Case law

Hughes v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 7, 2019

See, e.g., Brown v. First Nationwide Mortg. Corp., 206 F. … (quoting Brown v. Dayton, 89 Ohio St.3d 245, 248 (2000)). Generally, a mutuality of interest in effectuating a foreclosure is sufficient. See, e.g., Smith v. Lerner, Sampson & Rothfuss, L.P.A., 658 F.

Harris v. Hunt

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 31, 2022

Motley, 526 F.3d 921, 925 (6th Cir. 2008) (finding the district court may sua sponte dismiss a complaint under Section 1915(e)(2) as time-barred where, as here, the defect is obvious on the face of the pleading); Browning … v.

Kayyali v. American Arbitration Association, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 6, 2021

: Case No. 1:21-cv-718 Plaintiffs, : OPINION AND ORDER : [Resolving Docs. 4 & 8] v … To ensure the independence and impartiality of arbitrators’ quasi-judicial role, arbitrators and the boards that employ them are entitled to immunity from suit for “all acts within the scope of the arbitral process

Paglio

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 3, 2026

Heyman v. Lincoln Nat’l Life Ins. Co., 781 App’x 463, 471 (6th Cir. 2019) (quoting Hayes v. Equitable Energy Res. Co., 266 F.3d 560, 572 (6th Cir. 2001)). … Residence Hall Fines $50.00 Art Fee $50.00 Block Tuition $14,082.00 Room and Board

Reichelderfer

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 10, 2026

Harrington, 562 U.S. at 102-03 (citation 10 modified); see also Brown v. … Pulley v. Harris, 465 U.S. 37, 41 (1984); Estelle v.

Soto-Garcia

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 16, 2025

Alexander v. N. Bureau of Prisons, 419 F. App’x 544, 545 (6th Cir. 2011) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 2243; Allen v. … Inst., Walpole v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 455, 105 S. Ct. 2768, 2774, 86 L. Ed. 2d 356 (1985). “Some evidence” is “any evidence in the record that could support the conclusion reached by the disciplinary board.”

Dartron Corp. v. Uniroyal Chemical Co., Inc.

893 F. Supp. 730 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 11, 1995

United States v. … Co. v. B.J. Carney & Co., 797 F.Supp. 1472, 1488 (D.Minn.1992) (allowing trespass and nuisance claims premised on environmental contamination against owner of adjacent property); Brown v. Scioto Cty.

Sullivan

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 4, 2026

Harrington, 562 U.S. at 102-03; see also Brown v. Davenport, 596 U.S. 118, 133 (2022) (internal quotation omitted). … Sullivan denied shooting the victim and claimed that police coerced his confession by showing him a loaded weapon and writing down on a white board what police wanted Sullivan to say.

Burris v. Williams

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 10, 2020

Hilton v. Braunskill, 481 U.S. 770, 775, 107 S. Ct. 2113, 95 L. Ed. 2d 724 (1987); see also Allen v. … This standard is satisfied where “there is any evidence in the record that could support the conclusion reached by the disciplinary board.” Id.

CDG Acquisition LLC v. Dollar Bank, Federal Savings Bank

District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 7, 2020

In Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. … Nat'l Credit Union Admin. v. Michigan Nat.

Clayton v. McCary

426 F. Supp. 248 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 29, 1976

Klein v. Pincus, 397 F.Supp. 847 (E.D.N.Y. 1975). Moreover, as stated by the court in Mataya v. … In Brown v.

Pollard v. Phillips

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 2, 2022

Demsey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 2005 WL 1917934, at *2 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 10, 2005) (citing Cacevic v. City of Hazel Park, 226 F.3d 483, 492 (6th Cir. 2000)); see also Brown v. … .”); Kensu v.

Hartman v. Medina County Sheriff's Office

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 24, 2023

See Carter v. … Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 (1977) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

Johnson v. 212 Fremont Sandusky Wine & Spirit, LLC

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 18, 2025

Powell-Pickett v. AK Steel Corp., 49 F. App’x 347, 352 (6th Cir. 2013); see also Penny v. … Id. at 569 (quoting Brown v. Bunge Corp., 207 F.3d 766, 782 (5th Cir. 2000)). The evidence shows Defendant took affirmative steps to address the alleged issues.

Cleveland Area Local, American Postal Workers Union v. United States Postal Service

968 F. Supp. 1199 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 3, 1997

Kroll v. United States, 58 F.3d 1087, 1090 (6th Cir.1995); United States v. Ritchie, 15 F.3d 592, 598 (6th Cir.1994). … Moreover, the propriety of the suspensions of the two union stewards is the subject of a charge submitted to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

Levert v. Montefiore Home

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 30, 2022

(quoting Brown v. Francis, 75 F.3d 860, 864–65 (3d Cir. 1996)). … See Nemeth v. Montefiore, 2022 WL 4367165 (N.D. Ohio Sept. 21, 2022) (Fleming, J.); Friedman v. Montefiore, 2022 WL 3584481, at *1 (N.D. Ohio July 11, 2022) (Lioi. J.); Estate of Spring v.

Dreyer v. United States

349 F. Supp. 296 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 5, 1972

Ingham v. Eastern Airlines, 373 F.2d 227 (C.A.2, 1967); Harris v. United States, 333 F.Supp. 870 (N.D.Tex., 1971); Wasilko v. United States, 300 F.Supp. 573 (N.D. Ohio, 1967), aff’d. 412 F.2d 859 (C.A.6, 1969). … As was held in Hartz v. United States, supra, 387 F.2d at 874, the PAR Controller must follow the Manual. It is the “Bible for Tower Operators.” United States v.

Rodriquez v. Williams

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 18, 2020

Urbina v. Thoms, 270 F.3d 292, 295 (6th Cir. 2001). … This standard is satisfied where “there is any evidence in the record that could support the conclusion reached by the disciplinary board.” Id.

Oslavic

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 19, 2026

As such, courts “shall not ‘accept post hoc rationalizations for agency action in lieu of [accurate] reasons and findings enunciated by the Board.’” Keeton v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 583 F. … (Id. at 635-39 (citing SSR 16-3p, 2017 WL 5180304, at *8; 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1529(c)(3)(iv)-(v), 416.929(c)(3)(iv)-(v)).)

Alghusain v. Nemeth

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 7, 2021

Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir.1989), abrogated on other grounds, Moore v. City of Harriman, 272 F.3d 769, 772 (6th Cir. 2001) (en banc). … Plaintiff also states that the Commission “cleared [Gupta] from these charges because [Gupta] is a good friend of the Ohio Ethics Commission Board.” (Id. at 61).