Appendix — United States v. General Dynamics Corp.

Supreme Court brief1974

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

-

eR Sas SY Ces

Na ane

OB PEON HET SIGE INL RI. SINE

a ms % ">

U Sr.

NITED STATES OF AMERICA, ‘

Year

ELECTRIC COAL COMPANIES, and FREEMAN

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Supreme Court of the United States

OctToBER TERM, 1973

No. 72-402

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellant

Vi

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, THE UNITED

ELEcTRIc CoAL COMPANIES, and FREEMAN

CoAL MINING CORPORATION

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

INDEX

Government Exhibits:

Gx + en et Sorat eee

1

Gx 2 seed Boer Gone Sree ee

1961

GX 38— Annual Report of General Dynamics Corporation

1

8

1962 5

GX 4— Annual Report of General Dynamics Corporation

Gx 5 Annal Report of Generai Dynamics Corporation :

GX 6— Annual Report of General Dynamics Corporation

Gx < Aumenl Dapect of Goneenl Diynengl Weadaielion

1966 fiers 3

GX 24— Chart entitled “The United Electric Coal Com-

panies Fixed Assets, Long Term Indebtedness,

Working Capital and Net Assets or Stockholders

Equity 1940 to 1967” 10

\

ii INDEX

Government Exhibits :—Continued . . Page

GX 25— Chart entitled “The United Electric Coal

panies Net Sales, Earnings Before Income Taxes,

Net Earnings, and Net Earnings as a Percentage

of Net Sales 1940 to 1968” 12

GX 26— Standard & Poor’s Industry Surveys—“Coal,”

April 28, 1966, Section 2, Basic Analysis... 13

GX 27— Letter dated March 26, 1968 from Reuben L.

clared and Paid by UEC during the period Janu-

ary 1, 1950 to December 31, 1967 .__.. -___.__.

GX 29— Standard Industrial Classification Manual 1967 _.

GX 381— Chart entitled “The Consumption of Fuel by

Steam-Electric Plants in the Eastern Interior

Province Sales Area for the Years 1960-1967”. 37

GX 32— Chart entitled “Consumption of Fuel (Shown in

Millions of BTU’s) by Portland Cement Plants

in Illinois in 1967” and Chart entitled “Consump-

tion of Fuel- by Portland Cement Plants in

Eastern Interior Coal Province Sales Area in

GX 384— Financial Statements: The Upited Electrical

;

&

GX 35— City, Water, Light & Power (Springfield) letter to

Department of Justice dated March 21, 1968

GX 386— Illinois Power Company letter to Department of

Justice dated March 21, 1968 an

GX 387— Dairyland Power Cooperative letter to

of Justice dated April 23, 1968

GX 389— Corn Products Company letter to Department of

Justice dated May 24, 1968 _.._-___-- __ . _ -—

GX 41— Union Carbide Corporation letter to Department

of Justice dated August 2, 1968

GX 43— Dundee Smith Company letter to Department of

Justice dated August 22, 1968

GX 49— A Staff Report on National Gas Supply and De-

mand by the Federal Power Commission

GX 651— Chart entitled “Coal Shipments to Illinois Desti-

nations by District of Origin, 1965 to 1967” ___..

Gx 52— Chart entitled “1967 Sales of Coal in the Eastern

Interior Coal Province Sales Area by Coal Pro-

ducers Located in Illinois, Indiana and Western

Kentucky” Pee gS es AP 68

GX 654— Freeman Coal Mining Corporation; Shipments

of Coal in Tons from the Crown Mine to Customer

Destinations, 1967 73

GX 55— Freeman Coal Mining Corporation; Shipments of

Coal in Tons from the Orient No. 8 Mine to Cus-

tomer Destinations, 1967 74

2eeesa8 & & S

INDEX

iii

Government Exhibits :—Continued Page

GX 56— Freeman Coal Mining Corporation; Shipments of

tomer Destinations, 1967 75

Gx 57— Freeman Coal Mining Corporation; Shipments of

Coal in Tons from the Orient No. 5 Mine to Cus-

tomer Destinations, 1967 tl a

Gx 58— The United Electric Coal Companies; Shipments

of Coal in Tons from the Banner Mine to Cus-

tomer Destinations, 1967 77

Gx 59— The United Electric Coal Companies; Shipments

of Coal in Tons from the Cuba-Buckhart Mines to

Customer Destinations, 1967 78

GX 60— The United Electric Coal Companies; Shipments

of Coal in Tons from the Fidelity Mine to Cus-

tomer Destinations, 1967 __ 79

GX 61— Chart entitled “Total Coal Consumption in Tons

in 1967 by Steam Electric Plants in the Eastern

Interior Coal Province Sales and the Total

Sales of Coal in Tons in 1967 from Mines located

in the Eastern Interior Coal Province to Steam

Electric Plants in the Eastern Interior Coal Prov-

Gx 62— Chart entitled “Production of Coal in Illinois by

the Leading Companies and Their Subsidiaries for

the 1957 Calendar Year” 81

Gx 63— Chart entitled “Production of Coal in Illinois by

: the Leading Companies and Their Subsidiaries

for the 1958 Calendar Year” 82

Gx 64— Chart entitled “Production of Coal in Illinois by

the Leading Companies and Their Subsidiaries

for the 1959 Calendar Year” wcis 83

Gx 65— Chart entitled “Production of Coal in Illinois by

the Leading Companies and Their Subsidiaries

for the 1960 Calendar Year” __\ 84

GX 66— Chart entitled “Production of in Illinois by

the Leading Companies and Their Subsidiaries for

the 1961 Calendar Year” 85

Gx 67— Chart entitled “Production of Coal in Illinois by

the Leading Companies and Their Subsidiaries for

the 1962 Calendar Year” 86

Gx 68— Chart entitled “Production of Coal in Illinois by

the Leading Companies and Their Subsidiaries

for the 1968 Calendar Year” 87

Gx 69— Chart entitled “Production of Coal in Illinois by

the Leading Companies and Their Subsidiaries

for the 1964 Calendar Year” 88

Gx 70— Chart entitled “Production of Coal in Tlinois by

the Leading Companies and Their Subsidiaries

for the 1965 Calendar Year” 89

76

iv

INDEX

Government Exhibits:—Continued _

Gx

Gx

Gx

Gx

Gx

Gx

Gx

Gx

Gx

Gx

Gx

Gx

Gx

Gx

71— Chart entitled “Production of Coal in Illinois by

¢ The Leading Companies and. Their Gubeldiaries for

the Top Two, the Top Four, and the Top Ten

Producers, 1957-1967, and their Percentage of

Total Production for These Years” —.._.____

74— Chart entitled “Sales of Coal in Illinois by the

Leading Companies and Their Subsidiaries in 1967

(From Mines Located in Eastern Interior Coal

“r

75— Chart entitled “Production of Coal in Illinois,

Yerior Coal Province since 1954”

88— Chart entitled “Common Known Customers of

The United Electric Coal Companies and Free-

eee ee ee

tion Points 1965”

Points 1967”

91— Chart entitled “Per Cent of Sales of Each Com-

pany to Identical Customer Facilities by The

United Electzic Coal Companies and Freeman Coal

Mining Corpération for the Year 1965-1967” ___

98— Central Illinois Public Service Company letter

to Department of Justice dated October 28, 1966_

91

101

107

111

114

117

118

INDEX

Government Exhibits:—Continued

Gx 94— Illinois Power Company letter to Department of

Justice dated October 17, 1966

GX 104— Central Illinois Electric and Gas Company letter

to Department of Justice dated October 20, 1966_

GX 185— March 26, 1970 Petition of Commonwealth Edison

to form

GX 200— United Electrie Coal Companies, Board of Di-

rectors Minutes—1959 =

GX 201— United Electric Coal Companies, Board of -

rectors Minutes—1960

GX 210— Testimony of Jack Simon before Illinois Com-

Commission

merce

Gx 219— Keystone Coal Buyers Manual 1967

GX 282— Article entitled “The Energy Outlook”, by Gerber

and Netschert, entered in the IEEE Spectrum,

June 1969

GX 233— Speech by J. Cordell Moore entitled “The Future

Role of Fossil Fuels in Electric Power Genera-

tion,” at the American Power Conference luncheon

in 1968

GX 239— Article entitled “New Horizons for Coal—the

Comeback » by Robert E. Lee Hall,

ticle, dated March 7, 1968

GX 247— Article entitled “Natural Gas Fiasco”, printed in

Defense Exhibits:

Dx 1— October 9, 1957 memorandum from Frank Kolbe

to R. J. Hepburn re punch mining

Dx 2— October 18, 1957 letter from J. M. Morris to

Frank Kolbe re Northern States Pewer Company,

Displacing gas with coal

Dx 3— June 19, 1958 letter from A. J. Christiansen to

A. H. Truax with three page attachment.___

Dx 4— July 1, 1958 letter from J. M. Morris to Frank

Nugent

Dx 5— July 11, 1958 letter from R. J. Hepburn to Frank

Kolbe with two page attachment

176

194

197

Dx 6— August 4, 1958 letter from “President” to Mr.

Justin Potter

DX 7%— November 21, 1958 Wall Street Journal article

“General Dynamics Seeks To Acquire Chicago

Building Firm”

210

vi

Dx

Dx

Dx

Defense Exhibits :—Continued

INDEX

8— December 11, 1958 letter from Geo. Robert Boller

to F. F. Kolbe with one page attachment. .—s—

wits tes ~ 1959 letter from Frank Nugent to

. F. Kolbe

1l— May 27, 1959 letter from R. J. Hepburn to F. F.

Kolbe

12— October 2, 1959 Paul Weir Co. report to F. F.

Kolbe

13— May 27, 1960 letter from T. H. Latimer to R. J.

Hepburn

14— August 23, 1960 letter from J. M. Morris to

C. Evans Parks, Iowa Southern Utilities Co.

1 Sones *, 000 hur fen 3. A ae &

H Mann

16— September 13, 1960 letter from H. L. Mann to

J. M. Morris

17— November 15, 1961 letter from J. M. Morris to

H. L. Mann -

18— June 12, 1962 memorandum from R. J. Hepburn

19— November 30, 1962 letter from H. L. Mann to

Robert J. Hepburn

20— December 10, 1962 letter from Robert J. Hepburn

to H. L. Mann re Iowa Coal Field

21— March 8, 1963 letter from R. J. Hepburn to J. M.

Aiken

22— May 19, 1964 letter to Frank Nugent enclosing

one page draft letter to Arch Kraakevik of Illinois

Power Co. ’

23— “June 16, 1964 memorandum from Irving Crown to

Frank Nugent with four page attachment

24— June 29, 1965 memorandum from J. M. Morris

to R. H. Inman et al. re Industry field ss

25— October 27, 1965 letter from J. M. Morris to

Frank Nugent with one page attachment

26— January 5, 1966 letter from Q. W. Wellington to

oe eee a.

27— March 8, 1966 memorandum from Dale H. Emling

to J. M. Morris with two page attachment

28— March 14, 1966 letter from J. M. Morris to Frank

Nugent

29— July 18, 1966 memorandum from D. H. Emling to

R. H. Inman

30— July 29, 1966 memorandum from R. H. Inman to

T. H. Latimer, et al. :

31— August 9, 1966 memorandum from D. H. Emling

and B..C. Jensen to R. H. Inman re Star Lake

Field, McKinley County, New Mexico

-,

Be RERERESELS EES BBE

S2— September 12, 1966 letter from J. Morris to

Frank Nugent

83— October 18, 1966 memorandum between R. H. In-

man and T. H. Latimer

34— July 31, 1967 letter from Jack A. Simon to

See £8 8 RES sees gee Ee Tg

INDEX

57— 1960 utility use of Illinois coal

i

ith

DX 56— Government

Dx

Dx

EE&ES @RERFFFRSS FEB

‘3

He

geds

i

69— September

to

DX Té6—

610

33

ay

S

INDEX

Defense Exhibits :—Continued

Dx

Dx

Dx

Dx

DX

Dx

Dx

DX

Dx

Dx

Dx

Dx

DX 93—

Dx

Dx

Dx

Dx

Dx

Dx

81— 1968 Annual Report of Standard Oil Company

ab Hakaelts pegened Waiewl @ ies Ge ew

8 .

5d(4) and 5e(3), United States v. Standard Oil

Company (New Jersey et al.), Civ. No. 954-64,

D. NJ. (1964)

tistics by Dr. Bruce C. Netschert

86— “Structure and Geography of the Electric Utility

Market for Coal,” report and statistics by Abra-

ham Gerber

S7— Report on coal reserves and deep mining by Pau!

eir

88— “Availability of Economically Mineable Strip Re-

94— 1968 Annual Report of Commonwealth Edison __

95— “Edison Seek A-site Downstate,” Chicago Daily

News, March 9, 1970

96— Advertisement entitled “Nuclear Power for Chi-

cago,” Chicago Daily News, March 18, 1967 _____

97— Advertisement entitled “Commonwealth Edison

Reports on Chicago’s Air Pollution Problem,”

Chicago Sun Times, July 11,1969

99— Advertisement entitled “No Smoke. No Dirt.

No Fumes,” Chicago Tribune, February 8, 1970.

617

910

INDEX

Defense Exhibits :—Continued

DX 100— Advertisement entitled “You're Looking at 20,000

Tons of Smokeless, Fumeless ‘Coal’,” Chicago

March 8, 1970 __-

DX 103— Comparison of Coal-Fired and Nuclear Power

Piants for the TVA System, June, 1966

DX 104— Letter of October 17, 1962 from Elmer Hill te-

Barton -

DX 105— Letter of October 18, 1962 from Barton Gebhart

to Elmer C. Hill with two page attachment

DX 107— Central Station Nuclear Plants, AEC Division of

Industrial Participation, March 30, 1970 /

DX 108— AEC Release N-2, January 13, 1970, re Status

Report on U.S. Civilian Nuclear Power Plants __

DX 110— Chart entitled “U.S. Utility Orders for Electric

Generating Equipment” _ Rt

DX 111— Letters of February 19 and 22, 1968 from Rich-

ard P. Ryan, General Counsel, Humble Oil and

Refining Company to John T. Cusack =. ss —.

DX 112— Excerpt from Minutes of Meeting of Board of

4282

|

F

z

Sun Times, July 8, 1969

DX 1387— entitled “Before everyone runs out

of breath about we're doing

pollution,

something to the air,” Chicago Sun Times,

December 12, 1969

DX 138— 1969 Steam-Electric Plant Factor

1012

1015

1022

1041

- 1042

1085

1086

1087

June 26, 1969

DX 153— Article entitled Pollution !”

Chicago Sun Times, July 14, 1969

DX 154— Article entitled Cuts Use Of Coal, Re-

duces Air Pollution,” Sun Times, Novem-

ber 11, 1969

DX 155— Article entitled “8 Utilities Face Pollution Probe,”

Chicago Sun Times, November 13, 1969

DX 156— Article entitled “Clean-Air Edicts Offered In

DX 157— Article entitled “Mikva Bill Would Make Air

Pollution A Federal Offense,” Chicago Sun Times,

November 20, 1969

DX 158— Article entitled “Pollution Fight—Edison Tells

Coal Doubts,” Chicago Daily News, December 1,

1969

Street Journal, January 7, 1970

DX 160— Article entitled “Business Bulletin—A Special

Background Report On Trends In Industry And

Finance,” The Wall Street Journal, March 19,

1970

1124

1130

1184

1136

1187

1138

1139

1141

INDEX

Defense Exhibits :—Continued

DX 163— Article entitled “Commonwealth Edison Is

Allowed To Import Low-Sulphur Fuel Oil—Hickel

Says One-Year License Doesn’t Establish New

Policy; Coal Industry Fought Action,” The Wall

Street Journal, March 26, 1970

DX 164— Article entitled “The Real Meaning Of Alaskan

Oil Finds,” U.S. News & World Report, March 3,

1969

DX 165— Article entitled “Petroleum Prize—Oil Firms At

North Slope Race For Data As Giant Lease Sale

Bidding Approaches,” The Wall Street Journal,

May 2, 1969

DX 166— Article entitled “Jersey Standard Unit To Send

Oil Tanker Through Northwest Passage In Test

Run,” The Wall Street Journal, June 4, 1969 _____

DX 167— Article entitled “Three Oil Companies To Study

Feasibility Of Building First Coast-To-Coast

Pipeline,” The Wall Street Journal, July 24, 1969_

DX 168— Article entitled “Northern Natural Gas Plans

Major Canada Pipeline—Cost Of System To

Transport Canadian Gas To The U.S. Put At

About $1.4 Billion—Governtent Approval Need-

ed,” The Wall Street Journal, April 1, 1969 ____

DX 169— Article entitled “People Gas Unit Plans To Buy

Midwest Area’s First Gas From Canada,” The

Wall Street Journal, June 18, 1969 _... SS >SS

DX 170— Article entitled “Alberta Agency Backs Northern

Natural On Bid To Export Gas To U.S. Midwest,”

The Wall Street Journal, December 17, 1969 ____.

DX 171— Article entitled “Consumers Power Announces

Plans For Atomic Plant—Dow Chemical Will Be

Chief Customer Of New Facility; Cost Put At

$267 Million—Completion Is Slated In 1975,”

The Wall Street Journal, December 15, 1967 ___.

DX 172— Article entitled “Jersey Standard Joins List Of

To Make Nuclear Fuel—Subsidiary To

see: nancial ee asides a Phe ok

search Assigned To Battelle Institute,” The Wall

Street Journal, March 20, 1969

DX 173— Article entitled “In 1970: 23 Utilities Will Ask

Bids On 29 Nuclear Units,” Nucleonics Week,

January 15, 1970

DX 174— Article entitled “The Anti-Atom Nuts,” Chicago

Tribune, January 20, 1970.

DX 175— Article entitled “Consumers Power Announces

Plans For New Plant—Pumped Storage Facility

Set For 1973: Detroit Edison To Share Cost And

Output—Outlay To Total $186 Million,” The Wall

Street Journal, November 28, 1967

INDEX

Defense Exhibits :—Continued

DX 176— Article entitled “FPC Aide Again Approves Con

Edison Bid To Build Power Project; Protests

1ikely,” ‘The Wall Street Journal, August 7,

Dx 177— Article entitled “TVA Plans To Start $155 Million

Project At Raccoon Mountain—Plan Will Include

4 Reversible Pump-Turbine Units With Total Ca-

pacity Of 1.4 Million Kilowatts,” The Wall Street

Journal, January 19, 1970.

DX 178— Article entitled “Geophysics,” Time Magazine,

July 26, 1968

DX 179— Article entitled “Earth’s Own Power Source,”

Chicago Daily News, January 8 ere

DX 181— Excerpt from transcript of Hearings before the

Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, 99th Con-

Necessity.”

DX 182— Article entitled “New England Affiliation Slated

—Utiilty Concerns Plan Affiliation,” New York

Times, June 12, 1968.

DX 183— Article entitled “Boards of Iowa P&L And Iowa-

Illinois G&E Approve Merger Plan—New Entity,

Towa Energy Corp., Plans To Retire The 2 Utili-

ties’ Outstanding Preferred Shares,” The Wall

Street Journal, July 22, 1969

DX 184— Article entitled “Ayrshire Collieries Asks Bids of

5 Firms—Coal Concern Invites Offers To Pur-

chase Or Merge With It; Replies Expected Next

Month,” The Wall Street Journal, November 27,

1968

DX 185— Article entitled “Ashland Oil Plans To Buy Or

Lease Ayrshire Assets—Boards Vote Proposal

That Includes The Sale Of Coal Royalties To

Third Firm—Pact Involves $125 Million,” The

Wall Street Journal, January 22, 1969

DX 186— Article entitled Pressed say ae Sign

Merger Accord—Acqu Producer

By Metals Firm Valued At Minimum Of $626

Million—Boards And Holders To Vote,” The Wall

Street Journal, April 24, 1969

1158

1159

1160

1161

1162

1163

1164

1165

1166

1167

1168

a,

Today, More and More Apartment Building Own-

ers Are Turning To Gas Heat. Things Stay

Cleaner Inside And Out,” Chicago Sun Times,

May 16, 1967

DX 188— Advertisement entitled “1977 The Year Our City

Died.” Philadelphia Inquirer, December 4, 1967_

DX 189— Advertisement entitled “You Can Heat 2%

Houses With Modern Oil For What It Costs To

Heat 1 House With Electricity!”

DX 190— Advertisement entitled “We're Helping Main

Street Switch To Nuclear Power.”

DX 191— Advertisement entitled “This Pollution Was

Caused By Burning Money. How Much Of It Was

Yours?” Fortune, March 1, 1968

DX 192— Advertisement entitled “What's Gas Energy

Doing To Make Industry Nice To Be Near?”

American Gas Association, Inc.

