Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Louisiana, Appellant v. Phillip Callais, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 3, 2025

Nos. 24-109, 24-110 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF LOUISIANA, Appellant, v. PHILLIP CALLAIS, et al., Appellees. PRESS ROBINSON, et al., Appellants, v. … Appellees (Br. 38) and Louisiana (Br. 18-24) contend that the same is true of Section 2. They are wrong; Section 2 contravenes neither commandment.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Public Interest Legal Foundation, Petitioner v. Al Schmidt, Secretary of Pennsylvania, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 30, 2025

Akins, 524 U.S. at 24. … Id. at 24−25.

Jurisdictional Statement — Hodgson v. Minnesota

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1971

Sinai Hosp. 111 (1954) 0. 24 Hall, Abortion in American Hospitals, 57 Am. J. Pub. … Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399 (1966) (1860 stat- ute). 3° NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415, 488 (1963). * Griswold v.

Reply Brief — Lodi Truck Service, Inc. v. Division of Labor Standards Enforcement

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1986

displaced states’ power over safety of operation employees of inter- Pe ee a 8 6 6 cbs ace kasd cee ce be ceeensann Cases cited by appellee are not directly related or applicable to the issue herein S28 24 … 1973 Cah abcd kd awk Gx 42 © 8 Motor Carrier Act of 1935 (49 Stat. 543) (MCA)...... 2 Seamen’s Act (38 Stat. 1164, 1169, 1170-1184) ........ 2 Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, section 350-399

Reply Brief Petitioner — National Labor Relations Board v. Bradford Dyeing Ass'n

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief Petitioner · 1940

IV, Title 24, See. 151 et seq.): Section 9 ® . … Natiorval Bituniinous Coal Commission, 99° (2d) 399, 406 (App. D. C.). . omental J 4 \, offered hy the Cc.

Motion — Caldwell v. City of New Orleans

Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1975

New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1972) .......... 8 Bloom v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 194 (1968) .............. 8 Coolidge v. … New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1972); Johnson v. Turner, 429 F.2d 1152; ULS. v. 9 Merick, 459 F.2d 644; U.S. v. Potvin, 481 F.2d 380; Maita v. Whitmore, 365 F.Supp. 1331.

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Eubank v. Illinois

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1971

Davis, 399 F. 2d 948, 951-952 (2nd Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 987 (1968) ...... 8 see taaiai nein iii. United States v. Marcello, 423 F. 2d 993, 1005 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 90 S. … State of California, 386 U.S. 18, 24.” Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. at 274. In the present case, Mrs.

Supplemental Brief — Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Billing

Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 2007

LEVINE WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & DORR LLP 399 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 230-8800 Attorneys for Petitioner STEPHEN M. SHAPIRO Counsel of Record KENNETH S. … See Pet. 20-24; Pet. Reply to Billing 2-4; Gordon, 422 U.S. at 682, 685; NASD, 422 U.S. at 730-734.

Opinion — Winters v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1908

Argued October 24, 1907.—Decided January 6, 1908. … Kincannon, 7 Pet. 399; Masterson v. Herndon, 10 Wall. 416; Hampton v. Rouse, 13 Wall. 187; Wilson’s Heirs v. Insurance Co., 12 Pet. 140.

Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Benson v. Rich

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1972

(Petition pp. 24-36). In their appeal to the _ >. … Discipline Committee of East Tennessee State U niv ersity, 6th Cir., 419 F.2d 195, cert. den. 399 U.S. 906 (1970). Those in charge of the situation need.

Jurisdictional Statement — Voorhes v. Dempsey

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1965

Martin, 375 U.S. 399, 112 L.Ed. 430, 84 S.Ct 454; 32 Law Week 4101 (1963). : 7 Davis, Secretary, a et al. v. ome et al., 374°U.S. 803 (1963) 3 ‘ « 3 Eaton v. … Murtin, 375 U.S. 399, - 112 L.Ed. 430, 84 S.Ct. 454; 32 Law Week 4101 (1963).

