Opinion

Ruanova, Guillermo v. Western Express, Inc.

  • 2018 TN WC 82
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Jun 13, 2018
Status
Published
On the bench
Joshua Davis Baker
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

Jun 13, 2018

09:58 AM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT NASHVILLE

GUILLERMO A. RUANOVA, ) Docket No. 2016-06-1925

) Docket No. 2017-06-1668

Employee, )

v. ) State File No. 33552-2015

) State File No. 69245-2017

WESTERN EXPRESS, INC., )

)

Employer. ) Judge Joshua Davis Baker

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

TEMPORARY DISABILITY AND MEDICAL BENEFITS

At an Expedited Hearing on May 23, 2018, Mr. Ruanova requested temporary

disability and medical benefits for two work injuries: a fall from the sleeping berth of a

Western Express truck and a motor vehicle accident that occurred six days later. Western

Express asserted it provided medical treatment for Mr. Ruanova’s injuries, and that no

treatment is currently recommended by a treating physician. It further asserted it owes

Mr. Ruanova no temporary disability benefits. For the reasons below, the Court denies

Mr. Ruanova’s request for temporary disability and medical benefits.

History of Claim

Mr. Ruanova worked as a trainee driver for Western Express. On March 25, 2015,

while he rested in a truck’s sleeping berth, the driver of the truck slammed on the brake,

causing Mr. Ruanova to fall, injuring his neck and back. Six days later, Mr. Ruanova

alleged his neck and back injuries worsened when another vehicle collided with the back

of his Western Express trailer.

Western Express provided treatment for Mr. Ruanova’s injuries. Following initial

treatment at Nashville General Hospital, Mr. Ruanova saw Dr. Joseph Benson, who

1

assigned work restrictions and treated Mr. Ruanova for a thoracic and cervical strain. Dr.

Benson then referred Mr. Ruanova to a neurologist.

Western Express provided a panel of neurologists from which Mr. Ruanova

selected Dr. W. Garrison Strickland. At the first appointment, Dr. Strickland noted Mr.

Ruanova’s complaints of “headache, neck pain, bilateral shoulder pain, left elbow pain,

mid back pain and low back pain.” Dr. Strickland added, “[S]tates he hurts all over.”

The medical record reflects that Mr. Ruanova fully explained both accidents to Dr.

Strickland. Dr. Strickland ordered MRIs and referred Mr. Ruanova to Dr. Mitchell K.

Schwaber to treat his dizziness. After an EEG proved normal, Dr. Schwaber released Mr.

Ruanova from his care without restrictions.

After diagnostic testing, Dr. Strickland noted “no significant abnormalities” from

the “MRI brain, MRI C-spine, MRI T-spine and MRI L-spine.” On August 31, Dr.

Strickland recommended Mr. Ruanova return to work without restrictions. In November,

he released Mr. Ruanova from his care and indicated he would see him as-needed.

Almost a year later, Mr. Ruanova’s former counsel wrote Dr. Strickland to ask

whether Mr. Ruanova’s initial injuries “were more likely than not aggravated by his

motor vehicle accident on March 31, 2015.” Dr. Strickland said no.

In December 2016, Western Express provided another panel of neurologists, and

Mr. Ruanova selected Dr. Steven Graham. Dr. Graham concluded Mr. Ruanova reached

maximum medical improvement, retained no permanent neurological impairment, and

needed no work restrictions. He noted Mr. Ruanova’s complaints of recurrent neck, back

and shoulder pain, but found no “neurological exam abnormalities . . . no loss of motor

strength, no loss of balance, and no loss of sensory function.” Dr. Graham recommended

no additional treatment.

Mr. Ruanova acknowledged that Western Express paid for all of his medical

treatment and also paid him a higher wage on light duty than he earned pre-injury.

Western Express terminated Mr. Ruanova shortly after Dr. Strickland released him to

work full duty.1

Legal Principles and Analysis

Mr. Ruanova has the burden to prove every element of his claim but need not

prove every element of his claim by a preponderance of the evidence to receive relief at

an expedited hearing. Instead, Mr. Ruanova must present sufficient evidence that he

1

Western Express’s counsel elicited testimony during cross-examination to explain Mr. Ruanova’s

termination. However, the Court declines to address whether Mr. Ruanova was terminated for cause, as

Dr. Strickland had released him to work full-duty at the time of his termination.