DX 193— Advertisement entitled “How Nuclear Science

pom ee fo American

DX 195— Advertisement entitled “Who Offers You 24-Hour

Plant Site Location Service On The 60-Mile IIli-

.¢, nois Shore? Peoples Gas, Of Course.” The Peoples

Gas Light And Coke Company And North Shore

Gas Company

For Complete Chicagoland Plant Site Informa-

tion,” The Peoples Gas Light And Coke Company

And North Shore Gas Company... >>>

DX 197— Advertisement entitled “The Perfect Salt Substi-

tute,” American Natural Gas Company

DX 198— Advertisement entitled “St. Louis’ Tallest Office

That Saves With Natural Gas,” American Gas

Association, Inc.

DX 200— Advertisement entitled “Natural Gas Energy

1169

1170

1171

1172

1173

1174

1175

1176

1177

1178

1179

1180

1181

1182

INDEX

Defense Exhibits :—Continued

DX 201— Advertisement “What Do You Call It?

No Matter What You Call It There’s A Lot More

Coming From Gas There's A

Produce Electricty, Cooling and Heating.” Amer-

ica Gas Association, Inc.

DX 204— Advertisement entitled Buy All Year

Gas Energy For Heating, Cooling And Electric

Boe pnd Saves $1,000 2 Month.” American

1184

1187

1188

1189

1190

xvi 3 INDEX

Defense Exhibits :—Continued

DX 213— Advertisement entitled “Texas Gas Invites You

To The Wireless House.”

DX 214— Advertisement entitled “Here’s The Story Of The

Gas Fuel Cell. It’s Electrifying.” American Gas

Association, Inc.

DX 215— “Nuclear Steam-Generation of Electricity: Its

Implication for the Future of Coal Transport by

Railway and Water,” by John C. Spychalski, JCC

Practitioners’ Journal, (July-August, 1967) __.

DX 216— “The Story of Coal,” The Petroleum Situation

(October 27, 1969 and November 28, 1969)

DX 218— Chart entitled “The Prime Interest Rate, 1928-

1968,” Chicago Daily News, December 18, 1968 _

DX 219— Letter dated March 9, 1970 from V. H. Clark,

Secretary- , Electric Energy, Inc., to

Reuben L. Hedlund _

DX 220— Letter dated June 29, 1942 from Frank F. Kolbe

to B. L. Slack

DX 221— Letter dated July 23, 1954 from Frank F. Kolbe

to Herman G. Schenck

DX 222— Letter dated June 11, 1956 from Frank F. Kolbe

to Nye F. Morehouse

DX 223— Brochure entitled “Taum Sauk, Union Electric’s

Pumped—Storage Hydro Plant.” _

DX 224— Press release, University of Chicago, January 19,

1970

DX 225— Letter dated May 25, 1960 from Ward B. Cham-

berlin, Jr., Office of Chief Counsel, General Dy-

namics Corporation to Robert A. Bicks, Acting

.. Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division,

Department of Justice and exhibit C thereto.

DX-227— November 1, 1968 Memorandum from R. H. In-

man to R. J. Hepburn re Freeman analysis of

Kerr Mine

DX 228— Excerpts from the Minutes of the Board of Di-

rectors of The United Electric Coal Companies

the

poena Questionnaire for the Freeman Coal Mining

Corporation

DX 230— April 18, 1970 letter from Mr. Allen Van Wyck,

Chairman of the Board of Illinois Power Company,

to Donald G. Kempf, Jr. _

DX 231— April 14, 1970 letter from K. E. Bowen, President

of Central Illinois Public Service Company, to

Donald G. Kempf, Jr.

DX 282— Brochure entitled “Low Cost Electric Power and

Dependability . . . Through MAPP”... ==»

DX 233— Brochure entitled “Mid-America Interpoo] Net-

work—MAIN”

xviii INDEX

Deposition Exhibits:

Abrahamson Deposition Exhibit 1—Front Cover of 1967

Annual Report of Wisconsin Power & Light Company___

Abrahamson Deposition Exhibit 1A—Back page of 1967

Annual Report of Wisconsin Power & Light Company__

Beck Deposition Exhibit 1—Letter to Antitrust Division,

Department of Justice, Chicago, Illinois, from C. V.

Beck dated November 14, 1968

Brazzale Deposition Exhibit 1—Document entitled “Heat-

ing Fuel Economic Analysis” for the Federal Office

Building and United States Courthouse, Chicago,

Illinois

Burton Deposition Exhibit 1—Document entitled “Solicita-

tion, Offer, and Award Contract GS-05S-4945” issued

August 1, 1967

Camicia Deposition Exhibit 1—Keystone’s Map of the Coal

Fields of the United States _

Gallagher Deposition Exhibit 3—Mineral Industry Surveys,

Bituminous Coal and Lignite Distribution, Calendar

Year 1967

Griswold Deposition it 3—Report of the Secretary of

Health, Education, aad Welfare to the Congress of the

United States enti “Air Pollution by Federal Facili-

ties” and dated January 1968

Griswold Deposition Exhibit 4—Second Report of the Secre-

tary of Health, Education, and Welfare to the United

States Congress entitled “Air Pollution Abatement by

Federal Facilities” and dated January 1969... =

Griswold Deposition Exhibit 5—Document entitled “Oper-

ating Experience with Wet-Dolomite Scrubbing” by

J. F. McLaughlin, Executive Assistant, Union Electric

Co., St. Louis, Missouri, and J. Jonakin, Products Man-

ager, Air Pollution Control Systems, Combustion Engi-

neering, Inc., Windsor, Connecticut, presented at the Air

Pollution Control Association Annual] Meeting in New

York City on June 22-26, 1969

Jensen Deposition Exhibit 12—Memorandum from Burl C.

Jensen to Mr. R. H. Inman dated June 7, 1965 _.. ____.

Jensen Deposition Exhibit 18—Memorandum from D. H.

Emling and B. C. Jensen to Mr. R. H. Inman dated June

7, 1966

Kolbe Deposition Exhibit 2—Annual Report of The United

Electric Coal Companies 1956

Kolbe Deposition Exhibit 4—Annual Report of The United

Electric Coal Companies 1958

Kolbe Deposition Exhibit 7—Annual Report of The United

Electric Coal Companies 1961

Kolbe Deposition Exhibit 12—Letter to Mr. W. B. Hillery,

unsigned, by the President dated February 27, 1957 __

Page

1409

1410

1411

1412

1413

1415

1416

1456

1470

1502

1519

1521

1526

1530

1582

1533

INDEX

Deposition Exhibits :—Continued

man to Mr. R. J. Hepburn dated May 10, 1961.

Kolbe Deposition Exhibit 42—Annual Report of The United

Kolbe Deposition Exhibit 51—Annual Report of The United

Electric Coal Companies 1948

Kolbe Deposition Exhibit 57—Annual Report of The United

Electric Coal Companies 1954

Kolbe Deposition Exhibit 59—Paul Weir Company Valuation

of Physical Assets of UEC as of December 31, 1959. __

Kolbe Deposition Exhibit 60—Document entitled “Regarding

Need For Additional Stripping Equipment at Fidelity

Mine” dated June 17, 1966 and signed by J. M. Morris.

Kolbe Deposition Exhibit A—Comparison between Truax-

Traer Coal Company and The United Electric Coal Com-

panies

Company, January, 1956” of Theron G. Gerow, Mining

Consultant and Engineer

Kolbe Deposition Exhibit L—Letter dated September 12,

1960 from J. M. Morris to Mr. Frank Nugent

Kolbe Deposition Exhibit N—Memorandum to Mr. R. J.

Hepburn from T. H. Latimer dated October 3, 1955

No. 2,825,064, dated July 27, 1948, entitled “Explosive

Composition, Robert W. Lawrence, Wilmington, Dela-

ware, assignor to Hercules Powder Company, Wilming-

ton, Delaware, a corporation of Delaware” acted cabana

Kolbe Deposition Exhibit T—Letter from Mr. Keane,

_ Assistant General Manager of Hercules ‘owder Com-

pany, to The United Electric Coal Companies dated

June 27, 1956

Kolbe Deposition Exhibit W-1—Letter from Frank Kolbe to

Harry LaViers dated February 25, 1958

1571

1587

1628

1629

1681

1634

1639

burn from “President” dated December 8, 1957

Heine Depouttion Exhibit X-1—Latter from RJ Hepburn

to Frank Kolbe dated November 29, 1957 __ Be

Kolbe Exhibit X-2—Memorandum from T. H

Kurtz Deposition Exhibit 9—Bituminous Coal Facts 1966. 1656

Kurtz Deposition Exhibit 10—Bituminous Coal Facts 1968. 1657

25—Memorandum from T. H.

Latimer to Mr. R. J. Hepburn dated September 25,

1964 1662

Latimer Deposition Exhibit 88—Memorandum from T. H.

Latimer to Mr. R. H. Inman dated July 19, 1966... 1664

Latimer Deposition Exhibit 48—Memorandum from T. H.

Latimer to Mr. R. J. Hepburn dated February 10, 1961. 1665

Exhibit 1—General Dynamics Proxy

17, 1959 from R. J. Hepburn to Mr. J. M. Morris .... 1678

Morris Deposition Exhibit 4—Letter from Mr. John M.

Morris to Mr. Frank Nugent dated January 10, 1966... 1680

Morris Deposition Exhibit 5—Letter from J. M. Morris to

Mr. Frank Nugent dated March 14, 1966 ..... 1682

Morris Deposition Exhibit 14—Letter dated May 3, 1965

from J. M. Morris to Mr. Frank Nugent _...........—s-—:« 1683

Morris Deposition Exhibit 31—Memorandum from R. J. Hep-

burn to Mr. J. M. Morris dated January 24,1961... _ 1686

orris

to Mr. T.

burn to Mr. J. M. Morris dated July 17,1962. —»-.1689

Tarzy to Mr J. M. Morris dated February 14, 1961.

Morris Exhibit 47—Letter from T. H. Latimer to

Mr. G. I. dated November 20, 1957

- to Mr Jebn Morn Sd hc a aie au

gent

Morris 59—Letter from G. H. Utterback

to Mr. Robert S. Overbeck dated November OT ictiniat

Morris Deposition Exhibit 60—Letter from Mr. RS.

beck to Mr. G. H. Utterback dated December 18, 1962 ___

and

Alumin Company of America dated May 8, 1965___

Morris Deposition Exhibit 62 Letter dated Septestoy if

for the effective period of the date of award through

June 30, 1968

Coal

1959 pete

Nugent Deposition Exhibit 2—Financial Freeman

Coal Corporation; Year Ended December $1,

1960

Nugent Deposition Exhibit 5—Financial Freeman

Coal Mining Corporation; Year Ended December 81,

1963 __

Nugent Deposition Exhibit Freeman

. 1718

1714

1715

. 1741

1744

1747

1750

1753

1756

INDEX

Deposition Exhibits :—Continued

Nugent Deposition Exhiibt 7—Financial : Freeman

eet oe December 31,

Nugent Deposition Exhibit 8—Financial Reports: Freeman

Coal Mining Corporation; Year Ended December 31,

1966

Nugent Deposition Exhibit 9—Financial Reports: Freeman

ee et eee Year Ended December 31,

Nugent Deposition Exhibit 11—Annual Report of the Chi-

oR ag apace desea wetter: gm Sieetinegd

ear

Nugent Deposition Exhibit 16—Advertisement of Freeman

Coal Mining Corporation in 1967 Keystone Coal Buyers

Nugent cong Exhibit 17—Advertisement of antag

Electric Coal Companies in the 1967 Keystone Coal

Buyers Manual

Nugent Deposition Exhibit 19—Advertisement of The United

Electric Coal Companies in the 1968 Keystone Coal

Buyers Manual

Nugent reg ey Exhibit 20—Advertisement of The United

Electric Coal Companies in February 1968 issue of The

Black Diamond

Nugent Deposition Exhibit 22—Letter dated February 13,

1968 from Reuben L. Hedlund to John T. Cusack re

Dividends Paid to MSC, Freeman, GD on the Stock of

UEC, January 1, 1959 to December 27, 1967_...___._

Nugent tion Exhibit 29—Annual Report of The United

Coal Companies 1964

Nugent Deposition Exhibit 35—Invitation for Tenders of

Common Stock of The United Electric Coal Companies

by General Dynamics Corporation dated October 5, 1966_

Nugent Deposition Exhibit 88—Map entitled “Shipping Coal

Mines In Illinois” prepared by Jack A. Simon, State of

Illinois, Department of Registration and Education,

State Geological Survey, dated January 1, 1966 _.._._.

Nugent Deposition Exhibit 39—Letter from Tom Tarzy to

Frank Nugent dated December 11, 1964 and Chart Show-

— Midwestern Coal Consumption by Utility Plants,

Nogsat Depstion, Eehibit «Minutes of The United

Electric Coal Companies Board of Directors Meeting

held October 28, 1960 re Capital Appropriation for UEC.

Nugent Deposition Exhibit A—Letter from Frank Kolbe to

Henry Crown dated October 9, 1956

1774

1776

1786

1793

1794

1796

1797

INDEX

Deposition Exhibits :—Continued

Pedersen Deposition Exhibit 5—United Electric Coal Com-

panies Computation of Provision for Federal Income

Taxes, Month of October 1966 and Ten Months Ended

October 31, 1966

Redard Deposition Exhibit 1—Keystone Steel and Wire Com-

ae ne te Eepietaass We Sustioe dated April 26,

1 ot

Simon Deposition Exhibit 1—Simon, J.A., An Evaluation of

Illinois Coal Reserve Estimates, 1968

1847

1381 *

WEST CENTRAL REGiGN

POWER SURYEY

1970-1999

se y

pene

A REPORT

to the FEDERAL PCWER COMATISSICN

Prepared by

THE WEST CENTRAL

REGIONAL ADVISORY CCRIMITTEE

The West Central Region comprises about one-fifth of the

conterminous United States and includes about 14% of the

population. The region is outlined on the map, Figure 1,

below.

The region extends from Lake Michigan and the Illinois-

Indiana state line on the east to an irregular line through

eastern Montana, Wyoming and western Nebraska. In the north-south

direction, the area extends from the Canadian border to an

irregular mid-continent line including most of Nebraska, northern

Missouri and all of Illinois. The West Central Region corresponds

to PPC power supply ereas 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 (excluding the Kansas

City area), 26, 27, 28 and 40.

The principal load centers are

region, and are concentrated in

Milwaukee, Minneapolis-st. Paul,

and St. Louis.

The non-coincident peak load for 1965 in the

was 24,290 megawatts and the projection

1970, 70,610 megawatts for 1980, and 13

1383

detailed in the following tabulation.

1990 of about five and one-half times

anticipated population growth of 40

used per person is expected to increase from

to 18,500 kwhr in 1990.

Pigure 2

LOAD GROWTH IN THE WEST CENTRAL REGION

(MEGAWATTS )

percent.

located in the eastern half of the

the metropolitan areas of

Omaha, Des Moines, Quad Cities

ion of the region is an area of

responding low load requirements with

West Central Region

S are 35,930 megawatts for

1,680 megawatts for 1990 as

This indicates a load in

the 1965 load compared to an

The total energy

4,800 kwhr in 1965

1965

40 (Excl .EEInc)

40(EEInc only)

Total (Non-

3, 344 (w)

6,733 (s)

2,943(s)

2, 984 (Ww)

2,471 (s)

2,529(s)

— 565 (“)

24,290

coincidental)

Total (Non-

23,920

coincidental summer season)

The task force based th

independent judgments o

forecast for the region as a whol

4,660 (w)

10,070 (s)

4,530(s)

4,280(s)

3,730(s)

3,835 (s)

735 (w)

35,930

34,830

8,510(s)

19,810(s)

9,720(s)

9,210(s)

7,160(S)

1,820 (w)

1,900 (w)

4,390(s)

7,355(S)

—233 (5)

70,610

69,780

3,680

8,070

13,255

131,680

130,240

(S) denotes summer peak

(W) denotes winter peak .

ese load projections on a

£ the util

ities in the region.

e is higher than that appearing in

pooling of the

This current

1384

the 1964 National Power Survey. As an example, the 1980 forecast

of 70,616 mw compares with the previous forecast of 61,050 mw, an

increase of about 15%. The principal reason for this increase is

the continued rapid growth in the economy and growth in utility

sales and peak loads during the period subsequent to the 1964

National Power Survey effort.

Substantial fossil fuel resources are located within the region,

with approximately 370 billion tons of recoverable coal reserves

believed to exist. Additionally, a recent report indicated

additional reserves could amount to 225 billion tons of recover-

able coal reserves in unmapped and unexplored areas. Although

the bituminous coal resources have made a considerable contribu-

tion to the supply of electric energy to date, the sub-bituminous

coal supply in Montana and Wyoming and the lignite coal reserves

in the Dakotas and Montana are receiving new attention with the

advent of unit-train transportation and improved burning tech-

nology. As a matter of interest, one county in North Dakota

contains 71 billion tons of lignite coal. This is the largest

tonnage for coal bearing counties in the nation.

The natural gas reserves in the region comprise less than 1% of

the total reserves in the United States. The crude oil and

natural gas liquid reserves approximate 2% of the total liquid

hydro carbon reserves in the United States.

The fossil fuel survey indicated that the average price of coal

f.0.b. mine has increased about 10% for coal obtained from

Illinois, the highest producing coal area in the region, during

the period 1961-1966. Rail transportation has predominated in

the movement of coal in this region, and within recent years the

cost of coal transported by rail has been reduced substantially

on selected*movements of coal shipped by unit train. During

1966 about 22% of coal for the region was shipped by unit train,

27% by rail-barge, and 11% by rail-lake.

Large investor-owned utilities are the principal suppliers of

electric energy to the major metropolitan centers in the eastern

portion of the region. Rural electric cooperatives are well

established throughout the entire region and the generation-trans-

mission type (G & T) cooperatives are functioning in Iowa,

Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wisconsin. Public

agencies are the principal suppliers of electric energy in

Nebraska. The largest numbers of municipal systems in the region

are found in PSA 17 (188), PSA 28 (138), ana PSA 16 (110).

Nene. wre

1385

In the West Central Region there are 85 investor-owned systems,

261 cooperatives, two Federally-owned systems, and 701 publicly

owned systems, comprised mainly of municipal systems and public

power districts. Investor-owned companies serve 83.8 percent of

the energy requirements in the region, the cooperatives 2.6 percent

and the public agencies (other than Federal) 6.9 percent. The

Federal Government generates 6.7 percent of the electric energy

in the region, its output being sold principally to municipalities,

public power districts and cooperatives. In 1965 about 38 percent

of all the power generated by G & T cooperatives in the United.

States was produced in the West Central Region with cooperatives

in PSA 16 alone accounting for about one-half of this amount.

The five largest of the 85 investor-owned electric systems supply

nearly 60 percent of the electric loads in the region. Common-

wealth Edison Company of Chicago alone accounts for about 27 per-

cent and Union Electric Company of St Louis for about 11 percent

of the regional load. The largest municipal system in the region

is Springfield, Illinois, which had a peak load in 1967 of 170

megawatts or about one-half percent of the total regional load.

Public power districts are the principal suppliers of electric

power in Nebraska. Many towns in the state are served by

municipal systems. Some of the municipalities provide their own

generation but most obtain their power from public power districts

which carry out the principal generation and transmission functions

in the state. Public power districts and cooperatives in Nebraska

are also the principal agencies for the distribution of power.

There are no investor-owned utilities providing electric service

in Nebraska.

The Bureau of Reclamation is the marketing agency for hydro-

electric power from Federal projects located in the Missouri River

Basin. The power is marketed largely to customers having prefer-

ence under Federal Law, i.e., municipal systems, public power ,

districts and cooperatives, over a transmission network which

generally has a voltage of 230 kilovolts. Numerous wheeling

arrangements have been made by the Bureau with utilities in the

area for delivery cf power’to such preference customers.

There is a total of 1,049 electric systems serving the region.

With the exception of 71 isolated systems comprising .57% of the

total service, all the systems are interconnected and operate in

parallel with the vast majority of electric utilities in the

United States. By 1970, the interconnecting transmission system

will be overlaid with a 345 kv transmission system in the eastern

S-4

1386

half of the region and an overlaying EHV system in the western

half will have been begun. The pattern of transmission develop-

ment anticipates that the 345 kv system in the eastern half will

be substantially augmented during the 1970-1980 period and a

765 kv system will have been started. In the western half of the

region the transition to a 500 kv system will be initiated. By

1990, several east to west 765 kv transmission lines are antici-

pated with their extension through western Minnesota, the Dakotas

and the state of Nebraska at 500 kv to interconnect with the

western systems.

