Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.33s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 703 (1974) (quoting Marbury, 5 U.S. at 177). … . at 482-83."
Amicus Curiae Brief — Burton v. Stewart
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
North Carolina, 482 U.S. 233 (1977) ..... 29 Harris v. United States, 536 U.S. 545 (2002) ....... 21, 27 Ivan V. v. City of New York, 407 U.S. 203 (1972) ....... 28 Lambrix v. … Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963). See Banks, 542 U.S. at 417.
549 U.S. 147Amicus Curiae Brief — Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis v. Trinko, LLP
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Image Technical Services, Inc., 504 U.S. 451, 482-483 (1992), confirmed that reading when it quoted the Griffith language in describing the elements of a Section 2 claim, but immediately followed the … Co., 475 U.S. at 594.
540 U.S. 398Amicus Curiae Brief — Brecht v. Abrahamson
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
California, 395 U.S. 250, 254 (1969); Milton v. Wainwright, 407 U.S. 371, 377-378 (1972). It is difficult tobe nearly certain about such a secondhand conclusion. … S. 471, 482 (1945) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting). Chapman should not be retained out of any unwarranted fear of state courts.
507 U.S. 619Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
U.S. … Salerno, 482 U.S. 739, 745 (1987). “The existence of a hypothetical or potential conflict is insufficient to warrant the preemption of the state statute.” Rice v.
538 U.S. 644Amicus Curiae Brief — Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
. at 423 (emphasis added). … * See U.S. v. Parke, Davis & Co., 362 U.S. 29, 44 (1960).
551 U.S. 877Amicus Curiae Brief — Murray v. Giarratano
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
Hours: N.C. 482 92 38 612 Med. … Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972).
492 U.S. 1Amicus Curiae Brief — Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
Electric Auto-Lite Co., 396 U.S. 375, 382; J. I. Case Co. v. Borak, 377 U.S. 426, 482. … United States, 406 U.S. 128.
421 U.S. 723Amicus Curiae Brief — Parker v. Levy
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974
Snyder, 1 U.S.C.M.A. 423, 4 C.M.R. 15 (1952). Army Court of Military Review: Homosexual conduct not amounting to sodomy, United States v. … Wilson, 346 U.S. 137 (1953); Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938).
417 U.S. 733Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019
U.S. Const. Art. … Connecticut, 564 U.S. 410, 423-424 (2011). In those cases, the Court has refused to apply federal com- mon law if a federal statute “speaks directly to the ques- tion at issue.”
Amicus Curiae Brief — Atwater v. Lago Vista
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
if Supreme Court, U.S. … Watson, 423 U.S. 411, 429 (1976)(Powell, J., concurring), for logic is sup- ported by history.
532 U.S. 318Amicus Curiae Brief — Cedar Rapids Community School Dist. v. Garret F.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
See U.S. … Gray, 470 U.S. 414, 423 n.9 (1985); American Surety Co. v. Marotta, 287 U.S. 513, 517 (1933).
526 U.S. 66Amicus Curiae Brief — Chapman v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Kirby, 7 Wall. 482 (1869) United States v. Kozminski, 487 U.S. 931 (1988) United States v. Larsen, 904 F.2d 562 (10th Cir. 1990), petition for cert.pending, No. 90-5509 United States v. … Scales, 367 U.S. at 211; DeBartolo Corp., 485 U.S. at 575.
500 U.S. 453Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Russell
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985
PBGC, 446 U.S. 359 (1980), reh. denied, 448 U.S. 908 (1980)... Newport v. Facts Concerts, Inc., 453 U.S. 247 SES eA NR 2d SAE Se NLRB v. Amazx Coal Co., 453 U.S. 8322 (1981) _...... Ross v. … PBGC, 446 U.S. 359, 361 (1980), reh. denied, 448 U.S. 908 (1980).
473 U.S. 134Amicus Curiae Brief — Howlett v. Rose
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Nye); 482 (Rep. Wilson); 487 (Rep. Lansing); App. 195 (Rep. Buckley) ; 251 (Sen. Morton); App. 277 (Rep. Porter); App. 262 (Rep. Dunnell); App. 311 (Rep. Maynard) (1871). … Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 (1977); Monell, 436 U.S. at 663 n.5.
496 U.S. 356Amicus Curiae Brief — Saenz v. Roe
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic, 506 U.S. 2638 (1998) City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Ctr., 473 US. 482 (1985) Clark v. Jeter, 486 U.S. 456 (1988) Dunn v. … Shapiro, 394 U.S. at 634; see Dunn, 405 U.S. at 338- 343.
526 U.S. 489Amicus Curiae Brief — Cedar Rapids Community School Dist. v. Garret F.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
See U.S. … Gray, 470 U.S. 414, 423 n.9 (1985); American Surety Co. v. Marotta, 287 U.S. 513, 517 (1933).
526 U.S. 66Amicus Curiae Brief — Hj Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
McCready, 457 U.S. 465, 472 (1982). See Sedima, 473 U.S. at 495; Alcorn County, Miss. v. U.S. … Imrex Co., Inc., 741 F. 2d 482 (1984), rev'd 473 U.S. 479 (1985), declaring the ‘‘extraordinary, if not outrageous’’ ‘‘uses to which private civil RICO has been put,’’ cited E.F.
492 U.S. 229Amicus Curiae Brief — Defenders of Wildlife v. Chertoff (No. 07-1180)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
See, e.g., Touwby, 500 U.S. at 168- 79 & 170 (Marshall, J., concurring); Skinner, 490 U.S. at 218-19; Chadha, 462 U.S. at 953 n. 16; Youngstown Sheet & Tube, 343 U.S. at 585; Yakus, 321 US. at 425. … Los Angeles County, 482 U.S. 304, 316 (1987) (citing Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United States, 467 U.S. 1, 5 (1984); United States v. Causby, 328 U.S. 256, 267 (1946); Seaboard Air Line R.
Amicus Curiae Brief — California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Turkette, 452 U.S. 576 (1981) 12 Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (19717 3 CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS: Supremacy Clause, U.S. Art. … Tribe, American Con- stitutional Law, § 6-26, at 482 n.8 (2d ed. 1988). 18 Nor, for this same reason, can FERC properly use the com- prehensive nature of its regulatory authority under the Federal
493 U.S. 1068
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.