Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.68s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Timbs v. Indiana, 139 S. Ct. 45 (2018) (No. 17-1091)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
As commentators have noted, penalty amounts have “tended to be quite high because legislatures have used a ‘worst case’ mentality in setting them.” Robert O. … With the City’s estimated fine revenue doubling from $400 million to $800 million in a ten-year period, de Blasio sought “answers about what this ‘fine first, ask questions later’ enforcement is doing
Amicus Curiae Brief — Byrd v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 54 (2017) (No. 16-1371)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Courts and commentators have recognized that financial incentives may prompt law-enforcement officials to seek out opportunities to seize motorists’ assets through asset forfeiture. … For example, car-sharing services like Zipcar, car2go, Getaround, Enterprise CarShare, Hertz 24/7, and Maven offer to rent cars for time periods shorter than a day, with flexible pick-up and drop-off
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 9, 2026
Municipal suppliers must cover the relentlessly increasing costs of ensuring residents with a reliable supply of clean, safe, potable water, meaning that infrastructure must be maintained and upgraded, … See Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300g-1 (National drinking water regulations.).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Rowe v. New Hampshire Motor Transport Ass'n
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
The commencement of smoking in adolescence 4 results in a longer period of exposure and heavier use during adulthood. … Interstate Commerce Com- mission Termination Act of 1995, Pub. L.
552 U.S. 364Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 19, 2021
Fair Housing Act of 1968. … As one commentator observed: “At least some of us who shook our heads over Baker v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — BASF Corp. v. Peterson (No. 06-144)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
The issues remain just as urgent in the wake -of that result, and this case resents a clean vehicle for the Court to address them definit:vely. … Jean Wegman Bums, Confused Jurisprudence: False Advertising Under the Lanham Act, 79 B.U.L.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
ployees for each working day” for 20 or more weeks in a year—to cover any person that has 15 or ore em- plovees “on the payroll and regularly employed during cach working day over the prescribed period … During the course of the Senate debate, two issues re- lated to the definition of “employer” were aired.
518 U.S. 1053Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 13, 2026
As a result, parents may be excluded from any decision-making and even any contact with their child for extended periods while the State facilitates potentially irreversible medical interventions. … H2 used the Center’s number when she was angry about having to clean her room.
Amicus Curiae Brief — The Dutra Group, Petitioner v. Christopher Batterton
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 29, 2019
currently the world’s top producer of oil and natural gas.3 This domestic oil and gas production enables our energy independence by lessening our reliance on foreign oil and gas, particularly during periods … It must be available at home and abroad, over great distances, through adverse weather, and across air, land, and sea, often against determined adversaries.8 In 2017, Reuters reported that while the use
Amicus Curiae Brief — Gobeille v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 135 S. Ct. 885 (2014) (No. 14-181)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 97 (1983)). … Act.”
Amicus Curiae Brief — Sarah K. Molina, et al., Petitioners v. Daniel Book, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 12, 2023
Frazier to prevent that footage from airing—as it eventually did—on news programs around the country. … KTLA aired the footage the following night, setting in motion a sequence of events that resulted in the video being seen by millions.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 3, 2021
of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000, Pub. … She later started her own cleaning business. In December 1997, immigration officials started the process to deport Ms. Perales-Cumpean, and she filed for VAWA cancellation. In court, Ms.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Indeed, the United States later invoked the Ministry’s filings in this very case to argue to the WTO that China controlled export prices in precisely this way, including during the 2002-2005 period … Moreover, China did act through diplomatic chan- nels.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Dutra Grp. v. Batterton, 139 S. Ct. 627 (2018) (No. 18-266)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
This domestic oil and gas produc- tion enables our energy independence by lessening our reliance on foreign oil and gas, particularly during periods of increased tensions in international trade. … As one commentator put it: “The perils peculiar to the drilling industry are compounded by all the dangers of the sea.”
Amicus Curiae Brief — Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Lessee of C her, 15 Rac EEE Wii cnssinssciensbinighasiebetommeuttetieceuaneient 7,8 Cleans © Se, DE GLE. … The only other treaty case during this period was Owings v. Norwood’s Lessee, 9 U.S. 344 (1809), which involved a dispute related to land in Maryland.
548 U.S. 331Amicus Curiae Brief — Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
Castro for back pay for any period of time, despite its concession that it acted illegally in Mr. Castro’s layoff. … In suburban New York, where large numbers of workers toil in landscape and small construction, restaurants, domestic service and building cleaning ~ Aarne srr u}ndocumented workers are the employees
535 U.S. 137Amicus Curiae Brief — Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Dabit
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
“In Connection With” Plaintiffs’ Own Purchases, Either Before or During the Class Period. … ® See, e.g., In re CIHC, Inc., No. 3-11578, Securities Act Release No. 8455, Exchange Act Release No. 50165, Investment Co.
547 U.S. 71Amicus Curiae Brief — Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Henson
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
The application by the respondent service- member for extraordinary relief in that case sought review of an executive action of the Air Force in removing his name from the Air Force rolls. See id. … The Court of Appeals below overlooked this function of the All Writs Act when 19 it concluded that 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a) exhausts the circumstances under which removal is permitted, as have those commentators
537 U.S. 28Amicus Curiae Brief — Green Tree Financial Corp.-Ala. v. Randolph
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
to cancel before the trial period ended. … and/or by improperly depriving consumers of the three-day HOEPA waiting period.
531 U.S. 79Amicus Curiae Brief — Green Tree Financial Corp.-Ala. v. Randolph
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
to cancel before the trial period ended. … and/or by improperly depriving consumers of the three-day HOEPA waiting period.
531 U.S. 79
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.