Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ronald R. Myles, Jr., Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court briefFeb 18, 2021

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

gp-m

c-l

***»

n n n

;

Li lJ

«_i

\—i

supreme Court, US.

FILED

IN THE SUPREME COURT

FEB 1 8 2021

OF THE UNITED STATES

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

RONALD R MYLES, JR.

PETITIONER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

RESPONDENT.

ON PETITION FOR A WRIT' OF CERTIORARI TO THE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

SIXTH CIRCUIT

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

RECEIVED

FEB 2 S 2021

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

SUPREME COURT, U.S.

(ytifS&ens 9nmif£

%v!uo

/./ J)ioi 4 ilvtf&m

pl^i& metS [JmjL frr$ otss n*fcj cmJa/td A, Mo

dUt Uflfat'States

$£ crirft as

<k wi (H~ £» (fast/*fat'**-y

/7U

[</&!'io^j

Std&

j j

____

/- ^

/i _ .

/l / i

'mm*- to USt ijL pdfy'fntf

z^boes

Jedt/d

QUO* M (Jit *?-?*#' **'**?*,£* * v

x>&M'QM^mfy, /^ fl f ,lz^

» >

ifU

ud .refusut.

jL ng US>d wdz

3^ m^rrt^c ia

TeJ&fd- J>btris&

/buU&w 4 @4MpfaeMo

*670 U*£.

373. me, atL EcL. z*t W,I0S §>. t£. isw W*d

25 J» 4

trd%L diut*»L

i+b* f£jt $fZA rd£a,T-Ji 4m

(ml’ J'll-^rrf^ ¥) *4 &

iMmMDU’ld *

toed)

A ^(msAdt. tttrffa

cm^6

^9^.

as Wf U)Mdt wxJtHL '/l tfo Cm& 6? m M/vfah state*

(s*t

ft !f^v /)

( h Lt)

LIST OF PARTIES

\n All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page.

[ ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of

all parties to the proceeding in the court whose judgment is the subject of this

petition is as follows:

RELATED CASES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

OPINIONS BELOW

JURISDICTION

CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

REASONS FOR GRANTING THE WRIT

CONCLUSION

INDEX TO APPENDICES

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX B

APPENDIX C

APPENDIX D

APPENDIX E

APPENDIX F

(3^

TABLE Qg. AUTHORITIES

PAGE NO

Rootcer-Feldman Doctrine

DC Court of Appeal v Feldman, 460 US 462 (1983)

Rooker v Fid Tr Co, 263 US 413 (1923) .............. ..

Doctrine of Res Judicata

Migra v Warren City Sch Bd of Educ, 465 75y 80-85

(1984)

.............................................................................................

Ohio Res Judicata Law

United States ex rel v Sheldon v Ketterin Health

Network, 816 F3d 399, 415 (6th Cir 2016)(quoting

Hapwood v City of Warren, 127 F3d 490, 493 (6th

Cir 1997)

............................................................ .......................

§ 1738 State and Territorial Statutes and Judicial

Proceedings 'Full Faith Credit’ .................................

Montana v United States,

440 US 147, 153 (1979)

Midland Asphalt Corp v United States

489 US 794, 798 (1989)

...................

Caitlin v United States

324 US 229, 233 (1945)

United States v Bennett,

170 F3d 632, 636 n. 1 (6th Cir 1999)

Supreme Court Review,

28 U.S.C.S. § 1257(a)

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

PAGE NO

Kettering Network,

816 F3d at 415

Berry,

688 F3d at 299

Herring v United States,

555 US 135, 142, 144-145 (2009)

i/. Amiricm, 4c*4

Wo tf,£. 3 73,

Vie,.

Or ifapcwk'c,

■ Ed. a<L

loss?cd, 1397(ms).. J-3.

HmfUss I/. fa&L States, 392 r. Set Sss $52 &0. fo 3005s)

!/. Ufi/tU £t&t&i £30 P.

%£j *73 If

Sr 9005)

Kmu, «5U U-S. ate 9U2

ft?

