Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,323 results
1.16s
BROWN v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 2024
Brown’s “Appeal of Magistrate Judge’s Order (Doc. 475),” denying Mr. Brown’s Motion Stay (Doc. 469). ECF No. 476. In denying Mr. … Brown’s extensions, but has now determined that it is time for this case to proceed to the next stage. The Courts finds no error in this conclusion. See Santos v. United States, 655 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBROWN v. STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION- ALBION
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 2024
BROWN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) … See, e.g., See Wareham v. Jeffes, 564 A.2d 1314 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1989); William v. Syed, 782 A.2d 1090, 1096 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2001); Watson v. Caleb, No. 385 MDA 2019, 2019 WL 3763967, at *1 n. 2 (Pa. Super. Ct.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBROWN v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-SOMERSET
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 19, 2023
They show that the Common Pleas Court denied Brown’s PCRA petition and that in May 2022 the Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed that decision. Commonwealth v. Brown, 279 A.3d 1283 (Pa. Super. Ct. May 25, 2022). … Brown is proceeding pro se and is solely responsible for his own conduct. See, e.g., Emerson v. Thiel Coll., 296 F.3d 184, 190 (3d Cir. 2002); Winston v. Lindsey, No. 1:09-cv-224, 2011 WL 6000991, *2 (W.D. Pa.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBROWN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 2023
Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011). See also Rutherford v. Barnhart, 399 F.3d 546, 553 (3d Cir. 2005) (holding that remand is not necessary where the error would not affect the outcome of the case). … V.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBROWN v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 9, 2023
For example, in Hinton v. … V.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBROWN v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 14, 2022
Ctr. v. Sullivan, 183 F.R.D. 119, 127 (D.N.J. 1998). motions. Such a decision as to when that occurs is committed to the discretion of the Magistrate Judge. … Brown’s Appeal is denied. For primarily the same reasons, Mr. Brown also, or alternatively, seeks a stay of this action.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBROWN v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 2022
Lescinsky v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist., 539 F. Supp. 3d 1121, 1125 (D. Nev. 2021) (citing Flam v. Flam, 788 F.3d 1043, 1046 (9th Cir. 2015)). … Ctr. v. Sullivan, 183 F.R.D. 119, 127 (D.N.J. 1998). The Court finds that the Magistrate Judge’s Order is not clearly erroneous, contrary to law, or an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, Mr.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBROWN v. SAINT VINCENT HEALTH CENTER
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 2022
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JIMMY LEE BROWN, ) Plaintiff ) C.A. … See Kier v. F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBROWN v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 2021
Anderson v. City of Bessemer, 470 U.S. 564, 573 (1985) (citing United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364 (1948)). … Ctr. v. Sullivan, 183 F.R.D. 119, 127 (D.N.J. 1998).
Cited 0 timesUnknownBROWN v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 2021
Lazaridis v. Wehmer, 591 F.3d 666, 669 (3d Cir. 2010) (citing North River Ins. Co. v. CIGNA Reinsurance Co., 52 F.3d 1194, 1218 (3d Cir. 1995)). … Prusky v. Phoenix Life Ins. Co., 2003 WL 22597610, *2 (E.D.Pa. Nov 04, 2003), citing Glendon Energy Co. v. Borough of Glendon, 836 F.Supp. 1109, 1122 (E.D.Pa.1993).
Cited 0 timesUnknownGIBBS v. PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 2025
Heacock v. … Brown y. Pennsylvania Board of Parole, 309 F. Supp. 886 (E.D. Pa. 1970); Gomori v. Maroney, 300 F.2d 755 (3d Cir. 1962). Accordingly, Gibbs’ claims are meritless, and his petition will be denied.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 25, 2025
Id The Order further stated that, “within twenty-one (21) days of service of this Order, the Pennsylvania Parole Board shall file the Answer on behalf of all Respondents.” … See Bolden v, Se. Pennsylvania Transp.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLocal Union 396, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board
421 U.S. 976 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 19, 1975
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textBROWN v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 2021
Palmore v. Hornberger, 813 F. App’x 68, 70 (3d Cir. 2020) (quoting Rauser v. … Palmore v. Hornberger, 813 F. App’x 68, 71 (3d Cir. 2020). 7 Citing Cochran v. Morris, 73 F.3d 1310, 1317 (4th Cir. 1996); Woods v. Smith, 60 F.3d 1161, 1166 (5th Cir. 1995); and Colon v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBROWN v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 2, 2021
Anderson v. City of Bessemer, 470 U.S. 564, 573 (1985) (citing United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364 (1948)). … Ctr. v. Sullivan, 183 F.R.D. 119, 127 (D.N.J. 1998). cc: Alton D.
Cited 0 timesUnknown33 F. 599 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 1887
“To Brown & Lambie, Attys., Fifth Ave., Pitts., Pa.: Our board have agreed to accept the proposition of L. B. Duff, assignee of Carrier & Baum. “J. W. Reilly, Prest.” … The board of directors of the bank never approved or ratified the agreement of March 31, 1884, nor was any action with respect to it taken by the board.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 2025
ORDER Derrick Hampton (“Petitioner”) is a state prisoner who is seeking federal habeas relief from the decision of Respondent Pennsylvania Parole Board … Bracy v. Gramley, 520 U.S. 899, 904 (1997). See also Harris v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWelch v. Board of Directors of Wildwood Golf Club
904 F. Supp. 438 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 1995
PRELIMINARY FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW In connection with said referral, the Court makes the following preliminary Findings of Fact that Defendants, Board of Directors of Wildwood Golf Club and Board of Directors … Hutchinson v. Staton, 994 F.2d 1076, 1081 (4th Cir.1993). 11. Counsel are properly compensated for time spent litigating a fee petition. Keenan v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFITZGERALD v. PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 2025
Kelly V. ) ) Re: ECF No. 8 PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD, and ) WARDEN JOE DEMORE, ) … See also Burns v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHaggerty v. Selective Service System, Local Board No. 15
325 F. Supp. 69 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 1971
It is argued that, under Mulloy v. … See also United States v. Ford, supra. I disagree.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna