Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFD

10,000+ results

1.34s

  • Hankison v. Board of Prison Terms

    768 F. Supp. 720 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 27, 1991

    In Townsend v. … Brown, 417 F.Supp. 340 (E.D.Pa.1976). 8 This Court also cannot ignore the probable existence of pressures upon Myklyn to help the father she still professes to love. See Iowa v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • McKelvie v. Brown

    District Court, D. South Carolina · May 29, 2024

    Brown, Defendant. … See Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Escambia County Board of Education v. Benton

    406 F. Supp. 2d 1248 · District Court, S.D. Alabama · Dec 23, 2005

    B. v. … Dukes v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Weaver v. Madison City Board of Education

    947 F. Supp. 2d 1308 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · May 29, 2013

    Coffee County Board of Education, No. 87-D-1095-S, 1988 WL 214509 (M.D.Ala. Jan. 15, 1988); Coleman v. Lowndes County Board of Education, No. 88-V-220-N (M.D.Ala. May 5, 1988). Rolin v. … Co. v. County Board of Education, 217 Ala. 565 , 117 So. 163 (1928).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brantley

    District Court, S.D. Georgia · May 5, 2025

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION PATRICK BROWN, ) Petitioner, v. … For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, and in consideration of the standards enunciated in Slack v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Grutka v. National Labor Relations Board

    409 F. Supp. 133 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Feb 12, 1976

    Mitchell v. Donovan, 398 U.S. 427 , 90 S.Ct. 1763 , 26 L.Ed.2d 378 (1970); Swift & Co. v. Wickham, 382 U.S. 111 , 86 S.Ct. 258 , 15 L.Ed.2d 194 (1965); and Phillips v. … Jameson and Co. v. Morgenthau, 307 U.S. 171 , 59 S.Ct. 804 , 83 L.Ed. 1189 (1938); National Student Association v. Hershey, 134 U.S.App.D.C. 56 , 412 F.2d 1103 (1969); Sardino v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Barker

    District Court, D. South Carolina · May 16, 2024

    Brown (“Plaintiff” or “Brown”), proceeding pro se, brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging Defendant Karen W. … Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (2005) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Anderson v. Brown

    District Court, D. South Carolina · May 15, 2024

    Anderson v. Brown, No. 23-7152, 2024 WL 1736711, at *1 (4th Cir. Apr. 23, 2024) (unpublished). … See Langford v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Cowan

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · May 7, 2025

    Corp. v. … See e.g., Marion v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. English

    District Court, N.D. Indiana · Apr 28, 2025

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). Brown is proceeding without counsel, and therefore the Court must give his allegations liberal construction. Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007). … Board v. Farnham, 394 F.3d 469, 478 (7th Cir. 2005) (cleaned up).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Davis

    District Court, S.D. Texas · Mar 30, 2021

    Nos. 8-1, 8-2); Brown v. State, No. 13-17-00339-CR, 2018 WL 6626731 (Tex. App. – Corpus Christi-Edinburg, Dec. 19, 2018, no pet.). … See Victor v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Monsalud

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 27, 2024

    Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976). … Giles v. Kearney, 571 F.3d 318, 330 (3d Cir. 2009).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rice Corp. v. Grain Board of Iraq

    582 F. Supp. 2d 1309 · District Court, E.D. California · Sep 30, 2008

    See generally Universe Sales Co., Ltd. v. … Plaintiff argued for the first time during oral argument that the “substantial compliance” standard applies to service of process on the Grain Board. See Straub v. A P Green, Inc., 38 F.3d 448 (9th Cir.1994).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Trudeau v. New York State Consumer Protection Board

    237 F.R.D. 325 · District Court, N.D. New York · Jul 21, 2006

    On August 11, 2005, a Complaint was filed in this matter based upon the allegation that *329 the New York State Consumer Protection Board (“CPB”) threatened to contact certain television stations in regards to Plaintiff Trudeau … Hamm v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Mang v. Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 14, 2023

    ) Civil Action No. 23-cv-02283 (TSC) ) MUNICIPAL SECURITIES ) RULEMAKING BOARD, ) … See Vanzant v. Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth., 557 F. Supp. 2d 113, 117 (D.D.C. 2008) (“The WCA is the exclusive remedy for a workplace injury.”) (citing D.C. Code § 32-1504(a)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Rayford

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Mar 21, 2025

    Faheem-El v. Klincar, 841 F.2d 712, 717 (7th Cir. 1988). … AM General Corp. v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 311 F.3d 796, 804 (7th Cir. 2002).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Angie

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Mar 21, 2025

    Faheem-El v. Klincar, 841 F.2d 712, 717 (7th Cir. 1988). … AM General Corp. v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 311 F.3d 796, 804 (7th Cir. 2002).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Alaska Industrial Board

    17 Alaska 658 · District Court, D. Alaska · Aug 2, 1958

    Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Alaska Industrial Board, 9 Cir., 1951, 13 Alaska 401 , 191 F.2d 262 , certiorari denied 1952, 342 U.S. 913 , 72 S.Ct. 359 , 96 L.Ed. 683 . In Gorman v. … State Industrial Board Accident Commission, 1940, 163 Or. 492 , 98 P.2d 714 ; In re Iles, 1941, 56 Wyo. 443 , 110 P.2d 826 ; Byouk v. Industrial Commission of Colorado, 1940, 106 Colo. 430 , 105 P.2d *668 1087 ; Geis v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Franks

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 2024

    Pa. 2014) (“The use of a Taser during an arrest, especially when the suspect is resisting arrest, may be reasonable.”); Brown v. Cwynar, 484 F. … XI; Idaho v. Coeur d’Alene Tribe of Idaho, 521 U.S. 261, 267-68 (1997); Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1, 10 (1890). 67 Will v. Mich.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Brown-Adaska Co.

    4 Alaska 89 · District Court, D. Alaska · Apr 28, 1910

    Ed. 130 ; Unit *92 ed States v. Kenworthy; 68 bed. 904, 908, 16 C. C. A. 61 ; United States v. Tiffany & Co., 151 Fed. 473, 474 , 81 C. C. A. 11 ; United States v. Mexican International Ry. … On October 18, 1906, the importers appealed from the decision of the general appraiser to the board of general appraisers.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.