Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

6,243 results

0.86s

  • GRANTED: June 20, 2013

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    The contract covered a phase-in period, which per amendment 1 ran until March 13, 2006, and five option periods, each one year in duration, with the first beginning on March 14, 2006. … The matter was also raised in this comment by a prospective offeror: Sub-Factor 2.

    Civilian Board of Contract Appeals
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    At the time, Michelle owned an old Ford Mustang that did not have air conditioning, and Mr. Beck drove a Buick Century, titled in the name of the corporation. … Commissioner, 118 F.2d 308, 310 (5th Cir. 1941), revg. 40 B.T.A. 424 (1939), or the intentional commission of an act or acts for - 36 the specific purpose of evading a tax believed to be owing, Webb v

    United States Tax Court
  • In the Matter of ABBEYS SPECIALIZED HAULERS

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    The period for submitting bids closed on May 17, 2011. DCMA awarded the shipment to Abbeys Specialized Haulers (ASH), with $16,589 to be paid to the carrier. … CBCA 2763-RATE 3 GSA’s Federal Acquisition Service submitted comments on this matter and documents in support of its position.

    Civilian Board of Contract Appeals
  • FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Under Section 7A(g)(1) of the Act, any person that fails to comply with the Act’s notification and waiting period requirements is liable for a civil penalty of up to $16,000 – increased in 2009 from $11,000 … The public comment period ended on October 18, and the agencies are considering those comments before implementing HSR form changes. 52 52 75 Fed.

    Federal Trade Commission
  • FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Under Section 7A(g)(1) of the Act, any person that fails to comply with the Act’s notification and waiting period requirements is liable for a civil penalty of up to $16,000 – increased in 2009 from $11,000 … The public comment period ended on October 18, and the agencies are considering those comments before implementing HSR form changes. 52 52 75 Fed.

    Federal Trade Commission
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    20, 1988, Office Auditor Barrow sent (...continued) filed on Jan. 26, 1995, and, therefore, has been considered under sec. 7430 as amended by sec. 6239(a) of the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act … Laundry & cleaning 10. Rent on business property 11. Repairs 12. Supplies 13. Taxes 14. Travel & entertainment 15. Utility/telephone 16. Tolls 17. Pick up charges 18. Claims/chargebacks 19.

    United States Tax Court
  • Interim Decision #1818

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    The record reveals that the alien arrived in Bermuda by air on a British Overseas Airways Corporation flight, hereafter referred to as BOAC, and in the United States on the same airline. … We return now to comments submitted by the American Consul in Bermuda: In response to a request for information from their files concerning the applicant, the Consul advised that according to his records

    Executive Office for Immigration Review
  • U.S. Department of Labor

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    , the Federal Railroad Safety Act, and Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.152 Notably, interest on federal tax underpayments—the reference the Board has long used in determining the appropriate interest … Reg 44,121, 44,128 (July 27, 2012). 151 See, e.g., Procedures for the Handling of Retaliation Complaints Under the National Transit Systems Security Act and the Federal Railroad Safety Act, 80 Fed.

    Department of Labor
  • T .C . Memo . 2009-4 2

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Alami was responsibl e for cleaning his uniform . Mr . … Alami was also responsible for cleaning her own uniforms . Ms . Alami was periodically required by her employer to be on call .

    United States Tax Court
  • U.S. Department of Labor

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Delta Air Lines, ARB No. 03-070, ALJ No. 2003-AIR-004, slip op. at 2 (ARB Feb. 24, 2005). 9 29 C.F.R. § 18.72(a) (2018); Franchini v. … Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century, commonly known as “AIR 21.”

    Department of Labor
  • In the Matter of DONALD E. CONEY

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Coney retired from the United States Air Force in 1994 while stationed in Europe, where he remained. When he transferred to the United States, Mr. … shipment and/or delivery to the new permanent private sector housing due to extended transit time incident to ocean transportation, strikes, customs clearance, hazardous weather, fires, floods, or other Acts

    Civilian Board of Contract Appeals
  • These synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    As part of the purchase, the customer receives 7,000 points (air miles) from W to be redeemed for future air travel. … As part of the purchase, the customer receives 7,000 reward points (air miles) from W to be used for future air travel.

    Internal Revenue Service
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    From 1986 until the end of 1988, Air America did not operate as a consolidator, but during - 6 - that period it continued to operate as a retail travel agent. … The TRO was renewed periodically through at least November 22, 1988.

    United States Tax Court
  • ABX Air, Inc.: No Action, Interpretive and/or Exemptive Letter of June 13, 2007

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    ABX Air, Inc.: No Action, Interpretive and/or Exemptive Letter of June 13, 2007 Home | Previous Page Securities Act of 1934 Rule … Holdings Common Stock in exchange for Company Common Stock may take into account the periods during which they held the Company Common Stock for the purpose of calculating their holding periods for Holdings

    Securities and Exchange Commission
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    (cleaned up)); United States v. AT&T, Inc., 310 F. Supp. 3d 161, 192–93 (D.D.C. 2018), aff’d, 916 F.3d 1029 (D.C. Cir. 2019) (same); Fruehauf Corp. v. … (cleaned up)). 29 David Reiffen & Michael Vita, Comment: Is There New Thinking on Vertical Mergers?

    Federal Trade Commission
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    At the time, Michelle owned an old Ford Mustang that did not have air conditioning, and Mr. Beck drove a Buick Century, titled in the name of the corporation. … Commissioner, 118 F.2d 308, 310 (5th Cir. 1941), revg. 40 B.T.A. 424 (1939), or the intentional commission of an act or acts for - 36 the specific purpose of evading a tax believed to be owing, Webb v

    United States Tax Court
  • In the Matter of CARROLL ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP COOPERATIVE

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    There is no dispute that the applicant and work are eligible for public assistance under the Stafford Act. … Under the Stafford Act, however, the Board is not bound by FEMA’s determinations. The Board reviews the evidence de novo.

    Civilian Board of Contract Appeals
  • DENIED: September 4, 2014

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    The agency has paid some or a portion of some out-of-pocket expenses not in dispute here (such as equipment move out and return costs, and equipment cleaning costs). … The agency acted within the terms of the contract in suspending performance. The sovereign act does not constitute a breach by the agency.

    Civilian Board of Contract Appeals
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Petitioner's mission as a social science expert was to act as a liaison between the NATO command and the local people of Kandahar and its surrounding area. … He was assigned to NATO by the Air Force. NATO did not have the authority to hire petitioner or to fire him from the Air Force.

    United States Tax Court
  • cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES (2006)

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Please note that the scoping period will close on July 31, 2006. … A 30-day comment period will be allotted for review of the EA. We will consider all comments submitted on the EA in any Commission Order that is issued for the project.

    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.