7' Jhvu^ (u~ ruJkmouJjMrF

3*c

%it S

ur. 2 £>0(7)

Howard (/, ld'&jkc6, 3%3 V. 5d U33/ (iM (o& Sr Zoot) -.

^ U.

ft. /I- 3 ?/y (0*. CM M ^

Wo?)

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below.

OPINIONS BELOW

[ ] For cases from federal courts:

The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at Appendix

the petition and is

[^reported at fr)^US> i/• or,

[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or,

[ ] is unpublished.

The opinion of the United States district court appears at Appendix

the petition and is

' fcrf #**»*)

[^reported at

1/ > U&n jOj - td/ - &1

; or,

[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or,

[ ] is unpublished.

[ ] For cases from state courts:

The opinion of the highest state court to review the merits appears at

Appendix_____ to the petition and is

[ ] reported at

; or,

[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or,

[ ] is unpublished.

The opinion of the_

appears at Appendix

court

to the petition and is

[ ] reported at

; or,

[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or,

[ ] is unpublished.

JURISDICTION

[ ] For cases from federal courts:

The dateon which the United States Court of Appeals decided my case

was

____

// ** aoao

[ ] No petition for rehearing was timely filed in my case.

A timely petition for rehearing wa& denied by the United States Court of

Appeals on the following date:

wot- <2,0^, and a copy of the

order denying rehearing appears at Appendix -Z~

[ ] An extension of time to file the petition for a writ of certiorari was granted

to and including______

(date) on

(date)

in Application No.__ A

The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U. S. C. § 1254(1).

[ ] For cases from state courts:

The date on which the highest state court decided my case was

A copy of that decision appears at Appendix_______

[ ] A timely petition for rehearing was thereafter denied on the following date:

______________________ , and a copy of the order denying rehearing

appears at Appendix

[ ] An extension of time to file the petition for a writ of certiorari was granted

to and including____

(date) on

(date) in

Application No.__ A

The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U. S. C. § 1257(a).

CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS

Under the Doctrine of Res Judicata,

Res Judicata Doctrine:

federal courts must give the same preclusive effect to state

court judgments as those judgments would receive in hte courts

of the rendering state.

S Migra v Warren City Sch Dist Bd of

Educ., 465 US 75, 80-85 (1984).

Ohio Res Judicata Law: In Ohio, Res Judicata has four elements;

(1) a prior final, valid decision on the mertis by a court of

competent jurisdiction;

(2) a second action involving the same

parties, or the privies, as the first;

(3) a section action

raising claims that were or could have been litigated in the

first action; and (4) a second action arising out of the trans

action or occurrence that was the subject matter of the previous

action .

United States ex rel. Sheldon v Kettering Health Net-

work, 816 F3d 399, 415 (6th Cir 2016)(quoting Hapwood v City of

Warren, 127 F3d 490, 493 (6th Cir 1997)).

§ 1738. State and Territorial statutes and judicial proceedings;

full faith and credit

The Acts of legislature of any State, Territory, or Possession

of the United States, or copies thereof, shall be authenticated

by affixing the seal of cuh State, Territory or Possession

hereto.

The records and judicial proceedings of any court of

and such State, Territory or Possession, of copies thereof,

shall be proved or admitted in other courts within the United

States and its Territories and Possessions by the attestation

of the clerk and seal of the court annexed, if a seal exists,

together with a certificate of a judge of he court that the said

attestation is in proper form. Such Acts, records and judicial

proceedings or copies thereof, so authenticated, shall have the

same full faith and credit in every court with the United States

and its Territories and Possessions as they have by law or.us

age in the courts of such State, Territory or Possession from

which they are taken.

On the merits bars further claims, by par

A FINAL JUDGMENT:

ties or their privies, posing as the 1st based on the same

cause of actions.

Montana v United States, 440 US 147,

153

(1979).

Midland Asphalt Corp: In criminal cases this prohibits Appel

late Review, until (after) conviction and imposition of a sen

tence .

Midland Asphalt Corp v United States, 489 US 794, 798

(1989).

Caitlin v United States: A decision is FINAL if it ends the

argument on the merits, and leaves nothing for the Court to-do

but executed the judgment.