Consideration of probable increasing fossil fuel costs, increasing

concern for air pollution, fossil fuel transportation difficulties,

and the anticipation of relative decreasing nuclear fuel costs

with the development of fast breeder reactors have resulted in a

considerable emphasis on nuclear generating plants. Although

about 90% of the electric energy produced in the region is.

presently supplied by fossil-fuel generation, by 1990 nuclear

generating capacity is anticipated to comprise 57% of the region's

capacity. Nuclear generation is expected to supply nearly 70%

of the region's energy requirements by that time. While the

quantity of coal burned annually is indicated to increase from

51 million tons in 1966 to 69 million tons in 1975, the regional

use of coal apparently will remain relatively constant at about

65 million tons for the remainder of the study period.

Generating capacity of 79,832 megawatts is projected by 1980 to

_ supply a non-coincident summer peak of 69,780 mw with a reserve

of 15.6%. By 1990, generating capacity of 151,041 megawatts is

projected to cover a non-coincident summer peak of \W30,240 mega-

watts reflecting a reserve of 16.6%. An importation of 800 mw

of hydro pOwer from Canada is included in each of these reserve

calculations. Additional reserve of an undetermined amount exists

because of the diversity of load between utilities within the

season. About half of the 1990 capacity is shown to be in units

of 800 megawatts or larger. Generator unit size up to 2000 mega-

watts and total plant size up to 4000 megawatts are included.

There are six power pools within the region and three major

regional coordinating groups. These organizations permit the

coordination of planning of transmission and generation and the

coordination of operating these facilities. Such coordination is

made possible through the direct work of committees and task forces

comprised of representatives of individual utilities on the

pool level, and of representatives of pools and areas on the

regional level. Two offices have been established to provide

coordination of hour-to-hour and day-to day operations.

S-5

1387

Additionally, liaison established with contiguous regions pro-

vides continuity in the development of interconnections at the

boundaries of these organizations and in the operating of

mutually~affected facilities. As further coordination develops

in increasing depth, it is anticipated that a single regional

coordinating organization will evolve with the major planning

and operating responsibilities being carried on by five area-wide

groups. The interworking between these five groups then will be

coordinated within the one principal organization.

S-6

1388

INVENTORY OF FOSSIL FUEL RESOURCES

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this report is to update the 1964 National Power

Survey, Vol. II, Advisory Committee Report No. 21 on Fuels for

Electric Generation, prepared by the Fuels Special Technical

Committee.

In updating Report No. 21 we have not attempted to change or

modify the extensive and authoritative background material in

that report, which represents the best advance thinking on industry

fuel problems by some of its foremost members. Instead we have

supplemented that report where changes have occurred in the price

of fuel, the cost of transportation and methods of transport.

The West Central Region fossil fuel reserves are reported in

detail by individual counties in each state. The reserves are

tabulated by class of reserves as to whether they are “measured,”

“indicated” or “inferred” and by thickness of the coal beds.

Measured reserves are those for which tonnage was computed from

direct measurements. Indicated reserves are those for which

tonnage was computed partly from specific measurements and partly

from responsible assumptions based on available data and geologic

evidence. Inferred reserves are those for which quantitative

estimates are based on a broad knowledge of the character of the

bed or the cegion, but for which there are few, if any, actual

measurements. This detailed information on coal reserves should

be useful to system planners in selecting future sites for large

thermal power plants.

Other task force committees have prepared reports on load proj-

ections, types of generation, air pollution and nuclear power;

therefore, this report does not include information on those sub-

jects. If the reader desires information on productive capacity

of the coal industry, future projected prices of various fuels or

other related information regarding fuels, it is suggested he con-

sult the report of Puel Resources, Requirements and Costs for

Electric Generation in the Eastern United States which was pre-

pared by a committee that included representatives from the

Federal Power Commission, the Bureau of Mines and the Office of

Oil and Gas, Department of the Interior.

II-1

‘1389 :

SUMMARY

During the period 1970-1990, electric generation will be dependent

upon five basic forms of energy -- coal, gas, oil, hydro, and

nuclear. This report is concerned primarily with fossil fuels.

The availability of approximately 370 billion tons of recoverable

: Coal reserves in the West Central Region is more than sufficient

to meet the electric utilities' requirements in this region through

the year 2000. A recent report indicates additional reserves in

this region could amount to 225 billion tons of recoverable coal

reserves in unmapped and unexplored areas.! Coal, however, will

be faced with continuing pressures from other forms of energy, and

based on present trends the most significamt competition will be

from nuclear energy.

Mechanization and handling of coal at the mine will continue to

improve. Some of the new developments in underground mining in

recent years have been the use of a mobile bridge conveyor which

has increased the Productivity from a continuous miner substan-

tially, the underground push button miner, the installation of

long wall mining equipment, and the application of computer simu-

‘In determining the type of fuel to be used for electric genera-

tion a number of factors have to be reviewed and evaluated, each

of which will have a bearing on total fuel costs for any one

location. The cost of transportation, anti-air pollution devices,

lity and price of fuels, the final determination in selecting a

fuel or fuels for a particular plant must be based on the specific

facts pertinent to that plant and its location. :

A fossil fuel survey, questionnaire was sent to twenty-six

electric utilities Which consume approximately 90 percent of the

coal used for electric generation in the West Central Region. The

questionnaire inquired as to producing district, tonnage burned,

£.0.b. mine price, average BTU per lb. received, cents per million

BTU f.0.b. mine, methods of transportation used, freight rate,

haulage distance, and tonnage per shipment. 5

This survey indicated that in the period 1961-66 the average price

of coal f.0.b. mine has increased from 15.03 to 16.57 cents per

million BTU or an increase of 10.18 percent on the coal obtained !

1. Averitt, Paul, 1968 U.S. Geological Survey.

II-2

1390

in District 10. (36 million tons of 46 millions tons reported for

the region).. The average annual increase in the cost of District

10 coal in the five year period 1961-1966 amounts to 1.9 percent

per year. Due to the less significant tonnages reported in

relationship to tonnage produced, a comparison of the price in-

creases for coal obtained from other districts is not shown.

Rail transportation in the past has predominated in the movement

of coal in this region, and within recent years the cost of coal

transported by rail has been reduced substantially on selected

movements of coal shipped by unit train. Based on the 46 million

tons reported in the survey for the year 1966, approximately 10

million tons, or 21.8 percent, were shipped by unit train,

12,200,000 tons, or 26.6 percent, were shipped by rail-barge, and

5,280,000 tons, or 11.5 percent, were shipped by rail-lake. The

amount of coal shipped by conveyor and captive shuttle train

during the period 1970-1975 will increase by 11,000,000 tons ver-

sus a 7,000,000 ton increase for unit train shipments.

The average rail freight cost in the West Central Region for

coal shipments in 1966 amounted to $1.97 per ton on a tonnage of

23,500,000 tons, or approximately 46 percent of the coal consumed

in this region. The unit train freight rates reported in the

survey when compared on a basis which considers railroad owner-

ship of all equipment indicates that the mills per ton mile range

from 10.3 mills per ton mile for an 85 mile haul to 7.2 mills for

a 138 mile haul and down to 5.0 mills for a 355 mile haul.

Past projections indicated that unit train freight rates could

level out at a cost of 4 mills per ton mile for hauls between

350 miles and 600 miles.? However, no hauls of 400 to 500 miles

at 4 mills were reported. The inability of the utilities to

obtain a low@r cost than 5 mills per ton mile is partially sub-

stantiated by the fact that as of the present date between now

and 1975 approximately 10,000 megawatts of nuclear capacity is

planned or considered for installation in the West Central

Region.

In the five year period 1961-1966 the consumption of gas for

thermal electric generation increased from 0.223 to 0.260 trillion.

cubic feet or at an average annual rate of 3.11 percent compared

to a 7.73 percent average annual increase in coal consumption in

the same period. The average cost of gas for the region in the

same period increased from 25 to 25.3 cents per million BTU or by

1.2 percent. Zz

2. 1964 National Power Survey, Vol.2, Advisory Report No. 21, Pg. 338

II-3

1391

| Table A, page II-5, indicates the electric generation

by coal fired plants in the West Cehtral Region will increase

from 124.8 billion Kwh in 1970 to 155.3 billion Kwh in 1990 and

nuclear generation will increase from 17.5 billion Kwh to 489.1

billion Kwh in the same period. Table B, page II-5 indicates

coal consumption will increase from 60.4 million tons in 1970 to

65.7 million tons in .1990.

Table 1, page II-ll, lists the remaining coal reserves in the

West Central Region by percent sulfur content and approximately

72.7 percent of the reserves in the region contain 1.0 percent

or less sulfur. However, most of these low sulfur coal reserves

are located in the States of Montana and North Dakota and most

of the coal consumed in the region is obtained from the State of

Illinois.

Table 2, page II-12, indicates ‘the coal consumed for electric

generation in the West Central Region in 1966 had an average

sulfur content of 2.8 percent which is slightly more than the

2.3 percent average sulfur content of all coal consumed by the

electric utilities in the United States.

The growing demand for air pollution abatement regulations has

contributed to a major shift from the use of coal for electric

generation to nuclear energy. In the West Central Region in 1966

approximately 72 percent of the electric generation was produced

in coal fired plants and 1 percent by nuclear plants. Present

projections illustrate that by 1990 approximately 22 percent of

the electric generation in the region will be produced in coal

fired plants and 70 percent ‘by nuclear plants.

The natural gas reserves in the West Central Region as of

December 31, 1966 amounted to 1.33 trillion cubic feet or less

than one percent of the total reserves in the United States.

Based on the projected United States cumulative natural gas

requirements for the period 1966 to 1990 of 680 trillion cubic

feet the reported reserves of this region could supply only 0.20

percent of these requirements.

The oil consumption in the West Central Region represented less “

than one percent of the total fuel consumption for the region.

The crude oil and natural gas liquid reserves in the region amount

to 0.813 billion barrels or approximately 2 percent of the total

liquid hydrocarbon reserves in the United States.

In the State of Illinois as of July 1, 1965, the latest revised

estimates of coal remaining in the ground totaled 140,700 million

II-4

emi@— = em — el —

mt —

—m.. i. mm i. mm lL mm. tL. —m -1L

me (678 nw oe s me a we ua

no eS “9 2 2.8 1 2 $4

nmr

reece

fi

: Yalil i

i

.

Fuel quantities tm eiliiens of tone of coal, barrele of off and MCT «f gas.

1893

tons in reserves, of which 63,900 million tons are classed as

measured and indicated and 76,800 million tons as inferred, all

of which is of bituminous rank. The reserves are well distri-

buted over an area of 38,000 square miles or 67 percent of the

State's area in 78 counties of the 102 counties in Illinois... The

minimum thickness of coal considered in preparing this estimate

was 28 inches, except for areas of strippable coal where an

average thickness of 18 inches was used.

Coal seams in Illinois are at depths ranging from a few feet to

several hundred feet below the surface. Ages ago, the coal

bearing formations were downfolded into a huge spoon-shaped basin

centered in the southeastern part of the State. As a result, the

beds minable by underground methods lie at the center of the

basin while along the outer rim in a total of 40 counties, approx-

imately 19,000 million tons of strippable coal lie near enough to

the surface to be recovered by strip mining.

Tonnage figures alone, however, cannot demonstrate the full

importance of Illinois coal reserves. The thickness of the beds

is also extremely important since this aspect has a bearing on

mining methods and, therefore, Productivity. Most of the remain-

ing coal reserves are in coal beds thick enough to permit

effective mechanical mining.

The estimated original coal reserves of Iowa total 7,236 million

short tons, of which 3,500 million tons are classed as measured

and indicated reserves and 3,735 million tons are classed as

inferred. A total area of about 1,316,040 acres in 37 counties

was included in the reserve calculations; an additional area of

about 1,291,830 acres in 44 counties is indicated by the currently

available information to be favorable for the presence of coal

beds more than 14 inches thick. The total recorded coal produc-

tion of Iowa through 1963 is about 356 million tons. Assuming

that for each ton of coal produced another ton has been made

unrecoverable, the remaining reserves of the State are about

6,524 million tons.

Past estimates of the coal resources of Iowa were highly general-

ized and were based solely on an assumed total area underlain by

coal of potential economic interest and on an assumed average

thickness of coal within that area. The estimate of Campbell and

Parker (1909), the most frequently quoted, of 29,160 million tons

included coal 14 inches or more thick in an area of 12,560 square

miles. The present detailed estimate by Landis (1965) is smaller

than the older generalized estimates and covers a much smaller

area. This estimate of Iowa coal reserves is on a bed-by-bed

II-6

1394

original reserve basis. The ratio is about one-fourth as ‘much

reserves in about one-sixth as much area.

About one-third of Missouri is underlain by bituminous coal-

bearing strata, and coal has been mined in 55 of the 63 counties

in which it occurs. Coal deposits occur in an area of some 24,000

square miles extending northeastward across the State from Jasper

County to Clark County. The estimated original coal reserves of

Missouri total 23,977 million tons.

In the years since the Hinds (1912) estimate of 79,393 million

tons was made, stratigraphic studies have indicated that many of

his correlations of coal beds were in error and that the persis-

tence in thickness which he assumed cannot be demonstrated in

many localities. Coal beds thin and thicken from one area to

another and in many instances in very short distances. An addi-

tional factor of considerable importance in the area north of the

Missouri River is that glacial drift-occupies the position of

coal beds in many places. Details of this relationship can be

established only by drilling or mining but, in general, consider-

able areas are affected.

A re-evaluation of Missouri's original (before mining) coal

resources was made by Searight (1966) on a county-by-county basis.

Current information does not support the large resources indicated

by Hinds, and these have consequently been adjusted downward. In

some noe ca only 10 percent of the previous estimate has been

reta » and others have been cut to as little as one percent of

the earlier estimate. The total tonnage represented in the present

estimate of 23,977 million tons is less than one-third that of

1912 estimate figures. The total cumulative tonnage mined in the

period 1840 through 1967 has been approximately 313 million tons.

The coal réfaining is, therefore, estimated to be approximately

23,335 million tons.

The original coal reserves of Montana total 222,047 million tons

as estimated by Combo and others (1949). This estimate includes

2,363 million tons of bituminous coal, 132,151 million tons of

subbituminous coal, and 87,533 million tons of lignite. The

reserves were estimated according to standard procedures of the

U.S. Geological Survey with several minor exceptions as follows:

for bituminous coal the thickness categories used were 14 to 24

inches, 24 to 36 inches, and more than 36 inches, instead of the

standard categories of 14 to 28 inches, 28 to 42 inches, and more

than 42 inches, which were established after the Montana work was

underway. For subbituminous coal and lignite standard categories

of 24 to 5 feet, 5 to 10 feet, and more than 10 feet were used.

II-7

Pie ae

-1395

The Montana coal fields cover 35 percent of the total area of the

State. Reserves are present in 35 out of 56 counties, but are

concentrated largely in the Fort Union region and the Powder River

Basin in the eastern part of the State. Big Horn, Powder River,

and Rosebud Counties alone contain more than half the total in

the State. For the past several years considerable exploration

has been conducted by mining and petroleum companies and currently

(April 1967) revised estimates indicate the presence of deposits

of strippable reserves totaling about 8 billion tons.

The original lignite reserves of North Dakota, as estimated by

Brant (1953), total 350,910 million tons of which 9,522 million

‘tons are classed as measured, 50,120 million tons as indicated,

and 291,268 million tons as inferred. The reserves were estimated

according to the standard procedures of the U.S. Geological Survey.

All the lignite included in the estimate. is less than 1,200 feet

below the surface and about 70 percent of the total reserves are

less than 500 feet below the surface.

The reserves are well distributed over an area of 28,000 square

miles in 23 counties in the western half of the State. Of several

counties with large reserves, Dunn County is conspicuous in

containing 71 billion tons or about one-fifth of the State total.

This is also the record reserve at for coal-bearing counties

in the United States.

The original lignite reserves of South Dakota, as estimated by

D. M. Brown (1952), total 2,033 million tons, all of which is

less than 1,000 feet below the surface. The reserves were esti-

mated according to standard procedures of the U.S. Geological

Survey. The lignite reserves are concentrated in six counties

in the northwestern part of the State. Harding County contains

nearly 84 percent of the estimated reserves, but most of past

production has been obtained from Dewey and Perkins Counties.

II-8

1396

INVENTORY OF FOSSIL FUEL RESOURCES

During the period 1970-1990; electric generation will be depen-

dent upon five basic forms of energy -- coal, gas, oil, hydro,

and nuclear. This report is concerned primarily with fossil fuels.

The availability of approximately 370 billion tons of recoverable

coal reserves in the West Central Region as shown in Figure 1 and

listed in Table 1 are more than sufficient to meet the electric

utilities’ requirements through the year 2000. Coal, however,

will be faced with continuing pressures from other forms of energy,

and based on present trends the most significant competition will

be from nuclear energy.

In determining the type of fuel to be used for electric genera-

tion a number of factors have to be reviewed and evaluated, each

of which will have a bearing on total fuel costs for any one

location. The cost of transportation, anti-air pollution devices,

storing, handling and disposing of the fuel product are economic

factors which can make a low cost fuel the most expensive fuel.

Therefore, while a general picture can be drawn of the availability

and price of fuels, the final determination in selecting a fuel or

fuels for a particular plant must be based on the specific facts

pertinent to that plant and its location.

During the past twenty years the coal industry has contributed a

great deal to the stability of fuel prices. Mechanization of the

mines has enabled the industry to either reduce or at least main-

tain within reasonable limits the price of its product, in spite

of continuing increases of over-all price indexes. During the

period 1970-1990 it is expected that there will be continuing

improvement in the mechanization and handling of coal at the mine.

Some of thenew developments in underground mining in recent years

have been the use of a mobile bridge conveyor which has increased

the productivity from a continuous miner substantially, the under-

ground push-button miner, the installation of long wall mining

equipment, and the application of computer simulation techniques.

Although coal is available in sufficient quantities in the West

Central Region to supply the entire energy requirements of the

electric utilities in this region, competition will determine the

extent to which coal will penetrate each market.

Ii-s

- 1897

temperature to 86°F. Cooling towers are included in the design

of two large nuclear plants presently under construction in anti-

cipation of state agency temperature limitations of 86°F. for

mixed water or 5° over ambient. Capital costs for cooling facili-

ties to date are estimated at $10,000,000 for plants totaling

2700 megawatts,

One utility in the area is constructing a 20 megawatt plant utili-

zing @ recently developed air cooled condenser. This plant is to

be a prototype for larger plant installations now under considera-

tion. Because this type of facility eliminates the need for large

quantities of cooling water, it may provide greater freedom in the

siting of moderate size generating facilities.

In addition to state and local agencies, the Air Quality Act of

1967 introduces a new factor. The Secretary of Health, Education,

and Welfare is to designate air quality regions and issue criteria

and control technology documents. The governors of states

involved will have approximately nine months to draw up standards

acceptable to HEW and another six months to establish a method of

control for the region. Additional research and development of

control technology is being funded under the Air Quality Act, but

to date the control strategies commercially available to the

utilities are largely the use of Pprecipitators and high stacks.

The concern of Wisconsin companies for proper and effective

control of air and water pollution has been expressed by the

formation of an active task force on air and water criteria.

This task force, which is sponsored by the Wisconsin Utilities

Association, has been working with the Wisconsin State Department

of Natural Resources to provide the Department with data/on the

onsin utilities. It is hoped that the results of these studies

will provide the industry with knowledge that can be used to

Properly assess the degree and consequence of water and air pollu-

The problem of air pollution weighs heavily in the choosing of

generation sites, the type of fuel used, the capital costs of

equipment to maintain acceptable conditions, and ultimately on

what the cost to the customer will be. The future will remain

uncertain until air quality and emission standards are defined

more clearly and equipment for reducing sulfur emissions is deve-

loped and becomes available commercially.

| Ge Se.

III-6

1398

oer?

COORDINATED PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

I. Structure of the Industry

Fifty-one interconnected systems currently generate approxi-

mately 95% of the energy consumed through electric utility

service in the West Central Region. Table I below provides

1967 data as to number and size of these major utilities in

the various ownership segments of the industry. This group

generally can be described as consisting of those systems

providing virtually all of the high voltage system facilities

in this region.

Table I

Non-Coinci- Energy

Type of dental Peak Gen Cap Prod

Qwnership Utilities Load (Mi) _ (M4) (1000 MyH)

Investor-owned 25 22 954 26 032 118 566

Rural electric Gs?

cooperatives 19 1 657 1 382 5 646

State 6 1 461 1 120 4 226

Pederal ~ jl} 746 2 048 9 692

51 26 818 30 582 138 130

1967 load and capacity data for the individual major utilities

in each ownership segment are shown in Appendix A.

In addition to these major utilities there are about 1000

other utility entities involved in generation and/or distri-

bution of electric energy. These are identified as to type

of ownership, size and general location in Appendix B.

Iv-1

II.

