Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
1.07s
Amicus Curiae Brief — RiseandShine Corporation, dba Rise Brewing, Petitioner v. PepsiCo, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 15, 2026
Hana Bank, 574 U.S. at 423. 21 because consumers rarely bother complaining even if they ultimately figure out that they were confused. … Google, 593 U.S. at 24.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Morrison v. Olson
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988
Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983) .0000..0000 21 Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294 (1964)... 27 Kendall v. United States ex rel. Stokes, 37 U.S. cacescscceoee 18, 19 McCulloch v. … Maryland, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316, 423 (1819) has been that the Court will not upset a rational congressional judgment. Kat- zenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294, 303-04 (1964); L.
487 U.S. 654Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Texas, 136 S. Ct. 2271 (2016) (No. 15-674)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
The Federalist No. 70, at 423~—24 (Hamilton) (Clinton Rossiter ed., 1961). … See U.S.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 31, 2021
Stroop, 496 U.S. 478 (1990) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Wright v. … Stroop, 496 U.S. 478, 482 (1990) ("In ascertaining the plain meaning of the statute, the court must look to the particular statutory language at issue, as well as the language and design of the statute
Amicus Curiae Brief — Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 293 (2017) (No. 16-402)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Knotts, 460 U.S. at 284. … Watson, 423 U.S. 411, 416 (1976). That “strong presumption” should weigh at least as heavily as the general default rule against warrantless searches.
Amicus Curiae Brief — DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Ysbrand
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Cohn, 420 U.S. 469 (1975)). … See Cox Broadcasting, 420 U.S. at 482-83 (review of interlocutory state court decision resolving an issue of federal law is appropriate when “the federal issue has been finally decided in the state
542 U.S. 937Amicus Curiae Brief — Maryland v. Craig
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Superior Court, 457 U.S. 88 — W —— — 5 Glendening v. State, 536 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 1988), cert. denied, 109 S. Ct. 3219 (198999 18 Kentucky v. Stincer, 482 U.S. 730 (19877 3, 4, 10 Ohio v. … Roberts, 448 U.S. 56 (1980) ) 14 Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39 (1987) 2,18 People v. Algarin, 129 Misc. 2d 1016 (N.Y. Supp. ꝗ——— 17 People v. Cintron, 1990 W.
493 U.S. 1041Amicus Curiae Brief — Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
(U.S. … Health Politics, Pol'y & Law, 423 (1986). Congress did not take leave of its senses.
533 U.S. 525Amicus Curiae Brief — Gonzales v. Oregon
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702 (1997); Vacco v. Quill, 521 U.S. 793 (1997). … Cruzan, 497 U.S. at 282-284 (1990); Addington, 441 U.S.
546 U.S. 243Amicus Curiae Brief — Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
The U.S. … FCC, 183 F.3d 393, 413, n. 14 (Sth Cir. 1999), cert. dismissed, 121 S.Ct. 423 (2000).
533 U.S. 946Amicus Curiae Brief — Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Sebelius
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013
Keller, 423 P.2d 447, 451 (Okla. 1966); Barium Steel Corp. v. Wiley, 108 A.2d 336, 341 (Pa. 1954). … U.S.
571 U.S. 1067Amicus Curiae Brief — Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
No. 473, 94th Cong., Ist Sess. (1975) U.S. Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 8, Clause 8 U.S. Register of Copyrights, Report of the Regis- ter of Copyrights on the General Revision of the U.S. … Aiken, 422 U.S. 151, 156 (1976) quoted in Sony Corp. of America v. Universal Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 416, 432 (1984).
510 U.S. 569Amicus Curiae Brief — eBay Inc. v. MERCEXCHANGE, LLC
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Root, 105 U.S. at 191-92; Cochrane, 94 U.S. at 782. 5. … The Court also considered the adequacy of legal remedies, noting that “the [patentee’s] remedy at law remains.” 210 U.S. at 423.
546 U.S. 1029Amicus Curiae Brief — Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Ct. 482 (1992). … Manhart, 435 U.S. 702, 722 and n.42 (1978); Florida v. Long, 487 U.S. 223, 235-36 (1988); Arizona Governing Comm. y. Norris, 463 U.S. 1073, 1105-08 (1983).
512 U.S. 1288Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 15, 2024
Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 651 (1972); Pierce v. Soc’y of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510, 532 (1925). … See Parham, 442 U.S. at 606.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Code § 9-107, at 423 (Reporters Note) (1975). … See 479 U.S. at 428.
544 U.S. 113Amicus Curiae Brief — Albertson's, Inc. v. Kirkingburg
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
United States, 316 U.S. 137, 144 (1995). Where, as here, “the statutory language provides a clear answer, it ends there as well.” Hughes Aircraft Co. v. Jacobson, No. 97-1287, slip op. at 5 (U.S. … Guernsey Memorial Hosp., 514 U.S. 87 (1995); Martin v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Comm'n, 499 U.S. 144, 157 (1991).
527 U.S. 555Amicus Curiae Brief — Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 391 n.4 (1987); Deford v. Soo Line R.R., 867 F.2d 1080, 1086 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 927 (1994). * See, ¢.g., Shumaker v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 1996 U.S. Dist. … Fox, 464 U.S. 523, 536 (1984); Texas Indus. , Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc., 451 U.S. 630, 639 (1981); Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66, 78 (1975). See, ¢.g., Mendes v.
517 U.S. 1118Amicus Curiae Brief — Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. Dedeaux
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co., 780 F.2d 419, 423 (4th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 106 S. … Pireno, 458 U.S. at 129.
481 U.S. 41Amicus Curiae Brief — Danco Laboratories, LLC, Applicant v. Louisiana, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 6, 2026
A U.S. … MED. 57 (2022). 33 “App.” refers to the Appendix to the Application by Danco to Stay or Vacate the Fifth Circuit's Stay Pending Appeal. 34 U.S.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.