Case law

Specht v. City of Eastlake

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 24, 2024

Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). The Court is not required to conjure unpleaded facts or construct claims against defendants on behalf of a pro se plaintiff. See Beaudett v. … See Bassett v. Nat’l Collegiate Ath. Ass’n, 528 F.3d 426, 437 (6th Cir. 2008); see also Scheid v.

Union Trust Co. v. White Motor Co.

22 F.2d 816 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 7, 1927

These principles were fully stated and dealt with by me in Universal Rim Co. v. Firestone Steel Products Co. (D. C.) 289 F. 884 . … Brown, clearly and conclusively shows many dissimilarities between Exhibits 19 and 20 and Melanowski’s patent drawings, and ma^y similarities with Exhibit 11.

Miller v. Anderson

District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 17, 2024

) Plaintiffs, ) JUDGE JOHN ADAMS ) v. … Specifically, Defendants named in this matter include members of FirstEnergy’s Board of Directors, its CEO, its President, the non-executive Chairman of the Board, its Senior Vice President and Chief Legal

Quintanilla v. AK TUBE LLC

477 F. Supp. 2d 828 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 12, 2007

See Browning v. Rohm & Haas Tennessee, Inc., 16 F.Supp.2d 896, 904 (E.D.Tenn.1998) (where discharged employees were told they would be given priority for rehiring, employer had no duty to rehire them). … See Black v.

Davis

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 14, 2025

Proceeding in forma pauperis is a privilege, see Wilson v. Yaklich, 148 F.3d 596, 603 (6th Cir. 1998), not a right, and permission to do so is committed to the sound discretion of the Court. See Foster v. … Once again, see Joseph-Allen Davis v. Yunus Adewale Abass, et al., No. 5:22-cv-1739, Doc. No. 7 (N.D.

Malkamaki v. Sea Ray Boats, Inc.

411 F. Supp. 2d 737 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 6, 2005

In East River Steamship Corp. v. … In the case sub judice Plaintiff offers the case of Brown v.

Barringer v. State of Ohio

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 5, 2023

Boag v. MacDougall, 454 U.S. 364, 365 (1982) (per curiam); Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). … Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). The Court is not required to conjure unpleaded facts or construct claims against defendants on behalf of a pro se plaintiff. See Bassett v.

Duke's K9 Dash N' Splash, LLC v. Zizka

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 28, 2024

Co. v. … Nonetheless, case law demonstrates that a board of zoning appeals can be sued in at least some contexts. See, e.g., Danis Montco Landfill Co. v. Jefferson Twp. Zoning Comm., 620 N.E.2d 140, 141 (Ohio Ct.

Cuno v. DaimlerChrysler, Inc.

154 F. Supp. 2d 1196 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 1, 2001

Counts II and V will be dismissed. V. … See Parella v. Retirement Board of Rhode Island Employees’ Ret.

Paramount Finance Company v. S & C Tavern, Inc.

245 F. Supp. 766 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 22, 1965

In Abraham v. … Board of Commissioners, 40 N.J. 379 , 192 A.2d 584 , 63-2 U.S.T.C. 89,703 (1963).

Avery Dennison Corp. v. Alien Technology Corp.

626 F. Supp. 2d 693 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 18, 2009

.”); Pergo, Inc. v. … Trovan, Ltd. v. Sokymat SA, Iron, 299 F.3d 1292, 1301 (Fed.Cir.2002); see also Checkpoint Sys., Inc. v.

Jewell Coke Co., Lp v. Arcelormittal USA, Inc.

756 F. Supp. 2d 858 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 27, 2010

Remington Rand Corp. v. … Brown v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc., 991 F.2d 1020, 1032 (2d Cir.1993).

Cox v. United States

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 14, 2023

Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Engler, 146 F.3d 367, 374 (6th Cir. 1998) (“A motion under Rule 59(e) is not an opportunity to re-argue a case.”); Brown v. Robinson, No. 3:20-cv-113, 2022 WL 1819336, at *1 (S.D. … Cox v. United States, No. 22-3366, 2022 WL 15526712, at *2 (6th Cir. Oct. 25, 2022) (citing Taylor v.

Freeman v. Mr. Cooper

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 28, 2025

Von Dunser v. Aronoff, 915 F.2d 1071, 1072 (6th Cir. 1990). … Overton, 391 F.3d 710, 712 (6th Cir. 2004), pro se litigants are not exempt from the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989).

Michel v. Beutler

888 F. Supp. 2d 861 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 3, 2012

Plaintiff has filed a voluntary nonsuit as to Putnam County and the Putnam County Board of Commissioners. For the reasons that follow, I grant summary judgment as to all other defendants except Dockery and Siefker. … Gregory v. City of Louisville, 444 F.3d 725, 758 (6th Cir.2006) (citing Yancey v. Carroll Cnty., 876 F.2d 1238, 1243 (6th Cir.1989)).

Felder v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 20, 2025

Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). The Court is not required to conjure unpleaded facts or construct claims against defendants on behalf of a pro se plaintiff. See Beaudett v. … See Bassett v. Nat’l Collegiate Ath. Ass’n, 528 F.3d 426, 437 (6th Cir. 2008); see also Scheid v.

Pumphrey, Jr. v. Stark County, OH

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 27, 2024

Dakota v. Brown, No. 3:12 CV 2110, 2012 WL 5378733, at *5 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 31, 2012), citing Dist. of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. … See, e.g., Sefa v.

Leach v. Dewine

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 30, 2024

See Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989, 992 (6th Cir. 1989) (citing O.R.C. § 2305.10). … See Brown v. Holiday Inn Express & Suites, 118 N.E.2d 1021, 1025 (Ohio Ct.

Caldwell v. Giunta

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 24, 2023

BR-16-012805 (2057 E. 79 St., Cleveland, OH 44103) (Board of Revision); Treasurer of Cuyahoga Cnty. v. Caldwell, No. … BR- 18-018340 (unlisted house number, E. 80 St., Cleveland, OH 44103) (Board of Revision); Treasurer of Cuyahoga Cnty v. Caldwell, No.

Sanchez-Garcia

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 13, 2026

See 28 U.S.C. § 2243; Alexander v. N. Bureau of Prisons, 419 F. App’x 544, 545 (6th Cir. 2011). … See Regla-Araujo v. Warden, FCI Elkton, No. 4:25-cv-544, 2025 WL 1532498, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101686, *5 (N.D.