Caitlin v United States, 324 US 229

233 (1945).

United States v Bennett:-We-further conclude, that- no federal

s-ea-r-C-h- warrant waa—n~e-e-e-s-s-aa^y-_ Evidence seized by state officers pursuant to a state search warrant generally may be used

in a federal prosecution, provided that the warrant passes

constitutional muster.

See United States v Bennett, 170 F3d

632, 636 n.i (6th Cir 1999).

states a final judgment from the high28 U.S.C.S. § 1257(a):

est court of a state, may be reviewed by the United States Supreme Court by Writ of Certiorari.

Kettering Network: the Government was not a party

court action.

to the state

See Kettering Health Network, 816 F3d at 415.

Berry :

See Kettering Health Network, 816 F3d at 415.

The Rook-

er Feldman and Res Judicata do not apply because the state court

did not address the argument on the mertis and issue a decision.

See Berry, 688 F3d at 299.

5a/)

<<•

n i ■&

}f /aSl

r ptfittm tfmnLoL

fd), [U& 2m ^ 2 Cmfc

^f-1 AUS tcrwictet cv\.

?«&*. $t <ty 3(#~wi

tl\L pi£!tl0\(jr iiMS 30^c&L {o ftps On

^'^"70

(k, ^OMaLj {jo '(/it

tdrurit Cmi df 4fftatsf qv Td 6/^

f f/__ CASl 4fc 'l7~3GWj tit fetS PJrc/jj& /)ttirm&C jfac

digfcdoi' (juds {knld, s4 Ol

& S^WfiS^ &ndtoC£.

fryL ftpmuty m fsu- frAutf A//*$.<, H/p*rf#(*A3)

M &<L M 7k (Altd State;

AtAld. JL Mftfitws lufit V <Ur#«*'\ fa

%i M613M& SufMc. C&t.faX &. pt#**"

Cwt

tefrttiSte -(qt ft ' /]idf>% LuAr [^tdi 22).

&<L toa. sfe- 20/1 itc jvbnC J)Utec& M2 Su/U &

pckitiflws Ronald %* f^Us urS 3cc6^ £&$£

. TS E&dsaL

Jjist&b

dtoJ<d J'ruti/' tbifi fllr- Wtytg aSiMmS tic SOsVt

Cummt robed ^ 2lr^S meA, to tit, /J7&ruut &u*t <4-dfrtafc ert

TUtmvj Ql$t 26ij a/pdltefiL bs®t#:{/7'3%/(7) Oncimiy ti2

d mdincc /ul, ate^ d prmdh 7a- tus rtdtoL Cazl, //l TtMfoL

2iJtrro& Cm2 Qj£>ci2(lU -cr-adi) oS Castyu/Atij dtriaL Tic pe6&f<*tes

2255

^ Pit. rn di£ tflU) irilejL 0L %u(jl £2 &) metiers

r^tctAllij kfwstfw tit %A mL

Ctosfc to a/&r or favetd

*7%

tiA

io jdt /l, nfjj vuSm tmgjtj 2tit

d prfQftij. (set zdfkh u/pdfex)

11 e)

0\y

fytidMCC' wd ftfar^

fir. tfto/g mnecH m Lb HuJjL 59^$

fY}A rt%lejr

use.

% (tewstofc 4

is£4s?<' if (/C£

<-/

j a/* m

*y - // —

fifj

Cl&

L Zc£)f4 8$&P^ >«*) ~ **f

O&twofc (Mu^o rntttrtst- (/. tffitoCAA;

<9rft0f*&d<s

Smarts, Ho US. sVfSSQ, 2/ l- EU. M, 5 rtt JOS-S. c&.

IZ27 0&5). teu*/Atie/flVCA)

,/) /

fflr. r4cJts fitrtftr muni ‘M d Ul mn^pfa feW

j)>Strfct Uu$ allows 7L Itm/ sfa&s w dwri^ fa ■<*&.

m, ttijUs ___________ '^f/fysUlSCrfph, J

district C*“Oj7Met ^smu ijo

/V f-

s/difa Gtut Uri>t !73» M,

nAfdtoCC

<6U--ed°r }

dkty &t

j cMttt &yht#U i

RAwL (Mrict <bu*t/ J nnsi alOv <Ul InUzri

dhm.

