

and Chemical Substance Air-Freshening Products

Used Inside the Aircraft Cabin.

1. In 2014, a “Hazard Communication Module”,

was provided by Respondent, and required by all Flight

Attendants to acknowledge, or not qualified to fly.

2. Respondent approves and willfully uses Chem

ical Cleaning and Chemical Air-Freshening Products

inside the Aircraft Cabin, with no Official Government

Oversight Document providing a “Certificate of Compli

ance”, Certifying and Verifying the Respondent is follow

the Rule of Law.

Proceedings in the U.S. Federal District Court,

Case No. 5:17-CV-01426-SL.

1. COMPLAINT—

Filed: 7/7/2017

Docket: #1

(PagelD #:l-7)

(App.66a-75a)

Note: The “Charges of Discrimination” were

written by Petitioner and part of COM

PLAINT, however, were misplaced and put

in Exhibit D—EEOC Letters, Docket #1,

Attachment #5, PagelD#: 13-22.

2. COMPLAINT—

Filed: 7/7/2017

Docket: #1, Attachment #5,

Exhibit D—“EEOC Letters” (are missing).

Respectfully, First missing EEOC Letter: “DIS

MISSAL AND NOTICE OF RIGHTS” dated April 18,

2017, whereby the EEOC was unable to certify the

Respondent is in compliance with the statutes. Respect

fully letter is being provided for thoughtful judicial

review, (App.94a-96a).

Respectfully, Second missing EEOC Letter: Free

dom of Information Act (“FOIA”) dated June 2, 2017,

communicating redacted information withheld, due

to fear of public scrutiny, is also respectfully being

provided for thoughtful judicial review, (App.97a-100a).

3. COMPLAINT—

Filed: 7/7/2017

Docket: #1, Attachment #6

Exhibit E—Emails

U.S. Ohio Senator’s Office

(PagelD #: 23)

(App.l01a-102a)

U.S. Congresswoman

(PagelD #:24-25)

(App.l03a-104a)

Association of Flight Attendants

(PagelD #:26)

(App.l05a)

Respondent

(PagelD #:27)

(App.l06a-107a)

Association of Flight Attendants

(PagelD #:28)

(App.l08a-109a)

4. COMPLAINT—

Filed: 7/7/2017

Docket: #1, Attachment #7

Exhibit F—Letters

U.S. Ohio Senator’s Office (PagelD #:29)

(App.llOa-llla)

FAA

(PagelD #: 30)

(App.ll2a-113a)

OSHA

(PagelD #:31-32)

(App.ll4a-116a)

5. COMPLAINT—

Filed: 7/7/2017

Docket: #l,_Attachment #10

Health and Wages Overview (PagelD #:58)

(App.ll7a-118a)

Significant difference in Health and Wages when

subjected or not subjected to “Chemical Substance

Products” in the Aircraft Cabin.

6. ORDER—

Filed: 11/15/2017

Docket: #25

(PagelD #:217-218)

(App.45a)

“STRICKEN” Evidence by the Lower Court, res

pectfully, applying the Wrong Law.

“STRICKEN” Dockets:

11 Filed: 8/21/2017

(PagelD #: 130-134)

(App.ll9a-126a)

14 Filed: 8/29/2017

(PagelD #: 144-153)

(App.l27a-138a)

16 Filed 9/14/2017

(PagelD #: 157-159)

(App. 139a-142a)

17 Filed: 9/18/2017

(PagelD #: 160-169)

(App.l43a-153a)

19 Filed: 9/26/2017

(PagelD #: 175-184)

(App.l54a-165a)

20 Filed: 10/17/2017 (PagelD #: 185-193)

(App. 166a-176a)

21 Filed: 10/25/2017 (PagelD #: 194-199)

(App.l77a-186a)

22 Filed: 11/3/2017

(PagelD #:200-206)

(App.l87a-196a)

23 Filed: 11/13/2017 (PagelD #:207-208)

Respectfully providing the available published

books with the Public Court Report Records.

(App.l97a-300a, 301a-435a)

7. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER—

Filed: 2/15/2018

Docket: #26

(PagelD #: 219-233)

(App.l5a-31a)

AMENDED COMPLAINT to be filed within 30

days. Lower Court entered Judgment in Respondents

favor, respectfully, applying the Wrong Law: American’s

with Disabilities Act (ADA).

8. AMENDED COMPLAINT—

Filed: 3/9/2018

Docket: #27

(PagelD #:234-24l)

(App.53a-65a)

AMENDED COMPLAINT is not about just one,

but about all in this environment. United States

Constitution, Article V — In respectful terms: “An

attack against one is attack against all.”