13899

Trends in the Development of Coordination Mechanisms

At present, nine coordinating organizations function within

the region as follows:

Wisconsin Public Service Corporation-Wisconsin

Power and Light Company-Madison Gas and Electric

Company Pool

Wisconsin-Upper Michigan Systems

Illinois-Missouri Pool

Iowa Pool

Mid-America Interpool Network

Mid-Continent Area Power Planners

Missouri Basin Systems Group

Nebraska Public Power System

Upper Mississippi Valley Power Pool

Coordination areas of these organizations are shown in

Figures 1-3. Appendix ¢ presents first a brief summary and

then detailed information on each body and its structure,

purposes, and activities.

It' is emphasized that there are no particular discontinuities

in the pattern of interconnections at the boundaries of these

organizations. Numerous other interconnection agreements and

inter-relations exist that Provide mechanisms for liaison and

continuity in coordination across the region as demonstrated

by the examples enumerated below:

1. MAIN and MAPP have overlapping membership with

eight utilities being members of both of these

organizations. This liaison arrangement is

deemed particularly desirable for close co-

ordination in planning and operation along the

recently completed Twin Cities-Mi lwaukee-Chicago-

St Louis-Twin Cities 345 kv loop. Operation of

this loop and all other interconnecting trans-

mission lines, and those otherwise mutually

affected, is provided through established opera-

ting committees, through system simulation

Operating studies, and through continuous liaison

between the respective coordination offices. The

studies consist of current year Operating studies,

transfer capacity studies, and extreme disturbance

studies. The areas of coordinated planning are

handled through the planning arms of each of the

organizations. Much of the Planning is based upon

Iv-2

the aggregate load and capability forecasted and

includes not only consideration of new facilities

s but also the future use of the interconnecting

transmission facilities and power transactions to

effect optimal use of generating equipment.

2. MAPP and MBSG liaison on projects of mutual interest

is handled through the Intersystem Coordinating

Committee. This committee was established by the

respective organizations in 1965. Prior to the

establishment of the MAPP Coordination Office and

the associated Coordinating Committee, the Inter-

system Committee organized an interim task force

to review relay operating practices to assure that

relaying of mutual interest would provide a relia-

ble operation. Progress has been slow in the area

.of joint planning of transmission and generation

and the committee itself has recently proposed

that its parent organizations reconsider its

membership and better define its responsibilities

in the interest of improving progress.

3. .All members of the Iowa Pool and UMVPP belong to

the MAPP organization and have thereby broadened

their capabilities in the traditional pooling

activities of coordinated planning of generation

and transmission, including power transactions, and

coordinated operation of generation and transmission

including short and long term maintenance scheduling,

economy energy interchange, voltage profiles, auto-

matic under-frequency load shedding, and dispatching

procedures. This broadening comes about through the

overview afforded in considerations. of the Planning

Committee which is geographic in its representation

and through participation in the Coordinating Com-

mittee associated with the Coordination Office.

4. All members of the Wisconsin Power Group and Illinois-

Missouri Pool belong to the MAIN organization.

5. MAPP-MAIN-UMVPP-Iowa Pool liaison, together with

USBR participation in the MAPP Coordination Center,

has resulted in development of an extensive tele-

type communication system permitting broad area

coordination on day to day operating matters.

The area is presently served by three teletype

Iv-3

Se

1401

systems, all of which employ rented telephone

company facilities. Cost sharing varies in each

of the three systems ranging from equal shares to

formulas using both number and size of systems

- involved, Teletype stations are located in the

dispatching offices of the participating systems

and the coordination centers. Use is limited to

exchange of operating information and weather

information.

The present systems are:

MAIN 15 terminals - 5 in Wisconsin, 4 in

Illinois - 2 in Minnesota (MAPP & NSP),

2 in Missouri (UE & AEC), 1 in Little

Rock, Arkansas (SCEC) 1 in Canton, Ohio

(AEP ECAR)

UMVPP. 10 terminals - 1 in North Dakota, 1 in

South Dakota, 6 in Minnesota, 1 in

Wisconsin, 1 in Iowa

USBR 1 in South Dakota

IOWA POOL 10 terminals - 2 in Minnesota (MAPP &

NSP), 7 in Iowa, 1 in St Louis,

Missouri (UE)

The UMVPP and Iowa Pool systems will be replaced in

April 1969 by one MAPP system containing 25 terminals.

This will include the present terminals plus new

terminals for other MAPP members and adjacent utili-

ties. The system will be comprised of 2 terminals

in North Dakota, 6 terminals in Minnesota, 2 in

Wisconsin, 2 in South Dakota (including USBR), 8 in

Iowa, 2 in Nebraska (OPPD and CPPD), and 3 in

Missouri (UE, St Joseph L&P and KCP&L). The MAPP

system will utilize 100 wpm teletypes under the

contraql of an automatic polling device located in

the MAPP Center. All transmission will be by

punched tape except during emergencies when an

emergency override will permit manual transmission.

Cost sharing will be according to a formula intended

to recognize size of systems, mileage between adja-

‘cent terminals, and benefits accruing equally re-

gardless of size. ’

Iv-4

IIi.

1402

6. As planning of Specific facilities reaches a

point in progress where the coordinating organi-

zation is agreed on the basic function and design,

the participating utilities are represented on a

number of task forces having responsibility for

design, contractual arrangements, and use. The

Projections of as so Requirements

The following discussi £ possible future organizational

fifty-one systems identifiea in Section I as providing 95%

of the electric service in the region. It is, of course,

recognized that corporate consolidations will very likely

reduce the number of separate entities in the future. How-

ever, there is no basis for Predicting the specific patterns

or timing such consolidations may follow other than a general

reference to those already announced to be under study.

By 1970, MAPP intends to increase the coordination among the

various parts of the MAPP organization, including the Iowa

Pool, the UMVPP, and its Nebraska members by developing a

super-pool agreement. This consolidation will result in

these five sub-regional systems remaining as workable co-

ordinating entities within the West Central Region:

Commonwealth Edison Company

Eastern Wi8consin Utilities (including the

Upper Peninsula) _ >

Illinois-Missouri Pool (including Central

Illinois Light Company)

Mid-Continent Area Power Planners

Missouri Basin Systems Group

Each of these systems will exercise primary responsibility

for planning and operation within their area, particularly

with respect to economic matters.

With regard to reliability-oriented coordination, MAIN would

continue with its present inter-pool operation in the eastern

part of the region. Reliability-oriented coordination for

the western portion of the region is expected to be provided

by the recently executed Mid-Continent Area Reliability Co-

ordination Agreement either expanded to include MBSG members

Iv-5

. eR me a ——_— _—

1403

or through liaison arrangements with a separate MBSG

reliability group.

Future patterns of generation and transmission developments

prepared by the WCRAC contemplate 765 kv and 500 kv trans-

mission lines across the region in the 1980's. These lines

will provide capacity for meaningful power exchanges on a

region-wide basis and also inc se the interdependency

among systems, particularly with "respect to reliability. It

is therefore proposed that a single West Central Reliability |

organization be established by 1980. In view of the large

number of systems involved, manageability considerations

y dictate an interpool-type organization such as MAIN with the

five above-identified area systems as members...

The foregoing material relating to future coordination

patterns has been presented at meetings of the MAIN, MAPP

and MBSG organizations in an effort to solicit views of

utilities not represented on the WCRAC.

IV. Problems and Solutions

Operation of an electric power system is a complex matter

involving the consideration of innumerable electrical elements

and many people. Taken as a whole, the configuration changes

from season to season, from day to day, and from hour to hour.

To operate all of the interconnected electrical systems within

a region in a truly coordinated manner becomes a tremendously

complex matter requiring knowledgeable people, the necessary

equipment and communications for the required overview, and of

equal importance a strong desire on the part of all of those.

so engaged. That this coordination.can be accomplished, and

must be accomplished, is fully appreciated and has been taken

on as a challenge of considerable substance by the utilities

in this region.

It is recognized that the true strength of the operation is

in the local knowledge of each area's needs and the resources

available to supply these needs. The requirement then is for

a coordinating effort which will supply the involvement neces-

sary to do the job but which will not unnecessarily interfere

in operations that can be adequately handled locally. Further-

more, it cannot be expected that a coordinating effort can be

arbitrarily overlaid on the existing operation. Instead a co-

ordination evolution is required which will gradually develop

the capability of the coordinating organization and, in turn,

the confidence of the participating systems with a resultant

Iv-6

ee

- 1404

growing. willingness to accept the decisions and judgement of

the coordinating personnel and to encourag® their efforts.

Within the West Central Region there are variations in the

nature of systems and load densities across the region pro-

ducing differences in coordination problems and requirements.

Por examplé, a relatively few systems along the eastern edge

of the region (Eastern Wisconsin Utilities, Commonwealth

Edison, and the Ill-Mo Pool) generate almost 60% of the

region's requirements while serving 15% of its area. As a

result, pooling and interconnection arrangements appropriate

for this area are markedly different than those applicable

to the large number of systems serving the remainder of the

region. Many types of utilities are represented with varying

characteristics including that of size and of financing within

the major groupings. Because of the hour-to-hour vital need

to have a reliable operation, the coordinated operation of

these systems has proven to be an endeavor not significantly

affected by this dissimilarity. In the area of planning.

substantial strides have been made in coordinating planning

of both generation and transmission. As previously noted,

only MAPP and MBSG have yet to fully coordinate their efforts.

This situation is recognized by both organizations and is

under active consideration. -

Interregional Coordination

There are two formal arrangements for interregional coordina-

tion identified as such. These are the liaison arrangement

between MAIN and ECAR, and MAIN and MAPP membership in the

National Electri¢™Reliability Council. Beyond these there

are numerous bilateral interconnection agreements and other

established channels for coordinated planning and operation

with electric systems in adjacent regions.

The USBR hac membership in both the Western Systems Coordina-

tion Council (WSCC) and the MAPP Coordination Committee and

MAPP operating representatives attend WSCC operating meetings.

These arrangements, along with these inherent within the USBR,

provide liaison with the west lying region.

™“

Some multi-system coordination activities involving other

regions are: The MIIO Agreement among Commonwealth Edison

and five major utilities in Indiana and Michigan, which, ;

among other returns, resulted in system performance studies

in ¢epth which included Commonwealth Edison Company as a

participant and enveloped the eastern portion of this region.

Iv-7

1405

The Twin Cities-Kansas City 345 kv Coordinating Agreement -

among four MAPP members and Kansas City Power and Light

Company and St Joseph Light and Power Company in the South

Central Region, which provides for the exchange of power

and energy with the aim of optimizing the utilization of

generation and bettering reliability. And the East-West

Tie Closure Task Force, which was formed for the express

purpose of studying the feasibility of and the procedures

for closing the Bureau of Reclamation ties between the

eastern and western portions of its Missouri River Basin

systen, and hence interconnecting the western region systems

to the remainder of the U.S. interconnected systems.

The Manitoba HyGro Electric Board, although not yet inter-

connected with United States systems, participates in plan-

ning activities through its membership in the MAPP organiza-

tion. As a result, negotiations for the 1970 construction

of a Winnipeg-Grand Porks 230 kv interconnecticn have now

been completed and construction and operating contracts

signed. This interconnection will have a capacity of about

200 mw although it is being initially regarded as having a

nominal 100 mw capacity for purpose of scheduling power and

energy. This interconnection will provide Manitoba Hydro

with interconnected operation with the U.S. syetems, will

make unnecessary the construction of thermal capacity, will -

provide a market for future excess power and energy, and will

provide a source of energy during dry years. For the U.S.,

& power supply will be provided which is diversified in the

source of the power and has prompt availability. The seasonal

load diversity will permit mutually advantageous seasonal

power exchanges and the reliability on either side of the

boundary will be improved from the improved diversity overall. >

No unusual problems have been encountered in its planning

even though the facility is being installed by such diverse

interests as two investor-owned utilities and one G & T

cooperative on the U.S. side, and by a Canadian Crown Corpora-

tion on the Canada side. Peasibility studies for a second

230 kv interconnection between Manitoba and the Garrison,

North Dakota area are scheduled to be undertaken jointly by

Manitoba Hydro and a number of MAPP and MBSG members.

MOTE: Boundaries indicate general areas and do not necessarily

include all systems within an area.

=

Pigure 1

Iv-9

1410

SSS

1411

.

1724 RAILWAY EXCHANGE eLDG.

ie Pe. coos

> pfewren«

wn cers

"| ke* 35 t96e

dy § BF Ls Izsty

hk Lee nas fh, RN

Ss

le CONVEAT Two $0,002 #[MR BomeRS WHICH AKE STOKER

FiRe> AT PResanT To Burn EITHER GAS OR ON.

2. IST A¥o,000 THEREMS@ 622 f/THERM, BALAWME @ S-2¢ -

ADD OS¢/rHernM, Pur cnase Gis ADJUSTMENT AND

-SH¥Jo CITY UTMITy TAx-

3 MAG On 16 0.46% SuULPHVR MAX,

|

2

¢;

rua.

COnsusPT! On C. O04 (Gel tons) “

(Humber) — 2eu,200 |

a. com (Por ton delivered im Bin) .

s. os Rer. Pag

50. cae c. om len delivered ia tank. ig ‘Tm

©. onae

12. we a. OTe PER oT OF EL

aS FIRED 8. Grricsency

4. new Gustmcten [FUEt 0% SToS : 232021, ry TE

. ne x — _—e ” seem ccm _——

c WTA ecT2:4s 30,000 65,0007 ©o ~

Sos be,ges°2| 21 202=

a ee ee eee 2

ct : L7z & = 99 =

& 2% _i.._t u.1._.& 200 =

&. mectc rove Bo2o37T roe

4. Se °. Stam soe ¥ ‘) axa 237

> gad 6. pwwins on (STM. Te 4 ce re Zsa-

&. SEPRECIATION & INTEREST (8% of Line ° = = £722") fe =

- 4. oman (Specs ty) .

BF AOIRE wpm wh eee bos Ib] 30022) {5 b20= lI 10 259 |n2¥se 2

1 woe suLecteD — ~— ,

a. com (uodernizety “ [Ve on Cle as (1) fectty

‘+6. ameams -

2 Makes Le

“Computed on besis of actus! mohthly rates applicable. GSA 22"s> 1289

SPECIAL AND SUPPPLEMENTAL PROVISIONS

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

een te nares Feed See ree Cae Tee

vision, to use the Contracts listed herein

E

¢

QUOTATIONS: (a) As used in this schedule the term

“F. O. B. Mine (cars)” means

:

at

;

unit price. A price quoted ; i

out explanation or qualification shall mean free

cars at the mine. (b) Whether or not this schedule

shows that bids on any item are invited on

of F. O. B. cars destination or delivered-into-bins at desti-

nation the bidder may submit such bids, indicating in the

item the basis thereof. In connection with a delivered-in-

to-bin destination quotation, the bidder- shall state the

truck loading point.

Awards will be made on either an F. O. B. mine

(shipment to be made on Government Bills of Lading,

or on commercial documents to be converted to

243

—_

sa

84

se

Ht

sE8e

eee

ee

4 afi

pil

“He

s

ilits

chia?

His

EE

on coal offered

of Mines does not have

the

latest

shows the

offer

|

2

7

KEYSTONE'S MAP OF THE Cdl

_ KEYSTONE COAL BUYERS MANUAL

wv

~ “eGR?

ite : Hee I Hf

: . a =

HE i ny

ihn na HF iti i Ha

tal ake aeTeREE bet

ea i

ty ae fl Hag i

la ull - tt Bh oad uu

ite it if l tf He TF o

i nt

et sites Ha HEL i! ie

ae 17 my

Eames * oe ee

S.e*® 5.8.

oa 43

22 &° 884

ane ©

aeesa" © o. a:

SS a

[aE

TAG 33433

ee te

ia He i

i yl

| : jal F lala q

fulin i |

it q fits ue lj i! ste hi i fi

CALENDAR YEAR OF 1967 (cont.)

aces eee ee

(In Thousand net

Re te See

| 2a ey

| e2.... ne

| Bea

F°RHG GES" g,,

’ ee a

DISTRICT OF ORIGIN 1

aaa 88. gea88 Zz

az. 38 Rge"R RERRE AMe ss

Bases BREE RI RASRZ $2.

é aea*s dae

*-. ©

pa ns al

CONSUMER USE

» and Mexico

} ne

ih i

a i

si :

ii, lt

diy ri it

TP je

—~

TABLE I « DISTRIBUTION OF BITUCINOUS COAL AND LIGNITE PRODUCED IN THE UNITED STATES DURING THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 1967 (cont. )

Net Tons)

? GR ta ovis a2: SOP ites

ET es ne ar he ae

1 TGR aR re Si $E.8% an

a ON a> ie

S| trees weeee Lt Si

“t siemeerea 7.

i mes oe

betne 6906s — ann

BE feesk seses — 7

Pe :

ee Th 1 i, ia hla,

iF i! fii ‘he lhe

1424

o| S879 pe sg RE © =< eng FE

DISTRICT OF ORION y

1

=o ————

S ER* 6 RP 86." BAR: .z... a4

= ——

3 S58 ARSE 58". q g.°8 Bg.e Sa ge Re I”

3 and 6 4

9 gt OP cede © eee seeee s*eeeer 2 "8

& 278 $875 22,~ B &..8 $8.3 BZ..8 2 aR

SAL AD LIONITE PRODUCED IN THR UNITED STATES DURING THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 1967 (cont .) (In Thousand Net Tons)

PAE ie Te

yh ii UF ue i i

i ey Hii Li He

See footnotes at end of table.

MEM R GEER

ri s a .§32 R22 8,8, ee sees

“= R Rese Hay aaa" 6 oka

di tt dally

del: dy i 7

“fee it it nt

SABLE I - DISTRIBUTION OF BITUCINOUS COAL AND LIONITE PRODUCED IN THE UNITED STATES DURIND THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 1967 (cont.) (In Thousand Net Tons)

’ 1 a r ‘

94.9% $6, 2 $85. R gS" £73% ommm

Dan DB

28.7 99.7 99. 2 AME G89! BE. en.

awn wa

. 33 §, 85 re ee eee

A a

oo

ee te eC ae 3

nat ¢

li rT i i

Ht ti, Hy! i i ida HF

Hite flat fl it cae ae!

1427

i

| [be

4

ee

= } ee re eonees

3

ij |- Gh Be es

al > ae

ili q as A gar 2

M4 | SS

fl” % ESS 2P88F an an

RnGian

ee ee age

i= =I m1

3 ; a g.*8 ps 23 #8 a ane ga 5

an $ BA*E G65°8 94%.“ ...., ga°d

“ — hea an eae -faesed~00es — me

i | aon EG a al a mn

“aa

:

A yf i i Lt

ia in 4 ihe ‘i fi

See footnotes at end of table.

] [gel =

| esas Ps eres

| Feast

: “Ris 836° 2 amin .. § 9.a8 88.58

~ ee an OF 3 nr DA |

Peas

i|-E ro ap ee a Rea 8.863

ae “7 <—s

a

GER BR ce cee ee AB

; ae ae a ee ey Re

:

eae ;

ae ee

iy ih! 4 i ja

Ani i ite UE i : fll Buk i

i

OTATES DURING THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 1967 (cont.) (In Thousand Net Tons)

tee vhs M2 .. GRP. aR

ag.8f move SRG SES TATRA 88.8

Aa ae oe

[=o Ps

° Sa: e.8,. = ., & 8888 87H? RRATE

E sie = 3

iaRes 7,3 i 4 HERE

eae sieges

aye erases 1 ca meets 5

peaeeanety. 9540 SS ee POS ly

ROPER AES. QOSH 99 F GREE AEA TAN

ee

hale ah i ab al al

| i ids jitia lls fii hk ita gilda

13

Bee footnotes at end of table.

I: ij hoe .

hue i hy, dieu, 1 a

Ae a it

Pe ee ee ee | Pe a 0 |

OE ete be eel Go a ne

5 n AR AA RAAN

8 v ofa R89 Bg. K anny 88.28 § $,.88 SSPe nanny 1,8

a 3 WA AA AARAN

- & FABRE REFRS R38RR 2 SAAR ATF Wy RORY

2 Lal /"s « a «a

a...

: iTR ges 5, Re R898 8 RB, gS

5

é Fis ef..." $8 93.88 0.000, q2.89

fi

8.

is

g

:

8

5

§

a

DISTRIBUTION OF BITUMTICL

COAL AND LIONITE PRODUCED IN THE UNTTED @TATES DURING THE CALENDAR YEAR CF 1967 (cont. )

(In Thousand Net Tons)

1431

tude Thauhakas beans $:2..982.8 .... 0000.

DISTRICT OF ORIGIN 1/

17

ip i

.

~~

~

a

i a a i ae dn}

hy i

:

:

Bee footnotes at end of table.

1432

ar FE F&

7 | [sReeee te gR59 ¢4ag aR E

i PM aa 88 ~~. 8 ee ee

2 oo At Balok 1K SER!

|) |

E E dliad Tn CUT EET Ce re 2 .8.. 62. 8-8

PEL

t iE

an . 8

Ho

7 E a2 3%" egy

J

: C ERE SER EE 8? SS WE GaEy Gee EGG

2) pttetee se ee

:

E |

E : .

