Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.12s

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Miller v. United States (No. 09-467)

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2009

    See Caseer, 399 F.3d, at 840; Cosby, 682 F.2d, at 1383; Delay, 440 F.2d, at 568. … App. 24 Effective: January 7, 2008 18 U.S.C.A. § 111.

  • Appellants Brief — Regional Rail Reorganization Act Cases

    Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1974

    Conn. 1968); New Haven Inclusion Cases, supra, 399 U.S. at 481-82. … It is in light of the discussion at 399 U.S. at 481-82 that one must read the following single sentence of the Court’s opinion (399 U.S. at 490) upon which Gov- ernment counsel presumably relied in

    419 U.S. 102
  • Opposition Brief — Mattei v. Laborers Combined Funds of Western Pennsylvania

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991

    Super. 399, 518 A.2d 1296 bo PE eee Tee POE ETT LCC TC TAT OeT OEE 4 Laborers Combined Funds of Western Pennsylva- nia v. Mattei, 402 Pa. … Super. 399, 518 A.2d 1296 (1986) (Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Appen- dix, pp. Al6-A27).

    502 U.S. 968
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Phoenix-El Paso Express, Inc. v. National Carloading Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1944

    A.) 260 Fed. 70...... 24 Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio Rr. Co., 294 U. 8. 240, SO Sup. Ce. 407, 79 L.. Bid. GOB... 2... ice ee 31 Pacific Mail Steamship Co. v. Joliffe, 69 U. … Heth, 3 Cranch 399, 2 L. Ed. 479; U. S. vs. Burr, 159 U. S. 78, 15 S. Ct. 1002, 40 L. Ed. 82; Shwab vs. Doyle, 258 U. S. 529, 42 8. Ct. 391, 66 L.

    322 U.S. 747
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Eric C. Sutherland, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 16, 2022

    Perkins, 569 U.S. at 399), report and recommendation adopted, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115685 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2015); see also Weeks v. … P. 22(b) and 24, respectively. There being no just reason for delay in its entry, this is a final and appealable Order.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ronald R. Myles, Jr., Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 18, 2021

    Sheldon v Kettering Health Net- work, 816 F3d 399, 415 (6th Cir 2016)(quoting Hapwood v City of Warren, 127 F3d 490, 493 (6th Cir 1997)). § 1738. … ■u'$ IM> ‘S'* 4 fr£l&AM^dM^ si J ouM act ust n& * t-L [n~K fytCuJi Cju*t &i <4$^ U2t~ Qti />tV. 0&&- j2M>, 24 /UwraMc (e& CJccdiC^ u/__ ..

  • Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — United States v. Albert & Harrison, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1947

    Wil- son Co., 133 F. (2d) 399 (App. D. C.), and is inconsistent with the court below’s earlier deci- sion in Massman Construction Co. v. United States, 102 C. … It could not acquire such a right by purporting to ‘reserve’ it” (133 F. (2d) at 399, 400).

    331 U.S. 810
  • Motion — United States v. Midwest Video Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1972

    *Tex., 1968), aff. 399 U.S. 383, — 90 8. Ct. 2018 (1970). Streets, sidewalks and.other simiJar’ places. … Collier, 24 F.C.C. 251, 16 R.R. 1005 (1958). But.

    406 U.S. 649
  • Opposition Brief — United Food & Commercial Workers Local 951 v. Mulder

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1995

    Casey, 956 F.2d 399 (3rd Cir. 1992) ........ . 10 Litton Financial Printing v. NLRB, __ U.S. ery eee 5 Tierney v. … P. 24(b) for permissive intervention. Intervening defendant NLRB is granted 60 days in which to file its answer or other responsive pleading.

    513 U.S. 1148
  • Respondents Brief Opposing Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — United States v. Oregon

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief Opposing Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1961

    Or.) 67 F. 399; Graham v. Allen, 116 Or. 01,2 P. 1007. The presumption of contract arising under t! … Fox, 94 U.S..315, 320, 24 L. ed. 192. See ° | | 12 also United States v. Security-First National Bank of Lo Angeles, 130 F. Supp. 521.

    366 U.S. 643
  • Opposition — Freeman v. O'Neal Steel, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980

    INT Teamsters, 399 F.2d 875 (5th Cir. 1968) 3 Willets v. … INT Teamsters, 399 F.2d 875 (5th Cir. 1968).

    449 U.S. 833
  • Supplemental Brief — In re Ainsworth

    Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1991

    FILED MAR 20 399) 4 j bn } No. 90-1397 OFFICE OF THE CLERK | SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 1990 IN RE JONATHAN B. AINSWORTH, Petitioner Vv. … This was in clear violation of the United States Supreme Court's holding in Schiavone v Fortune 477 U.S. 21. 24 Pi ee maa 7 a een Pee ao = ae a = 7 — of 7 > Se Pe _ 4 7 : gh - == 2 .

    500 U.S. 903
  • Appendix — Moore v. East Cleveland

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1977

    Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1972). … Ed. 2d at 399.

    431 U.S. 494
  • Opposition Brief — New Jersey v. Hackett

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986

    Resor, 407 F.2d 281 (1969), cert. den. 399 U.S. 933 (1979) n--cencencesicessensasuaeeaee eee 11 Carafas v. LaValle, 391 U.S. 234 (1968) 000... 9-11, 13, 14 Fain v. … On July 24, 1984, Hackett submitted applications for permits to purchase a handgun and to carry a handgun to the Chief of Police of Orange, New Jersey.

    479 U.S. 814
  • Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Rule v. Sears

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1946

    Ct. 399, 56 L. Ed. 680. 14 Sears v. Rule, 45 Cal. App. (2d) 374. 5 STATUTES. California Code of Civil Procedure, Sec. 1699.0... ccccceceeeeee 15 California Constitution, Art. … (Br. p. 24.) SRR Se aR Ne It is also pertinent to add that the foregoing quotation is taken from a section of the brief which is headed: “C. There Was No Collateral Agreement or Trust.”

    328 U.S. 843
  • Respondents Brief — Wallace v. Foster

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1950

    Illinois, 399 U. S. 178 Delaney v. United States, 268 U. 8, 586, 589 District of Columbia v. Pace, 320 U. 8. Eagles v. Samuels, 309 U. S. 304 Feldman v. United States, 382 U. … E. 24 396... 2 Wallace v. The State, 205 Ga. 751, 55 S. E. 24145. 2, 10 Williams Mfg. Co. v. U. S. Shoe Machinery Corp, 816 U. S. 364, 3 San Woolsey v. Best, 299 U.

    340 U.S. 815
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Amarin Pharma, Inc., et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 25, 2026

    No. 24-889 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ———— HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC. AND HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS PLC, Petitioners, v. … Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012) ........................................... 4, 7, 8 Eli Lilly and Co. v.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — National Basketball Association, Petitioner v. Michael Salazar

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 2, 2025

    No. 24-994 ____________ NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. … Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399 (1966)........................................... 17 Javier v. Assurance IQ, LLC, No. 21-16351, 2022 WL 1744107 (9th Cir.

  • Respondents Brief — Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1990

    /d. at 24, 545 N.E.2d at 1325. … Rodeghero, 24 Ill.

    497 U.S. 1
  • Brief for the United States — United States v. Poland

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1920

    .----- 24 Land Department Circular of Instructions (27 L. te} See 23, 24 STATUTES. … S. 399, are conclusive upon that point.

    251 U.S. 221

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.