2

would likely prevail at a hearing on the merits. McCord v. Advantage Human

Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

At the hearing, Mr. Ruanova sought compensation for his employer’s negligence

in handling his injuries. However, the exclusive remedies provided by the Workers’

Compensation Law prohibit Mr. Ruanova from recovering damages for negligence from

his employer, Western Express. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-108(a) (“The rights and

remedies granted to an employee subject to this chapter , on account of personal injury or

death by accident . . . shall exclude all other rights and remedies of the employee[.] ”).

Western Express argued that Mr. Ruanova’s March 31 injury is barred by the

statute of limitations. However, it did not raise that issue in the Dispute Certification

Notice. “Unless permission has been granted by the assigned workers’ compensation

judge, only issues that have been certified by a workers compensation mediator within a

dispute certification notice may be presented . . . for adjudication.” Id. at § 50-6-

239(b)(1). Thus, the Court will not address the statute of limitations defense.

An employer is required to provide injured workers “such medical and surgical

treatment . . . as ordered by the attending physician . . . made reasonably necessary by

accident.” Id. at § 50-6-204(a)(1)(A). Likewise, employees are required to “accept the

medical benefits afforded under this section” provided that the “employee has suffered an

injury and expressed a need for medical care” and selected a treating physician from the

employer’s panel. Id. at § 50-6-204(a)(3)(A)(i). When the selected physician refuses to

see the employee for his continuing symptoms, the employer is required to provide a new

authorized treating physician. See Limberakis v. Pro-Tech Sec., Inc., 2017 TN Wrk.

Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 53 (Sept. 12, 2017).

Here, the Court finds Western Express provided Mr. Ruanova with the benefits

that the law entitled him to receive. It provided him with several panels for treatment of

his injury, and the treating doctors all treated and released Mr. Ruanova without

assigning restrictions or impairment ratings. The doctors also did not instruct him to

return for additional care. Accordingly, while Mr. Ruanova has the right to reasonable

and necessary medical treatment for his injuries, no physician has recommended

additional treatment at this time. The Court declines to substitute its judgment

concerning Mr. Ruanova’s need for additional care for that of trained physicians.

Therefore, Mr. Ruanova’s request for additional medical treatment is denied.

As for temporary disability benefits, Mr. Ruanova acknowledged earning more

money while on restricted duty than he earned at the time of his injury. He received pay

at this greater rate until his termination, which occurred after Dr. Strickland released him

to return to full-duty work. Thus, Western Express paid him more money in wages

during his period of disability than the lesser amount required under the Workers’

3

Compensation Law. Therefore, Mr. Ruanova’s request for temporary disability benefits

is denied.

It is ORDERED as follows:

1. Mr. Ruanova’s request for temporary disability and medical benefits is denied

at this time.

2. This matter is set for a Scheduling Hearing on July 23, 2018, at 10:30 a.m.

(CDT). The parties or their counsel must call (615) 741-2113 or (855) 874-

0474 toll-free to participate. Failure to call may result in determination of

issues without that party’s participation.

3. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed,

compliance with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from

the date of entry of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated

section 50-6-239(d)(3). The Insurer or Self-Insured Employer must submit

confirmation of compliance with this Order to the Bureau by email to

WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the seventh business day after

entry of this Order. Failure to submit the necessary confirmation within the

period of compliance may result in a penalty assessment for non-compliance.

For questions regarding compliance, please contact the Workers’

Compensation Compliance Unit via email WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov.

ENTERED JUNE 13, 2018.

______________________________________

Judge Joshua Davis Baker

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

4

APPENDIX

Exhibits:

1. Affidavit of Guillermo Ruanova

2. Medical Records

3. Causation Letter from Dr. Strickland

4. First Reports of Injury

5. Panel Selection Forms

6. Driver’s Comments

7. Wage Statement

8. Employment Application

Technical Record:

1. Petitions for Benefit Determination

2. Dispute Certification Notices

3. Requests for Expedited Hearing

5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of this Expedited Hearing Order was sent to

the following recipients by the following methods of service on June ___,13th 2018

Name Certified Fax Email Service sent to:

Mail

Guillermo A. Ruanova, X natcheztraceins.@comcast.net

Self-represented

Employee

Rachel Hogan, X rhogan@ortalekelley.com;

Employer’s Attorney dsaulters@ortalekelley.com

______________________________________

PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

6

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal,” and file the

form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven

business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice

of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten

calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at

any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the

alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s

website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-

completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of

Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will

result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request

from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of

the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file

it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of

Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both

parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of

the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’

Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the

Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof

concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be

a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten

business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The

party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business

days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a

statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the

expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of

the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an

argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

Filed Date Stamp Here EXPEDITED HEARING NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Division of Workers' Compensation

Docket#: - - - -- -- - --

www.tn.go v/labor-wfd/wcomp.shtm l

State File #/YR: - - -- - - --

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

1-800-332-2667 RFA#: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____ _

Date of Injury: - - - -- - - - -

SSN: _______ _ ______ __

Employee

Employer and Carrier

Notice

Noticeisg~enthat _ _ _ _ _ _ _~~--~~~~---~~~--------~

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies) on separate sheet if necessary]

appeals the order(s) of the Court of Workers' Compensation Claims at _ __

-~~~-----~~~~~~~~-to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board .

[List the date(s) the order(s) was filed in the court clerk's office]

Judge___________________________________________

Statement of the Issues

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

Additional Information

Type of Case [Check the most appropriate item]

D Temporary disability benefits

D Medical benefits for current injury

D Medical benefits under prior order issued by the Court

List of Parties

Appellant (Requesting Party): _____________ .A t Hearing: DEmployer DEmployee

Address:. _______________________ ______________ ___________

Party's Phone:.____________________________ Email: _________________________

Attorney's Name:________________________________ ___ BPR#: - - - - - - - - - - - -

Attorney's Address:. _ _ _ _ _~~-~~~~----~~---- Phone:

Attorney's City, State & Zip code: _____________________ ___________ _ _ _ __ _

Attorney's Email :_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

*Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant*

LB-1099 rev.4/15 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: - - - -- - - -- - - - SF#: _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ DO l: _ __ _ __

Aopellee(s)

Appellee (Opposing Party): _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.At Hearing: OEmployer DEmployee

Appellee's Address: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Appellee's Phone:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.Email:_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __

Attorney's Name:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ BPR#: - - - - - - - -

Attorney's Address:._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone:

Attorney's City, State & Zip code: - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -

Attorney's Email:._ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, certify that I have forwarded a true and exact copy of this

Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal by First Class, United States Mail, postage prepaid, to all parties

and/or their attorneys in this case in accordance with Rule 0800-02-22.01(2) of the Tennessee Rules of

Board of Workers' Compensation Appeals on this the day of__, 20_ .

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev.4/1S Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

.

ll .I

Tennessee Bureau of Workers' Compensation

220 French Landing Drive, 1-B

Nashville, TN 37243-1002

800-332-2667

AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY

I, , having been duly sworn according to law, make oath that

because of my poverty, I am unable to bear the costs of this appeal and request that the filing fee to appeal be

waived. The following facts support my poverty.

1. Full Name:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 2. Address: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

3. Telephone Number: - - - - - - - - - 4. Date of Birth: - - - - - - - - - - -

5. Names and Ages of All Dependents:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - --

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

6. I am employed by: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , -

My employer's address is: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

My employer's phone number is: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

7. My present monthly household income, after federal income and social security taxes are deducted, is:

$ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___

8. I receive or expect to receive money from the following sources:

AFDC $ per month beginning

SSI $ per month beginning

Retirement $ per month beginning

Disability $ per month beginning

Unemployment $ per month beginning

Worker's Camp.$ per month beginning

Other $ per month beginning

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082

9. My expenses are: ' ; !•

'

Rent/House Payment $ per month Medical/Dental $ per month

Groceries $ per month Telephone $ per month

Electricity $ per month School Supplies $ per month

Water $ per month Clothing $ per month

Gas $ per month Child Care $ per month

Transportation $ per month Child Support $ per month

Car $ per month

Other $ per month (describe:

10. Assets:

Automobile $ _ _ __ _

(FMV) - - - - - -- - - -

Checking/Savings Acct. $ _ _ _ __

House $ _ _ _ __

(FMV) - - -- - - -- - -

)

Other $ _ _ _ __ Describe:_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __

11. My debts are:

Amount Owed To Whom

I hereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing answers are true, correct, and complete

and that I am financially unable to pay the costs of this appeal.

APPELLANT

Sworn and subscribed before me, a notary public, this

_ _ _ dayof _____________ ,20____

NOTARY PUBLIC

My Commission Expires:_ _ _ _ _ __ _

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.