%l4t& ef Ul Us. C^t6u$AmudML or

4nh/mti) wl/L /U

CcuUs

k 1k. /Aw Afotis d /frwdc*-^-

a,jCJ_/’j-jij

------ 4, fij ¥A MOO 7L LmJ(t MmL Strict Owfjh&L.

/Of. fltjk. tfult S9 (t) metiii A awL A-jiKLgi&a-i*- 'JUmr_

dht*'dwtitod CASvfflkt - Cr- as/) ybt) u rt&K. & «A ^olusik

92__________

JV%3& far okifa/rk/tSt, * ^ (^tt t'ky bi6 E/2 /a)

lit kmtoMp

y&6nc& C*A M*0

& flijCts u (i) As m/m, rw sfov*

tsti^Mst a. W’1' &

H (K tlto/r W d (tua nee

fnMfd&d hUAgrtuCOL. '

^smC e\flddor dji bnemUn- AfW dM^

Qm ndim dk: JJ^L h- M eHcOafa- tffdfr U»def 3% 3S-Cr //7S?

CPC ofuttvdsc. ff]c.

(tfe'lfek. (4

bwdkc dbwi&t’'cafoJ- lit d& .(CdjjcMkdo ddc l/M'dic Coin’d (-fit /peeler)

fssud/ i

Od 0toU{; fyudj 0$ dfieCefe ^

Kont/ei d Aklls ^'■^ dtnd OfUfJ- iWAstd. b, $l d/wnddi 4^d&-

Owt Ui/iKld'3W7)^(f#^ </)

tidfeedfa <$

%S <3Ua'Ju&dj Je/tfal feuds ffa*c£

die £o<pc pKcA&^e&zd.

lo <Shfe Cuitt (%kae*»JB as dddL Mfyvna& ‘Q&dl nd*,

fa, $c foiU'fe ^^ruskriw

(su *M%

*4&/?*&'y

f)n PuttcL !3#-a(foo i47~7fA-al dhdkck toldJeM_

Mf- Wife fM.t*M!«- tudr 'sifr //fe t- 29S3 tud^tdc

Pu/lf

* Mdedad [**t/jl sr pjdn vrd) /<** nA mt Sl sdsfoeffd

rhti,' (toM* *)

Air- fflhjliS -(lid. O. CGA-, nfJtfe do ddc d ^ (Jetuibr

Ceu*t 'J 4pdus ujuUc Ft/.. %• Afp- fC4)

(Jr dfasdetiL

tjv- 4tGto-3&S2s). 0L Owl "id?- 2020 Me (e^ (Jr £fe&

<?t rffpw? -dlAJtL /7JA w

11 Ate fcdl&S) rfeU " vJ or $ U3% decs Wu iJcpryc l/icsentefrstd

. (MA ,MTbecause h. ■lajl/Jlj h rake 16 ck dJeadr <2emC

MS W ckmntfT&teJL CAan, do tjcCaec (k ddkdd. *

(3E)

^ to Ml

e( Mg n^Tgfe:

tVltflCfS

*- °“ 1 3°*?'■u'$ IM> ‘S'*

4 fr£l&AM^dM^ si

J ouM act ust n& *

t-L

[n~K fytCuJi Cju*t &i <4$^ U2t~

Qti />tV. 0&&- j2M>, 24 /UwraMc (e& CJccdiC^

u/__

.. Is tfoaC 6fidtr deMty .AM rtt/Us tfM/ktd*’^•u.

kum>- dc dtl nJ) M- A

3&eu/fm j# $. 4M

4 A UrJ.

^ te**i

ndel'M

fir (M mb ffMtd- or rtsfy«lU fiffl g

^^7^

®wt Hl CquaHj /fy/dtl- ,/Sf- tbli* tSA grtiM*- %1‘ £■ 4?’ ^

(Ste faJuLifi jtJ

#£/

REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION

('t/rfa/taui -to/;/-£/ir^.

