Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,618 results
0.86s
State of Wisconsin v. 3M Company
District Court, S.D. California · Jan 3, 2023
Fleming involves a putative class of Alabama residents who use water provided by the City of Guin Water Works and Sewer Board. … No. 6:22−00285 Central District of California MCKINNON, ET AL. v. APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES, ET AL., C.A.
Cited 0 timesUnknownThibodeau v. ADT Security Services
District Court, S.D. California · Oct 21, 2019
Brown v. Desert Christian Ctr., 193 Cal. App. 4th 733, 740 (2011). … Citizens for Better Forestry v. U.S. Dep’t of Agr., 567 F.3d 1128, 1131 (9th 1 Cir. 2009) (quoting Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown148 F. Supp. 3d 958 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 2, 2015
Fields v. Brown, 503 F.3d 755, 766 (9th Cir.2007). … (People v. Gordon (1990) 50 Cal.3d 1223, 1253 , [ 270 Cal.Rptr. 451 , 792 P.2d 251 ]; People v. Brown (1988) 46 Cal.3d 432, 446-448 , [ 250 Cal.Rptr. 604 , 758 P.2d 1135 ].)
Cited 6 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jul 31, 2020
As in Valtierra v. … See United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownNational Campaign Committee v. Rogan
69 F. Supp. 679 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 24, 1945
committee report, nevertheless, House Report 728 and Senate Report 734 pf the Seventy-Sixth Congress which were filed on the amendment in 1939, indicate that after three years of “intensive study” by the Social Security Board … And that under the doctrine of Fidelity Union v. Field, 311 U.S. 169 , 61 S.Ct. 176 , 85 L.Ed. 109 , and other cases which they cited, such judgment must be accepted here.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Apr 21, 2021
California Men's 12 Colony v. … United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Oct 24, 2022
Ass’n of Washington v. Washington State Bldg. … Daubert v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownFeng v. Lunaphore Technologies, SA
District Court, S.D. California · Jul 16, 2025
See Manetti-Farrow, Inc., 858 F.2d 17 at 514 (finding forum selection clause applied to tort claims that related in some way to 18 rights and duties enumerated in the contract); Brown v. Artec Glob. … v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownNdandu v. Golden State Annex Detention Center
District Court, S.D. California · Jan 8, 2024
Canell v. Lightner, 143 F.3d 1210, 1215 (9th Cir. 1998); see also 3 Brown v. Washington, 752 Fed. … Vega v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jan 14, 2025
See Heffron 22 v. … See, e.g., Edwards v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGlobus Medical, Inc. and NuVasive, LLC v. Alphatec Spine, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California · Dec 3, 2025
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) 10 (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Del. 2021) (“It seems to 19 me neither wise nor consistent with principles of judicial economy to allow court dockets 20 to serve as notice boards for future legal claims for indirect infringement and enhanced 21 damages
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Aug 18, 2020
Rizzo v. … (See June 6, 2020 Order citing Brown v. Marshall, 2012 WL 9 12906131, *9 (E.D. Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Oct 8, 2020
Sarver v. … See Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A. v. Brown, No. 23 CV 17-5968 PSG (AFMx), 2018 WL 3816721, at *5 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2018) (same); see 24 e.g., Schering Corp. v. First DataBank Inc., No.
Cited 0 timesUnknown837 F. Supp. 2d 1127 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 28, 2011
The second accident, on June 18, 2007, occurred when Plaintiff operated a truck-mounted boarding ramp. (White Depo. 105:5-11; 111:3-8). … Mary’s Honor Center v. Hicks ] Id. [ 509 U.S. 502 ] at 507-08, 113 S.Ct. 2742 [ 125 L.Ed.2d 407 (1993) ]. (citations omitted) Coghlan v. Am. Seafoods Co., 413 F.3d 1090, 1094 (9th Cir.2005); Wallis v. J.R.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Aug 23, 2024
Board of Regents of the 8 University of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 9 B. … See Lira v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownEncuentra v. Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. California · Jan 2, 2024
A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)). Here, 26 Plaintiff asserts that the Court has specific jurisdiction over Defendant Church & Dwight. 27 (See Doc. … See Telesaurus VPC, LLC v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHidalgo v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
District Court, S.D. California · May 12, 2025
See, e.g., Steckman v. … Jurisdiction may be general—where the defendant is 21 “essentially at home” in the forum, Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. 22 Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)—or specific, where the suit arises from or relates
Cited 0 timesUnknown901 F. Supp. 2d 1196 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 4, 2012
Malik v. Brown, 16 F.3d 330, 333 (9th Cir.1994) (citations omitted). … ” Estate of Ford, 301 F.3d at 1050 (quoting Jeffers, 267 F.3d at 910); Browning v. Vernon, 44 F.3d 818, 822 (9th Cir.1995). First, the law governing the Defendants’ conduct was clearly established.
Cited 48 timesPublishedR. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Bonta
District Court, S.D. California · Mar 15, 2023
Dep’t of Revenue of Ky. v. 4 Davis, 553 U.S. 328, 337-38 (2008) (quoting New Energy Co. of Ind. v. … Nat’l Ass’n of Optometrists & 26 Opticians LensCrafters, Inc. v. Brown, 567 F.3d 521, 528 (9th Cir. 2009).
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna