Opinion

BROWN v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.

Court
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Filed
Jun 14, 2022
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 29.3%

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ALTON D. BROWN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) Civil No. 16-cv-1680

)

WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Before the Court is Alton D. Brown’s “Appeal to U.S. District Judge From Magistrate’s

Discovery Order Dated 5/18/2022; and Motion for Stay.” ECF No. 375. Magistrate Judge Eddy

issued a Scheduling Order setting a briefing schedule for Motions for Summary Judgment. ECF

No. 374. Judge Eddy also Ordered that discovery in the case was closed and further requests for

discovery would be stricken. Id. Mr. Brown appears to challenge the Scheduling Order for two

reasons: (i) he has been unable to complete discovery due to Defendants attacks and sabotage;

and (ii) he is in an unfair position due to mental and physical injuries inflicted upon him by

Defendants.

The Magistrate Judge’s Order is non-dispositive, and since it involves management of the

case, the Magistrate Judge is authorized to use her discretion.1 In a case that has been in

litigation this long, eventually the time comes to close discovery and proceed to dispositive

1 The standard of review of a non-dispositive matter is whether the decision is “clearly erroneous or contrary to

law.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), accord Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) (referring to “a pretrial matter not dispositive of a

party’s claim or defense”). “Where a magistrate judge is authorized to exercise his or her discretion, the decision

will be reversed only for an abuse of that discretion.” Cooper Hosp./Univ. Med. Ctr. v. Sullivan, 183 F.R.D. 119,

127 (D.N.J. 1998).

motions. Such a decision as to when that occurs is committed to the discretion of the Magistrate

Judge. The Court finds that the Magistrate Judge’s Order is not clearly erroneous, contrary to

law, or an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, Mr. Brown’s Appeal is denied.

For primarily the same reasons, Mr. Brown also, or alternatively, seeks a stay of this

action. The decision as to whether a stay is warranted at this time is a matter best decided by the

Magistrate Judge. Therefore, Mr. Brown’s motion for a stay as appearing on pages 6 through 8

of ECF No. 375, is referred to the Magistrate Judge for resolution.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of June 2022.

prhy. yAora—

Marilyn J. Hora

United States District Court Judge

cc: Alton D. Brown, pro se

DL-4686

SCI Fayette

48 Overlook Drive

LaBelle, PA 15450-1050

(via U.S. First Class Mail)

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.