. ai b, fy. yd A duit ik

UU gia Ht ped lt ied

gga Eda pda oj a ME Has aa j a |:

\ \

1433

i| |.

a1 f

8

g

g

2 aj 2

Hit ,

e4 (ae 28 S82 ee PEER HS... BRS

‘i uel en _ 2a

F | |e

; TE SE BES rec ceree eee ees

* \ BB. i

Hb il 3 i 3 [i Ll 4 :

: pee ar Hi fh i | iy i

i hie ah His i FEE (lik ate iq jis .

1434

-~ . & »- ae .*

&

§

% an

é RR. AR

Pel

e let_

z 8

a

_& ”

a

:

5 ,

(|) =i ee

: - |

s | 8 i

B a B :

2 —

E a u

3

i i

See footnotes at end of table.

4a dae!

ee

idk fl ve Hae

se

62

00g

62

sz

_ l6z

00g

x62

; * “a Ses4tTI9N OF2200TE

- - . 18703 ‘peoztyer

eyeatad pue ‘s0feauco ‘Aermesy

\(penutquoo) ‘yanoeetn

“OL TE

a 1 n st at

/t wYOTEO 40 Lorureta

(suo, 20% puwenogy UI)

(*9009) 196T 40 UVEX BVONMFTVO HL ONTUNd SALVIS GAIN FHL MI AIONGOUd ALINOIT GNV TVOO SNONIWNLIG 40 MOTINGTUISIC - I FIVE

1436

“@TQ2 JO pe 48 Se;0U;00; seg

a se

Lt OST

Se

re

8.8 oom GES RTE

a eed ft eee

a

SP

“§ BRA REAPS Gee GETS B BOn E

nw

BR SB° RS

nw 4°

228 8 &

30

SOTIFTIIN OF2300TR

19909 ‘TIe4-TIV

SOTattran oT4300TE

tQUeMeACw JO Spo”ujem

T8103 ‘st A

920490 TIV

S10TVOD TIEI0"

SOTITTIIN OF4z00TE

T2203 ‘TIe4-TIV

SOTITTHIN OTT200TE

$qUemeAC™ JO Spoyrem TTY

T7103 ‘wTQUMTOD JO 49T230T0

#20420 TIV

S19TVOP TTI0"

S2TITTIIN OF2900TH

Te704 ‘Hons

equvTd sw? pus eq09

SOTITIFIN OF2700TE

18909 ‘se7BAePTL

#20470 TTV

Si9T VOD TI8I88

squvTd sw? pus e709

SOTITTIIM OF1Q09TE

10203 ‘TIBI-TTV

SOTITTHIN OF1900TE

tqusmeACM JO Spoyzem TTV

Te109 ‘pueThzey PUY oreAUTOd

SPaWNTIV aang

cz

ny 2T

tw

oT 6 “ @ . L " 9 puss 2 tT

A MIOTHO 40 LOIuLera

WoL

NOLLVMILS3d 40 ZVI

MOISIAIC OIBdVuoOsD

(suoL Ve puvenoyy ur)

(*3000) 1o6T 40 UVEX UVOMFIVD FHI ONTUN SUIVIS CALINN FHL MI GaONGOUd ALINOTT GNV TVOO SMONIWMNIIG 40 NOI INGIUISIC - I FIGVL

.1437

*@TQR2 JO pus 48 80303003 eeg

Coal

i

nim § BAB HBAS

na

mr

HS..9 23.78

4

ee" @ REE RRR $8.7 5,58

0's

SLE‘t 16669 619'¢

a)

RS REARS

Fira)

a qos

geRag S85

a8 4 GENE 2

”

~

%

#20490 TLV

S20 vep Th¥I9"d

SOFIFTHIN OF.1900TR

T1009 "Ties-TIV

-e2047° ITV

S10T Voy Th939u

SOTIFTIIN OF4900T"

sqUeueACW JO SpO"iey TTY

Te102 ‘BUTTOZeD YAO"

e2eqn0 IlV

SOTITTEIN OF2900TR

Te203 ‘peosties

eqeatad puw ‘sofeauoo ‘fencesy

SOFITTIIN OF2900TR

Te207 ‘Honay

s2ey7° TIV

SseTeep Tree"

equetd sud puw 0409

SOTITTEIN OF4900TT

18909 ‘aeaya-xe puw s0aty

SOTITTIIN OF .00T"

T3909 ‘Thet-TIV

SOTITTIIN OF4900TR

Squewencw JO Spourew TIV

19204 SwpUTPzy, 380%

ww

ot 6 9 L

2 |omes| 2

A toro 40 Lorvista

(su0y 49m pussnoyy UI)

(*2009) 1961 40 VEX UVOMTIVD Bil OMLUNG SAILS CAJINN FHL MI GONGOUS ALINOII AMV TVOD SMOMIMNIIE 40 MOLINMIUISIC - I TIeVL

a

"9 ay ey

=~ =

bad ne

>

3

BS aged .. & Gga8

= 7

». RA A a2 a, eee eeee os

DISTRICT OF ORIGIN 1,

“uw NAN Ft WN

TABLE I - DISTRIBUTION OF BITUMINOUS COAL AND LIONITE PRODUCED IN THE UNITED STATES DURING THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 1967 (cont.) (In Thousand Net Tons)

3 and 6

North Carolina, (continued) «

Truck, total

Retail dealers

All others

Eg eee ae ses

eta 84" 64 C4 e FSS 8 $.73 macs ASRS

— =

a so, 25,. 2 2

“#8. GB nmevm S8898 & 8.82 85.83 = ae

a7

=| | ESAREE mmm 8. .88 § $899 BRSRG .. GER*

8 AAT :

, s wR ae Pte ee Re BS SS SAR

:

3 pera fri Carre

: BRORA GG" EAMES EGRE 88029 RE ga°8

8 8 : .Y ‘

on :

mili a a uk dk

WP i teah, Gaah, ath Pau, Ha

nee ae nat

jgedaa padaa j a jie [lla Ho jis :

1440

j . @ Boe s Wy st. ee

S| [BE SR Tae, ibe tie

_faaaes... i FEE mw,

=a ~_

Fs E ot 4 KS &.E.5 MeM eens a ar Pavey

4! (s eememerosmerr

— |

= 5 S10 ChFE Wet ee ees a

ea |:

Se oT rik eee

ul |: 7

g

2 m ee tesey rire see ee

5 *

og | og’ Sat Riaee age aete> 4g goa aaaa ae.

: : a :

iz

© | ge fg Pog F

is ee a tathiec chiles

& 3 ofa ok 5 ie ,.&

Pll dled Ho aida dd

~ |aEE’*2a3. Haj. F2, 34 HE ita, iM, ie af [5

g (PP pisidl que aud oa: gall 33 A 1 i

fiidia {dla pla jada i Huh | fia Ha ji

4,

{ARLE 1 - DISTRIRUTICN OF BITUMINOUS COAL AND LIGNITE PRODUCED IN THE UNITED STATES CURING THE CALENDAR YEAR ¢

(in Thousand Wet Tons)

1441

dhemnict oF ontoIa 1

1

fi

oe.

i i, ii,

i i tt wat fi fyi Fe ut ;

See footnotes at end of table.

(In Thousand Net Tons)

2

1442

DIATRICT OF ORIGIN Jy

re a 7 ae a]

TABLE I ~ DISTRIBUTION OF BITUMINOUS COAL AND LIGNITE PRODUCED IN THE UNTTED STATES DURING THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 1967 (cont.)

iy i i he Le i,

lis fis ‘lls ju i if i! E i il

ft

See footnotes at ond of table.

1443

3 © ve ee

*

g ‘ eevee eeeee ee -» B RRS BR SE RASS aw

“ ~~ aw

mee mere -8000 60 & 006 BS Stu SQ weww oe

of 28. ORS 3 3

3

8 8hR SFEMR GI" an § ¥.. EE. eee ee

DISTRICT OF ORIGIN 1)

TABLE I - DISTRIBUTION OF BITUMINOUS COAL AND LIONTTE PRODUCED IN THE UNTTED OTATES DURING THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 1967 (cont.)

{in Thowsend Het Tons

Peat == x —'

$ z,2F SR, & RZIR se . mm % *eeee *eee se

|

3

3

x 4 ef ‘ seee seeee *eee ee

:

Hy ‘elias

iM yo By

a Hi i ui ne

i

i

i! finds il

See footnotes at end of table.

3 > BOR BePe OOM kk cack cca®™ an

zi‘ eee seee srtee ‘ seee ee 8 8 - Sam ee

a we hae Ge. tea cae

om SE. OR

q 4.08 78.09 9e? a

— mn.

n n nm a“

ee ‘ ee

DISTRICT OF ORIGIN 1,

17

a ———— ees

|

, Pat Rae gp —

th,

Hf Mil bi : tt

i i

ii ih

iz 4

fa (Mi my 1 i i

See footnotes at end of table.

1445

RAF sg ase

.» RRA RRer =F RB SR...

aR? &. 6 —

REE .. REA RRA BA

-~ = =

~~ a an

cont.

18

=. 22

.

i

ae

ip ®

[

E 2

=| |:

: : :

: % ++ BANS B ge BgeA = £ HR RER BAB

|

ay! i i

i tMdabacr f

a Maal Ed ely

g] [Ada HE fila Ulla fla Ele fle fis

1446

a “eae wT aise fale

3

SOM AS een eee ye

1D : 2 98 8." AEE

a’ cna

Jac & ES Rees 2 aR gan

ip ae ee 9" > 4.4-ES

} i3I: 2 $E a8 938 R

3 - REPRE sons we ee

] |- aga aga

" 22.88, 8,8

2 fs Ra ae a SPE GATE “" E RQNE SPER BRRRE

27s ”~

he | |

iit! L, ‘ ly ij t~

i yy yah a Ha

ae a

1447

.» & BG BhR-*

DISTRICT OF ORIGIN Y

TABLE I - DISTRIBUTION OF BITUMINOUS COAL AND LIGNITE PRODUCED IN THE UNITED STATES DURING THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 1967 (cont.)

California, total (

ts

ts

ji

in fit

See footnotes at end of table.

1448

g J . ee z e aah er AS ed PE

= ad a - «a

. 86 § &,*8 sf ; eS sete 2,8

an

+S B88 8 es

ao

a ~

s siete tin ct a

5. ee We Me bse seater aeeeess ce 2:

F gs - ean an 4 eo aH

e SS * SOUR OAS Cet et 4 eee

3 : Fay ance “aa aN RR ag = aa om

”

se & AS“2 aR “2 ee? . oo es ao ee | Ran, dt waa

o § Ba-8 __ *e*epvpees Sa, a a3 "* PTO

Merve ts ce 79+ bem eed obo a de oh

(In Thousand Net Tons

2

All others

See footnotes at end of table.

Tidewater, total

«<

1449

i,

4 z

a, oe rr ce Rae ESET ETERS

| oe |

33

nF fy

Hada 1h

a

a

”~

-

-“

2

“

a

s 3

>. 2

»

0

ay

ch 32

39n eaANSKOO

bestncad wis ad gt At n st at st at

7 wrotwo a0 soruieta MOLLWKLISEG 40 ZiVi8

ToL Tol aNeTORT UT)

(“au00) 196t 40 WVEX BVOKIPIVO MK OMTNNG SAVES GUAINN BAL KI ORONOONE BIINOKT GAY ‘TOD SNORIWIE 40 NOTLNETULEIG = 1 SIEVE

8

£107USAUT oUTU UT sPuBYyo oN

soekotdme .

09 SeTwS Puy souT ye pesn TeOD

seyuedwoo uvt pee

Seyuedmos se79g pertUn

BRR att 3 3,

fe

" 9 mee 2

FE mIOTWO 40 LoTuieta

[sor Ton puwsnouy Ur)

(+9409) 196T 40 MVE MVONFIVD BML ONTUNd SAIVIS GALINA SHL MI GFONdOUd ALINOIT GNV TVOD SMONIWALIG JO NOIUNGIUISIC - I FIaVL

TABLE I - DISTRIBUTION OF BITUMINOUS COAL AND LIGNITE PRODUCED IN THE UNITED STATES DURING THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 1967 (cont.)

(In Thousand Net Tons)

DISTRICT OF oxIoIN 1

}

Canadian commercial docks

Vessel fuel

U.S. dock storage

va

Great Lakes movement:

Tidevater movement:

Coal used at mines and sales to

employees

Het change in mine inventory

States of destinations, etc., are shown

respondent figures)

of movement,

in footnotes, it is for purposes of concealment of individual

FOOTNOTES (Where special combinations of consumer uses, methods

4

shipments.

itorage for which consumer uses are not available

th all-rail shipments.

-reil shipments.

1 shipments.

yor, and private railroad are included with truck

Shipments vie Great Lakes are included with all-rai

a]

river are included wi

bunker fuel, the destinations of which are not available.

exports and United States tidewater dock s

via tramvay, conve

Shipments via river and ex-

Shipments via tidewater are included with all

1452

i. RE SER

3 ¥ : ers :

Mi sha ea

je bb eee eg RR

: Ws) 3 34*8

= et

: i ¥ - seit tinal al

i i Bees aan a

| é § a i See

6

g

eile] Tate

1 i TERE!

i 8 § & RES 4

au fe oe TELE ry

ute

5 3

: Mal a iin

i gw? RG aR gas

i & R yaxogsa

ME Head. Be GRERE?

R" so eeress

Bi - . aa_3F i

G1), lel doscat ole fll :

: f jit REE Hee :

is : 4 all pagece’ $3 RAL &

Jesh (iis iday ta np

i iii viii Hl i.

‘ ae. 9s "! anh Ee H 2 g 4 d

bslatiststtl PI dal

Sexo" wmoyeTYO ‘euetstnoy ‘sesueysy

Te107 T[eaqueD {neg 3894

JddyeetsstH pue cweqeTty

oossquuay,

a

.

anane eo aae

*

CEE

bags

g

ORR? f SSPRBE R SHR AE

REUSAR B

p AZERS R AGSRSREE RES ER

=

=

> = 7 =

z

z

T

9

990"

o'er

my

at

e6t' OR

6

T

9

~~

“4

BIE we Sk O88

(SuoZ yom pavenogy aI)

QNV 196T 40 SHVEL UVONTIVD AHL ONTANA SALVIG GALINA BBL MI GaONdOUd BLINOTI GV TVOO SNONDMLIE 40 MOLINGTMISIA 40

1454

, i

tii

~~"

2 ia] Stee Pree

: fd] [pe eee

1 OL, assis

7 Ae

AD oe

ts g/SBe F628

TLE baa aie te

a A ee

[Se i oF Fie

aif .

slgengegaqegee a fee gs

Ba Fe

f

F

i i

altel i

is is

1455

“STQWTIAS 30 B28 OTB Jo SUOT{SUTISEP ON ‘TEN; 2eqKUNG SeyNTOUT ‘seAsnoy |

. {elQut yea Jou 928 Semn AeENEUOD BTYA 40j PEI048 HOOP JOVERSPTS SOINIG POTTER pus sys0dxe seessene sopntoxe £ |

orn Corerrss }

24 Seasion

sexe [me |

formes hf A- eg oe

‘& th»/es

AIR POLLUTION BY

FEDERAL FACILITIES

REPORT

OF THE

SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION,

AND WELFARE

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES

IN COMPLIANCE WITH

PUBLIC LAW 90-148

THE CLEAN AIR ACT, AS AMENDED

JANUARY 1368

APRIL 1, 1963.—Ordered to be printed

———

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

P3868 WASHINGTON : 1968

1457

‘SENATE RESOLUTION 261

Submitted by Mr, Raudoipk of West Virginia

In Tur Sevare or Tue Unitep Stares,

Agreed to April 1, 1968.

Resolved, That there be printed as a Senaie document the report of

the Secretary of Health, Education, 2nd Welfare, entitled “Air

Pollution by Federal Facilities”, in complixnee with the provisions of

title I, section 111(b) of the Clean Air Act, Public Law 90-145, es

amended; and that there be printed 2,500 additional copies of such

document for the use of the Committce on Public Works.

Attest:

Francis R. Vaeo,

Secretary.

By Darrepyi Sr. Criainze,

Chief Clerk.

§

ss

1458

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

Tue Secretary oF Heattu, Epucation, aNp WELFARE,

Washington, D.C., February 7, 1968.

Hon. Henert BH. Huspurey,

President, U.S. Senate,

Washington, D.C.

Dear Mr. Paesrent: In accordancé with the provisions of title I,

section 111(b) of the Clean Air Act, Publie Law 90-148, as ,

there is transmitted herewith a report on measures being taken to

control — emission of air pollutants from Federal facilities.

: Wizsur J. Cone,

Acting

(1m)

1459

AIR POLLUTION BY FEDERAL FACILITIES

INTRODUCTION

The Clean Air Act, es amended, emphasizes the need for Federal

leadership and assistance to State and local agencies in the contro!

of air pilbation, In addition, the act indicates that the Federal agencies

shall cooperate with the Department of: Health, Education, and

Welfare and with any air pollution control agency in preventing

and contrelling air pollution frem the facilities for which they ere

a It also provides for the establishment of classes of air

pollution sources fur which limited permits could be issued and further

requires the Secretary to submit an annual report to the Congress

on the status of such permits and compliance therewith. The language

of the act is such that the Secretary ts given discretion with respect

to the classification and permit procedure to be established.

In addition to the act mentioned above, the program of abaiemeiit

and control of air pollution from Federal facilities is governed by

Executive Order 11282, dated May 26, 1968, entitled “Control of Pol-

lution Originating from Federal Installations,” by the “Performance

Standards and Techniques of Measurement” prescribed by the

Secretary of Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, issued

June 2, 1956, in response to “Sec. 5 Standards” of Executive Order

11282 and by Bureau of the Budget Circular No. A-78 issued on

August 6, 1966, and seni to the heads of executive departments and

establishments. '

It is expected that several vears effort will be required to full

control air pollutant emissions from Federal establishinents in wien

ance with the best current practices. ‘i’ provide the necessary technical

tidance for this overall effort, the National Center for Air Pollution

Contre! of this Department has established a Federal Facilities

Section, the staff of which will devote full time to the surveillance

of air pollution problems arising from Federal act ivities, the extension

of sachalirel ussistance to other agencies and departments, and to

studie. of the schedwing of the necessary improvements in control

of the emissions at Federal establishments.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

The Performance Standards accompanying Executive Order 11282,

through section 76.5(¢)(1), called for the Secretary of the Department of

Health, Education, and Welfare to establish by regulation limits on

the emission of sulfur oxides to the atmosphere from Federal facilities

within 6 months of the effective date of the standards for Standard

metropolitan statisticel areas or standard consolidated areas which

have a population exceeding 2 million end a population density

exceeding 15,000 persons per square mile. The result of this require-

a

intention to adopt--30 days after the publication of the notice—

m

ific limits on the emission of sulfur oxides in these three arezs.

30-day effective time limit was extended by the Secretary of the

Department of Health, Education, and Welfare for an additienal 90

days at the request of an industrial trade association which was con-

cerned about impact of the proposed regulations on certein seg-

ments of the fossil fuel industry. The proposed limits were published

in final form in the March 23, 1967, issue of the Federal Register to

be effective October 1, 1968. ;

The limitations on sulfur oxide emissions for Federal facilities in

these three heavily polluted areas are sufficiently stringent to cause

serious ane and poe Spe ys ape received indicates that all

agencies int to comply with the regulations gs rapidly as possible.

This compliance is related closely to the efforts of the air pollution

~

control agencies in these cities to relieve poet oe prnine of excessively

high to sulfur oxides and is an t example of coo

intgQhimeninebintaham

During 1967, 2 number of studies of special Federal ns of air

of problems associated with fuel supply nationally and with specitic

er is on New York, Philadelphia, and Chicago. The Department

of Defense initiated a program of testing fuel oil for its sulfur content

since the current military and Federal specifications on fuel oil permit

sulfur contents which are considerably in excess of that associated

with current and anticipated limits. Several directives were issued to

military commands to put this new program into effect immediately.

Laboratory resources of the Department of Defense will be utilized

Toxic propellants continued to be a problem during 1967.

Potential beryllium emissions have been controlled, largely because

of the Public Health Service policy statement on beryllium issued in

1966, and through the t cooperation by the two princi

igencies concerned (DOD and National Aeronautics and Space Ad-

ic polluti h toxic chemicals under developmeni f

tion with toxic i for use

aad os

compounds of berylliuin long-range toxicity for some humans.

Therefore, no amount of ium should be tely emitted to

the atmosphere, except circumstances directly relevant to

defense of the Nation.

