Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.61s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Thompson v. Western States Medical Center
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
Cited............. 5, 16 All 50 States Pharmacy Practice Acts Cited........... 13, 14 Md. … Si taicaenantttied oth harp eftahen, conhs, and sot He must have his mortars, stills, pots, filters, glasses, boxes, clean and sweete.
534 U.S. 1077Amicus Curiae Brief — Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. v. PACIFIC GAS
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Timm, 502 U.S. 410, 419 (1992) (“When Congress amends the bankruptcy laws, it does not write on a clean slate [and] this Court has been reluctant to accept arguments that would interpret the Code . … 13, under which unsecured creditors are likely to receive periodic distributions under confirmed plans.
549 U.S. 443Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Y4.F76/2:Am3/5.......... 1] Viil Periodicals Boston Globe, Nov. 13, 1990, at 12 ................ … Compania Naviera Hidalgo, $.A., 353 U.S. 138 (1957) (National Labor Relations Act); Foley Bros. vy. Filardo, 336 U.S. 281 (1949) (Eight Hour Law); Air Line Dispatchers Ass'n v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — EEOC v. Arabian American Oil Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Y4.F76/2:Am3/5.......... 1] Vill Periodicals Boston Globe, Nov. 13, 1990, at 12 ................ An Extra Enemy for Women Soldiers, Chicago Trib- eS OL. ee re ee T. Eisenberg & S. … Compania Naviera Hidalgo, $.A., 353 U.S. 138 (1957) (National Labor Relations Act); Foley Bros. v. Filardo, 336 U.S. 281 (1949) (Eight Hour Law); Air Line Dispatchers Ass'n v.
499 U.S. 244Amicus Curiae Brief — American Electric Power Co. v. Kentucky Public Service Commission
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
United States. 435 MIG EE - REI asnicgctetacuectakdesacees puke 29 Western Air Lines v. Board of Equalization, No. Fe CP, a UIE wimcccccsccentstuacokeisimoncns cc. 19 Younger V. … Western Air Lines Vv.
481 U.S. 1023Amicus Curiae Brief — Republican Party of Minn. v. White
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
Phillips, Comment on Judicial Independence and Accountability, 61 Law & Contemp. Probs. 127 (Summer 1998) ...........++.. 4 Roy A. … Phillips, Comment on Judicial Independence and Accountability, 61 Law & Contemp.
536 U.S. 765Amicus Curiae Brief — Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1932
-. limited to the brief period of three. months each, but pro-- vision was made for a re-adjustment of the limitation with-- in the three months’ period should new evidence show that. . … The Oklahoma Conservation - Act applies only uring periods of overproduction. Further- | more, the orders complained of are for thrée months’ pe- riods subject to re-adjustment.
286 U.S. 210Amicus Curiae Brief — Good News Club v. Milford Central School
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
It defies logic to suggest that the government should act in a less neutral or more discriminatory manner toward impressionable children. Impressionability works both ways. … Vincent, 454 U.S. 263, 272 n.10 (1981) (noting that “by creating a forum the University does not thereby endorse or promote any of the particular ideas aired there”).
533 U.S. 98Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 18, 2023
Act. … Ct. 2044, 2055 n.5 (2018) (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Metro-North Commuter R. Co. v. Buckley
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Ct. 2396 (1994), Conrail, like other United States railroads, had been subject to a prolifera- tion of claims for negligent infliction of emotional dis- tress under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act … Pearson, Liability to Bystanders for Negligently Inflicted Emotional Harm — A Comment on the Nature of Arbitrary Rules, 34 U. Fra. L. Rev. 477, 489 (1982)).
521 U.S. 424Amicus Curiae Brief — Grutter v. Bollinger
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
This Court by no means is writing on a clean slate. Of course, the precedent most relevant to the issues here is this Court’s decision in Bakke. … In response, Strong stated: “I am glad to have your comments on the Jewish problem, and | shall appreciate your help along this line in the future.
539 U.S. 306Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Commerce, et al., Petitioners v. New York, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2019
This argument carried the day, and the Framers concluded that “the periods & the rule of revising the Representation ought to be fixt by the Constitution.” Id. at 582. … This, of course, transgressed long settled principles that demand that agencies act in accord with the rule of law. See Utility Air Reg. Grp. v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983) .. 10, 11, 15, 18 Stuart Circle Hosp. Corp. v. Aetna Health Man- agement, 995 F.2d 500 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S. … That surcharge was to be by hospitals, which were then to pay it into the 11% surcharge was in effect The only for a one-year period ending on March 31, 1993.
511 U.S. 1067Amicus Curiae Brief — Dep't of Commerce v. New York, 139 S. Ct. 1249 (2019) (No. 18-966)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019
Evans, 536 U.S. 452 (2002)..............c.0cceeee- 3, 4, 8, 9, 10 Utility Air Reg. Grp. v. EPA, lL EAE EE Re 18 Wesberry v. … This, of course, trans- gressed long settled principles that demand that agen- cies act in accord with the rule of law. See Utility Air Reg. Grp. v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
This Court held in Petrella that a copyright owner can only recover damages for the three-year period leading up to suit. … When an infringing advertisement will air in two days or an infringing artwork will be shipped out of the country in four days, even special handling would not allow for a registration decision in
Amicus Curiae Brief — Halo Elecs., Inc. v. Pulse Elecs., Inc., 136 S. Ct. 356 (2015) (No. 14-1513)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
A trial judge should consider any such period of good-faith licensing negotiations or study and re-design when assessing what portion, if any, of the infringing activity was willful. … Instruments, Inc. 517 U.S. 370, 377 (1996) (citations omitted) (emphasis in original); see Tull v. 21 United States, 481 U.S. 412, 426 (1987) (“The assessment of civil penalties [for violation of the Clean
Amicus Curiae Brief — Warner-Lambert Co. v. Kent
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist., 541 U.S. 246 (2004) ................. 3 Far Eastern Conference v. United States, ee 11 Fidelity Fed. … As one commentator noted: “The attraction of substantial equivalence to manufacturers is clear.
552 U.S. 440Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Air, Ine.; and Snicknej Co. Il Joe Fortenberry, a sole proprietor doing business as Fernwood Transportation. … Commentators also have pointed out the hydraul!. pressures for economic legislation that discriminates in favo? of local interests.
496 U.S. 18Amicus Curiae Brief — Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983) .............. 7 United States v. Clingan, 254 F.3d 624 (6th Cir. … acts.
545 U.S. 193Amicus Curiae Brief — Shawn Montgomery, Petitioner v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 21, 2026
During this early period, most of the ICC’s work involved evaluating and 9 determining applications for certificates of public convenience and necessity. Id. at 178. … Section 601(c), 108 Stat. 1606 of the FAAAA, which is now codified at 49 U.S.C. § 14501(c), closely “tracks the ADA’s air-carrier preemption provision.” Id. at 261.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.