ffena6>l

*A* fOijh> £r_ fflu (S (p^SS^

lfiMue#6tw -oft (morose

/]tided folstribi CdUft to JJC7Ct<L jih V/%Jf€a*r .Stofov, J

fr&rf fans (J ■ OM tn&L Qt t/l<L ksiS $a£ tis> (s&

...^

.... -

MV- t

/CTfb&r

flp\tj\ifr)tot Y-ldfe &r wJL (/fUfyL SffytZS (jqgirf&cOf^ g/&vi_ PistaQ/

___ o

m_i‘A&

Us £OtJ

■/fy*&v6ne*£ ffifAfs of Ok

U>£‘

QJf (k(ML 0Y9G&&) /due JSlfA&t u£uSl Ok

TtJjxvL District fmxt &6mittp( fit (MifoL Spates &fi /fmn'dA. tp

(J&L £l f . Wilts SUp1 fwcm&(js/Trar&cfds as Ue£t /?<? SO&fe

'dingt

"L TUtraL SiStJ'P Cswd, dt MWjk £ul Sedml ty^tuneJ:

IS of Obt£,‘ ■k'

$- JPifer Sfatt CmS M^c pUuJAsL 4 k£ Sta& Iromcrlo&f

■fuf f&ilk £ (JnJjO(jwditSiuc tf&t) //L IbtktrlZ't- 7) tsfribfc (mmC~

(USC !7££> * Q(l Til

0.620, $L IpiaxtTOt f&larxt d£€naf c#us&

(hid mt. m/es finksi (A rneti^ as &<£- as 4&

^/wSt.yh

lit UnHM state C*d‘M^ 4^ZJuLlh. Jwd(c ~FdM- JhWd U*t $*■ * JMruih b- -f1 g*

(eJird tern, (jk-tr- 9S/) ht ll.^. nocM c^r s»users’

ffr 6\(Avtitex., " (bl&t Blp^S-le^d *)

/ / A // > //

7Tw thiltd-duf-mt Ceurf iS U^ft^sk /[dd) tfd

(uK. (aim W CsUif, statiM-t(*$£■ 1*138) direck & »W Ctuii fa rtttr

uM2> m/!tfvjL.

PO(Ufts<L \J. %rr)aiatfi_ 4ca/&w df Or llopajLcli't £m&nai 470 U°S 375 ?^o

^t.Ed. ad ^ los s/a. 13/7 (ipsy

tlk 4lty(j£ ojjp pkuttk th 4)t Oedtr

U 4/t l& (Jr (jturO

&x Ctfpwtfc ^ r^a <j?/^ 'Qofl Osptttah (M

' l If,z- V-3^/7

,r*

USQ.u W/fs

£efc

Ojw,

to {far

iffM) $ {buxlu&ttAL tMtefc) oJ Us OUMjc rifidtj it. OJm i£j&n*zjto Jt,N- '(O

il£>C (iss fiiilj /Wx, OaM QjfU:'IS tdA-^ A- ftJmLtfajrk £4usl -(o j\*ts

Sthirriuif

mdbushst iMusk {ro U)OtL J b -IfJiiSL tujir Sjcrfj

_______

(xuA, "

« Ka

LC\U,fidr> ft- KCMntol udlSS (S

SSatfUj, C/tob&M

r fyjfl

d A* USd Jfimvr 7%* US. at MX

dins 0kv\- {Jit kawafo. -itAwL dAftn'iA

jJoL W to ust, mr mte

i^MnQL OA {/{jn$t tjf^

fthms

A St.

Coft/

iAuu. fo

(Ufa

p*#*')

Pr;^

fLf^

aiVL, a/I fttr Mato^ /Mtm& fa

^ (***<*

fttuU^c Ufa) tutor*) *> S3 ust pf S, is to-alkL

ft:-J/-

\ »1A

aJ.j^J-, 114k. d #1L U.s.

