Documents

Opposition — Brackett v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978

Alabama, 399 U.S, 1..------ 6 DeVerse v. United States, 536 F. 2d 804, certiorari eae eae 13 Dorszynski v. United States, 418 U.S, 424.......---- Passim ITankerson v. … Maryland, 428 F. 24 169.........-.-..-- 6 Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541....--.----_ 2,3 MVeConnell vy. Rhay. SE Ee ne > McCray v. United States, 542 F. 2d 1246_.....---___ 12 McK nabb vy.

Opposition — Arizona Public Service Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1984

Food Employers Council, Inc., 399 F.2d 501, 502 (Sth Cir., 1968) NLRB v. Retail Clerks Local ’ F.2d 984, Cir., 1978) NLRB v. … Food Employers Council, Inc., 399 F.2d 501, 502 (9th Cir., 1968); Lammert Industries v. NLRB, supra.

Petition — Whalen v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

Dancy, 156 U.S.App.D.C. 399, 401, n.6 510 F.2d 779, 781 n.6. (1975). … Woods, 286 N.C. 612, 218 S.£.24 214 (1975) ‘convictions. . for kidnapping and rape vacated); State ex rel.

Opposition Brief — Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United States, 24 Cl. Ct. 167 (1991) (No. 91-1)

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991

See Re- funds Resulting From Btu Measurement Adjust- ments, FERC Order No. 399, 49 Fed. Reg. 37,735 (1984). 3. … gress enacted in Section 13839(a), the Comptroller General’s opinion interpreting a statute that did not contain such a bar is of no relevance here.* 8 Petitioners also err in relying (91-1 Pet. 23-24

Amicus Brief — Michigan v. Summers

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1981

Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970)---26 Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969)-26 Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 433 (1971 ) oe <enwewneccecsmeenaeecwbeeunaan 26 Harris v. … New York, supra, to the effect that a "Single, familiar standard" of * Interview with James Larkin, Assistant District Attorney of Harris County, Texas, in Houston, Nov. 24, 1980.

Opposition Brief — Barefoot v. City of Wilmington

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2002

Colo. 1970) (three-judge panel), aff'd, 399 U.S. 901 (1970). Murphy v. Kansas City, 347 F. … The state petitioners then sought discretionary review in the North Carolina Supreme Court _ which was denied on August 24, 2000. Rogers, et. al. v.

Petitioners Reply Brief — Baker Commodities, Inc. v. Commissioner

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1970

Greenough, 100 F. 24° 1006 .....--ssesssseeeoe- 7 Stephens v. Arrow Lumber Co., 354 F. 2d 732 ....... 7 Miscellaneous | 2 U.S. … United States, 399 F. 2d 194 (Ct. Cl. 1968), on rehearing 402 F. 2d 1000 (1968).

Opposition Brief — Chance v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1965

The petitioner previously sued this respondent claim- ing total permanent disability as the result of an accident on June 24, 1951. … Q. 393, 399-400 (1960), as follows: “But the fact that a federal question lurks in the case doesn’t mean, standing alone, that a state decision will. be reviewed.

Motion — Cupp v. Murphy

Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1973

Faced with no other lead, the police rounded up some 24 Negro youths, without warrants, and took them to police headquarters for finger- printing after which they were released. … Maroney, 399 U. S. 42 (1970) and Carroll v. United States, 267 U. S. 132 (1925). | 17 CONCLUSION.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Sugarman v. California

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1949

United States, 151 U.S. 396, 399, 404; Optner v. United States, 13 Fed. (2d) 11, 12; Ashe v. United States, 2 Fed. (2d) 735; Krulewttch v. … United States, 151 U.S. 396, 399, 404; Optner v. United States, 13 Fed. (2d) 11, 12; Ashe v. United States, 2 Fed. (2d) 735; Krulewitch v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ronald David Jones, Petitioner v. Grand Canyon University, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 7, 2018

24.They all seem to have an agenda. Was someone paid off? 25.1s not Trump University a private university? … Ct. 399, 78 L 12 Ed. 2d 341 (1983).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Robert Phillip Ivers, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2021

United States, 524 U.S. 399, 403 (1998)). … See Brief of Appellee at 24-25, in United States v. Ivers, No. 19-1563, 2019 WL 3947835 (8th Cir. 2019) (“Government’s Eighth Circuit Brief ”).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Georgia Association of Club Executives, Inc., Petitioner v. Georgia, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 23, 2025

No. 24-881 In the Supreme Court of the United States __________ GEORGIA ASSOCIATION OF CLUB EXECUTIVES, INC., PETITIONER, v. … Larosa, 796 F.3d 399 (4th Cir. 2015) ............................................ 7 Champion v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Abislaiman v. Florida

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1984

(T. 24-26). Using remote control equipment located in the monitor room, Nieto purposely activated the zoom lens on the camera to look inside the vehicle. (T. 8, 26-27). … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 49-50, 90 S.Ct. 1975, 1980 (1970); Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 45 S.Ct. 280 (1925).

Petitioners Brief — Brett Jones, Petitioner v. Mississippi

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Jun 5, 2020

Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986), which bars the execution of insane defendants, Enmund v. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 416–17, 106 S.

Brief for Respondent — Gagnon v. Scarpelli

Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1973

Alabama, 399 US. 1, 90 S.Ct. 1999, 26 L.Ed.2d 387-(1970) ioe ek See be ees 18-19 Dixon v. Alabama State Board of Education, 294 RATIO OMG) 5 8 OR. EE Ee 31 Doherty v. … Larche, 363 U.S. 420, 80 S.Ct. 1502, 4 LEd.2d 1307 (1960) ........... 10-11, 23-24, 25,26,27 Holden v. Hardy, 169 U.S. 366, 18 S.Ct. 383, 42 a aE SRE RS tna reel 14 Jenkins v.

Petition — Walker v. Newgent

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979

Nissan Motor Co., 399 F.Supp. 838 (S.D. Fla. 1975). 7. Walker v. Newgent, 583 F.2d 619. 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 9 Mr. … Wash- ington, 326 U.S. 310, 66 S.Ct. 154, 90 L.Ed. 95 (1945), or if the defendant has performed some act “by which [it] purposefully avails itself of the privi- 24 lege of conducting activities within

Respondents Brief — Your Home Visiting Nurse Services, Inc. v. Shalala

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1999

Bowen, 485 U.S. 399, 403- 404 (1988). … Petitioner’s further argument (Pet. i, 21, 24- 25) that denying judicial review of denials of reopening would violate its due process rights was not raised below.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Steinbrink v. Independent Insurance Insurance Agents Agents of America (Nos. 92-507, 92-484)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

Georgia Association of I t Insur- ance Agents, 399 F.2d 1010 (5th Cir. 1968) ... 6 i v. Kerr, 555 F. Supp. 1090 (S.D. … § 24(Seventh), authorized national banks to act as agent in the sale of credit life insurance, wherever the banks were located.

Opposition Brief — Drobny v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985

Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386, 399 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 (1976). And see United States v. … Holschuh, 694 F.2d 136, 143-144 & n.24 (7th Cir. 1982); United States v. Riedel, 126 F.2d 81, 83 (7th Cir. 1942).