New justification for the longstanding Federal concern about con-

renninstllans af: She auhdenh shecmgbadh hep ten vkanteanmeeane of

1461

3

beryllium arising from any activity of government, was provided by

a recent court decision. In October 1967 & Pennsvivanic j jury awarded

$109,120 to a 45-year-old mother on the ground tbat her serious lung

was caused by beryllium fumes emitted to the atmosphere by

an industrial plant located several miles from her residence. (Heck v.

id a Corp., Berks County, Pennsylvania Court of Common

wy = that court decision produced no pee pe in the conserva-

tive Health Service policy toward control of beryllium, it did

stimulate intensified activity within the Department of Defense to

assure enforcement of the st sire by guidelines issued earlier to control

any rocket motor tests apeans “7 the national defense. It also stim-

ulated serio need for toxic rocket propellant

preys Pose obacn.: stare sing ones one enh when virtually a

researeh Govelopaians Siavelving beryllium as a propellant had

st

ivity also was continued in Chattanooga and Hamilton County,

—— because of continued interest of citizens of the area in general

ution abatement, because of complaints the emis-

sions from the Volunteer Army Ammunition Plant in Hamilton County

or because of technical problems involving efforts to control sulfur

oxides, nitric oxides, sulfuric and nitric acid mists, red water inciner-

ator wastes and other contaminants. ‘The Abatement Program is

studying the air pollution situation of the entire area and air pollution

from the ammunition plant. The most ificant recommendation

made to the Office of the Surgeon General, ment of the Army,

by the Public Health ec ae a to install catalytic reduction units

o the plant to reduce markedly the emissions of nitric oxides to the

from Os nitric acid plants at the Volunteer Army Ammu-

nition Plant.

Special coo tion continues with the Tennessee Valley Authority

through its Division of Health and Safety. In addition to participating

in an advance review of TVA’s phased and orderly plan prior to its

submission to the Bureau of the ass the Federal Facilities See-

tion and ‘meteorological personnel of the abatement also

reviewed TVA’s current plans to control air pollution its new

plant in berland City, Tenn. This plant will burn a high-sulfur

coal which is the most readily available fuel in the aa wih needed

and will have one or two 1,000 foot stacks equipped re. md

efficient (99 percent) electrostatic precipitators to eels part te

emissions, depending on final engineering design decisions. Although

there is not considered chy Sg ain han: gpm 7 prntoren ay

of removing sulfur oy from these stack gases. TVA

that these oxides may be er eee ae

of control mechanisms in the future when they are developed. >

should be noted here that considerable research is underway by the

Public Health Service and TVA, by the Bureau of Mines of the

Department of the Interior and by private utilities and chemical

ere vane ty hg technology to remove sulfur oxides from stack

gases of powerplants.

Most of the activity by the Federal Facilities Section of the abate-

ment program involved <r wa War to the departments and

agencies

in preparing their 5-year phased and orderly plan for the Bureau of

- 1462

i aa ag2 i pat" |a2 | fisgzist Pt LE uae? tgs

ile i i i eH fe uel

ats] at ae 3 Ht + Bie : aE i F

a a je sae

cada | Ubdeut li pinBe

tata | ek ae

i Hi Ht | Ae sai ieatanied HL

Hie Hell Hill i if iy ali

WED il paver HEE

1463

5

exists the actuality or probability of interstate air pollution also bad

Het pry hast, Pron foe ene

or units,

frotallation of special incinerators for disposal of binlogical waste,

Se ee mist eliminators, catalytic

potuee unila ealie desaheets und weed lnamneranlite, enpanvonglee

of other abatement devices needed for the projects.

At the of the Bureau of the B the Federal Facilities

mnalyzed the 1909 portion of the 5-year and ord

the Bureau a system of priorities through whic

‘a

egree of seriousness of potential

with

i phasis

state areas and interstate areas in which the Department of Health,

Education, and Welfare had initiated formal abatement actions under

the Clean Air Act of 1963, as amended. Attention also was called to

projects on which abatement work has been started or scheduled in

that the Bureau of the B approved for fin: in 1969 all

pase for facilities in the New York City, Chicago, and

metropolitan statistical areas, ashi 4

con sign

exist and jects located in interstate areas where the ent

of Health, Education, and Welfare has started air pollution abatement

procedings under the Clean Air Act of 1963, as emended. A list of

these projects received from the Bureau of the Budget, by agency

fiseal . Many of these projects are to be completed during that vear

feet cies reqebe sddinienal sope tsegent fiscal years. (A list

of the projects scheduled to start in 1968 is found in app. B.) These

corrective measures scheduled for oye cover 166 projects to re

financed ftom regularly ted construction, 0 tions, an

pn eth other moneys bes represent a sizable contnbation to air

u

tration and TVA are ou ing with respect to these planned projects

as part of their regular operations, repair and maintenance activities.

The Department of Defense also had an appreciable input.

each aehew pating agency ive Order 11282 and

Bureau of the SP eeea Ne’ ATS. The first of these reports i

genta 3 Backed chngroer eae pace sac oo ath

Vv ve problems of o urDing solid wastes

which, although not reported in the pbased and orderly plan, are

1464

being studied by the agencies in cooperation with the Federal Facili-

ties Section of the National center for Air Pollution Control and the

solid wastes program of the National Center for Urban and Industrial

Health of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. The

results may indicate needs for further propozals for air pollution

abatement xs an extension of the plan in fise years 1969 or 1970.

The adoption of rezulations for the control of organic solvents such

as rule 66 of the Los Angeles County Air Pollution Control District

and rule 3 of the San Francisco Bay Area Air Pollution Control District

during 1967 also brings a need for several agencies tu assess this

problem as soon as possible. The Department of Defense already is

active in this respect and all other agencies have been notified to

review their operations in the Los Angeles and the San Francisco

areas. There appears to be a need for uniformity with respect tu these

rules to prevent the adoption of different requirements in many

different sections of the country. The National Center for Air Pollution

Control currently is establishing an Advisory Committee on Organic

Solvents to consider this matter further.

During December 1967, the Department of Health, Education, and

Welfare called a conference under procedures of the Clean Air Act of

1963, as amended, to consider problems associated with interstate air

pollution in the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area. As part of that

conference each Federal agency presented its plans to abate air pollu-

tion from its facilities in the defined area. Federal installations account

for about 30 percent of the air pollution of the District of Columbia

and about 10 percent of the metropolitan area total. It is estimated

that opyecnienatalr $2 million will be required to abate air pollution

from Federal operations in the area considered by the conference,

exclusive of the $733,333 grant made by the Department of Health,

Education, and Welfare to the government of the District of Coluinbia

to permit the development of a sanitury landfill and the abolishiwent

of open burning at the Kenilworth dump. Technology is available to

solve the other major air pollution problems in the area. The General

Services Administration is expected to play a key part in Washington,

as elsewhere, because of its mt in purchasing low-sulfur fuels for both

the Federal Government buildings and those of the District of Co-

lumbia. The presentation of the Federal ency plans was importaut

to this conference because of the relatively high density of Federal

activities in the District of Columbia area.

No requests have been received from an department or agency for

cremate from the provisions of the standards accompanying Exccu-

tive er 11282, and no cognate have been received for operating

permits. The cooperation by the Federal agencies with the Department

of Health, Education, and Welfare and the Bureau of the Bu vet in

developing the 5-year phased and orderly plan is overwhelming

evidence of their desire to fully participate in developing national

leadership in air pollution abatement envisioned by the Executive

order. Eventual realization of this objective will depend upon the

rate at which the program is funded. —_

rN OTS EE SES

1465

APPENDIXES

APPENDIX A

1969 PROJECTS TO BE FUNDED (BASED UPON DATA RECEIVED FROM BOS DEC. 28, 1957)

Agency Location Problern

Department of Defense:

ph SE ores Andrews Air Force Base, Camp Springs, Fuel ecnversion, ircineraior, smoke

Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Tucson, Smelting of scrap metal.

ROBY catniatinnn emigitnts Cameron Station, Alexandria, Va... ..... Vepor control, incinerator repiace-

Volunteer none Ammunition Pilani, NO», SO:, H particulates, in-

Chattanooge, Tena. —

Hail Station, Arlington, Va..... Incinerators.

Fort Meade, Odenton. Md_....... Fuel conversion, vapor coatrol.

: deny “yaad RS, Fuel conversion. — seem

PENS ROB scrubbers, fuel conversion, in-

os eee Vapor control, scrubbers, etc.

~~Fort Dax, Fort Dix, WJ... ..........--. Mechanical

Ammunition Plant, Joha- Incinerators absorption tower, fiy

son Co., Kans. ash colfe te

: catalytic reduction, ime:erators,

Pentagon, Washington. D.C.............: Vaporcontrol

Army Ammunition Plant, Baraboo Electrostatic precipitators, fuel

conversion vapor control.

Nba ovis eivbenk iid Bs sie Rosey Punts oske Contes, Senet Satan, Fuel conversion.

Naval Supply ee Do.

Naval Training , Ficefighte: school.

Haval Training Center, Great Lakes, Ill__. Fuel conversion, fire training schcol.

Koval Shiovosts Poitsdelpbia, Po SecA ft Fuel conversion. incinerator, fovcry

Clectronic T: Center, Naval Station, tire trzining schoo!

ee 4 Barber's Point, Hono- Sanitary landfill, firefighter school.

Hee auaenhAcentee: Rete, Smoke detecicrs.

Naval Air Station. Glenview, Ii! ___._._.. Firefighter school, smoke detectors

WS. Naval Ordnance Lab, White Oak, Md.. Smoke

sa San Francisco Bay Naval Shipyard, Fuel conversion.

Naval Supply Center, Norfolk, Va........ Vapor control; furc cotiectors on

smelters; rebuild furnaces.

Naval Air Station, San Ciego, Calif_...... Fire school; vapor control, plating

Naval Fuci San Pedro, Calif... ... Vapor control.

poe ae oe Sy ny abae pes pciner ator.

Fleet T ‘ | ee Fire trasning center.

Navy Public Center, Vs... Fuel conversion alarms and detecto:s

Navy Public Works Center, Newport. R.1.. tncineraior. fly ash elminaiors.

U.S. Naval Air Station, Minneapolis, Minn. Vapor control: hrefigh’

Naval Ait Depot, Hawthorne, Nev__...... Smoke recorijers; fume collectors,

3 fire school; baghouses.

Kodiak, Alaska .. Sanitary landfill; fire school; smoke

I

j

1466

i

wi geet e| i

anc

New Orleans, Incinerator.

hectrotate

on

Rivers,

06...

eo

Cl at Lays Installation of electrestatec pre-

Tectogcal

ee

Aut

Francisce Merbor__.........

esectogl Test Fecility, Bay St. Louis, Incinerator or sanitary landfill.

Pion arrived tate

Cee pens Cows eeanent, Geena,

Naval Torpedo Station, Keyport, Wash. __

Naval Station, Adak, Alaska............

bate dhl

mt SR ficheed Ameo

Administration... . ..

Health, Education, and

Aerongutics

Post Office Dep

Tennessee Valley Authority_..........

Veterans’ A

National

a

.

il li

Pere,

Base,

Nebr.

ri eet

toe eee een ewenees

eee eeene

: bere

hve A Pay Reema

ly

|

: 1468

Agency Location Probtem

Navy—Con_ Naval Reserve Training Center, Elizabeth, Fuel conversiua.

Naval Reserve Training Centers, Nassau

Naval Revere Tring Caner, Slo

Naval Reserve Training Center, Jersey

i Newark, &)._.

Navel Reserve T: Center, Waite-

Do.

De.

Do.

Do.

Do.

Do.

De.

Do.

eo ey tastal monitoring and recording in-

phe stati tuel au

Corps of Engineers (Civil Works)... . Puget ciieuadilbebidngebiliypesins an Gaps

nee ee ewww ene t ener cee

|

E

Center, Moffett Field, Fume scrubber, incinerator afler-

‘Langley Research Center, Hampton Va. _. ee

Department of Justice... ....... Federal Va_.... Fuel conversion.

it}

i

i

i

|

FPF FFF FF F RERRF FIER FF PF

Cie Lf Bep. ee v, it

S/7? to 9)

AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT BY

FEDERAL FACILITIES

SECOND REPORT

SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION,

AND WELFARE

To TRE :

UNITED STATES CONGRESS 7

PURSUANT TO

Public Law 90-148

THE AIR QUALITY ACT OF 1967

JANUARY 1969

MARCR 4, 1969.—Ordered to be printed

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

3-100 WASHINGTON : 1969

1471 oe

SENATE RESOLUTION 88

Submitted by Mr. Randolph of West Virginia

In Tue SENATE OF THE Unirep States,

Agreed to March 4, 1969.

Resolved, That there be printed with illustrations as a Senate docu-

ment the report of the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare,

entitled “Air Pollution Abatement by Federal Facilities” submitted

to the Congress in accordance with section 306, Public Law 90-148,

the Air Quality Act of 1967, and that there be printed two thousand

five hundred additional copies of such document for the use of the

Committee on Public Works.

Francis R. Varzo,

Secretary.

1472

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

Tue Secreranry or Hearn, Epucation, anp Wenrarpr,

Washington, D.C., January 17, 1969.

Hon. Huaerr H, Ucmpurey,

President of the Senate,

Washington, D.C.

Dean Mr. Presinent: In accordance with the provisions of title

I, section 111(b) cf Public Law 90-148 (the Air Quality Act of 1967),

I em -ploased to transmit the report on measures being taken by

ri = agencies to control the emission of air pollutants from Federal

acilities.

It is the intent of this report to describe in detail such progress as

as has been made toward controlling air pollution from sources for

which Federal departments or agencies have jurisdiction.

Sincerely,

: Wizeur J. Conen,

(mt)

}

}

«4

I

i

1478

“«

(A)

Cen rn eenmnnewnwenanssannnnansewnsnnereaansannasan “"¢) xipueddy

PROP LAEAO EDO ERLAHEDLALRAARSADODER CORP BBA SEZ AS EZ ee { xipuoddy

ee ee ee ee ee a ee a Cone r een eoaaiey xipueddy

PERTH PSPSPS OBOD AED CE CD OBOSLADODEDCBABDAZASRELe See dbaker UoIsn[sU0D

PAPAS AOPHROROEBBOEBOEHAHDEDSDDHBR FOC AHAEe ““SOIPIAIOV SNOOUTI[VISITY

Cae ee cree cecadacecsces<-"""-yOIs UN jOdosj0W ““7'C] ‘UO TUYRU AY

oe ee eee eg ee ener neo on © + ieegeees eumeniees

PARR Rene n ease nena enn nn seanennannewnasiawannane ~~ a1} lutaxty

iy i ae pont Ae se alla ay tabard

aie On ee ee ee enon © © "eee

SLNALNOO

1474

AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT BY FED

FACILITIES |

I. INTRODUCTION

ae

The Air Quality Act of 1967, as did the earlier Clean Air é

amended, emphasizes the need for Federal ip and assistance

to State and local ies in the control of air poll The act also

indicates that the Federal agencies shall pe pew: with the Depart-

ment of Health, Education, and Welfare and with air —

t

control agency in preventing and — air tion.

provides, at the discretion of the Secretary, for the establishmen

classes of air pollution sources for which limited i

issued, and it further requires the Secretary to submit an a

— = the Congress on the status of such permits and compliance

with.

In addition to this act, the program of abatement and control of

air pollution from Federal facilities is governed by Executive Order

11282, dated May 26, 1966, entitled, “Control of Pollution Orivi ating

From Federal] Installations”; the “Performance Standards Tech-

iques of Measurement” prescribed by the Secretary of Health,

ucation, and Welfare, issued June 2, 1966, and subsequen

amended, in response to “Section 5 Standards” of Executive Order

11282; Bureau of the Budget Circular No. A-78 issued on August 6,

i

b

order, has been used as a control device, rather than de t of

_——_, tem, as authorized in the Air Quality Act of ~

s

Control Administration, devotes full time to the surveillance of air

scheduling necessary improvements to control emissions from Federal

establishments. This staff also assists the Bureau of the Budget in

technical and administrative review of the 5-year phased and orderly

plans prepared by the various governmental groups concerned in this

abatement activity.

@

1475

TE. ABATEMENT PLAN

As called for by Executive Order 11282 end Bureau of the Budget

Circular No. A-78, the departments and agencies submitted revisions

of their original phased and orderiy plans on July 1, 1968, and also,

for the first time, furnished reports of progress on projects which could

be funded within available appropriations.

The revised plans are concerned principally with proposed abate-

ment actions to be undertaken during fiscal year 1970. Appendix A

contains the detailed proposals for abatement activities which have

been en for funding by the Bureau of the Budget for fiscal

year 1970.

On June 20, 1968, the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare

announced that 32 Air Quality Control Regions would be designated

during the next 12 months. These regions, in the order in which

designation is expected to occur, are the following:

1. Washington, D.C. - 17. Hartford

2. New York 18. Indianapolis

3. wae. 19. Minneapolis-St. Paul

4. Philadelphia 20. Milwaukee

5. Denver 21. Providence

6. Los Angeles 22. Seattle-Tacoma

7. St. Louis 23. Louisville

8. Boston 24. Dayton

9. Cincinnati 25. Phoenix

10. San Francisco 26. Houston

11. Clevdand 27. Dallas-Fort Worth

12. Pittsburgh 28. San Antonio

13. Buffalo 29. Birmingham

14. Kansas City 30. Toledo

15. Detroit 31. Steubenville

16. Baltimore 32. Chattanooga

Under the Air Quality Act of 1967, designation of regions is 2 funda-

mental step leading toward action by State governments to adopt and

enforce standards to controi air po lution on a regional basis.

Once regions are designated, the Air Quality Act of 1967 requires

that States set ambient cir quality standards for the regions within

9 months following the publication of criteria for particular pollutants.

An additional 6 months are allowed for the development of an imple-

menting plan which would include einission standards for pollution

sources. This standard-setting process is expected to begin in the first

regions early in calendar year 1969.

Almost all of the Federal facility projects included in the President's

budget for fiscal year 1970 are located in the 32 Air Quality Contro!

Regions listed above. The funding of these projects will permit Federal

facilities to provide leadership in abating air pollution in these regions.

A few additional projects are included in the President’s 1970 budget

because they are violations of local codes or are designated to abate

toxic emissions which involve imminent danger to health. A project

at = installation is included because of excessive complaints from the

public. .

(2)

1476

IIL EXEMPTIONS

The D. ent of Defense requested and was ted a l-

exem ‘ioe tie Onbeber 1 1969) from the provisio pag posal oS 765,

title 42, Code of Federul lations, part 76, dated March 17, 1987.

is section required control of sulfur oxide emissions in the Chicago

and New York Standard Consolidated Areas and the Standard

Metropolitan Statistical Area of Philadelphia by October 1, 1968.

It was impossible for the t of Defense to meet this deadline

with regard to a number of its facilitics which require large hp cd

ent’s ]

expenditures for conversion of their boilers. The Departm

year 1969 budget. had progressed too fer to allow the necessary

to provide for these conversions. The Presideni’s year 1970

budget will allow the Department to undertake substantially all of

these conversions.

The Atomic Energy Commission requested an exemption from the

provisious of the same section requiring control of sulfur oxides

in the New York and Chicago Standard Consolidated Areas for the

Brookhaven and the Argonne National Laboratories, respectively.

The request was based on the denial of funds by the Joint Committee

on Atomic Energy for conversion to lower sulfur fuels at these labora-

tories. An ee for 1 year (to October 1, 1969) has been granted

to the Atomic Energy Commission for the Argonne and Brookhaven

sites on the proviso that the Commission again request funds for

fiscal year 1970 to convert the heating plant at Argonne to natural

ges and that efforts be made to secure 1 percent sulfur fuel oil for

rookhayen.

The Joint Committee on Atomic Energy in its denial of funds for

fiscal year 1969, coe a delay in the Argonne project pending an ex-

_ pected breakthrough on research which would produce en economically

acceptable method of removing sulfur oxides from stack gases. Atoinic

Energy Commission representatives have been informed by tne

National Air Pollution Control Administration that the current re-

search on developing control techniques for removing sulfur oxides

rye aaah oye ae directed to produce methodology aneee for oeatan

of large fossil fuel-burning power-generating sources not direct

to heating plants as pn as that at Argonne National Laboratory.

This laboratory is within the boundaries of the Metrcpolitan Chicaco

Interstate Air Quality Control Region, which is identical to the

Chicago Standard Consolidated Area. Since the region will be expected

to have air eggeapane control standards and regulations within the

next 15 months, a conversion of this facility now would be consistent

with providing Federal leadership, as called for in Executive Order

11282.