Reply Brief — Seventh-day Adventist Congregational Church v. General Conference Corp. of Seventh-day Adventists

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1990

Dolan, 544 F.24¢ 1219 (C.A. 4, 1976)..... United States v. Johnson, 801 F.2d 597 (C.A. 2, 1986)...... United States v. Pink, 315 U.S. 203 (1942)... cc eeeeveees 2. Statutes me meme. … United States, 399 U.S. 392, 435 (1970). Such is not the case here. The facts set forth for Judicial Notice are, relatively speaking, extremely limited.

Reply Brief — Ross v. Bernhard

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1969

Ney: 399, O4 y. K. $95 (1911), the defendant president and director caused: his corporation to pay him part of its capiti ul. … Hurley Motor Co.7.273 US. 18. 24 (1927 ys Okeechobee . County v. Nuveen, 145 F.2d 684, 6S7-and n. 5 (5 Cir. 1944) : Restatement, Restitution, yp. 5-9 (1937). In fact. the ne.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Brandon A. Dunkleberger, Petitioner v. Illinois

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 28, 2025

Dunkleberger, 251 N.E.3d 399 (Table), 479 Ill. Dec. 777 (2025). ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases: Page Federal Cases: Bradshaw v. … Buchanan, a family or household member of the defendant, in that said defendant strangled Katelyn Buchanan, and the defendant having been previously convicted of the offense of domestic battery” (C. 24

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Handy v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1972

Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)...... 7, 13, 24, 37, 40 —_ es eeE——eeEeEeEeEeEeeeeeeeeeeeee vi Cont. Cases Page People v. … Driscoll, 399 F 2d 135 (1968) "B10. 11, 24 U.S. v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967) ..... 1, 12, 13, a, 18, 19, 3. 21 24, 27, 31, 32, 33,34 U.S. v.

Petitioners Brief — Clemente Avelino Pereida, Petitioner v. Robert M. Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Jan 28, 2020

Uhl, 107 F.2d 399, 400 (2d Cir. 1939) (L. Hand, J.) … See supra at 22-24. 2. The modified categorical inquiry is not a “factual” one.

Opposition — Association of Massachusetts Consumers, Inc. v. Securities & Exchange Commission

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1976

New England Electric System, 376 F. 2d 399, reversed, 384 U.S. 176 3-4 Securities and Exchange Commission v. … App. 7, 52-53). 384 U.S. 176, reversing 346 F. 2d 399 (C.A. 1), and was re- affirmed in Securities and Exchange Commission v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Virginia v. Moore

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

Rodriguez, 854 P.2d 399 (Or. 1993)....... 8 Pasiewicz v. Lake County Forest Preserve, a EE ED Sic ce ccccosoncecsceves 12 Street v. Surdyka, 492 F.2d 368 (CA4 1974) ....... 12 United States v. … Rodriguez, 854 P.2d 399, 409 (Or. 1993) (holding that even if an arrest were invalid under the Oregon Constitution, “[blecause the arrest in this case did not violate the Fourth Amendment, the guns

Petition — ZITKO v. UNITED STATES (No. 77-622)

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977

Tyler, 399 Mich. 564, 250 N.W. 2d 467 ESS Ea ae er er eee See 15 See v. City of Seattle, 387 US 541 (1967) ........,.. 11, 13, 14, 15 Spinelli v. … Tyler, 399 Mich. 564, 250 N.W. 2nd 467 (1977 That case involved an administrative fire investigation statute and searches made pursuant thereto with a search warrant.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ibrahim McCants, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 1, 2019

Id. at 123–24 (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 27). … Navarette, 572 U.S. at 399–401. The Court explained that the eyewitness’s firsthand knowledge of ongoing criminality “lends significant support to the tip’s reliability.” Id. at 399.