Case law

Opinion No. 76-146 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 24, 1976

If not, the Act would be a local or special law within the prohibition of Section 46 of Article V. See, Tulsa Exposition and Fair Board Corp. v. Board of County Commissioners, 468 P.2d 501 (Okl. 1970); Williams v. … Johnson, 396 P.2d 518 (Okl. 1964); Haas v. Nolloman, 327 P.2d 655 (Okl. 1958); Oklahoma City v. Excise Board of Oklahoma County, 193 Okl. 189 , 141 P.2d 805 (1943); Thompson v.

McCaig, Ronnie v. LENNOX HEARTH PRODUCTS, INC.

2020 TN WC 92 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 17, 2020

In Baumgardner v. United Parcel Serv., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

Williams, Judy v. Tennessee Farmers Cooperative Risk Management d/b/a Smoky Mountain Farmers Cooperative

2024 TN WC App. 29 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 25, 2024

For example, in Mackie v. … Id. at 556; see also Cantrell v.

Opinion No. 80-072 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 7, 1980

See In re Block 1, Donly Heights Addition, 194 Okl. 221 , 149 P.2d 265 , (1944); Wright v. State, 192 Okl. 493 , 137 P.2d 796 (1943), and Ward v. State, 176 Okl. 368 , 56 P.2d 136 (1936). … Board of Education of City of Tulsa v. Morley, 168 Okl. 259 , 34 P.2d 258 (1934).

Holland v. Harris County

102 S.W.2d 196 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 10, 1937

The constitutionality of this article was upheld in the case of Jones v. Alexander, supra. … judges who were not members of such a board; and not as mere additional compensation paid t.o such judges for services as members of the juvenile board.

Fuller v. El Paso Times Co.

236 S.W. 455 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 4, 1922

Among his citations was the case of Boyd v. Beville, 91 Tex. 439 , 44 S. W. 287 , wherein our Supreme Court, in an opinion also written by' Judge Brown, shortly before his opinion in Lumber Co. v. … The case just quoted was cited with approval and followed by Judge Brown in case of Boyd v. Beville, 91 Tex. 439 , 44 S. W. 287 . Other authorities to the same effect are: Cotter, Trulove & Co. v.

Bottoms, Hope v. Roy Midgett d/b/a Midgett Farm Country Restaurant

2019 TN WC 171 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 26, 2019

To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1. … The appealing party has fifteen calendar days after the date of that notice to submit a brief to the Appeals Board. See the Practices and Procedures of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board.

Williamson, Rosalind v. Professional Care Services

2018 TN WC App. 40 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 13, 2018

Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 250 (Tenn. 2015); McBee v. CSX Transp., Inc., No. W2015-01253-COA-R3-CV, 2017 Tenn. App. LEXIS 129, *14 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2017). … Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility of the Sup. Ct. of Tenn., 301 S.W.3d 603, 615 (Tenn. 2010).

Galloway Township v. Dorflinger

2 N.J. Tax 358 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 31, 1981

Co. v. … In Bayonne v.

Ruanova, Guillermo v. Western Express, Inc.

2018 TN WC 82 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 13, 2018

RUANOVA, ) Docket No. 2016-06-1925 ) Docket No. 2017-06-1668 Employee, ) v. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Qualls, Steven v. Federal Mogul

2023 TN WC App. 8 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Mar 7, 2023

Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). However, “[n]o similar deference need be afforded the trial court’s findings based upon documentary evidence.” Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., No. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

Opinion No. 79-143 (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 5, 1979

Barnes v. Transok Pipeline, Okl., 549 P.2d 819 (1976). Furthermore, where the performance of a statutory requirement is mandatory there can be no compliance except in accordance with the particular provision. Oldham v. … Thus, a board of County Commissioners is authorized to make such finding of vacancy and shall formalize their findings by order or resolution.

Valentine v. Valentine

4 Redf. 265 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 15, 1880

The second exception should be overruled, for the reason that when the decedent was asked to pay board she did not deny her liability or refuse to pay, but recognized the liability, and promised to pay. … (See Bowen v. Bowen, 2 Bradf., 336 , and cases there cited.)

Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. Village Mills Co.

241 S.W. 122 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 10, 1922

Brown, August 10, 1849; Mary Brown Frazier and husband to T. J. Word, deed dated January 19, 1855; T. J. Word to George F. Moore, December 8, 1858; George F. Moore to Susan B. Moore, December 7, 18⅞0; T. J. … We seriously doubt the admissibility of this testimony as to the general reputation and activities of Brown.

Opinion No. (1991) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 29, 1991

ATTORNEY GENERAL LOVING HAS ASKED ME TO RESPOND TO YOUR LETTER SEEKING A FORMAL OPINION ON THE APPLICABILITY OF CHISOLM V. ROEMER, 501 U.S., 111 S.CT., 115 L.ED.2D 348 (1991), AND HOUSTON LAWYERS ASSOCIATION V. … SANCHEZ V. BOND, 875 F.2D 1488, 1492 (10TH CIR. 1989).

Dix, Jr., Jimmy v. Nyrstar Clarksville, Inc.

2021 TN WC 222 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 2, 2021

The Appeals Board has stated that “parties and their lawyers cannot rely solely on their own medical interpretations of the evidence to successfully support their arguments.” Lurz v. Int’l Paper Co., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. … In Limberakis v. Pro-Tech Security, Inc., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 53 (Sept. 12, 2017), the Appeals Board affirmed the trial court’s decision to award additional medical benefits.

In re the Estate of Morrison

130 Misc. 438 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 25, 1927

(See, also, Plummer v. Coler, 178 U. S. 115 .) … (Matter of Montefiore Home v. Prendergast, 159 App. Div. 644 ; affd., 211 N. Y. 549 .) Submit order on notice modifying the taxing order in accordance with this decision. J

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 16, 1981

OPINION — AG — *** RETIREMENT SYSTEM — CREDITABLE MILITARY SERVICE *** THE GOVERNING BOARDS OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS WITHIN THIS STATE ARE 'NOT' REQUIRED TO INCLUDE THE YEARS OF CREDITABLE MILITARY SERVICE PROVIDED FOR IN LAWS … GIVENS) == SEE: 769 P.2d 1302 (1988), ALLEN V. STATE EX REL BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM RETIREMENT SYSTEM FOR JUSTICE AND JUDGES

Di Yan, Jian v. Neng Yuan Lan, d/b/a China King

2023 TN WC 12 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 6, 2023

Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2022); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Axelrod v. Various Tenants

123 Misc. 2d 922 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Apr 19, 1984

board), or other authority, acting pursuant to state or local law as it affects projects covered by this subpart.” … In City of Boston v Harris (619 F2d 87), the City of Boston challenged the HUD regulations which preempted all local rent-control laws as applied to Federally insured subsidized projects.