The Department of Transportation requested, and was ted, 2

l-year exemption for fuel conversion at the Coast Gu base on

Governor’s Island, N.Y. This base is partially converted to burn

No. 2 distillate fuel oil, and the exemption was granted with the

(3)

1477

4

hada that conversion be completed as soon as additional funds

me available, It is expected thai this task will be completed before

Silat She D f Agricul ted

i y, the Department o icniture reques an exemption

from the vuaten oxide regulation for the heating plant at the Plum

Island, Long Island, Animal Disease Laboratory. A 1-year exemption

also was granted in this case, on the proviso that the laboratory use

the lowest possible sulfur content fuel oil which can be obtained from

the Genera! Services Administration for use at this site.

at

1478

IV. REMEDIAL ACTIONS

Actions to abate air pollution from Federal facilities were reported

this year, for the first time, to the Bureau of the Budget. As required

by Bureau of the Budget Circular No. A-78, these reports arrived on

zr ¢ 1, 1968, and refiect conditions as of April 1, 1968.

summary of these reports reveals that 442 remedial actions were

reported for 387 installations located .in 45 States, the District of

Columbis, Puerto Rico, and Guam. With few exceptions, the remedial

actions fall into the following categories:

1. Elimination of open burning of refuse.

2. Installation of new incinerators or upgrading of existing incinera-

tors to meet Federal regulations.

3. Reduction of particulate emissions from heating and power plants

by:

a. Repairs to old plants.

b. Construction of new plants.

c. Improvement of particulate collectors.

d. Installation or improvement of particulate monitors.

e. Conversion from coal to either gas or fuel oil.

4. Reduction of sulfur oxide emissions from heating plants by:

a. Using same type of fuel but of lower sulfur content.

b. Converting to a different fuel of lower sulfur content.

nt Reduction of gasoline and solvent vapor losses from storage

tanks.

6. Awarding of contracts during the year to remedy specific

situations.

7. Initiation of studies, design and/or engineering actions to

prepare cost estimates.

Appendix B presents an overall summary of accomplishmants by

agency and oy remedial action category.

Appendix C presents a detailed list of installations, arranged by

agency, reporting the above listed remedial actions.

These remedial actions reflect, in part, normal air pollution con-

trol activities of the agencies funded from their regular budgets as

well as actions stimulated and accelerated by the promulgation of

Executive Order 11282 and the need to prepare the 5-year phased

and orderly plan. Congressional action on year 1969 budget

requests had not been completed by April 1, 1968, and therefore,

most of these ai represent relatively small expenditures of

funds- already available to solve relatively simple and inexpensive

problems. Abatement actions at large installations or on very expen-

sive projects generally must await funding. Installation of electro-

static precipitators at the large Tennessee Valley Authority power-

plants is an exception to this situation, because of alternate sources

of funds.

(5)

25-140 O—69-—_-2

ile

ae

1479

6

hime eg also reflect favorably on the efforts of agencies to

od with the strict sulfur-oxide regulations governing the New

Y and Chicago standard consvlideted areas and the standard

Met itan Statistical Area of Philedelphia.

for use in these arees by the civilian agencies are obtained

ower” by the General Services Administration. Inquiry to the

Administration elicited the information that all fuels

used in the Chicago standard consolidated area are in conformity

with the requirements of the Executive order.

Attempts to secure bids on fuels which would meet the Executive

order regulations for New York and Phiiadelphia failed for the most

part. The limited response required a 64 percent premium over costs

of existing fuel. Readvertising for a maximum of 1 percent sulfur

content brought good response resulting in an 11 percent to 16 percent

increase in costs over previous higher sulfur fuels. These responses

were considered acceptable. This means that, for these areas, a No. 4

fuel oil with 0.7 percent sulfur and a No. 6 fuel oil with 1.0 percent

sulfar maximum will be used for the 1968-69 heating season.

This success in securing fuel oil with 1 percent or slightly less than

1 percent sulfur is encouraging and forecasts a considerable improve-

ment in future sulfur-oxide emissions; additional improvements will

accrue as a result of conversions to natural gas.

1480

V. WASHINGTON, D.C, METROPOLITAN AREA

Considerable progress in controlling air pollution has been made by

Federal facilities in the aréa folowing the National Capital Metro-

politen Area Interstate Air Pollution Abatement Conference heid by

the Departinent of Health, Education, and Weifare in December 1967.

Open burning hss been discontinued at Kenilworth Dump in the Dis-

trict of Columbia aid a sunitary landfll,has been started. Depert-

meut of Health, Education, and Welfare, the Department of the

Interior and the government of Washington, D.C. were instrumental

in effecting this long-soucht change.

The Department of Commerce has completed conversion of the

heating plant at the National Bureau of Standards in Gaithersburg,

Md., to burn naturel gas, with No. 2 fuel oil as standby; and the

Treasury Department has modified the elassificd-waste ineinerctor at

the Bureau of Engraving and Printing in Washington, D.C. Pending

funds for replacement, an incinerator at the Agricultural Research

Station in Beltsville, Md., has been repaired by the Departmeni of

Agriculture.

Cenversion of heating plants to burn natural gus is uuderway at

the Goddard Space Flight Center of the National Acronautics and

Space Administration in Greenbelt, Md., and at the National Zoo-

logical Park of the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, D.C.

jth respect to the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare,

ood and Drug Administration in Beltsville, Md., has reduced

Particulate emissions from a faulty incinerator by making operational

changes; several incinerators have been eliminaied on the Howard

University campus in Washington, D.C., by transporting refuse to the

District of Columbia incinerators; St. Elizabeth's Hospital in the

District has contracted for replacement of 2 faulty pathological in-

cinerator, has installed smoke meters on coal and oil-burning boilers

and has secured funds for equipping the main refuse incinerator wiih

air pollution contro! equipment; the National Institutes of Health in

Bethesda, Md., is now using a No. 6 fuel oil with a maximum sulfur

content of 0.5 parent. is redesigning classified waste incinerators for

installation of both afterburners and water scrubbers, and is engaged

in a joint effort with the Department of the Army and the Depart-

ment of the Navy to. design and construct a large eral waste

incinerator to serve the National Institutes of Health, the Naval

Medical Center, and Walter Reed Sone and Annex. Construction

will be ai the annex site in Maryland. The Department of the Army

has been issued e permit for land use for this project and design has

been started.

The General Services Administration, as anticipated, is playing an

importent role in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, as else-

where, with respect to procurement of low-sulfur fvel. Since November

1867, all fuel oil procured for the Department of Defense facilities in

the Washington area by the General Services Administration has

contained 2 percent sulfur. For the 1968-69 heating season, fuels have

(7)

ieee

1481

been secured at 1.5 agers sulfur, which is in accord with the recom-

mendations .of the Washington abatement conference. Furthermore,

it is expected that for the 1969-70 heating season 1 percent sulfur fuels

He 8 be provided. Department of Defense facilities involved are the

wing: ¢ ‘

Antington Hall Station, Arlington, Va.;

Pentagon Building, Arlington, Va.;

Cameron Station, Alexandria, V2.;

Fort Belvoir, Springfield, Va.;

Harry Diamond Laboratories, Washington, DC.;

Fort Leslie J. McNair, Weshington. DC.

Walter Reed Army Medicel Center, Washington, D.C.;

N. G. Camp Sims, Washington, D.C.;

Walter Reed Army Medical Center (Forest Glen Annex),

eae

Army Map Service, Montgomery County, Md.;

Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland;

Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C.;

Marine Barracks, Washington, D.C.;

Naval Communications Station, Cheltenham, Md.;

Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Md.; and

Naval Ordnance Laboratory, White Oaks, Md.

Additional activities of the General Services Administration in this

area have resulted in the replacement of three boilers, previously burn-

ing number 6 fuel oil, with two gas-fired boilers at the old Bureau of

Standards property on Connecticut Avenue in the District of Columbia.

The General Seoetees Administration also has reported that all of the

major coal-burning steam plants operated by the General Services

Administration now are using coal containing 1 percent sulfur or less.

Remaining problems of air pees abatement in Federal facilities

in and around Washington, D.C., generally are minor and work is

proceeding on many of these at this time.

1482 7 =

VI. MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES

During calendar year 1968, emission inventories of all 77 Federal

facilities im the Kansas City area were completed and entered in the

record of the second session of the Kansas City, Kans.-Kansas City,

Mo. Interstate Air Pollution Abatement Conference. A similar inven-

tery was completed of the 185 Federal facilities in the Philadelphia,

Pa., area in conjunction with the Delaware Valley regional air quality

program which is being conducted couperatively by Federal, State,

and local agencies. © :

In view of the mandate for Federal facilities to exhibit leadership

in abating air pollution, inventories of emissions from Federal facilities

have been completed in Washington, D.C., New York, Chicago,

Philadelphia, Chattanooge, and Detroit and started in Denver, 5t.

Louis, Boston, and San Francisco. Eventually, all 32 regions will be

completely inventoried. Information will be helpful to the facilities

themselves and will be important in any overall area emission studies

which must be carried out before control programs are developed by

States and communities concerned within each region.

Special studies also are underway concerning air pollution problems

and control practices in Federal foundries, ammonia oxidation pleats

used to manufacture nitric acid, and sulfuric acid manufacturing

plants. Information secured from these studies will be helpful in

developing improved contro! techniques for these air pollutants.

The Department of Defense again has included pro 5 for control

of emissions from the Volunteer Army ammunition plant in Hamilton

County, Tenn. Proposals fer this plant have been included in fiscal

year 1969 plans but were not funded by Congress. This plant probably

is the worst single Federal source of air pollution, principally oxides

of nitrogen, in the United States. It has been the source of complaints,

pe snag inquiries and general citizen dissatisfaction in its vicinity...

Failure to fund the 1969 project was a distinct disappointment and it

is hoped that corrective measures will be funded in fiscal year 1970.

Technical assistance on specific problems associated with boiler

operations was given to the Department of Defense, Veterans’ Ad-

ministration, and the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

Similar help eS was given to the Smithsonien

—n and to the Departments of Defense, Interior, and Agri-

ture.

A conference was held with representatives of the Corps of Engineers

civil works) concerning the disposal of debris from New York Harbor.

epresentatives of the Corps were reminded that the pit incinerator

being constructed at Caven Point, N.J., in its pro form, may be

inadequate to meet the standards concerning particulate emissions.

If this should prove to be true following testing of this device, further

design and engineering will be necessary to secure compliance with the

ations.

(9)

1483

10

A carbon monoxide vontrol study related to automotive traffic was

started ai selected border stations at the request of the Public Build-

Service of the General Services Administration.

3 et ae oy D.C., Air Pollution Division and the Natione)

Park Service of the Department of the Interior were advised concern-

ing an incinerator designed for the destruction of brush and logs.

These agencies are attempting to dispose of this waste in a manner

whieh hopefully will replace the current opea burning. Specialized

activities have been contmued to assure the control of exhaust products

from missiles and rockets powered with highly toxic propellants.

These activities involved close cooperation and intersgency liaison

with the Department of Defense, Nutional Acronautics and Space

Adininistration, Atomic Rasney Commission, Armed Services Ex-

“vont Safety Boord, and the National Academy of Sciences-National

esearch Council. During the year, not a single rocket motor con-

taining beryllium propel!snt was fired in the open air of the continental

United States.

In the interest of providing further assistance during the year, the

Federal Facilities Section distributed several hundred copies of the

892-page publication tided “Air Pollution Enginee:ing Manual” :.

the Federal agencies. Also distributed for comment and technical

criticism was the “Jnterim Guide to Good Tractice for Selecting

Incinerators for Federal Facilities.”

The Section also participated in a training course at Durham.

N.C., for approximately 70 engineers of the Army Materiel Command

and in a seminar at the Army Environmental Health Agency, Edge-

wood Arsenal, Edgewood, Md., with re ntatives of the Army

Surgeon General’s Office, the Bureau of the Budget and the Federal

Water Pollution Control Administration, to review the operation of

the 5-year phase and orderly plan. —

1484

VIL CONCLUSION

The Federal departments-and ezencies again this year evidence

excellent cooperation with the Deparunent ef eclth, Education, and

Welfare and the Bureau of the Budget for purposes of preventing and

conirolling air pollution. The reports of progress highlight both the

efforis and the intentions of the egcncies. With su‘ticient funding, there

is no reason why air pollution control by Federal agencies should noi

be successful. Announcement of the establishment of the first 32 air

quality control regions by the Natiewl Air Pollution Control Ad-

ministration has given further impevis to this program and has de-

fined more sharpty than heretofore areas to which specific attention

must be provided both by the Federal Government and by State und

local organizations.

Sufficient fundine will enable prompt abatement of air pollution.

from Federal esiallishments.

, : 11)

1486

Hi at ein #

: FH Hf nae

iar boa

di ily i

at ce He a

Hila HH i ii i i i

ei a ut ne

ij

i

3 :

}

iM I

> $2 626%

| i F a

a i

Jollet Army Ammunition Plant, Joliet, (Mt.

Fort Benjamin Harrison, indianapolis, ind. _.

Granite City, pee 60

j

i

&

Jayna 041; SHY) 404 WENSAS GONEIIUND DHOUS j>ns SHO] ‘eIyOPEHYd ‘sJ0\UeD BUIuses) JOs)UOy OFeweQ +

ssyennorens fae 01 wins Be Seieeean poe meee Wd ji0 oyiem wrepion a

ne on 1610110q Wo SWAEIE PUT £10)20;9P OKOUIS Jo HOHeVEYSUY ““" ~~“ 8A ‘MOHON *puRys) Aouesy’ s0\U0D Adding jerey

yp 1 NO Opeyi1151P Z “ON 10 190) ae ee 8 (ot eat eee? A'W ‘sueqiy “1S "penydson jeaen

pus ‘ou Depuien 1 Sveus¥P 2 "OM &H 10M Lem ITO » Con Due 9 on nnd nena “°° oo“ MINOONR “WOH HY fone

tip pus Bujusng wodo syeupunie : 0 SVeNEIP Z "ON OF NO [9M Jenp{a99 y “ON WHO, OAUOD “~*""~** “eene org aime eine oon em

. “9 Foypung ioe de gee Enya mths dm me Shee ene Oe ee dys wae

mel to we ae pe seeta nes tig oon an enter os

sate uousdtbe conan ie tim sjesearan wee Uiteeg-<--"---"----M mteg favog women eaweunlg fen

‘pouyss Buyuyesy Buyydyasty 10; Ayp1oey Y.dWoPEGE BYOwS UIySOG ~~ yeMeH ‘MymjouoH ‘s0qIeH eed “AnosD Buywjes4 omy

‘ung Bujusng vedo sceidos o Iripue: Aserwes jyeysuy ‘AyMJoUoH ‘Keg eycouRy ‘UOLINS sy S410] oujeW

soded poyysteja e uoj9h2 uo 40014 fetid pn aoc “*"" med ‘oosjquess wes’ pucys) sunsees4 ‘uonTS jeAey

weer abvoe an ny ue ie) Sago RR ie

Suymy Suunp ss0der wsng pus 1291}09 0} Wiayshs ase DUE wor} 204/09 woneyeysuy ““"*“"" r= - =~ Me - Pyne Fe Ray Troms

pane Gra eaiay Synan eenenyy Sane ee lueaeee” mea ‘o8o1g ues 12Aey (20\v09 Burwed,

1090 we porenp oe sxBucus p wow Ou) & sped som ‘meg

0) pus 109QA195 10 wasup Laas ene fs Png won ‘olaye) ‘pues ssp ‘prekdius oney hag eotrouesy 20g

s0ded a2¢)d0) 04 saipmys Zusoourdu0 pu udrsag ‘onsoues

“Te Sip oe jr Sa i howe nea ay SSMU D Ae OOH 18 Z PAO _UES “Wuidg Ss9}UNH ‘psehdiys jenen iia Orwouels tes

Jom © (e,SUl 10 LOUINGIOYE UNA 1ONEIO LID) boMNEKI" mW aPragdg ~—— "=" (2 wrens ills cee ieren

an geet 220 ye 1.0 (Hour ds Adeiites WOT 47K [VRISEY mea 2g ‘seyued $0109 suey :

rrp | 18261 ‘GLE PUR Yi ¥E SHU) ING Sielid 18d te ;. :. ‘

tonuen yor 1316 O WL6 Sud VOCE 104 FHAj0A s9qieIIg an ne neg, spew waren vd jose baen

“000 wis any 348 OF 818)109 7 JO WOISiuAUOD ~=""="=="""mm~ ww “weyd oyssrw

Weenr6 04 ody jy 064) paTsowgus epmyar pus yusi efev0%8 suryosed a pen taig rt ee ‘worunycem ‘NENIN HOS

yee Be 0 20) Kapur 8 msn i Bc enn mouse Vcescomee iaad siownen neva ‘none od

: wm Benga fepums ye gin sed on 8 da eee

pesy-7e0o erowes 40002 ul US G Gunlweays jonnsucg * “~*~ *“""" "rn .

ee nt a fa ty tan oni acon === ag ee eo bd pneu

Penunueg—esuejeg jo juewedeg

worse posodasg . * wonenersuy hovelly

1 ANIGISIUA JHL AG GIGNIWWOITY 3B OL S197/O¥d OL6I BVIA TWISI4

penunuer—v XIONIddY

rift and debris collected from these rivers.

Decision

Fort

* Tentative listing supplied by the Bureau of the Budget, Dec. 27, 1968,

WoStd “SBIONIOV NO SLNGMLNVAIO TWUDLY AB SNOLLOV TWHEINRY 40 ANVWNNS

@ XIGN3dd¥

SRRSE REESE En ee ro ae

Sum, amet demers purse aes a Sea

ba vy — ges ras

0 ‘obenyg ‘(poomujoour)) ¢ ‘ON

| 24 Wy ‘etemey ‘Qomennd 2 ow satg wah,

“Cant ng came Pen w00e Se ee lecaeee steno aie dg ember

|

i

9961 BVIA TWOSi4 ONIUNG NOLLVTIVASNI A@ SS3¥00d JO 1N0dI¥ TVANNY

9 XION3dd¥

1491

ple attr “774 "OLY poo sayeNa ‘wodang ynowuon 04

debapiieale ee eBay my seme sieniins

pesnoesd yo fons “unwmew Inyns sureiuoa 1 wot en feng “O71 “eweQ BYSN UEVNWEH JepuEXeiy

povnseud jo yong -wnurseu snyine yoacind | tareues leer ace” FW ‘e0np sowyry dweg

oat aries iae eS ti Fh wn

See

Stee ret

non cera ete tne Mi Fg et as

SE a

I sat at aR aa tee ea cera el od een ed

RES eae

pomny poy Sanened RaNRG “pene ‘eHEK) Sunn ‘sown Deg

SRS saiare ene wana at ey r “900 ean on eae

“E901 "T 90 soups poon wong sey snyns yoansed 1 yo whew BujsineeD fe yong -oee=="="-————yy

.

; PRORAPD-4A61 UIA TWISLA OWIUNG NOLAVTIVASNI AG S$3¥D0Ud 40 4¥OdIE TYRNNY

penuneea—2 XIONIddV

1494

“icayuod 6>j0us8) vpeuyse 3509 99/01 avedesd 9} wy “2B “y BuN29105 40; Aemsepun

SUOK|OFON “WiNUN Kew 4M{jAS uOdZad | Poufe;UDD Sey ‘/9BT ‘T ‘ACN DUIS soa hd Rai ai Bd ‘@ASUYOT ‘20)U0 Juewdo)oA0g ayy [eAEN)

AeW Ut payedjonue jenosdde AiQASv3 ‘g9Gt 280A je2sy WY perojdwod yrofosd pes shi she st A'N ‘umopsBuno, ‘Ayyoes Suyyyesy onsosoy

aeah Ul UOISLBAUOD 40)10q 10) Pojo(dwor ejewnse Cid “8961 4¥OA Jeary ‘

Uj sudr PUG 20qGRI28 104 Sv3 Aq panoidde JO OPBDyN199 YM

Wafosd yepoods “wNwyKew An)r5 Worse T paugequod sey "7961 “T "ACN ous posn fang “"~,'N ‘AyUNOD sudeNd ‘suEgiy ‘IS ‘sULgIY ‘IS ‘JeNdsoH

“AWAY IC WEVA OF Burdyd se3 youedg

8 SUCly “WINUIKe INNS 4UI2,00 | POuYeIIOG Sey ‘LZ9ET “T “AON SOUjS poiNdoid jong “~*""*~*"~ A'N ‘way yo01R ‘4004 MOK ‘YORE wee

“WALA PKOUL NYAS YU9DIEI | POUseIUOD SHY ‘79GT “[ “AON SOULS poINscId jong AyD YIOA MON “s9jUIG ZUYIELL mires ° aa

*Csuoqanias soyeseujoul) g-1y Y29[0Id (eyeds 40) peryouine ui}saq sBupy “UAjyoOoIg Cofyynoig oueis JeieN) paekdiag

‘og Mog ‘10,99 Buyuresy OAsOsoy Sds09 oUIeW pUe fereN

MS cee eee ANN ‘uc Bujuny ‘soyuag Suuiery ersosoy

“AN "Aig wapden ‘uAtyo03g ‘von

“0g BIS (BAON JO KOvUY Bujsnoy pesopay ‘souewy reunntin

‘og ‘AND wopieg ee $UIOD GUNICW JS] ‘SIOENDpPPOY

0G eer err ere fer { N wodoody ‘nue Jururesy ansssoy

0g eer eee ee ee oe N ‘ysemon ‘pac “us OAI9L904 ant

| eR Sener errs rn‘ v9 Aussie 10ju99 diyureay ansasay

‘og CeCe ee meee ene tN yoqezy} "10489 Bunuyesy OAOSoy

04 -* eee ewe oki 3) ‘ayiey “‘yodag uo uAuMYy

“WUE ANNs WL9IIEd | POUjeWUOD Sey ‘Z96] ‘| “AON DUIS paindo! Pag Cree nnree ene soiny f'N ‘UOsND “224LOD Buyuyesy OALasoy

*Ausly s@pUn eq [Mm VOR 'N

| AMUPISYL 996% ‘Og BUNF PaHedianua womysyreIsosg "y961 280A [z5y) poyo;dus0D Uiseg “euuoreg (1099 Ajadng 40 ed) Bupsno}4 YBnos0Gspj09

"B9GI ‘OC SUNG POYajdisEd OQ 04 SyuK} ASLIO}s OUNOseT J0;OUI NO LyojM) PodaauN NS “AON *eUJOU MEH ‘QUOI, Me} “Jodeg UOHjUnWuY jeaen

"oe

Pd eune fa PosOjdwod aq 0} SHU) eSes0}s Ousosed JO;OW UO sjo]Us potmougas ‘uieees

PACIICO fi He] UO} e\S-UO OF BuYHLY osnyos yoUNUOD ! ponjweorip setae” hia adi AGN ‘WONeY ‘WOH IS-AVy JEL xnYy Jeary

“SIP OSAjOI PUB 4O1jUOD BROWS J9}10q 404 ‘29g ‘S| “BHy PoYajdwiod aJrwAS? YS09 JoV[o.g ““""T* TTT sso waysog *vozsog ‘purddiyg eng 4

“(OHOwS s0pes9UF9UJ [01jUG3 0}) ABMUOPUA 42 ford UB\sog *-* one Rye! JOAIIS * peste BIUCUPIC [VAC Y

‘POs9PIO 516)20,0p GYOWS *“""pyy ‘ysCOg S99 ‘Asojesoyy } YOIeOSEY jeAeN

8961 J8QWOAON “dep VONo\dwWOD pajewsy ‘vONoMIsU09 JepuN juCIa JUkoy May “TTT TTT PW ‘siiodeuny ‘Awapesy jeaty ‘s'f

"HUY, Are pUES @ 204 Payrtmos suBtg ***"*"~ WeND “WuIOd BJOK ‘WeNY ‘19;U59 SHIOM IIGNG

“AWIDE) VOReLIWN® GyoWS jooyrs BuAYSyasy 40) parejduioa OEUiy}>9 4809 joBlorg ~ “YI ‘SOHET JeMsD ‘SaxeT CoD Powe dupuers [eaey

‘ANY AS Oded | 40 Yury & peYy Sey ‘Z95) ‘| ‘AON GOUIS Pasn Jang ‘jueid

-s0m0d Wye 10) $0914) jONYOD Jo UASOp 40) POPsEME JORIYNOD “JOn) [eALUe jo Jude ii!

804 $$ 40) ‘8961 ‘| ‘AON BANDAS Wuejdsomod Ujoul OY) 105 sed wWsy 410) papeme {2ENUOD ‘SOHBT JeIIQ ‘SeXeT JeAID ‘IN}UED Sy10Mm IGN AAEN

© eee Naga RCO ES “*AO1AUe}*) Uone}S ay jeaey

“SAYRE yuaasad | JO Wauifxew @ poujejuoo sey “7gg1 ‘T ‘AON dauIs peunoos wee re eee Wb HiRd 456404 ‘UONejg SIUeUpICO jareN

‘Wemen ‘Ninjcuoy

“MUPUCS Aseyjues 404 posedaid Susaq suoferyio0ds pie ewe’! ‘WiOd $,s0qIeg “WUJog $,10qQIeg ‘UONeIS Jy JeAeN

Sujwsng-ueco zZ soejdex 0} jypuey Aseyues Spuowworey) “ajajdwos Apnys Suseoujduz ~****~ @p ‘Auegiy ‘Aueqiy ‘seWu09 Ajddng sdiog suey

~

#9) 1OGIAG

Ie

ron inte fy arn a ay ar Terese “neg Cojmurmy Weg “yseH wotO) sy puETyIET

Fee ne ee ral doled om tbelt tated heteee ae ment -—-- ee ee ©2310 | iy HyIIOg

Due spinoy AgqueTs Ye pojjersuy 41)2-y0p Ca cali, nag * Hearn Wi ioN

eV lgaet Way 0} paqeysut Saree pus ro}oep eyous =o ‘wea ie ac

[Rt ny syn aces foe oe tony ty snd - Raa eats =

“mopon *

eyows cee fens sane srterecccone*mn SOpOM ‘s8URD SyIOM TIGRE jeAey

vo Buyyom 3 9 -¥ UupUe LinyuE w petod wai pe pos ng tad “""-""-ar weg wma ‘hes (Uy

ngs ey aes sy ii emmcheap hate

ry enon 4 ai pur ener yor vagal Sm ice santlae don eae

2m) rfeng “wnmrom sens wens’ | posiiues 699 hE tue patos ong“ “Ag ‘maasy monn ‘eroug morym ‘VoReIS Hy 1eAeN

peroyny wenn myn woered | sey ‘196 bore ~~ seececccecensss*mg ‘mudepeyyd yodeg Addag jexsy

Siocon woenes 3809 yoefesd esedesd oy wy 3 lang *rneteasecnscense cen

Ra See RSET eet wer en

PeMUALOD—SSEI YVIA WWISKs ONIUNG NOLLVTIVISNI AB SS3IUDOUd 40 LNOd3Y IVANNY -

penugueg—) XIONIddV

e

Sujuyequos Bujyoos “pasnooid Bujoq mou njjns yuersed g’o 2: note te ny " tim ‘AW OAIOSOY AY GADI MO;NM

#UOD yO 19) g Oe Ba) “Ape, yy

" “syue} 13a WO Sjoyuy padrowgng ****"*-*+*- 04 Yoingttig sodyny WdINgsiitd s0,e01H

“po SUE) JON} UO S}ojuj poTsaWIqng “**"*"~-*-++~ “**"*BaN0 ie UEWRLY “props AojsBuyy

“worje20d9 } ypu) Seite, 9° Waa ee CHO “SAYY “wSey A204 HY SMyIy

ere ar NNER lym gwen

saeeeeeseces N ‘wunos "BONEDS B2!04 sy CUNIOY -

eeee ‘a atten ‘Y,

19nj 40, wenn py id mod es wy ydunqsyeid

ae \ouuog @ HV pitng jeuoyjey

tio boseslnd ye MON snyRS MOY ;

“og

: { Pojapoyss ynooseyg

“896T matt Aq vonesode uj oq a peers MII’ “JOVCLOUIIUI-s0p

“POIYS UOHeUIqiUOD 20) B96 dy Ut popieme y2e1}uUG9 LoWjansjsuas pue paysjdums ulicag ‘sno Yg ‘seQUaQ UO BUOY) PUe JUD jerxyNeUdIOY

“L961 48q

“MWOADN POYO}AWIOD “syuey OXes0;s ounosed ‘183-006 ut Souy Padsaugrs jo UoNepc}Suy owees-"=""" "Sst ‘MOG ‘Seg a5104 IY I0|S39y

‘ “696 Ase0 U) Paysaye 9q 0) Sed yesmeu Oo} vorsi0augo jen) coer said uy teed “Seen UiN ‘SuDwO; Wenow loseg — onan?

Woyeidiwes popoedag “ued 9Fre}us Oy JDe/ord Ut Papnjom s¥B wrnjeu o) UerrssAtoD ln *woresg 0210 ‘fh

atweaves } pus wou jue hf un vai t CSRS ae bunt eae, 2004 te ewes

wormede yusid Supojuow as019 ewes a oadomy) Of AY JaAQsom

i 7 wiidel iecuieseg uy pases wht - “se """ssew ‘plojpeg ‘Gy6{ Wid prety woosuey ‘9 )

@ Kensepan uB\s0q ‘s0,e0u19u) 10) poou Soywuswia asny } ry : seesnees""DW ‘sBuldg dwied ‘eseg o2104 ny smoupuy

‘soot te 300 roby pro dole kon ‘peers 8 sexe ston m poMise oocee hy aH) ‘AND so1s80g “seg o2164 sty sjepsyseg

8961 Aine 20) payNpoyrs jnosceyg ‘pepsoY s¥2u0} OU J0YLIEICE vt “ores Ay HOUY 1194 “UOHRIS 69104 HY YeUNOW MoUs

Foy eee reer e == aMol “AND KDI ‘asuquiy Aig x

TISTIINLAND suey “uoners e104 109 Aug even

UE owey ‘o6eg 92104 sy synueyy

“WE “OUNAHOG ‘UONR)S 22105 Hy o1\1AoN0g

WO "SuyqQoy s9UIem ‘seg 82105 11y Suyqoy

Fup veoy Ye papleysy; \Lowd nds Suypuey yse ssajysng ~*---+-<=+--=--==- won aaa Ye

f ;

“Syue) O3es0)¢ an} punosBiapunN » VO ‘A Ai9n0904 JodeA ‘hyunog e1 ewes ‘ 0202 Jiy Bs

“B9GT Uns Aq pojxojdwod aq 0} same edn oun ae ee Meg es 'a8eg 23004 Ny veneroa

POROWANS "E961 1804 Jer8y 104 pojnpayre doys couevawujew aire 4} Huewerosdw ss gitmsawasouss cs Ty “sepuRYD ‘oseg e704 spy SweyM

; PenunUOD—B961 WVIA WISIA ONIUNG NOILVTIVISNI AS SSIUD0Ud 40 L¥Od3¥ TWANNY

penupuey—) KIGNIdd¥

be 304 eee eee wwen ’

pr on 1 ON “8A ‘Mh ‘umowet ow og 1} eos fron

7

a ae Ft

nn Ta eee eas SL ee,

ee se Tey

HqeHEAe epew spun, “rene =" “woul “HIRd jemBO}OOT jovoneN

suonay sourtiesu!

penunwoy—2 XIONIdd¥ -

Decemoer

7 and 8 were instetied and re-

10 electrostetic

ing outzges occurring pony =p tative

construction of electrostatic precipitators. Installation

Ddetween

cecal to Gas wIerway,

five

-1-T i ts

msirection of

th canst

of ef

i

iE

:

i

up-grade the

cont:

nev

imorgvement. al

©

bop af

beter hee heen replaced with

to convert boilers to gas-fe

vieet

a thon toe

on for caovercion of Doiters rom eos’ te

vopy Emer Dr sew Won lsiiseaee guetieed.

Contrast

a

} ee 3:

~~

Drreont nued

Sens torn

Beni

Pro! mimary

tue

Somos

feplecement conttructioa under

re Seren eee Pa

of {rom

Graveings tor ¢

fee

won

Mataliation

ore mace

ie ihection ior

injection syz'0".,

oved 2 ice

aworded for

schedy

ose Seepesead + 2908 04 9 8% 22 ees 28

SES eeeec eee S Seer er ers saree eeee

BESPeeeeeeteee Sees Pe eee reser se

Pe OSS PRPC ETS £4 FS ERS OS TB e SERBS

BERECEECEUCOE MEU EUEeP OCC eee es e.

SESE CR ERE ES ee Te CUR ER RESE EE

BEEP EEC SEC EE Re ee eee at CE RE BEG BB:

SZSSSEeEBeeeS MPEP SSeO SER EKP EEL ee

BSCS SSeeRE sees eeae ieee lr essere

SEGE Ce Paer Tak Meee Pe eee Se BES ee

SECRRCCR CC eee eereent seeues:

Se SESS ESE SES 22SEC R223 23s SS Te

BEevee ere Shim Cees ee sear xe eee?

SEGRE PERSE PSEC EET SESS CEE eee

SSPRRe eee ee ee eee ee oh eee SEES Ry

SESS REPRE RR ERS ShRSROE RRB ERS Reee

Pee

1 ae

jE TaN

SSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSsSSsssss

See footnote at end of table, p. 28.

eeee

see ee

re 2 & ws

seeee

eee

seeee

setre

=<

SSSS5

1501

2B

on

if

ia

oO

bal

ad

| lal tbl

1502

OPERATING FSPERIENCE SITE KET-DOLONITE SCKUBRING

ea ES =e

J. F. McLAUGHLIX, Executive Assistant

Union Electric Company

St. Lovis, Missouri we ou

and

J. JONAKIN, Product Manager

Air Pollution Control Systems

Combustion Engincering, Inc.

Windsor, Connecticut

Presented at

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIATION

ANNUAL MEETING

New York, New York

June 22-26, 1969

ithe tine — cog

2 2. 1503

OPERATING EXPERESNCE STM NET- DeLONiaE. SCRUESING

=

In Septerber 1967, Conbusticen Engineering, Inc. and Union

-Electric Co. announced plans to install a full- scale sulfur

_ dioxide venwest System on ore of the units at Union Electric's

Meramec plant in St. Louis County. The system was developed

by Corbustion Engineering and utilizes limestone or dolomite

injection into the furnace and a wet scrubber for particulate

and sulfur dioxide renova. Results of laboratory tests and

field tests of a pilot system at the St. Clair plant of

Detroit Edison Co. were reported at the American Power Confer-

ence in April, 1967." a

The system was designed and installed on the Meramec Xo. 2

unit during the period October 1967 to June 1968 (Fig. 1).

“Initial operation was deferred until Septeaber 1968 to avoid the

summer high-load period. The system was operated initially

on natural gas beginning September 9, 1968 and initially with

_ €oal on September 19. During the period September 1968 to

‘May 1969, the system operated on coal for 31 days.

Operetion of the systea has revealed problers that were

-not evident during initial experience with the pilot plant at

Detroit: Edison. It is the purpose of this paper to describe

this sounihes experience, the modifications that have been

made to the systen, and the plans and expectations for the piewns.

Description o of Systen

_ A schematic of the sulfur dioxide renova} system is shown

in Fig. 2. Crushed limestone is delivered to the plant by truck

and unloaded into a hepper normally used for rail coal unloacing.

The coal conveyer system is used to transport the limestore to

1504

the No. 2 unit ceal bunker. Buring this eperstien, cea) ¢aanct

te transported to the plant. The Se. 2 bunker hss dcea perti-

tioned to separate the lirestonc above the “a polvericer. fron -

the coal abore the ether three pulverizers, ae oS

The boiler-turbine unit has a nexinus capability of 130-2. ~ |

This” cupacity can be obtained «ith three pulverisers. when the ae : |

‘ pulverizers are in top grinding condiiton. Sone loss. in unit eek

capacity can be expected as the pulverizers wear, since the

fourth pulverizer is used for Linestone. aS ‘ 7 ;

The "A" pulverizer and exhauster systen pulverizes the .

limestone and injects it above the con) flame from ‘the ether

burners. The “a burners have been disconnected from the burner

tilt rechanisn and are fixed in a 15° upvard position, The

electrostatic precipitators have been blanked off with one

half of the Dianking plates at inlet ‘and outlet welded in place

and the other halt being bolted. This is done so that the *

bolted plates can be renoved during 2 short outage and the

gencrating unit operated with flue gas going through ‘the pre- 4

cipitator while modifications are nade to the ‘$0, rereval systen.

A closed Joop, liquid heat exchanger syston is provided to

extract heat from the flue ges ‘ahead of the scrubbers and to

reheat the flue gas after the scrubbers. The system is designed

to reheat the flue gases $0 F for plune sppearance, prisarily.

Txo Xational Dust Collector ‘Hydro-Filter scrubbers are

installed to operate in parallel (Fig. 3). " Power- operated inlet

and outlet denpers are provided for contrel-te naintain 2 minicum

“gas velocity a. the marble bed and for iselation of each —

scrubber. a + Steet ea

1505

Flue’ £38 en sters the scrubbers beneath the rarble bed aad

flows threugh the-bed a20 ou: the top of the scrubber. Kater

_ Sprays are lecated deacath the farbic bed and are eirectcd upxared.

The high-pressure érop through the rarble bed causes the water

‘anak to de brokea up into a turbulent, layer of water mist

~ which traps the particulate matter. Kater and collected particles

, Overflex into drains hich discharge below the bed. A gravity _

drain line ften each scrubber sanage se th: water and collected

particles to the clarifier. — gains:

ep Solids are ‘concentrated in the clerifier and purped to a

P disposal pond. "Most of the | water is ‘clarified and recycled to

"the scrubber. Bias . .

“The flue gases’ "pass jove the aatehe bed through a ieadeaer

and the reheater and then to the copcceemitans 25> fan.

Sebaseed Perfornance

a "Based on the pilot plant experience, Combustion blisivion

“has guaranteed that the air polluticn contro} systen (APCS) would’

perforn as follows: a eee ees se |

“ss ae The sulflr oxides leaving the APCS are equivalent to

burning a fuel containing 0.5% sulfur when sulfur in the fuel

is no greater than 3.4%.

2. The particulate matter ; removal fron the flue gas —e

the APCS will be 998.

“ Qperating Experience

‘il bi

I. D. Fan Inlet ar

The reheater is a finned tube heat exchanger with close

spaced tubes and fins. Cleaning of the heat exchanger was in-

tended te be done by 3 eater wash syster using the scrubber spray

_ +3-

1506

Water. The wash systen consisted of sprays logated abore and

belox the reheater. Originally it was planned that washing

would be done et half load with the scrubber inlet and outlet

dampers closed. The final design was worked out with oa Tine

‘washing planned. — : ~

After spproxinotely 12 hana of senasahial on coal, the

wash systen was operated to determine whether it would function

properly. Sone of the kash water carried over, to the I.D. fans.

-t was “observed to be leaking out of access doors in the fan

inlet boxes. After a few hours, 1.D. fan vibration increased.

Inspection showed a heavy bul dup. of deposits on the fan blades

with a thickness as great as 1 in, in ‘spots. Sand biasting was

required to remove the deposits. ate eh ee a yi 8 ere

It was apparent fron this experience that moisture must

be kept out of the fans. Drains were installed initially on

the fan inlet boxes. These were later changed to an eductor

system. Also, top rehéater sprays would not be used when the

scrubber was on line and botton sprays would ‘be used carefully.

Xo further problems were experienced with fan blade deposits.

Normally there is no moisture carryover from the reheatcr.

Moisture has dlen observed coming fron the inlet box drains.

during start- up and curing — ~fen operation. -

Overflow Drains :

Another early problem. «as the deposit of calcium sulfate

on the overflow drain screens (Fig. 4a). These deposits formed

in 2 short period of time (less then 24 horrs) in sufficient

amount to restrict the water flow and cause a high water leve)

<@s

ce

1507

in she scrubber. The screens were redesigned to ineresse the

the site of openings and were painted vith a polyurethsne coating

which has been found to reduce deposits (Fig. 4b). Frou the

date obtained since making the atove change, this problem scens

“to be solved. | ee yiy Rae ee at |

Marble Bed Plugging Spottt

ae Khen operation of the systen for periods longer than a

7 few one was undertaken, the probdier. of Plugging ‘of the ‘marble

bea was shederee. The. bed would decone inactive at the ges

: inlet end of ‘the scrubber and ‘this would progress until, on

* one occasion, nore than $0% of bed ares became Plugged. High

“velocity in the active portion of the bed would cause carryover

_ of water and solids acpi in Srestise on the donloter and

= the .Teheater. Shas Ra aoa

ts Mode] tests of the scrubber were nade oie ‘Guiectik

Engineering first using a water table and later or _using a three-

dimensional air-flow node. Poor gas distribution was found

| “—0) Salustrated in the photograph of the water table in Fig. Sa.

A series of ladder vanes, denoastrated by node} tests,

corrected the"gas distribution problem (Fig. Sd). These vere

instedied and the scrubber systen was operated for six days

. without bed Plugging. ‘It. would appear that this. probiem has been

corrected, although a Jenger period of operation is needed to

be certain. : ‘

yen As previously described, the marble bed plugging caused

| Carryever of water and solids to the denister and reheater.

-$-

ees gems es ,

As a result, the reheaters of beth scrubbers becaze severely

; pleserd SO that the APCS was Aneywrabie.. Efforts to 1c10ve

‘ deposits ty sand? lasti

This text is long and has been trimmed here. Open the source document for the complete record.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.

Appendix — United States v. General Dynamics Corp. · 415 U.S. 486 | Frix