U9i

Ot&VJ<^

4Huto1 mt to pdt &. mer fafa f»fa J tfh w&±

is pvr. rfyIdts gfaWMO^yffafapts Lmt£337) fh. S^s>fa

UP- upfa14 {/s US4 (UM $efafa

' /

JTu. l^ 3*11Wrtfis r,/i*-<*. 4l

ss mDm g^. <3^4 ^ tdplto J^gifc J/ul, (Tuts

Ummst uMz Sp. jsdt tMfrfa#.. fa

■fiurfar o^ms $a6 UsJ^tafa tomtit

dwJuJitL

^ ^S0'l■$#$<-

-~+//f

Cr-337)J oJmL

t- 'ffamL

^uO^ *as JeAsfaL

Hdtrspf,

/Kvbrlpyutfafc, <fh^

U 2ft M 1L A

^ fftlfa* - FAm~ thcfi^J**3

fl. QtJtrd. rila'iidftt i*1

fill n Aifffi fM/tfr /Ij/tt/fh. </V

ffiJ/inL ft&wlfc

fuft «mSATiMk3s,%ez I- 3A^,m?

Tnmfr.z&V) /aj

lius. kk -Vul butrafa (tk C/raJ-t Ctlurt 4

4t =5 {ok. CwA> 4 (4h-h "ndm “ '/fats >& TtUu. f>k

I'rttfrm&l,

« J fa imUk pidifW

p**

U, <J,

(Md)<k

‘A. m/. PiiMsGriL ?ML fa-32?)

fa ftohl nJlh

c*»t ^ UjA

[(*teHif9L*if*wLz

y^fijriwh

gacMJwm4 Mkm cm d o&o

^rr

,r/.S

„/.

)

ddMMkTlkf

rfzf

(jld;{fd!»~ tt%. rffe v * &r

S*:uJ <fnM ktwtm- CM ks ckmA,

ouor 2fafL ?MU% (k/M^fmodM^^

aUut k SML CM dek'ds uMUnfridi&dmal.

a 4s (Ml M fa iweak Hard- dMMM* ** %yj\ t

is/))

xkwrt

<*■

J*3

ty*

t*f*

writs?*m* as ^fc, i^ iW ^ vl<L SM** <&&. &r a.cv*&(kM 2fate, M !4S M7t /S3 (mt).

«*6UJfop fh^jdPaz uW££

*jy TtdtoL

fj&fcicd Cm^ VaUtfriM oMt

£a~ k fa km- CM w mo. ifa fa MM Mud

(mA MmU. kn ^W ham Cwfar mmd

k m* rifa &fafa- la&-4 \/k-is-337) k TeJtraL $&trf<x CMD m Ml&

h&fiu-to-mi') &

kclw't^iw' aff^L ft. ^

^ tn/f-

/3 ^

x . (Mxfa^ dd&jtt d CL

to*6

faun (id SMl Ctfonra^ US. tJ ^ /?*• ^ £torrart)m fo puto£

ssh^jru/d, x mcwd

//*- exf&fa&t

5/fi/u

Wft

/L Subg&lfltfa

$/i

_________

&fal.i/}j(irfw2 ififa CPr l<Smt, piL Mufa l/Qcdfcti * >/

Hwdms l/o (kHU Mates} 5% f. 3cL $S5

7/oed)

SS&T.^L 733 720, fc* &

„. A A hJr1fj *f e»»t(U m, fMsLk /6*dwr

<3dC0

lit /rid /r -M d&—&/fta£ faMaugMs mtyJL fiAdnftsuw

*71 W w

„

a. JW /#c A/ ^ w,

Of g/u/s .ftdfa ‘//yd no .s&A

/ wfa6*/ ' 4/l JzfyA, t&4l J //i/(fus&f &K &rrud Mfar&it

{&. sSt Mmd/i■ m )jks zpft (mi fern)c& c** «*u

Mj X USA SlfiJMf

71 ,J

, .

tout)'

^ '

(M" MMp C$Xf(2d fcd/d)(s Mwsu /u/t

[jwMjdl^ emfay according fo (U&C 17,3%) m(//Tfa& Joe

Ctfjfk

ommbd

.„.

