Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.60s
Opposition Brief — United Food & Commercial Workers Local 951 v. Mulder
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1995
Casey, 956 F.2d 399 (3rd Cir. 1992) ........ . 10 Litton Financial Printing v. NLRB, __ U.S. ery eee 5 Tierney v. … P. 24(b) for permissive intervention. Intervening defendant NLRB is granted 60 days in which to file its answer or other responsive pleading.
513 U.S. 1148Respondents Brief Opposing Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — United States v. Oregon
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief Opposing Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1961
Or.) 67 F. 399; Graham v. Allen, 116 Or. 01,2 P. 1007. The presumption of contract arising under t! … Fox, 94 U.S..315, 320, 24 L. ed. 192. See ° | | 12 also United States v. Security-First National Bank of Lo Angeles, 130 F. Supp. 521.
366 U.S. 643Opposition — Freeman v. O'Neal Steel, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980
INT Teamsters, 399 F.2d 875 (5th Cir. 1968) 3 Willets v. … INT Teamsters, 399 F.2d 875 (5th Cir. 1968).
449 U.S. 833Supplemental Brief — In re Ainsworth
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1991
FILED MAR 20 399) 4 j bn } No. 90-1397 OFFICE OF THE CLERK | SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 1990 IN RE JONATHAN B. AINSWORTH, Petitioner Vv. … This was in clear violation of the United States Supreme Court's holding in Schiavone v Fortune 477 U.S. 21. 24 Pi ee maa 7 a een Pee ao = ae a = 7 — of 7 > Se Pe _ 4 7 : gh - == 2 .
500 U.S. 903Appendix — Moore v. East Cleveland
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1977
Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1972). … Ed. 2d at 399.
431 U.S. 494Opposition Brief — New Jersey v. Hackett
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986
Resor, 407 F.2d 281 (1969), cert. den. 399 U.S. 933 (1979) n--cencencesicessensasuaeeaee eee 11 Carafas v. LaValle, 391 U.S. 234 (1968) 000... 9-11, 13, 14 Fain v. … On July 24, 1984, Hackett submitted applications for permits to purchase a handgun and to carry a handgun to the Chief of Police of Orange, New Jersey.
479 U.S. 814Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Rule v. Sears
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1946
Ct. 399, 56 L. Ed. 680. 14 Sears v. Rule, 45 Cal. App. (2d) 374. 5 STATUTES. California Code of Civil Procedure, Sec. 1699.0... ccccceceeeeee 15 California Constitution, Art. … (Br. p. 24.) SRR Se aR Ne It is also pertinent to add that the foregoing quotation is taken from a section of the brief which is headed: “C. There Was No Collateral Agreement or Trust.”
328 U.S. 843Respondents Brief — Wallace v. Foster
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1950
Illinois, 399 U. S. 178 Delaney v. United States, 268 U. 8, 586, 589 District of Columbia v. Pace, 320 U. 8. Eagles v. Samuels, 309 U. S. 304 Feldman v. United States, 382 U. … E. 24 396... 2 Wallace v. The State, 205 Ga. 751, 55 S. E. 24145. 2, 10 Williams Mfg. Co. v. U. S. Shoe Machinery Corp, 816 U. S. 364, 3 San Woolsey v. Best, 299 U.
340 U.S. 815Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 25, 2026
No. 24-889 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ———— HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC. AND HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS PLC, Petitioners, v. … Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012) ........................................... 4, 7, 8 Eli Lilly and Co. v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — National Basketball Association, Petitioner v. Michael Salazar
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 2, 2025
No. 24-994 ____________ NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. … Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399 (1966)........................................... 17 Javier v. Assurance IQ, LLC, No. 21-16351, 2022 WL 1744107 (9th Cir.
Respondents Brief — Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1990
/d. at 24, 545 N.E.2d at 1325. … Rodeghero, 24 Ill.
497 U.S. 1Brief for the United States — United States v. Poland
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1920
.----- 24 Land Department Circular of Instructions (27 L. te} See 23, 24 STATUTES. … S. 399, are conclusive upon that point.
251 U.S. 221Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988
Schor, 478 US. 106 S.Ct. 3245, 92 L.Ed.2d 675 (1986).. 7, 24 Consumer Product Safety Comm'n. v. GTE Sylvania, EE og wc ccc ccscccccesccces 8 DeBartolo v. … *29 U.S.C. § 102. 24 this Court.
485 U.S. 568Brief for Appellee — Beer v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Appellee · 1976
Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964) 00. 20 Burnette v. Davis, 382 U.S. 42 (1965) 0... 7 Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) ...... 14 City of Petersburg v. … Martin, 375 US. 399 (1964).
425 U.S. 130Petition for Writ of Certiorari — George Ferrer Sanchez, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 15, 2021
Grinard-Henry, 399 F.3d 1294 (11" Cir. 2005)............0004 10, 12 United States v. Hasting, 461 U.S. 499 (1983). 0... ce eee teens 9 United States v. … Grinard-Henry, 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11" Cir. 2005) (emphasis added); accord United States v. Blick, 408 F.3d 162, 171 (4" Cir. 2005) (citing Grinard-Henry).
Record and brief — Messenger v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1982
Kimball International, Inc., 620 F.2d 399 (3d Cir. 1980). … Kimball Interna- tional, Inc., 620 F.2d 399 (3d Cir. 1980) and Hing Lee v. Gray, 456 F.2d 1276 (3d Cir. 1972).
455 U.S. 944Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Gurley v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995
Bacon, 828 F.2d 1272 (8th Cir. 1987) 14n, 24, 28n Heiser v. Woodruff, 327 U.S. 726 (1946) 21, 23 Hormel v. … J-C-83-399, United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkan- sas, Jonesboro Division.
516 U.S. 817Amicus Curiae Brief — Cort v. Ash
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
The statute does not violate the constitutional rights of corpora- tions, their officers, or their share- ~ holders _ 19 1, The First Amendment Tights of shareholders _ 24 2. … Letter Car- riers, 413 U.S. 548 14, 29, 31, 34 Clarke, Ex parte, 100 U.S. 399 12 Curtis, Ex parte, 106 U.S. 371 _..____. 14 Egan v.
422 U.S. 66Transcript of Record — Federal Power Commission v. East Ohio Gas Co.
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1950
G-115, G-399, G-400 and ~ _ G-401. … Does the gas flow from the Hope lines into your lines 24 hours a day? A. Hope delivers us gas 24 hours a day. _ Q. Day in and day out? A.
338 U.S. 464Petitioners Brief — Arizona v. Manypenny
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1981
Sisson, 399 U.S. 267, 293 (1970). … Sisson, 399 U.S. 267, 281, 26 L. Ed. 2d 608(1970).
451 U.S. 232
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.