No Private Cause of Action Under Title 49. is an

ideal onnortunitv for transparency and new legislation

by the 116th Congress, sincerely encouraged. “To

Protect the People”: Respectfully in this case, the

Global Air-Traveling Public’s Health and Safety,

9. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER—

Filed: 11/20/2018

Docket: #31

(PagelD #:258"263)

(App.8a-14a)

Lower Court entered Judgment in Respondent’s

favor, respectfully, applying the Wrong Law: American’s

with Disabilities Act (ADA). Respondents motion to

dismiss is granted, case is closed.

10. JUDGMENT ENTRY—

Filed: 11/20/2018

Docket: #32

(PagelD #:264)

(App.7a)

AMENDED COMPLAINT is dismissed and case

is closed, respectfully, based on the Wrong Law:

American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA).

11. NOTICE TO APPEAL—

Filed: 12/18/2018

Docket: #35

(PagelD # 270-271)

(App.51a-52a)

Requesting the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals to

review the Lower Courts Judgment, respectfully, apply

ing the Correct Law: Federal Law 49 U.S.C. § 5124.

Proceedings in the United States Court of Appeals

for the Sixth Circuit, Case No. 18-4251.

1. ORDER—

Filed: 6/24/2019

Docket: #15

(PagelD #: 1-5)

(App.la-6a)

Respectful Order states: “Alessio attached several

documents to her complaint, including two documents

that she identified as ‘EEOC’ discrimination charges.”

(App.2a)

Respectful statement in the Order, is true.

With great respect and to be clear for the record,

the two “EEOC Charges of Discrimination” written

by Petitioner and respectfully submitted with COM

PLAINT were not an Attachment. The Discrimination

Charges were part of the actual COMPLAINT.

For 100% clarification, the “two documents” that

have led me to Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to

THE SUPREME COURT are identified as “EEOC

Letters” (written by the EEOC), and are respectfully

missing from COMPLAINT, Attachment #5, Exhibit

D, where it is noted: “EEOC Letters”.

Both missing EEOC Letters were written by the

EEOC to the Petitioner. The two missing document

EEOC Letters have been respectfully submitted with

the Petitioner’s Brief, for meaningful judicial review,

(App.94a-100a).

2. STRICKEN EVIDENCE

With respect, Sixth Circuit AFFIRMS the District

Court’s Judgment (applying the Wrong Law) and also

DENYS the motion to strike Petitioners appendices

from the record as moot, (App.6a). Respectfully, the

Petitioner’s hope and prayer is with the once

“STRICKEN” Evidence now made available (App.

119a-196a) for meaningful judicial review applying

the Correct Law, there is opportunity for a complete

fair, right and just review, with merit, to grant a

Writ of Certiorari.

3. WRONG LAW APPLIED BY THE LOWER

COURTS

American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA).

4. CORRECT LAW APPLIED TO THE PETI

TIONERS BRIEF:

Federal Law 49 U.S.C. § 5124.

REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION

YOUR HONOR and with great respect, this case

is sincerely about Principle and that all must follow

the Rule of Law.

YOUR HONOR and with great respect, the

Federal Question has never been answered to this

case.

Respectfully, may every HONORABLE JUSTICE

of the SUPREME COURT conclude that there is a

significant loophole and conflict of law whereby the

EEOC could not certify the Respondent is in compliance

with the statutes. With respect, the Respondent is

willfully approving the carriage and use of “Chemical

Substance Products” inside the Aircraft Cabin with no

Official Government Oversight Document, providing

an available and transparent “Certificate of Compli

ance”.

YOUR HONOR and with great respect, please

consider a review of the Petitioner’s Brief based on

the Correct Law. Federal Law 49 U.S.C. § 5124. Let

the facts, respectfully submitted, provide for a more

fully informed fair, right and just ruling, which holds

great NATIONAL/GLOBAL SIGNIFICANCE.

YOUR HONOR and with great respect, this case

is sincerely about simple, basic Human Rights and

the United States Constitution: “To Protect the People”.

Respectfully, this case is unique and needs sincere

attention with thoughtful review for a resolution in

protecting the Health and Safety of American Citizens

and all People of the Global Air-Traveling Public,

because respectfully, Air-Quality matters, especially

and respectfully, at 30,000 feet.

YOUR HONOR and with great respect, Petitioner

is giving an ideal opportunity for resolution, action

and outcome, with new legislation, providing an

Official Government Document “Certificate of Compli

ance” that in fact products used inside the Aircraft

Cabin by the Respondent are 100% Safe and 100%

Transparent for the Safety, Health, Dignity and

Respect that the Global Air-Traveling Public deserves.

YOUR HONOR and with great respect, Petitioner

wants to avoid further self-published books of Court

Reported Public Record Hearings, that the Global AirTraveling Public will have for knowledge (a preserved

record), for the respectful truth be told.

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, in good conscience and

in good faith, may The Supreme Court grant this

respectful and meaningful Petition for a Writ of

Certiorari.

Respectfully submitted,

Christina Alessio

Petitioner Pro Se

1970 N. Cleveland-Massillon Road

Unit 589

Bath, OH 44210

(330) 338-7052

September 19,2019

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.