Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.12s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Sebelius
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013
Keller, 423 P.2d 447, 451 (Okla. 1966); Barium Steel Corp. v. Wiley, 108 A.2d 336, 341 (Pa. 1954). … U.S.
571 U.S. 1067Amicus Curiae Brief — Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
No. 473, 94th Cong., Ist Sess. (1975) U.S. Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 8, Clause 8 U.S. Register of Copyrights, Report of the Regis- ter of Copyrights on the General Revision of the U.S. … Aiken, 422 U.S. 151, 156 (1976) quoted in Sony Corp. of America v. Universal Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 416, 432 (1984).
510 U.S. 569Amicus Curiae Brief — Obergefell v. Hodges
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Lewis, 188 N.J. at 423, 457. … See U.S. Dep’t of State, “U.S.
576 U.S. 644Amicus Curiae Brief — Deboer v. Snyder, 135 S. Ct. 1040 (2015) (No. 14-571)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Lewis, 188 N.J. at 423, 457. … See U.S. Dep't of State, “U.S.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 16, 2018
L. & Prac. 51 (2003) ....................... 19 U.S. … Trane U.S., Inc., 2016 WL 916435, at *1 (W.D. Wis.
Amicus Curiae Brief — eBay Inc. v. MERCEXCHANGE, LLC
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Root, 105 U.S. at 191-92; Cochrane, 94 U.S. at 782. 5. … The Court also considered the adequacy of legal remedies, noting that “the [patentee’s] remedy at law remains.” 210 U.S. at 423.
546 U.S. 1029Amicus Curiae Brief — Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Code § 9-107, at 423 (Reporters Note) (1975). … See 479 U.S. at 428.
544 U.S. 113Amicus Curiae Brief — Albertson's, Inc. v. Kirkingburg
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
United States, 316 U.S. 137, 144 (1995). Where, as here, “the statutory language provides a clear answer, it ends there as well.” Hughes Aircraft Co. v. Jacobson, No. 97-1287, slip op. at 5 (U.S. … Guernsey Memorial Hosp., 514 U.S. 87 (1995); Martin v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Comm'n, 499 U.S. 144, 157 (1991).
527 U.S. 555Amicus Curiae Brief — Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 391 n.4 (1987); Deford v. Soo Line R.R., 867 F.2d 1080, 1086 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 927 (1994). * See, ¢.g., Shumaker v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 1996 U.S. Dist. … Fox, 464 U.S. 523, 536 (1984); Texas Indus. , Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc., 451 U.S. 630, 639 (1981); Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66, 78 (1975). See, ¢.g., Mendes v.
517 U.S. 1118Amicus Curiae Brief — Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. Garrett
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Jd. at 482 (statement of Rep. Shellabarger). Only thus could Congress realize the promise of equality envisioned when the Amendment was adopted. II. … Romeo, 457 U.S. 307 (1982).
531 U.S. 356Amicus Curiae Brief — Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
Rainey, 488 U.S. 153, 169 (1988)). … Rev. 473, 482 (1986). This “loosening up” represents an informed vote of confidence in the ability of American juries to make proper use of expert testimony.
526 U.S. 137Amicus Curiae Brief — Danco Laboratories, LLC, Applicant v. Louisiana, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 6, 2026
A U.S. … MED. 57 (2022). 33 “App.” refers to the Appendix to the Application by Danco to Stay or Vacate the Fifth Circuit's Stay Pending Appeal. 34 U.S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Simmons v. Himmelreich, 136 S. Ct. 445 (2015) (No. 15-109)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Meyer, 510 U.S. at 477. … Corp., 456 U.S. 461, 482 n.22 (1982) (“Res judicata has recently been taken to bar claims arising from the same transaction even if brought under different statutes ....”); Restatement (Second) of
Amicus Curiae Brief — Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Pitts, 503 U.S. 467, 489-90 (1992); Wash v. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1, 458 U.S. 457, 482 (1982); Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717, 741 (1974). … Grutter, 593 U.S. at 333.
548 U.S. 938Amicus Curiae Brief — Randall v. Sorrell
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
See Buckley, 424 U.S. at 30; see also Nixon, 528 U.S. at 395. … Buckley, 424 U.S. at 55.
546 U.S. 1148Amicus Curiae Brief — Tamer Mahmoud, et al., Petitioners v. Thomas W. Taylor, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 9, 2025
Connecticut, 382 U.S. 479, 482 (1965) (discussing this “principle” of Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923) and Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925)). … Dist., 141 U.S. at 189.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 26, 2022
Hildebrant, 241 U.S. 565 (1916); Smiley v. Holm, 285 U.S. 355 (1932); 3 Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Indep. Redistricting Comm’n, 576 U.S. 787 (2015). … See Karin Mac Donald, Adventures in Redistricting: A Look at the California Redistricting Commission, 11 Election L.J. 472, 482 & n.71 (2012) (citing Editorial, Prop. 27 Would Strangle Redistricting Reform
Amicus Curiae Brief — South Carolina v. Catawba Tribe, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
App. 477-478, 482, 493. 4 After Congress was assured that the Tribe desired termination (see Hearings, supra note 4, at 9, 18, 84-85; C.A. … U.S. 371, 375 (1917).
476 U.S. 498Amicus Curiae Brief — Arkansas v. Oklahoma
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Arizona, 325 U.S. 761 ree ee one ee 15 Sporhase v. Nebraska, 458 U.S. 941 (1982) —........ 16 State v. … Heitner, 423 U.S. at 197.
499 U.S. 946Amicus Curiae Brief — Sisson v. Ruby
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
PA. 1983); aff'd, 735 F.2d 423 (3rd Cir. 1984), cert. den., 459 U.S. 858, 105 S.Ct. 1888 (1984) (DOHSA applied to a death claim arising out of Bahamian territorial waters). 16 admiralty courts and … Chambers, 312 U.S. 383, 61 S.Ct. 687, 85 L.Ed. 903 (1941); Coryell v. Phipps, 317 U.S. 406, 63 S.Ct. 291, 87 L.Ed. 363 (1943).
497 U.S. 358
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.