Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.70s
Petitioners Brief — Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2007
BAP 2003).... 10, 13, 24 In re Noll, 172 B.R. 122 (Bkrtcy.M.D.Fla. 1994) ......... 16, 17 In re Ponzini, 277 B.R. 399 (Bkrtcy.D.Ar. 2002)................ 18 In re Snyder, 279 B.R. 1 (1" Cir. … No. 95-989, at 94 (1978) .......ccccccccccccccceeeeeeeees 12, 20 Rules a 26 TE NE 24 ee 24 Fed.
549 U.S. 365Amicus Curiae Brief — Munro v. Socialist Workers Party
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Supp. 399 (M.D.Ala. 1984) Libertarian Party of Florida 5 v. State of Florida, 710 F.2d 790 (llth Cir. 1983) Libertarian Party of Nebraska 5 v. Beerman. 598 F. Supp. 57 (D. … Feb. 24, 1986) (No. 85-964).
479 U.S. 189Reply Brief — Preston v. Ferrer
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2008
R.B. 6, 15, 24, 34. … R.B. 2-6, 13-15, 24, 30-35, 44, 51.
552 U.S. 346Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Cordle v. Alabama
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1974
Alabama, 399 U.S. 1, 90 S.Ct. 1999, 26 L.Ed.2d 387 (1970). … Alabama, 399 U.S. 1, 90 S.Ct. 1999, 26 L.Ed.2d 387.
419 U.S. 1033Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Sierra v. Florida Department of Transportation
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005
SbAd cncescssecccsscsesrvscnesssnteeamnonaes 11 Trial Volume IV, pp. 383, 399 .............cscccssssessseees 10 Trial Volume V, pp. 4733-4 .....ccsccosccescsscessscosccesssece 1] IN THE Supreme Court … Lassiter at 24-25. It must be remembered that Ms.
543 U.S. 1052Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kauble v. Union Employee Discretionary Trust
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1997
Peck, 6 Cranch 87 ( Caen ae i ae wee In the Matter of Lytton's Appeal of Cluett, Peabody and Company, 832 F.2d 395, 399-402 (7th Cir.-1987) ..ccceees Michel & Lazarus vs. … App. 24.
519 U.S. 1058Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Zoie H., Petitioner v. Nebraska
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 22, 2020
JURISDICTION The Supreme Court of Nebraska issued its opinion on January 24, 2020. … New York, 399 U.S. 66, 71 (1970).
Respondents Brief — California ex rel. Brown v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1955
W. 24 919, 165 A. L. R. 785. … S. 120, 128, 48 L. ed. 900, 903, 24 S. Ct. 581.
348 U.S. 932Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 10, 2026
Sisson, 399 U.S. 267 (1970) ....................................................... 17 United States v. … Sisson, 399 U.S. 267, 307 (1970).
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1984
State, 358 So. 24 782, 786 (Ala. Crim. App.), cert denied, 358 So. 24 791 (Ala. 1978). … State, 399 So. 2d 859, 865 (Ala. Crim. App.), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 399 So. 2d 873 (Ala. 1979). That case is controlling.
466 U.S. 954Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Shieh v. Supreme Court of California
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1997
The United States of America, 775 F.2d 399 (2nd Cir. 1985); Brow v. Farrelly, 994 F.2d. 1027 (3rd Cir. 1993). … United States of America, 775 F.2d 399 (2nd Cir. 1985); Tripati v.
522 U.S. 933Federal Register · Notice · Jan 29, 2015
, 2005) (SR-Phlx-2004-91) (“Phlx Order”); see also e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 47628 (April 3, 2003), 68 FR 17697 (April 10, 2003) (SR-CBOE-00-55) (“CBOE Order”); 52331 (August 24 … SEC, 444 F.2d 399 (2d Cir. 1971); Arleen Hughes, 27 SEC 629, 636 (1948), aff'd sub nom. Hughes v. SEC, 174 F.2d 969 (D.C. Cir. 1949)).
80 FR 4954Securities and Exchange CommissionSupreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1940
Ed. nu... 7, 24 U.S. v. Albert Development Corp. (not reported) ae 8 U.S. v. Lexington Mill & Elevator Co., 232 U.S. 399, CORP Bee es i Oe ree 7 U. S. v. McCord, 233 U. S. 157, 162, 58 L. … S. 399, 410, 58 L. Ed. 658, 662; Crooks v. Harrelson, 232 U. S. 55, 60, 75 L. Ed. 156, 175; 25 Ruling Case Law, 982, 59 C. J. 984.
311 U.S. 15Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Aug 25, 1994
.......................19 43025-43280.............................................22 43281-43440.............................................23 43441-43702.............................................24 … 43308, 43309, 43311, 43517 91.....................................39711, 43784, 43994 189..................................................39395 257..................................................40836 399
Reply Brief — Amarin Pharma, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jun 1, 2021
Pet. 21-24. … Opp. 24-25. In any event, respondents are wrong on the merits.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Gray v. Mississippi
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1987
Ct. 399, 50 L Ed 2d 339 (1976), the dissent argued that this type of dismissal for cause could not be "sanctioned as ‘harmless error'." 472 So.2d at 425. The voir dire of Mrs. … Davis, 429 U.S. 123, 97 S.Ct. 399, 50 L.Ed2d 339 (1976). In Davis, the improper exclusion of a juror invalidated the subsequent imposition of the death penalty.
481 U.S. 648Petition — Huecker v. Weisenberger
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979
Ct. 1970 (1978) ...12, 24 Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Educa- tion, 66 F.R.D, 483 (W.D.N.C. 1975) .......00.. 24 Taylor v. … News 6338 ...16, 24, 27, 28 APPENDIX A Contents PAGE Weisenberger, et al. v.
444 U.S. 880Petitioners Brief — Bell v. Thompson
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2005
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986).................... 12, 13 Foucha v. Louisiana, 504 U.S. 71 (1992) ...........cccccccceeeeee 41 Gendron v. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986).
545 U.S. 794Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Miller v. United States (No. 09-467)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2009
See Caseer, 399 F.3d, at 840; Cosby, 682 F.2d, at 1383; Delay, 440 F.2d, at 568. … App. 24 Effective: January 7, 2008 18 U.S.C.A. § 111.
Appellants Brief — Regional Rail Reorganization Act Cases
Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1974
Conn. 1968); New Haven Inclusion Cases, supra, 399 U.S. at 481-82. … It is in light of the discussion at 399 U.S. at 481-82 that one must read the following single sentence of the Court’s opinion (399 U.S. at 490) upon which Gov- ernment counsel presumably relied in
419 U.S. 102
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.