rtd&

A VO /A ,/} /7 J 7/'/,!* / ,rJ j/JU^/J/

%f/h </l fa&r-fMntA /jffafw:

'L/mH dv\

d //. TJkhi U

d&(f

dfa QMTiFM, tuAfi) *■ (Pp (T ML

ddm/)fo ${/)fJ£ Prtdltd imrfhr J/sjr&dJt$^. , /msy M dv/ouM,#^

dti

(f K saMi/m. pkz*$I <mM u)4t. mis A a ®

* ItuM £uUd *mM Lm^, imifjsA wt &% a^’i&/yj^ MQurbi 9jJL UA (K £4i>»1a*tid' '<mrfiW Z-fm

l/ifutfa’6P

‘mdttti OM/nd M. rtffaj*' w iw-xn.

orv L

fjMfUsZ !/. ttXUVfote, 319 <6

Sss Sfsfit- CJrf***)

%c57o d -vfe PA/'du&i pwJkd&d w x rt/lM'd

/&, /up)

^ fa.cJbjLPtdi/f/r mpMr^ /Ut Is CL cIlM t/>6 rJC

fa a -dir Irht

d /vL fa'

{(fa

CL sfiadt dmfi dtedi^ is

r*spjnwl mu(MSiUh\ fifi sfiaA tiffMt Courfe &r fid Unified

'aAs

ddtui 3%

/ /dlsf/fid)

Ifjnij <d fyf&oWj fid fir fib dwafifit fitdrd dMptfd Solid

jat_ <m4 {A HwAr- ftMrrn-, gkfdrrtnjL fig J^r 4k

frfi ifrierifa^ frffrrv ptorfomly (Za

(Wf(4)

UnM

(jJMrfi (T Oto 17LL Crfadt gtexrevd'//v fzdrd pistSot Ldu*fi /s

w/. v cf.\ / l, ^ a&fdifdks (J9 (A /ftn&idjwd

U-A Cf&ftW'^; Ol3 ML Cts fi/it (fid /faedmd)) as

rhlis

fwaxs

UaS (juid Cgh/dd^ i/ifi/ud fils

3 CiSr tytwufidk) &i fylfot fid

fid **fififiu. (M LMrfOAp ffiu/Sm

d fi/iL §ddt C&irb fiulL fidvL S CMdifi (d

<U&) &

nst h,mP

fifit $fiadt CAsl W udkfi- Pit* Wyfizs urn

m^i/U'Cr-ZsYh fid to Mm* rd »

- Qfifa JjrtML

fififlfc fid tfUAL- fid C^xrgjit l*M$ fi/bt Stffi

SMstadk-ttd

7a. UMtwt)

(Ms (psmhseL m id LfimL Ceuxfi. gfifi olfo ™r»rt

3(od- 3D/C JVL

—t

fijs M- Pirns k)&> nmr GmttiJL /V

vr (fe3t.#S5

m/y fik ildfid

(faidtd &(u2l fifid sfafc ca&fiS

fylfot PVf- dljffis d ftdtod Jtetrfirf Cmfi am a^e/Ad ,^r? ^

l rdJtifiA/'/diu aPkr PauMffi^ ftjJL Irmsifii^ $

WdkU, d^hafifi (dp v* Unified i?fiizLksj l^fijjs ■

Q (jJwtL ({{fysmntw o&ltbitjc <K

j) HoMiihil eAPtM COL Qffk

rdwed stofa' X&m} d CoUM'd {Atyd, l/

dw**-' l/to r^3)cuicdj 11$ ft 3d y^5

C HiT Qlfr £001^

/ «*)

tlesifb

desk*, h m %

Uuu-

dt US.

iCeuti a-ld-U- dU UtvW- 5tsdts

U£*' ^r' <?

S>tcUt ?r*u</fnp (last #337)' state TrtuautftSj 82 UML 82 ^t®&.

tvtdwc CtA&hdfr (k U 7-etiraL Jb£r?v& du*t-

W Is odsv dew {U /^ mr. rhk s^tedflt v

(Can. #337') 4k IwMl itdtot dbe** c#4U rL tAM

'Sr-

/)/) *

i rrrv, (X.

^.,/A..

It,

~771

^U-/rS /Mim\

Sn/d

Oil Td

£$/*/

*/VmI&s rdh pv

eoC ndtnjj (ftK. (dud*

(d&Ile Afat

4hL \ fiuit (j$y (J&A'fWVQ M%d> (AtC Site.

^ dmf&U&j t (^ .pcfnfi&C fa '(die

- 'CMtkr hrfu£ (Tufa dd

t/iot (fvL Tu^c fete

(jMU

„

(U&S Wd "-3cfa.it

USi,, (Asr„ I3uu^ sV 7/

PjUjjJr „

MnoyUi tout b //

ffkHcte

d90^ pfrtoitsV VII (UdU S-dotis &$

fa use MS', mlts STUd^Sl)

hsctiMiy T TtMsvil fjfetrtcfr (fauteUj dots mr.

°j /d^tefiwtektsite

((tWL prpOteS r\oUs) frr $JL tf.S. fan telhjtdn- hpTfd'teitte 4/W? tdc czA^C

Ttdfa A odi stted UiMi^ne/ds

teted /oaMd fidC, fedwyd ocete/t

(oteotuteoL tfdtdb^ T TdjfefaL tbbtncT Ctfucfi dCCOrMnp fa U3C / *t3% ,

/[carding (o

: (gtfa (tretet UuA &$

<7r^ JU

d tVjjk dtfpdfefa tdSt-A- 1*1 "Stit! SOU (A-L imera^i ^^iKdt CMcrt

'$*' Ardur ffl (du tl*b* jTbArfcte &wrt

(f^t

dAj &l’.jj iS.

NV^r the Mn\<L 4 fidjicMod^. A/frU buds

Trnt pbL WL s^ttuteafa e tkcjk fa

_ 3fote a (M^dj SumetnpTM Otd JAa&t. I/jJ'U’m* ; ti/ctu&L

ftdiuc »V- (UTCmfa e( dye nJAu?m> state, *

Sol rnfo i/. Uhw^ City ScA d)isd, $c£. at 6^

%s ,5, 7JT 20-#sOl*i).

( L\

-Ol dhu>'*tl'3aK 4L d^muSJ

/V« ^UmU) rff //v.

Hjfflb f4r y&tl,

U*A '^Kf-*1 ^5^.

/Ww £,W d^s) 3 *k ^

*ihd Hu M,

J c*d6

(U3t nzx) Jinote a Ajf#*Lrjw*Lrilrir y {/ul (jm-otuSt*^- (&m) 0-f

wt,

W l(thk£- ^udj&ntrCfc L<m

tn&m^L !/.

JuJw

$w%in£,

tl'S. 3 731 i>20/ <Zi/ (3*

e£» 2loL 2 lit /OS 3, Ct, 132. 7#9*5)

O&u? ru3''

ilAtS

"ftu3;, (jjlvh. Ut

___ ___

'i3trn>

O/l Td.

2920 Utvt (t'Mftzfpa#L 2/p^fL3) ^

!s n# eruUi&tUt, e,Ptec&-t»J*r QZ ut's.t. I /73Z ^Vd^st:

/a. C*n0tf .kd^ 90,

. .

^ by {Ajl PcMs&L d/dpnd CflV-'df /-S ________

U& dilroaf

frohr ^ M Ql*t 2*tf UM * W**

»4

•* “

nd" Quid

■S'SfeSSt^3

te£»g)7?Vg..^

tdc du //1~3

5/r M*C as Mill OS i*!

fyndl

%■

«4e

Ott hfc (JiM Aw ^

*f«*'

f.'jrXJ^L

^ 'T^>ti\T«fir

J tost Id rd imt, omd .m w/£ ol mw

%fad

fcczpz/zixi)

ZtJj ht/^^ ^mAwTUwd X>H^ CMrf -

(1)

CONCLUSION

The petition for a writ of certiorari should be granted.

Respectfully submitted.

Date:

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.