Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,818 results
0.71s
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Nov 3, 2020
nose and mouth when inside a commercial establishment or any other building or space open to the public, whether indoor or outdoor.” (Rec. Doc. 17-2, Exhibit 1 at 3 § 4(A)). … In order to satisfy this burden at the pleading stage the plaintiff must clearly allege facts to satisfy each element of Article III standing. Id. (quoting Warth, 422 U.S. at 518).
Cited 0 timesUnknown777 F. Supp. 1332 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Nov 5, 1991
Second, defendant urges that there is no genuine issue of material fact on the issue of whether defendant is entitled to qualified immunity from plaintiff’s § 1983 claims, and whether defendant acted with malice and without … One can establish malice in at least four ways.
Cited 4 timesPublishedR. P. Farnsworth & Co. v. Albert
79 F. Supp. 27 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Aug 9, 1948
The methods followed by plaintiff in inviting bids, and of the defendant in submitting his proposal were in accordance with those well-established practices and customs. … In the instant case, not only did the defendant fail to qualify his proposal, but as was true with respect to the defendant in Harris v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · Feb 11, 2022
Here, plaintiffs do not contend that they qualify for any of the exceptions to Younger, and the Court does not find that any exception applies. … It is well-established that, “generally, a judge is immune from a suit for money damages.” Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 9 (1991) (citations omitted).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · Jul 8, 2026
A plaintiff must satisfy three elements to establish § 1983 liability: (1) deprivation of a right secured by the U.S. … The Court is not convinced from his response that Plaintiff can muster any facts that would support his claim or overcome a defense of qualified immunity.
Cited 0 timesUnknown53 B.R. 464 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Aug 12, 1985
The bankruptcy court clearly rejected this argument by finding that LIC, and not Boh, breached the agreement. This finding is not clearly erroneous. … I affirm this finding and conclusion as neither clearly erroneous nor legally incorrect.
Cited 14 timesPublished622 F. Supp. 2d 362 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Mar 6, 2009
Moody must establish both the “deficiency” and the “prejudice” prongs of the Strickland test. … Because Moody was sentenced to the shortest term of imprisonment available under the ACCA, which clearly applied to his case, he cannot show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for some deficiency in his counsel
Cited 0 timesPublishedBailey v. Board of Commissioners of the Louisiana Stadium and Exposition District
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Feb 21, 2020
Next, the LSED Defendants contend that sovereign immunity protects the Board from Plaintiff’s claims unless Congress validly abrogated the state’s immunity as to those claims.39 The LSED Defendants argue that applying the … ‘connection to [ ] enforcement’ is satisfied when standing has been established.”160 In Lujan v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMcKeithen Ex Rel. McKeithen v. the M/T Frosta
435 F. Supp. 572 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Jun 30, 1977
For clearly the commissioner is intended to have authority to sue any insurer transacting business in this state. … But to read it thus in splendid isolation would ignore the clearly voiced later intention of the Louisiana legislature.
Cited 10 timesPublishedEstate of Deobald v. United States
444 F. Supp. 374 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Dec 28, 1977
Frances Deobald, was duly qualified as executrix of his estate. A federal estate tax return was duly filed and the estate taxes paid. … decedent the contributions made by the employer to the qualified retirement fund.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · Oct 23, 2025
It is worth noting again here that it is Klein’s burden to establish subject matter jurisdiction, meaning it is his burden to establish to the Court’s satisfaction that the Eleventh Amendment does not apply here to bar … The acts that Klein complains of are clearly judicial in nature.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHeaton v. Monogram Credit Card Bank
408 F. Supp. 2d 213 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Jul 29, 2005
Heaton contends that Monogram was clearly not “engaged in the business of receiving deposits” because it received no deposits from the general public, but rather only a single deposit from its parent corporation. … as “ ‘adversely affected or aggrieved ... within the meaning’ of a statute, a plaintiff must establish that the injury he complains of ... falls within the ‘zone of interests’ sought to be protected by the statutory provision
Cited 1 timesPublished343 F. Supp. 1208 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · May 8, 1972
I found him to be well qualified and it appeared that his opinions were based on careful analysis and study. Mr. … He sought to adjust SCRAPCO’s book value by including projected lease values based on what he was “told” and on clearly unfounded assumptions.
Cited 3 timesPublishedIn Re New York Life Insurance Agents' Class Solicitation Litigation
92 F. Supp. 2d 564 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Apr 28, 1997
Louisiana clearly has a significant interest in protecting its citizens regardless of where the tort occurs. Id. In addition, two out of the four defendants are also Louisiana citizens. … Therefore, I find that good faith is absent and so the defense of qualified privilege is unavailable at this time.
Cited 2 timesPublished722 F. Supp. 273 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Oct 3, 1989
By law, compare La.R.S. 18:467(4) with id. § 18:468, he must formally qualify between December 13 and 15, 1989. 6 Defendants in this action are Sidney Bar-thelemy, who is the present Mayor of New Orleans, the sole other person … City of Rockwall, Texas, 877 F.2d 409, 416 (5th Cir.1989), could be construed as mandating a dismissal of pendent state-law claims whenever federal constitutional claims are dismissed prior to trial, at least on immunity
Cited 7 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · Oct 16, 2025
to establish that Landry was personally involved in any act that caused the deprivation of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights.12 II. … authority to dismiss a claim based on an indisputably meritless legal theory, but also the unusual power to pierce the veil of the complaint’s factual allegations and dismiss those claims whose factual contentions are clearly
Cited 0 timesUnknown623 F. Supp. 1050 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Dec 11, 1985
The judgment rendered by the Civil District Court of the Parish of Orleans in Louisiana puts much emphasis on the fact that the Notarial Act of April 23, 1984, does not comply with the formal act of surrender as established … Louisiana has also clearly spoken on this issue.
Cited 10 timesPublishedSnell v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare
275 F. Supp. 645 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Nov 1, 1967
The agreement clearly contemplated that the bus drivers were to receive retirement benefits from one of two possible sources financed in part by state funds. … If he was employed by the school itself, he qualifies for social security coverage because the statutory state retirement system does not cover employees in that position.
Reversed on other grounds by Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Otis C. Snell, Jr., 416 F.2d 840 (1969)Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · Jul 24, 2025
Defendants moved to dismiss plaintiff’s claims against them under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5) and 12(b)(6), contending that absolute immunity bars plaintiff’s claims against Judge Moore and that … To succeed on a Rule 59(e) motion, a party must “clearly establish either a manifest error of law or fact or must present newly discovered evidence.” Ross v. Marshall, 426 F.3d 745, 763 (5th Cir. 2005).
Cited 0 timesUnknownGreater Guide, Inc. d/b/a American Service Pets v. SAPS LLC et al.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Oct 31, 2025
However, the doctrine's immunity does not extend to petitioning activity that qualifies as a “sham.” … Section 1974 of the Act establishes that healthcare providers are prohibited from producing “documentation relating to an individual’s need for a support animal unless” the provider complies with a list of six requirements
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna